Re: March 2017 Board Report

Oh yeah! I think that's worth mentioning, too. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Yeah, I think all is pretty normal this quarter. We got a new site :) > > Andrus > > > > On Mar 12, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: >

Re: March 2017 Board Report

Yeah, I think all is pretty normal this quarter. We got a new site :) Andrus > On Mar 12, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > > I need to put this together tomorrow. It should be pretty standard and > similar to the last one, unless I'm missing anything? > >

March 2017 Board Report

I need to put this together tomorrow. It should be pretty standard and similar to the last one, unless I'm missing anything? Thanks! mrg

Re: December 2017 Board Report

Looks good to me. > On Dec 11, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Michael Gentry <blackn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I need to file this in about 24 hours or so. Please let me know if you > have any inputs to add to the report. > > Thanks! > > mrg > > > > #

December 2017 Board Report

I need to file this in about 24 hours or so. Please let me know if you have any inputs to add to the report. Thanks! mrg # Apache Cayenne Board Report, December 2017 ## Description Apache Cayenne is a Java database persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach to object persistence

Re: September 2017 Board Report

This is it in a nutshell. There's lots of exciting functionality, but of course the Board may not care for technical details. Andrus > On Sep 11, 2017, at 9:23 AM, Michael Gentry wrote: > > This is due in a couple days. Outside of mentioning 4.0 is in beta and >

September 2017 Board Report

This is due in a couple days. Outside of mentioning 4.0 is in beta and API-frozen and 4.1 has started, can you think of any other items which should be included? We mentioned starting to work on the updated website last report, but I'm not sure much has been done there or if it should be

Re: June 2017 Board Report

Yeah, I wasn't inclined to include it, but thought I'd ask. On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > Remember that the board cares about community development far more > than technical development. > They'd be more interested in how the CM prototype is

Re: June 2017 Board Report

Remember that the board cares about community development far more than technical development. They'd be more interested in how the CM prototype is affecting community. On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Michael Gentry wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrus Adamchik

Re: June 2017 Board Report

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > The only thing that comes to my mind is *maybe* mention the CM > prototype [1], > > Certainly you can mention it for our own sake. The Board does not care one > way or the other though. > Yeah, it doesn't seem

Re: June 2017 Board Report

is my current stab at the board report (has to be sent in by > Wednesday). Any recommendations for changes? The only thing that comes to > my mind is *maybe* mention the CM prototype [1], which is still slowly > under development. I'm getting closer to having the DataDomain editor &

June 2017 Board Report

Here is my current stab at the board report (has to be sent in by Wednesday). Any recommendations for changes? The only thing that comes to my mind is *maybe* mention the CM prototype [1], which is still slowly under development. I'm getting closer to having the DataDomain editor finished

Re: March 2017 Board Report

So explain it by mentioning more robust development activity and user support for more advanced features and assisting those trying out the milestone releases? On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > such as saying that we've had a dramatic increase

Re: March 2017 Board Report

> such as saying that we've had a dramatic increase in mailing > list participation recently Which is exactly what happened this quarter. So I think we should mention it. Andrus > On Mar 10, 2017, at 4:25 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > You'll be told to remove the

Re: March 2017 Board Report

You'll be told to remove the mailing list statistics unless they are showing something important, in which case you want to specifically state it (such as saying that we've had a dramatic increase in mailing list participation recently). Also, I'd change "No activity" for 3.x to "In maintenance

March 2017 Board Report

As always, please provide any feedback you might have before I submit it. Thanks, mrg ## Description: Apache Cayenne is a Java database persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach to object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote persistence services, and a GUI

Re: December 2016 Board Report

Looks good On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Michael Gentry wrote: > Per Andrus' suggestion, removed ICLA language and added Ruslan: > > ## Committer base changes: > > - Currently 20 committers. > - No new committers added in the last 3 months. > - Last committer addition was

Re: September 2016 Board Report

Yeah, my "summer lull" comment was mainly targeting the dev list since user stayed pretty much the same. I'm indifferent about including or omitting it. Thanks, mrg On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > Oh, and you may as well drop the mailing list

