+1, I revisit this pr, it's quite simple and default disabled.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:01 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me. This won't add any new risk.
> --
> Matteo Merli
>
>
>
> On Thu,
The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version
4.17.1.
Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage
service optimized for
real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build
reliable services.
It is also the log segment st
The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version
4.16.6.
Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage
service optimized for
real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build
reliable services.
It is also the log segment st
The vote is now closed, and the release was approved with 3 binding votes.
I will continue with the following steps.
Votes:
- Enrico Olivelli (binding)
- Andrey Yegorov (binding)
- ZhangJian He (binding)
- ZhiHeng Zhang
Thank you all for verifying and voting!
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter
The vote is now closed, and the release was approved with 3 binding votes.
I will continue with the following steps.
Votes:
- Enrico Olivelli (binding)
- Andrey Yegorov (binding)
- ZhangJian He (binding)
- ZhiHeng Zhang
Thank you all for verifying and voting!
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter
ree/v4.17.1-rc0
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
CI is passed https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/actions/runs/9498865602.
I'll start preparing for the RC as soon as I can.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 3:49 PM Hang Chen wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
> ZhangJian He
When I am trying to release 4.16.6, I found 4.16.5-rc0's binary is still in
the dev svn. I think it's better to remove it? Am I right?
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
ree/v4.16.6-rc0
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
n as I can.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 4:18 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
> +1 for downgrade to 4.1.100.Final
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
> Twitter: shoothzj
> Wechat: shoothzj
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 4:18 PM zhiheng123 <9
I have done cherry-pick, no pr in
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Arelease%2F4.17.1+is%3Amerged+-label%3Acherry-picked%2Fbranch-4.17
.
I'll start preparing for the RC as soon as I can.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024
+1 for downgrade to 4.1.100.Final
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 4:18 PM zhiheng123 <903292...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:
> I found that this exception was caused by the upgrade of netty. If you
> revert netty to 4.1.100.Final, the use
anch-4.17
<https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/actions/workflows/bk-ci.yml?query=branch%3Abranch-4.17>
Although
branch-4.17 CI works well, I still think it's worth cherry-picking. It
actually solves a problem.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Thu, Jun 6, 202
ping
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 9:17 AM ZhangJian He wrote:
> Hi, BookKeepers, I want to propose and clarify a new CI strategy based on
> our former practices.
>
> ## Current CI Jobs
>
> - **PR Validation Tests**: Current
ping
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 10:47 AM ZhangJian He wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> BookKeeper 4.17.0 was released one months ago, and I would
> like to discuss the starting 4.17.1 release to include some critical
> security and bug
gleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:997)
at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
at
io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
... 1 more
```
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Tue, Ma
/pull/4400
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4395
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 2:57 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 thanks
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Lun 27 Mag 2024, 08:52 Nicolò Boschi ha scritto:
>
> > +1
> > Th
advanced and supported JDK features
and help expose more problems.
Thank you for considering this strategic update. I look forward to your
feedback and further discussion.
[1] [JDK 11 End of Life Update](https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013)
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
uide this release.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
w in this thread.
If there's any concern, I'd like to volunteer to guide this release.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
+1(no-binding)
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
Nicolò Boschi 于2024年5月22日 周三17:33写道：
> Hey folks,
>
> Now that 4.17.0 has been released, I was wondering if we should set
> 4.14.x as EOL with 4.14.8 being the official last release.
> I believe the pro
, etc.
Second, commit typos in test files.
Lastly, fix other typos and commit the lint.
1. https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
2. https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4375/files
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
ior if it's not properly
overridden by all implementations.
I'd suggest making this method abstract instead to avoid potential
misinterpretation.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
I also noticed that the 'upgrade' section is not up-to-date. PTAL
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4348
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:46 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
> I opened PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/43
I opened PR https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4341 using `git tag`
time, also fix some grammar errors like `21st` :)
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:04 PM ZhangJian He wrote:
> I will take a look.
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian
I will take a look.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Twitter: shoothzj
Wechat: shoothzj
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:50 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello,
> I noticed that the News section is not up to date
> https://bookkeeper.apache.org/releases
>
> Any volunteers to fix it ?
>
> Cheers
> Enrico
>
+1(no-binding)
Thanks
ZhangJian He
thetumbled 于2024年4月30日 周二11:06写道：
> Hi, everyone.I would like to start voting thread for BP-66: support
> throttling for zookeeper read of rereplication.Proposal PR:
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4258
> Implementation PR: https:
+0.5 for this change. And this is a zookeeper specified change, and refers
to existing configuration params. I think `zkReplicationTaskRateLimit`
might be better.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:07 AM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> +1
>
> I am ok with the change if we maintai
ar with our
project before they make more valuable contributions.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:08 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Support for JUnit 5 tests was added in
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4197. Junit 4 and Junit 5 tests
> can co-exist in the code base. Ju
t5.
I created https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/4322 to track this
migrate.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:39 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> ZhangJian
>
> Il giorno mer 24 apr 2024 alle ore 18:58 ZhangJian He
> ha scritto:
>
> > I am reaching out to
ssume), parallel test execution, and other features.
I think we can write new test classes using junit5, and existing-test
classes can be slowly migrated.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
bring considerable unnecessary data
flow.
