+1
Thanks David for working on this and everyone involved.
Regards
Akash R Nilugal
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 1:07 AM, Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I submit the Apache CarbonData 2.3.1 (RC1) to your vote.
>
> 1. Key features of this release are
Congratulations Xubo
Regards
Akash R Nilugal
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 12:28 AM, Liang Chen wrote:
> *Hi *
>
>
> *We are pleased to announce that Bo Xu as new PMC for Apache CarbonData.*
>
>
> *Congrats to **Bo Xu**!*
>
>
> *Apache CarbonData PMC*
>
Hi xubo,
+1
Thank you for suggesting this. Totally agree with it. Containerising carbon
data is much needed one.
Few inputs to consider
1. Since most of the users are not using spark 2.4 and spark 2.4 we have to
put effort in removing the support.
2. We can support docker container for spark 3
+1
Regards,
Akash R N
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 10:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> No objections ?
>
> I will then move forward with proposed plan.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le ven. 18 nov. 2022 à 07:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a
> écrit :
&g
Hi Shreelekhya,
+1 for the feature. It was pending for a long time, thanks for working on
it.
I have added comments in the doc, please check
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:31 AM Kunal Kapoor
wrote:
> Hi Shreelekhya,
> +1 for this feature,
>
> I could not un
Congratulations Vikram
Regards
Akash R Nilugal
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022, 9:19 AM Liang Chen wrote:
> We are pleased to announce that the PMC has invited Vikram Ahuja as new
>
> Apache CarbonData committer, and the invite has been accepted!
>
>
> Congrats to Vikram Ahuja
+1
Regards
Akash R Nilugal
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022, 8:56 PM Kumar Vishal
wrote:
> +1
> -Regards
> Kumar Vishal
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 11:57 PM, Kunal Kapoor
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I submit the Apache CarbonData 2.3.0(RC2) for your vote.
> >
>
-1
there are some doc and performance improvements PRs like
4240,4241,4242,4243.
please include
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:56 PM 蔡强 wrote:
> -1, please include PR #4240,4241,4242,4243
>
> Kunal Kapoor 于2021年12月20日周一 21:39写道：
>
> > Hi All,
> >
prepare a document and add examples and proper design there will code
level info, that would be great.
Thanks,
Regards,
Akash R
On 2021/10/10 19:47:31, Mahesh Raju Somalaraju
wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> This mail is regarding char/varchar implementation in carbondata. Recently
&
ink to the google doc,
> > you can directly comment on that. Any suggestions and improvements are
> most
> > welcome.
> >
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x66X5LU5silp4wLzjxx2Hxmt78gFRLF_8IocapoXxJk/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards,
> > Akash R Nilugal
> >
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ravi
>
-time job.
> >
> > Further details are present in the design document. Please review the
> > design and help to improve it. I'm attaching the link to the google doc,
> > you can directly comment on that. Any suggestions and improvements are
> most
> > welcome.
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x66X5LU5silp4wLzjxx2Hxmt78gFRLF_8IocapoXxJk/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards,
> > Akash R Nilugal
> >
>
.
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 6:29 AM Ravindra Pesala
wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Ravindra
>
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 7:23 PM, Liang Chen wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards
> > Liang
> >
> > Ajantha Bhat 于2021年8月3日周二
Thank you all
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 6:29 PM Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> We are pleased to announce that Akash R Nilugal as new PMC for Apache
> CarbonData.
>
>
> Congrats to Akash R Nilugal!
>
>
> Apache CarbonData PMC
>
mentioned above, so we need to go
through the open PRs again.
Thanks
Regards
Akash R Nilugal
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 6:22 PM Ajantha Bhat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I submit the Apache CarbonData 2.1.1(RC1) for your vote.
>
> *1.Release Notes:*
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/se
Hi,
In addition to this, the probability of false positives will be more when
we just push the runtime filter of source data min max ok target as it
purely depends on source data.
Even I had done POC by just adding a range filter on target table.
We need file level or block level pruning like
Hi David,
Are you talking about the dynamic run-time filter pushdown of spark ? If
that is the case, I had already raised a discussion fee months back to do
the similarly in Carbondata to improve carbon join by using carbondata's
metadata. But since spark is already doing it , it's decided not
-DMtRUSfjkh9arWawPLSc/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks and Regards,
Akash R
Congratulations indhumathi
Regards
Akash R
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020, 8:16 AM Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> We are pleased to announce that the PMC has invited Indhumathi as new
>
> Apache CarbonData committer, and the invite has been accepted!
>
>
> Congrats to In
Congratulations indhumathi
Regards
Akash R
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020, 8:16 AM Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> We are pleased to announce that the PMC has invited Indhumathi as new
>
> Apache CarbonData committer, and the invite has been accepted!
>
>
> Congrats to In
+1 for ravi's comment. It's better, clean and safe.
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020, 8:34 PM Ravindra Pesala wrote:
> Hi Vikram,
>
> +1
>
> It is good to remove the automatic cleanup.
> But I am still worried about the clean file command executed by user a
Hi,
+1, we can deprecate it and as Vishal suggested we can keep as internal
property for developer purpose.
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 2:46 PM VenuReddy wrote:
> Dear Community.!
>
> Have recently encountered a problem of Segment directory and segment file
> i
+1
As Ravindra said, we should do it at outputFormat level, so that the same
implementation will be used to improve the simpler update performance in
the future.
So design should be like SDK will call update and delete of Outputformat to
do the operations.
Regards,
Akash
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at
+1
It's good to support complex for presto. Please include other types of map
and struct also in th same document.
If you can elaborate more on the implementation of nested array types in
the design doc, it would be helpful.
Regards
Akash
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, 9:11 PM akshay_nuthala
wrote:
+1
Regards
Akash R Nilugal
On Sun, May 17, 2020, 2:20 PM Kunal Kapoor wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I submit the Apache CarbonData 2.0.0(RC3) for your vote.
>
>
> *1.Release Notes:*
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12346046=Html=1232022
Hi march,
Thanks for suggesting improvemnt on update.
I have gone through the paper for some highlights and here are few points
with my understanding, we can work and discuss more.
1. Since we are talking about the updating the existing file instead of new
carbon data file which
is the current
Hi,
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/3734 and
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/373
<https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/3734>3 is required as these are
functional issues.
there are some documents whose content and hyperlinks need to be corrected.
-1
Regards,
A
+1
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:54 PM Kunal Kapoor
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I submit the Apache CarbonData 2.0.0(RC1) for your vote.
>
>
> *1.Release Notes:*
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320220=1234604
Congratulations Kunal
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, 12:37 PM Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> We are pleased to announce that Kunal Kapoor as new PMC for Apache
> CarbonData.
>
>
> Congrats to Kunal Kapoor!
>
>
> Apache CarbonData PMC
>
Congratulations Kunal.
Regards,
Akash R Nilugal
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, 12:37 PM Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> We are pleased to announce that Kunal Kapoor as new PMC for Apache
> CarbonData.
>
>
> Congrats to Kunal Kapoor!
>
>
> Apache CarbonData PMC
>
ith more use cases. Because
> > current index server startup will load, and when you say command, even if i
> > do count(*) also, that will load all the segments. So i think new command
> > won't be necessary.
> >
> > Please get back for any clarifications or doubts.
&
get back for any clarifications or inputs.
Thanks and Regards
Akash R Nilugal
From: xuchuanyin
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug, 2019, 11:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Cache Pre Priming
> To:
>
>
> Hi, I've two questions about the current index server implementation:
>
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