Re: September 2016 Board Report

Oh, and you may as well drop the mailing list statistics as the board doesn't want them unless they are being used to illustrate a particular point. But maybe that's what you meant by summer lull, in which case you can disregard both of my comments :) On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Mike

Re: September 2016 Board Report

Looks pretty good to me. Although I'm not really sure there was a lull. At least I didn't notice any lull in cayenne activity. On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: > Any feedback on the following? Needs to be submitted tomorrow (9/14). > > Thanks! > >

Re: June 2016 Board Report

I'm +1. 2016-06-13 9:30 GMT+03:00 Andrus Adamchik : > Will be sending this out today. > > > On Jun 13, 2016, at 8:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis > wrote: > > > > +1. We should submit this today, since the board meeting is in 48 hours. > > > > Ari > > > > >

Re: June 2016 Board Report

Will be sending this out today. > On Jun 13, 2016, at 8:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > > +1. We should submit this today, since the board meeting is in 48 hours. > > Ari > > > On 11/06/2016 12:15am, Michael Gentry wrote: >> Please review. >> >> Thanks, >> >> mrg >>

June 2016 Board Report

Please review. Thanks, mrg -- ## Description: Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach to object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote persistence services, and a GUI mapping/modeling tool. ## Issues: There are no issues

Re: September 2015 Board Report

You sure this link doesn't work for you? I'm pretty sure it works for any PMC member. (The ?cayenne is probably optional in your case.) https://reporter.apache.org/?cayenne In any case, here's the text-version of the output. Report from the Apache Cayenne committee [Andrus Adamchik] ##

Re: Board report

Looks good to me. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: On Mar 10, 2015, at 6:54 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: That's been on my to-do list, but I haven't gotten to it yet. Was going to try tonight along with building the release.

Re: Board report

That's been on my to-do list, but I haven't gotten to it yet. Was going to try tonight along with building the release. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Our board report is due tomorrow. Let me take a shot at preparing it in the next couple

Re: Board report

On Mar 10, 2015, at 6:54 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: That's been on my to-do list, but I haven't gotten to it yet. Was going to try tonight along with building the release. With the new report generation service at https://reporter.apache.org/ it was a breeze :) Here

Board report

Our board report is due tomorrow. Let me take a shot at preparing it in the next couple of hours. Andrus

Re: December 2014 Board Report

Looks like a good summary to me. And also a heads-up to keep looking at stackoverflow more often. Ari On 12/12/2014 6:48pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Here is a report draft. I don't think we need a wiki or even GoogleDoc for it. If someone wants to make an edit, doing it via email is

Re: December 2014 Board Report

Looks pretty good to me, too, but perhaps add a comment about the new Cayenne Modeler features, too? Thanks, mrg On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@maniatis.org wrote: Looks like a good summary to me. And also a heads-up to keep looking at stackoverflow more often.

Re: December 2014 Board Report

Just added a Modeler note. Will submit the report in a few minutes. On Dec 12, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Looks pretty good to me, too, but perhaps add a comment about the new Cayenne Modeler features, too? Thanks, mrg On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at

Re: December 2014 Board Report

Here is a report draft. I don't think we need a wiki or even GoogleDoc for it. If someone wants to make an edit, doing it via email is perfectly fine (and perhaps easier to communicate to all of us compared to alternatives). Feel free to comment. I am planning to email it to the board tomorrow.

December 2014 Board Report

I've been swamped with work/etc and haven't gotten to this yet. Does anyone else have a few cycles to try to put this together since we need to get it out? If not, I'll try to free up some time this evening. Thanks in advance, mrg

Re: December 2014 Board Report

I can probably do it tomorrow. On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:10 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: I've been swamped with work/etc and haven't gotten to this yet. Does anyone else have a few cycles to try to put this together since we need to get it out? If not, I'll try to free up

Re: Board Report

Any other changes? We really need to get this out. Thanks, mrg On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Here is my revision: https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry

Re: Board Report

I was going to email it to the board tonight. On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Any other changes? We really need to get this out. Thanks, mrg On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Here is my

Re: Board Report

I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get the report out soon. :-) On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@maniatis.org wrote: On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -

Re: Board Report

I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist - https://gist.github.com/ :) On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: I'm not beholden to a specific location. I just know we need to get the report out soon. :-) On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM,

Re: Board Report

Gist is pretty great. I'll create them there. Good idea. mrg On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist - https://gist.github.com/ :) On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry

Re: Board Report

https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a Leave comments if you care. Or reply here, etc. Thanks, mrg On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Gist is pretty great. I'll create them there. Good idea. mrg On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM,

Re: Board Report

Here is my revision: https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a Leave comments if you care. Or reply here, etc. Thanks, mrg On Thu, Sep

Re: Board Report

talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful. mrg On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit

Re: Board Report

://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 My biggest question was about the Git migration. Thanks, mrg -- -- Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report

with Git. I assumed other folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong. I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. Maybe we call it cayenne-pmc just in case we need to place something there that is not a board report in the future. For now I see

Re: Board Report

a separate Git repo for reports. Maybe we call it cayenne-pmc just in case we need to place something there that is not a board report in the future. For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and this list. Andrus On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry

Re: Board Report

Well, here is the current draft (which is also available in Git until I can delete it) in Markdown format: # Apache Cayenne Board Report - September 2014 Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach to object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote

Re: Board Report

On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong. Why not put them in the website folder?

Re: Board Report

it down. And let’s plan to write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?) Andrus On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK

Re: Board Report

, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful. mrg On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Thanks Mike

Re: Board Report

. And let’s plan to write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?) Andrus On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK

Re: Board Report

Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful. mrg On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git

Re: Board Report

board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful. mrg On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit the report in a few minutes. Going

Re: Board Report

, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful. mrg On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org

Re: Board Report

ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful. mrg On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit

Re: Board Report

Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful. mrg On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note

Re: Board Report

On 10/06/2014 1:20am, Michael Gentry wrote: Please review/comment: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 My biggest question was about the Git migration. Thanks, mrg -- -- Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4

Board Report

Please review/comment: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 My biggest question was about the Git migration. Thanks, mrg

Re: Board Report

Yes, the git migration is completely done now. Ari On 10/06/2014 1:20am, Michael Gentry wrote: Please review/comment: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 My biggest question was about the Git migration. Thanks, mrg

Re: Board report?

, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2014 Seems a bit sparse. Should we include things like discussing SonarQube, etc? On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.netwrote: I'll try to get

Re: Board report?

I'll try to get something today. Was nursing a migraine yesterday and avoided e-mail/etc. Thanks, mrg On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.orgwrote: So I guess we have this week to finalize the board report. I was sick all last week, so haven't replied

Board report?

So I guess we have this week to finalize the board report. I was sick all last week, so haven’t replied to Mike’s wiki messages. I don’t think we even need to use CMS for the board reports. We can just store them as unpublished text files in SVN. This is just for our collaboration after all

Re: December 2013 Board Report

report? On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.netwrote: Initial stub is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2013 I'll try to update it tonight or this weekend, but if anyone else wants to take a stab at it, that's also

Re: December 2013 Board Report

, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: I just did a quick review and don't see anything that really changed. Have there been any real changes since the last board report? On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Initial stub is here: https

Apache Cayenne Board Report

Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach to object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote persistence services, and a GUI mapping/modeling tool. Project Status * No releases since last Board Report. * Cayenne 3.1 Beta 2 released on Feb 18 is stable

Re: December 2013 Board Report

I just did a quick review and don't see anything that really changed. Have there been any real changes since the last board report? On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.netwrote: Initial stub is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report

December 2013 Board Report

Initial stub is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2013 I'll try to update it tonight or this weekend, but if anyone else wants to take a stab at it, that's also fine. Thanks, mrg

Re: September 2013 Board Report

, although working with infra on git migration might be describing it too generously. Ari On 9/09/13 11:38pm, Michael Gentry wrote: Draft created: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2013 Please review. Thanks! mrg On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:25 AM

Re: September 2013 Board Report

+1, although working with infra on git migration might be describing it too generously. Ari On 9/09/13 11:38pm, Michael Gentry wrote: Draft created: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2013 Please review. Thanks! mrg On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:25