I propose changing this to use scheduleWithFixedDelay instead, which
ensures that there is a fixed delay period between the end of one execution
and the start of the next.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Configurations
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 06:51, Yan Zhao wrote:
> Wenbing, Congratulatiton!
>
> On 2023/07/08 12:39:14 Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> > Hello Bookkeepers,
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache BookKeeper
> > has
+1(non-binding)
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 08:11, Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Overall, +1.
> I do have some concerns related to handling various limiters, so I left a
> comment on the PR.
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:05 AM Hang Chen wrote:
>
> > Th
Congrats!
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 19:12, Yunze Xu wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:57 PM Max Xu wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations! Hang. well deserved
> >
> > Best,
> > Max Xu
> >
&
+1
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 10:08, Hang Chen wrote:
> +1 for Yong's suggestion.
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
> Yan Zhao 于2023年2月20日周一 16:55写道：
> >
> > > According to the original PR's motivation
> > > <https://gith
Hi, Salvi. I have tried it in https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3264
and sent an issue to https://github.com/apache/datasketches-java/issues/398
You can see these for details. Recently, I had no time to keep working on
this. Thank you for working on this.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Mon, 13
+1
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 16:45, steven lu wrote:
> +1
>
> Hang Chen 于2023年2月8日周三 15:16写道：
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > One core dump issue[1] related to RocksDB was introduced by [2] and
> > released in BookKeeper 4.14.6. To fix the Rocks
Congratulations!
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 19:02, Max Xu wrote:
> Congratulations! Steven
>
> Best,
> Max Xu
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Hello BookKeepers,
> > I am happy to announce that
+1 （non-binding）
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 20:45, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I agree
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Dom 25 Set 2022, 03:09 steven lu ha scritto:
>
> > Hi BookKeepers, I've changed the API for
> > org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.Counter:
&
+1 , non binding
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 21:56, Lan Liang wrote:
> +1 , non binding.
>
> This is a useful feature!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Lan Liang
> Replied Message
> | From | steven lu |
> | Date | 9/25/
+1 non-binding
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Fri, 16 Sept 2022 at 14:27, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno ven 16 set 2022 alle ore 08:26 r...@apache.org
> ha scritto:
> >
> > LGTM +1
> >
> > On 2022/09/15 04:47:25 lordcheng
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3311 is ready for review.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 at 16:43, ZhangJian He wrote:
> Hi community, I want to open a discussion about importOrder in bookkeeper.
>
> Currently, we use puppycrawl checkstyle 6.19, which is not strict
Hi, Hang Chen. I hope to get this change into version 4.16.0.
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3406
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Hang Chen 于2022年7月15日周五 11:32写道：
> Hi Community,
>Bookkeeper 4.15.0 has been released for 2 months, and we have
> introduced Direct IO support[1] for l
I created https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3385 to solve this.
ping @enrico @merlimat
Thanks
ZhangJian He
ZhangJian He 于2022年7月6日周三 14:17写道：
> Hi tison. Thank you for telling us about this.
> I will work on remove `microbenchmark` module.
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
>
Hi tison. Thank you for telling us about this.
I will work on remove `microbenchmark` module.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
tison 于2022年7月4日周一 15:37写道：
> Hi BookKeepers,
>
> I notice that the main repo of bookkeeper has a module named microbenchmark
> which depends on jmh-core[1] which is
@sreeam
Hi, sreeam. I haven't consider Bazel yet.
Currently encountering some problems on gradle, we still using maven for
release.
IMO, using Bazel doesn't solve problems we meet(No active volunteers solve
build problems).
Thanks
ZhangJian He
sreeram duvur 于2022年6月7日周二 05:15写道：
have active committers who familiar with gradle
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Hi community, I want to open a discussion about importOrder in bookkeeper.
Currently, we use puppycrawl checkstyle 6.19, which is not strictly verify
the import order.
In the recently checkstyle version, it needs a strictly ImportOrder verify
if configs[1].
In simple terms, our config ImportOrder
Hello community, I want to open a discussion about build bookkeeper on
java11
## Motivation
Currently, bookkeeper keeps the compatible with java8. Java11, a lts
version of jdk, provides new features and performance optimization. And
Java11 was released in 2018 and is now mature. I think it's time t
Hello, everyone. After talking with enrico and nicolo. I want to start a
discussion about building systems.
We are now maintaining two build systems, I don't think that we want to
maintain both `maven` and `gradle`.
I think that we need to decide to keep maven or gradle in the future.
Personally,
Hello, now we have backward-compat-tests and pr-validation step Generate
Javadoc.I will try to make pr check consistent with release.
Thanks
ZhangJian He
+1 agree with Nicolò
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Nicolò Boschi 于2022年4月1日周五 21:20写道：
> Enrico, I agree with you and that was what I meant.
>
> To be clear:
> 4.14.3 and older: Log4J 1
> 4.14.5 and 4.14.6...: Reload4J
> 4.15.0 and next: Log4J2
>
> Nicolò Boschi
>
>
>
Congratulations Nicolò !
Thanks
ZhangJian He
Matteo Minardi 于2022年3月30日周三 17:36写道：
> Congratulations Nico, well deserved!!
>
> Matteo
> On 30 Mar 2022, 09:16 +0200, Enrico Olivelli , wrote:
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache BookKeeper
> > has invited
54 matches
Mail list logo
