Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping support for java 1.5 from camel-2.7.0 onwards

2011-02-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Now the major changes has been implemented (first 3 items from roadmap) http://camel.apache.org/camel-27-roadmap.html I think we should post a note on the 2.6 release notes about the change moving forward. Also we should consider adding a news post on the camel website as well. eg about jdk 1

[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-2229) switch to slf4j / logback by default as we'll get accurate version information in stack traces, plus MDC support (and neater ways to avoid the "if (LOG.isDebugEnabled())"

2011-02-07 Thread Claus Ibsen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-2229. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0) 2.7.0 Assignee:

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2853) camel-stream - tailing logfile does not seem to work when logfile is rolled over

2011-02-07 Thread Stan Lewis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-2853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991740#comment-12991740 ] Stan Lewis commented on CAMEL-2853: --- Will have a look, the test doesn't appear to show t

Re: [DISCUSS] The future of camel-extra

2011-02-07 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Yes, the package names must change, no matter what. Yes, the camel tent at apache-extras is empty now, as it is for most other projects. Only a few started to take advantage of it. I will figure out this week what is the best way to move the project. That is, can we actually move it or we shoul

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3606) Regression in stateful job support caused by duplicate job name check added in camel-quartz 2.6

2011-02-07 Thread Bryan Keller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991517#comment-12991517 ] Bryan Keller commented on CAMEL-3606: - I ran my test using the latest 2.7 snapshot and

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-3639) Fix sonar found same code for two branches issue

2011-02-07 Thread Tracy Snell (JIRA)
Fix sonar found same code for two branches issue Key: CAMEL-3639 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3639 Project: Camel Issue Type: Bug Components: camel-core Affec

[jira] Updated: (CAMEL-3639) Fix sonar found same code for two branches issue

2011-02-07 Thread Tracy Snell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tracy Snell updated CAMEL-3639: --- Attachment: sonar1.txt > Fix sonar found same code for two branches issue > -

Re: Camel added to the Sonar pilot

2011-02-07 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
If you have the karma, please! When we got the build failures, I asked Brett about having a Camel profile and if I could get karma on sonar, but didn't get an answer. Don't know if he didn't notice my request, or what the reason was for him ignoring it. I chose not to push it. Thanks, Hadrian

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3638) Upgrade maven-bundle-plugin to version 1.3.4

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991405#comment-12991405 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on CAMEL-3638: We do have integration tests that use OSG

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3638) Upgrade maven-bundle-plugin to version 1.3.4

2011-02-07 Thread Claus Ibsen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991404#comment-12991404 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-3638: There is osgi and karaf tests in the tests direct

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-3638) Upgrade maven-bundle-plugin to version 1.3.4

2011-02-07 Thread Christian Schneider (JIRA)
Upgrade maven-bundle-plugin to version 1.3.4 Key: CAMEL-3638 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3638 Project: Camel Issue Type: Improvement Components: osgi Affects Ver

Re: Camel added to the Sonar pilot

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
Hadrian, I believe the sonar build for Camel is using the default "Sun checks with Findbugs" setup. I could change that to use the Camel rules for Checkstyle and PMD. The CXF build is now using the CXF rulesets for both. It jumped the compliance level from ~85% to ~96% as we didn't feel a

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday 07 February 2011 7:41:28 am Guillaume Nodet wrote: > The bundle plugin has no knowledge of the source jar, but I think > there are ways to configure the jar plugin to add additional manifest > headers. > I'm not using eclipse myself, but itsn't there any decent maven > integration which w

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Guillaume, if you work with pure maven projects then the m2eclipse plugin works great and loads the source automatically. In this case though your eclipse has normal maven dependencies to jars in the local maven repository. If you work with the pde build then you are not so lucky. Then it s

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Nodet
The bundle plugin has no knowledge of the source jar, but I think there are ways to configure the jar plugin to add additional manifest headers. I'm not using eclipse myself, but itsn't there any decent maven integration which would download and grab the source jar from the local repository? On Mo

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Christian Schneider
It would at least mean to add a minimal Manifest header. In camel we do this manually: --- org.apache.maven.plugins maven-source-plugin 2.1.2 ${project.groupId}.${project.artifactId}.source ${camel.osgi.version.clean} ${project.groupId}.${project.artifactId};version="${camel.osgi.

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Nodet
It seems that would require our sources jars to be packaged as osgi bundles, which isn't the case afaik. On Monday, February 7, 2011, Christian Schneider wrote: > We already have this header but I think it could perhaps be done by the > bundle plugin automatically. > > The Manifest Header looks

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Christian Schneider
We already have this header but I think it could perhaps be done by the bundle plugin automatically. The Manifest Header looks like: Eclipse-SourceBundle: org.eclipse.pde.core;version="3.4.0.N20071128-0010";roots:="ant_tasks/pde-antsrc,." See: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse-dev

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I don't recall anything in the maven bundle plugin about that. Where would we point to ? maven central ? I suppose we could add that header in the root pom, though this would also require a big of magic to get the full path I think, and that may also fail for timestamped snapshots On Mon, Fe

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Guillaume, I am just trying a buildd with that version. Till now it looks good. Btw. Do you know if the source.jars now also will be generated with the "" manifest entry so you can click them in Eclipse if you work with a target platform? Or is this not part of the bundle plugin? Christi

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Nodet
The maven-bundle-plugin 2.3.4 has just been released, so we could try upgrading to that one. On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:41, Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > that´s a typical case of misreading a specification on my side. It´s good > that I now read the spec again to proof you wrong.

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Guillaume, that´s a typical case of misreading a specification on my side. It´s good that I now read the spec again to proof you wrong. So I found that I was wrong ;-) The spec says. version ::= major( '.' minor ( '.' micro ( '.' qualifier )? )? )? I did not really be careful enough to re

[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-3637) Mistake in camel-eventAdmin feature

2011-02-07 Thread Claus Ibsen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-3637. Resolution: Fixed trunk: 1067890. Thanks for patch. > Mistake in camel-eventAdmin feature > -

[jira] Updated: (CAMEL-3637) Mistake in camel-eventAdmin feature

2011-02-07 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Baptiste Onofré updated CAMEL-3637: Attachment: CAMEL-3637.patch > Mistake in camel-eventAdmin feature > --

Re: Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Guillaume Nodet
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:05, Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi all, > > I just had mail exchange with Guillaume on the karaf list about their number > scheme for snapshots. > There I told him that we use an ant script to create the osgi version from > the maven version 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT -> 2.7.0.quali

Camel OSGI snapshot versions

2011-02-07 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi all, I just had mail exchange with Guillaume on the karaf list about their number scheme for snapshots. There I told him that we use an ant script to create the osgi version from the maven version 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT -> 2.7.0.qualifier (At least that was how I remembered we do it). Guillaume to

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3626) Upgrade qpid to version 0.8

2011-02-07 Thread Claus Ibsen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12991298#comment-12991298 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-3626: I just noticed in parent/pom.xml there is some os