Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-01-29 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Just an update. On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > I think we should start closing down on the upcoming Camel 2.11 release. > > There is a few important tickets which IMHO needs to be resolved > before we are in shape. > > 1) > New set of OSGi bundles from the SMX tea

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (CAMEL-5992) Typo on the "control bus" site

2013-01-29 Thread Christian Müller
I got the mail from the right account off list because Jan not want share all his e-Mail addresses. Karma granted. Please log out/log in to verify it. Best, Christian On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > Hello together. > I am starting to work with Camel and so I do read t

camel pull request: New features for twitter-camel

2013-01-29 Thread lfoppiano
GitHub user lfoppiano opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/8 New features for twitter-camel Hello, I have implemented a few new features that are available in the twitter4j library and they are quite useful also in the camel twitter endpoint. 1

Re: Contributing Stomp Component

2013-01-29 Thread Henryk Konsek
> We would appreciate STOMP component written in Java. Sorry, my mistake. I understood that you created Scala component for STOMP Java library. However since Scomp is a pure Scala library I think that Scomp component written in Scala can be safely committed to the ASF Camel (after review process o

Re: Contributing Stomp Component

2013-01-29 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Ian de Beer wrote: > Hi > I have put the Camel-Stomp component onto Github: > https://github.com/zenaptix/camel-stomp > I have tested it against Apollo 1.5 and ActiveMQ 5.7.0. > Regards > Ian > Ian nice work. We can add a link to your component from the Camel use

Re: Contributing Stomp Component

2013-01-29 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Henryk Konsek wrote: Claus had some good arguments there not to use Scala. Nevertheless, I think your code should be published at camel-extra or github! > > Actually Camel Extra is not a right place to put there components > written in Scala. I'

Re: Contributing Stomp Component

2013-01-29 Thread Henryk Konsek
>>> Claus had some good arguments there not to use Scala. >>> >>> Nevertheless, I think your code should be published at camel-extra or >>> github! Actually Camel Extra is not a right place to put there components written in Scala. I'm afraid this component need to be rewritten to Java in order to

[DISCUSS CAMEL 3.0] weekly IRC chat at 01/29/2013 7:00PM - 8:00PM CET

2013-01-29 Thread Christian Müller
This was the today's discussion on IRC (irc://irc.codehaus.org/camel). Feel free to join the next time and/or comment on the today's discussed items: 01/29/2013 7:00PM - 8:00PM CET - DISCUSSING THE CAMEL 3.0 ROAD MAP [18:58:31] In the next hour I would like to discuss which ideas from http://

CAMEL-6019: Add PGP signature and signature verification support to PGPDataFormat

2013-01-29 Thread Daniel Gredler
Hi guys, I've added signing / signature verification support to PGPDataFormat in the camel-crypto component. If one of the committers has time, could you have a look at the patch [1] and let me know whether it needs any changes or can be committed as is? Thanks! Daniel [1] https://

Re: Building the manual.....

2013-01-29 Thread Babak Vahdat
Hi Dan I know I'm pulling up a old thread here, sorry for that, but (as you may already know) the provided fix caused problems which is currently commented out since ages: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-0-tp5714768p5715311.html Would you have time to look into t

Re: Contributing Stomp Component

2013-01-29 Thread Ian de Beer
Hi I have put the Camel-Stomp component onto Github: https://github.com/zenaptix/camel-stomp I have tested it against Apollo 1.5 and ActiveMQ 5.7.0. Regards Ian On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:54 AM, iandebeer wrote: > Hi Kai and Willem > I have it in my private git repo, but I shall extricate the releva

Re: [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (CAMEL-4164) A camel component for ISO8583 protocol

2013-01-29 Thread sothach
hey David, I think the Apache-2 license is considered the most business friendly of free software licenses, so no issues there. If by "packed EBCDIC" you mean character fields in EBCDIC and numerics in packed BCD, then this format is supported, although I must admit the EBCDIC has only be used in

Re: [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (CAMEL-4164) A camel component for ISO8583 protocol

2013-01-29 Thread sothach
Feedback appreciated, and I see what you are saying. Obviously support for this iso standard format is not a Camel core concern, but how best to categorize such formatting tools? A financial formats subdomain, perhaps? In any case, might be bettwe to move the discussion to the Users sub-forum?