Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename master branch to main

2020-08-07 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Hello, First of all, I don't think there is a need for a vote on this subject since the impact on the community is rather low. The fact that is discussed in this and other projects as well as inside companies shows that it is not an artificial need but something that might affect how some people f

Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename master branch to main

2020-08-07 Thread Vladimir Sitnikov
What is the suggested flow for the forked repositories? The forks would probably need to make adjustments: either rename the branch or re-target the branch (and update CI configuration). I don't think a volunteer can help with updating forks including private ones :( Even if we rename `master` br

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4166) UnsupportedOperationException when getting distribution in metadata quey

2020-08-07 Thread Krisztian Kasa (Jira)
Krisztian Kasa created CALCITE-4166: --- Summary: UnsupportedOperationException when getting distribution in metadata quey Key: CALCITE-4166 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4166 Proj

Calcite-Master - Build # 1869 - Failure

2020-08-07 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #1869) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/1869/ to view the results.

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-07 Thread Julian Hyde
Andrei, We agreed that this would be a quick release. Above I mentioned Aug 8th as a target, and it's Aug 7th already. Can you start moving the release process along, please. Julian On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:23 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > Julian, > > Yes this time I should have enough cycles fo

Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename master branch to main

2020-08-07 Thread Viliam Durina
> However, I don't see evidence to support your claims that this will bring no new contributors nor make anyone feel more welcome. I'm not claiming that I can point to any specific individual who will be positively impacted by this change and I will admit that it's possible that no one will be Evi

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4167) Group by COALESCE IN throws NullPointerException

2020-08-07 Thread Danny Chen (Jira)
Danny Chen created CALCITE-4167: --- Summary: Group by COALESCE IN throws NullPointerException Key: CALCITE-4167 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4167 Project: Calcite Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4168) Configure Gradle Remote Build Cache to speedup builds

2020-08-07 Thread Vladimir Sitnikov (Jira)
Vladimir Sitnikov created CALCITE-4168: -- Summary: Configure Gradle Remote Build Cache to speedup builds Key: CALCITE-4168 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4168 Project: Calcite

Gather real world statistics about row count, CPU, and IO cost

2020-08-07 Thread Thomas Rebele
Hi all, I'm working on basic query optimization. I once stumbled on the case that two operators had the same row count but one had a much higher CPU cost. Unfortunately the default cost model only takes the row count into account (see [1]). Stamatis had pointed out in another mail that the row cou

Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename master branch to main

2020-08-07 Thread Michael Mior
> What is the suggested flow for the forked repositories? GitHub has stated that they will be implementing changes this year to make this process smoother which is why I suggested waiting on this in the JIRA. At minimum this has been stated to include retargeting open pull requests. New pull reque

Re: [DISCUSSION] Rename master branch to main

2020-08-07 Thread Michael Mior
> even you and most of the other folks here doubt it I didn't say that I doubt that anyone would be affected. I said that this is possible, because I can't provide proof of specific individuals who might be impacted which seems to be what was requested. > you're not sure how to proceed >From a t

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-07 Thread Andrei Sereda
Hello, I'm starting the release today. If there are some PRs which you would like to be included in 1.25 please let me know ASAP. This should be a quick release mostly for CALCITE-4136 Thanks, Andrei. On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:33 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > Andrei, > > We agreed that this would be

Calcite-Master - Build # 1870 - Still Failing

2020-08-07 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #1870) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/1870/ to view the results.

Re: Gather real world statistics about row count, CPU, and IO cost

2020-08-07 Thread Julian Hyde
I consider there to be two fairly independent sub-problems: 1. Improve our cardinality estimates (especially for queries with complex joins and aggregation). 2. Calibrate physical operators so that, given a good estimate of the number of rows they will see, we can come up with a reasonable estima

Re: Gather real world statistics about row count, CPU, and IO cost

2020-08-07 Thread Julian Hyde
Also, check out the paper "Learning to Optimize Join Queries With Deep Reinforcement Learning" by Krishnan, Yang, Goldberg, Hellerstein, Stoica 2019 (which aims to improve the join-order benchmark and uses Calcite as one of its test platforms): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.03196.pdf On Fri, Aug 7, 2

Calcite-Master - Build # 1871 - Still Failing

2020-08-07 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #1871) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/1871/ to view the results.

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4169) Release Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-07 Thread Andrei Sereda (Jira)
Andrei Sereda created CALCITE-4169: -- Summary: Release Calcite 1.25.0 Key: CALCITE-4169 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4169 Project: Calcite Issue Type: Task R

master locked during 1.25.0 release

2020-08-07 Thread Andrei Sereda
Hello, Please avoid committing anything to master while 1.25.0 release is in progress. It will be unlocked after the voting / successful release. Many thanks, Andrei.

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-07 Thread Andrei Sereda
Hello, Does anybody want to mention any highlights for 1.25 besides removal of deprecated methods ? Currently it says: === This release comes shortly after 1.24.0 (in just two weeks) and removes methods which were deprecated in the previous version. === Thanks, Andrei. On Fri, Aug 7, 2