Ok, great.
Sent from a mobile device
Am 12.11.2011 02:50 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Claus Ibsen
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Christian Müller
> > wrote:
> >> @Hadrian: Camel 2.9.0-RC1 is out since 4 days. Is it possible for you
> to do
> >> the
Thanks Claus ;)
Regards
JB
On 11/12/2011 11:49 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
@Hadrian: Camel 2.9.0-RC1 is out since 4 days. Is it possible for you to do
the release announcement today or
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Christian Müller
> wrote:
>> @Hadrian: Camel 2.9.0-RC1 is out since 4 days. Is it possible for you to do
>> the release announcement today or tomorrow? If you are to busy or
>> traveling, what's about let Clau
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> @Hadrian: Camel 2.9.0-RC1 is out since 4 days. Is it possible for you to do
> the release announcement today or tomorrow? If you are to busy or
> traveling, what's about let Claus do the announcement?
>
Christian or anyone should definit
@Hadrian: Camel 2.9.0-RC1 is out since 4 days. Is it possible for you to do
the release announcement today or tomorrow? If you are to busy or
traveling, what's about let Claus do the announcement?
Best,
Christian
Yeah, sounds good to me. +1
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> > I just managed to get to testing
> >
> > A very late +1, how about the "Changes" notice that Dan and I were
> working on?
>
> Yeah definitely. I think we sh
+1
Sent from a mobile device
Am 09.11.2011 00:36 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> > I just managed to get to testing
> >
> > A very late +1, how about the "Changes" notice that Dan and I were
> working on?
>
> Yeah definitely. I think we should pic
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:48 AM, bvahdat wrote:
> So here is my word Claus asked for (I know it's too early, sorry for that):
>
> I gave a spin test with just only one of the apps of mine, and here my 2
> cents:
>
> CamelTestSupport's context, template, consumer, etc. fields are *not* static
> anym
So here is my word Claus asked for (I know it's too early, sorry for that):
I gave a spin test with just only one of the apps of mine, and here my 2
cents:
CamelTestSupport's context, template, consumer, etc. fields are *not* static
anymore through the revision [1]. So using them in a static cont
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> I just managed to get to testing
>
> A very late +1, how about the "Changes" notice that Dan and I were working on?
Yeah definitely. I think we should pickup this again in next week when
people are back from ApacheCon.
And IMHO that notice sh
I just managed to get to testing
A very late +1, how about the "Changes" notice that Dan and I were working on?
I really just wanted to communicate, yes this release we had more changes than
anticipated,
hence the update on what was going on, we also have some really nice stuff in
the patch br
Good to announce and draw attention.
I just build my projects without any problems.
I was struck by stricter regex parser which was due to me missing
escaping the expression in '' - which I found at
http://camel.apache.org/camel-290-release.html so thumbs up!
2011/11/9 Jon Anstey :
> Looks like
Looks like it is in the archive as this link
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/camel/apache-camel/2.9.0-RC1/apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1.zip
Pointed me to this Canadian mirror
http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/apache//camel/apache-camel/2.9.0-RC1/apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1.zip
Maybe we just announce i
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> The vote passes with:
>
> [6] +1 (cibsen, janstey, cmueller, ningjiang, cshneider, hadrian)
> [0] -1
>
> Thanks to all who voted. I will take care of the publishing the artifacts.
>
The artifacts is in central repo.
The release is not in th
The vote passes with:
[6] +1 (cibsen, janstey, cmueller, ningjiang, cshneider, hadrian)
[0] -1
Thanks to all who voted. I will take care of the publishing the artifacts.
Greetings from ApacheCon [1] in Vancouver. Remember to use the
#ApacheCon hashtag and follow us @ApacheCon on Twitter!
Hadr
Hi Hadrian
The vote has passed. Do you mind executing the release so its available?
