Hello,
Camel Extras has it's own Sonatype OSSRH[1] that is managed separately, as
far as I understand, and the camel-extras project is doing it's own
releases (or not doing them as the current state is :-P).
I guess in the same way servicemix-extras can apply for it's own Sonatype
OSSRH [2].
[1]
Hi
I'm asking you here because you release the Came Extra artifacts into Central
Maven Repo. We would like to release ServiceMix Extra into Central too. Can
anyone advise me how we can get rights to release under
org.apache-extras.servicemix or
org.apache-extras.servicemix-extra?
Kindly regar
Fyi
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Von: "David Nalley"
Datum: 01.10.2014 01:45
Betreff: Apache Extras PoC
An:
Cc:
Hi folks:
Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for
the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below
If you want to follow the discussion, here is the pointer [1].
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201209.mbox/%3CCALvzYd-h4Q=cteggqcneeninhvose8uigt2gtk22n9cmr_k...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Best,
Christian
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Luciano Resende
Luciano Resende wrote on Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 14:15:13 -0700:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Christian Müller <
> christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks all for the valuable input.
> > I think there are a few points where we have slightly different
> > interpretations from what is wr
, isn't that ASF activity? I've always assumed that work
> on GPL-licensed stuff at apache-extras should be done by individuals
> (who may happen to also do work at Apache), but that an Apache PMC
> should not coordinate that work. That a product is controlled by an
> Apache
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Christian Müller <
christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks all for the valuable input.
> I think there are a few points where we have slightly different
> interpretations from what is written down (or not). I want to clarify this
> on the appropriate mailing l
rdinating work, no matter where
> > it's hosted, isn't that ASF activity? I've always assumed that work
> > on GPL-licensed stuff at apache-extras should be done by individuals
> > (who may happen to also do work at Apache), but that an Apache PMC
> > should no
early delineate any work outside of
> that... great.
>
> Just don't confuse our users.
I'm a bit confused. If a PMC is coordinating work, no matter where
it's hosted, isn't that ASF activity? I've always assumed that work
on GPL-licensed stuff at apache-extras
On Sep 23, 2012 11:48 PM, "Luciano Resende" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Benson,
> >
> > The license stuff is a red herring. Ignore it.
> >
> > The primary issue is figuring where the notification emails sent to.
> >
> > -g
> >
>
> Sorry for jumping on this so
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Benson,
>
> The license stuff is a red herring. Ignore it.
>
> The primary issue is figuring where the notification emails sent to.
>
> -g
>
Sorry for jumping on this so late, but initially I thought this was
just a infra issue and I saw few di
Benson,
The license stuff is a red herring. Ignore it.
The primary issue is figuring where the notification emails sent to.
-g
On Sep 23, 2012 6:27 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
> With all respect to everyone involved, I really doubt that the infra
> list is the best place for the Camel PMC to
With all respect to everyone involved, I really doubt that the infra
list is the best place for the Camel PMC to refine their understanding
of how best to cope with glue code for an LGPL dependency. If infra@
feels that fixing the email flow from extras to core lists is
inappropriate due to their v
Christian Müller wrote on Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 19:29:21 +0200:
> Sorry for being inaccurate. I didn't understood your response as you mean
> it (only after your last mail). I'm not an English native speaker. Please
> have understanding for it...
>
No problem.
> We cannot move the camel-extra sou
; > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > Sam Ruby wrote on Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 21:19:00 -0400:
> > >> >> On Sep 12, 2012 8:51 PM, "Gavin McDonald"
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I do believe Sebb was correct in his actions, if no mo
t; >> >>
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >>> Trying to filter out jobs that can be self-accomplished is not a bad
> >> >> thing I don’t think.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> &g
t; >> thing I don’t think.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> However, we only get a few of these and am only happy to help out, so,
>> >> done.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
17 matches
Mail list logo
