Hi
Just an update on the status.
I discovered an issue in the scala DSL, which I managed to fix
yesterday. The problem was the scala DSL would cause all languages to
be evaluated as Expression, and then converted to Predicate if
applicable. This was wrong, as the DSL indicate whether it should
Well spotted, I was gonna mention this problem once I understood it better,
a couple of tests I brought over from the main patch were failing.
All tests pass after the update, so it's backwards compatible alright.
Taariq
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The current Simple language in camel-core has reached its potential in
terms of maintenance and how easy it would be, for example to add new
functions and operators. Likewise the current error reporting is not
precise to point out where in the expression String the problem is.
The
Hi Claus,
the parser looks quite good as far as I looked into it. In any case much
better than regex. Before we replace the old parser we should also think
about tooling though. Some longer time ago I thought about using Xtext
for the camel DSL and also the languages. The advantage would be
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Christian Schneider
ch...@die-schneider.net wrote:
Hi Claus,
the parser looks quite good as far as I looked into it. In any case much
better than regex. Before we replace the old parser we should also think
about tooling though. Some longer time ago I thought
The principle of not having *unnecessary* extra dependencies is good. However
this looks to me more like reinventing the wheel. If we write all the code in
Camel we won't have dependencies, but we get a bloated code base, hard to
maintain and taking forever to test. Reusing code (and having
It could be handy if we leverage the other lib in the other
camel-module. If the user need the module, it will not be a burden for
him to include a third part lib.
On 8/29/11 8:19 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Christian Schneider
ch...@die-schneider.net wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The current Simple language in camel-core has reached its potential in
terms of maintenance and how easy it would be, for example to add new
functions and operators. Likewise the current error reporting is not
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Willem Jiang willem.ji...@gmail.com wrote:
It could be handy if we leverage the other lib in the other camel-module. If
the user need the module, it will not be a burden for him to include a third
part lib.
There is already other scripting languages you can