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately 305
> issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
>
> Please find th
+1
I run the Camel in Action Sources with the new version and only three unit
test failed. It looks like Camel 2.9.0-RC1 interprets the "+++" in the log
component:
log("+++ before database +++")
Caused by: org.apache.camel.language.simple.types.SimpleParserException:
Unary operator ++ has no lef
FYI there are no -source jars deployed in this release. Just fixed it in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4611 so when we go for the
final 2.9.0 version we will be all set.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
> Looks good. +1
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Hadria
+1 to remove it for the kit, but we may need to upload the generated
pdf by hand.
On Thu Nov 3 20:53:52 2011, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:10 PM, James Strachan wrote:
Maybe just exclude the file for now then?
Yeah IMHO people can download the manual from the web site if th
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:10 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> Maybe just exclude the file for now then?
>
Yeah IMHO people can download the manual from the web site if they want it.
It also cuts 2-3mb of the dist size without the manual.
> On 3 November 2011 12:07, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> Yes, it
Maybe just exclude the file for now then?
On 3 November 2011 12:07, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Yes, it always is. Something that doesn't work with the mvn release: goals,
> that started a bit more than a year ago I believe after the upgrade. It
> works with mvn install though, so I did it manually
Yes, it always is. Something that doesn't work with the mvn release:
goals, that started a bit more than a year ago I believe after the
upgrade. It works with mvn install though, so I did it manually in the
past releases. There is an open jira for it assigned to me that was a
moving target for
+1
Christian
Am 02.11.2011 03:30, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea:
A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with
approximately 305 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-
The manual seems borked - it contains:
Download of http://camel.apache.org/book-in-one-page.html failed
On 2 November 2011 02:30, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately 305
> issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
>
> Ple
Looks good. +1
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately
> 305 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
>
> Please find the staging repo here:
> https://repository.apache.org/**content/reposit
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately 305
> issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
>
> Please find the staging repo here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel
A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately
305 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-137/
The tarballs are here
https://repository.apache.org/cont
That's the only change on trunk since the RC.
>>
>> So if its very fast to re-cut a RC then when Jean confirm the bundles
>> is in central.
>> We could possible upgrade those SNAPSHOT and re-cut.
>>
>> But still I am also OK with the current RC to give the com
re-cut.
But still I am also OK with the current RC to give the community time
to test it.
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 11/01/2011 08:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
---- Original Message ----
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0-RC1 (2nd attempt)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:09:41 -0
RC then when Jean confirm the bundles
is in central.
We could possible upgrade those SNAPSHOT and re-cut.
But still I am also OK with the current RC to give the community time
to test it.
> Thanks,
> Hadrian
>
>
>
> On 11/01/2011 08:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>
>&
0. If
anybody has a different opinion, I'll be more than happy to redo this RC.
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 11/01/2011 08:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0-RC1 (2nd attempt)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:09:41 -0400
From: Hadri
al Message
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0-RC1 (2nd attempt)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:09:41 -0400
From: Hadrian Zbarcea
Reply-To: priv...@camel.apache.org
To: priv...@camel.apache.org
A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately
304 issues resol
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0-RC1 (2nd attempt)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:09:41 -0400
From: Hadrian Zbarcea
Reply-To: priv...@camel.apache.org
To: priv...@camel.apache.org
A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately
Ok, than here is my -1 for this release
>
Ok, looks like there was a problem on the repository side. It looks like
I'll have to redo it. While at it we can fix the SNAPSHOT issue as well.
Hadrian
On 10/27/2011 05:18 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
Hadrian,
I cannot find the dependency to org.apache.camel:camel-parent:pom:2.9.0-RC1.
See [
Hadrian,
I cannot find the dependency to org.apache.camel:camel-parent:pom:2.9.0-RC1.
See [1]. So, all my tests fail because of this. Is this a problem with the
upload or with the release itself?
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-104/org/apache/camel/camel-pare
There are some SNAPSHOT dependencies in the apache-camel feature are not
addressed in this release candidate.
They are
cometd-java-server-bundle-version
quickfix-bundle-version
I'm not sure why the maven release pulgin can't find out these issue,
maybe we need to grep the SNAPSHOT among the pom
A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately
295 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-104/
The tarballs are here
https://repository.apache.org/cont
38 matches
Mail list logo