Re: September 2013 Board Report

: Draft created: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2013 Please review. Thanks! mrg On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: I haven't had time to put it together yet, but it is due soon. I hope to get

Re: June 2013 Board Report

date of last release, date and name of last committer added, date and name of last PMC member added. These are now newly-required sections in the board report: http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: I

June 2013 Board Report

I don't have time to work on it now, but I put the stub here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2013 If anyone has time before I can get to it, that's also great. Thanks, mrg

Re: June 2013 Board Report

We need to include date of last release, date and name of last committer added, date and name of last PMC member added. These are now newly-required sections in the board report: http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Michael Gentry mgen

Re: June 2013 Board Report

and name of last PMC member added. These are now newly-required sections in the board report: http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: I don't have time to work on it now, but I put the stub here: https

Re: June 2013 Board Report

10, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.comwrote: We need to include date of last release, date and name of last committer added, date and name of last PMC member added. These are now newly-required sections in the board report: http://www.apache.org/foundation/board

Re: March 2013 Board Report

? Thanks, mrg On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@maniatis.org wrote: Looks good. +1 On 5/03/13 1:27am, Michael Gentry wrote: I've made an initial draft here: https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/CAY/Board+** Report+March+2013https://cwiki.apache.org

Re: March 2013 Board Report

/Board+** Report+March+2013https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2013 I've modified the report to more closely match: http://community.apache.org/**boardreport.htmlhttp://community.apache.org/boardreport.html Please update anything you think I missed or reply here

March 2013 Board Report

I've made an initial draft here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2013 I've modified the report to more closely match: http://community.apache.org/boardreport.html Please update anything you think I missed or reply here if we need to discuss some element

Re: March 2013 Board Report

Looks good. +1 On 5/03/13 1:27am, Michael Gentry wrote: I've made an initial draft here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2013 I've modified the report to more closely match: http://community.apache.org/boardreport.html Please update anything you think I

December 2012 Board Report

I've added a draft board report at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2012 I didn't modify the DocBook/Apache CMS sections because I haven't been paying too much attention to that (sorry). If someone can please fix that section I'd appreciate it. Possible

Re: December 2012 Board Report

. Ari On 5/12/12 11:17am, Michael Gentry wrote: I've added a draft board report at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2012 I didn't modify the DocBook/Apache CMS sections because I haven't been paying too much attention to that (sorry). If someone can please

Re: September Board Report

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Draft is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2012 Please update. Should we mention the build issues that have been happening? Counterquestion: does building problems require

Re: September Board Report

/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2012 Please update. Should we mention the build issues that have been happening? Counterquestion: does building problems require Board attention? If it is just another bug - no. If it is a big thing which might bring the project to the attic, i think yes

Re: September Board Report

Grobmeier wrote: On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: Draft is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2012 Please update. Should we mention the build issues that have been happening? Counterquestion: does building

Re: Need help with Cayenne board report

. Perhaps the board might like to know how some people are using git, since that's an important topic for them... Ari On 18/06/12 3:50am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: We need to submit a board report for the June 20 board meeting. Appreciate if someone could take a lead on that. I am

Board report June 2012

Apache Cayenne(TM) is an open source persistence framework licensed under the Apache License, providing object-relational mapping (ORM) and remoting services. Development * Active work on Cayenne 3.1 release continues. * Cayenne 3.1b1 has been released and trunk branched for work on 3.2 to

Re: Need help with Cayenne board report

of the PMC and chair, committers are more than welcome to suggest things they'd like to see included. Perhaps the board might like to know how some people are using git, since that's an important topic for them... Ari On 18/06/12 3:50am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: We need to submit a board

Re: Need help with Cayenne board report

an important topic for them... Ari On 18/06/12 3:50am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: We need to submit a board report for the June 20 board meeting. Appreciate if someone could take a lead on that. I am on vacation this week with spotty internet. I guess I'll be able to resend it from cayenne-dev to board

Need help with Cayenne board report

We need to submit a board report for the June 20 board meeting. Appreciate if someone could take a lead on that. I am on vacation this week with spotty internet. I guess I'll be able to resend it from cayenne-dev to board@ tho :) Thanks, Andrus

Re: Need help with Cayenne board report

I always forget about that report every three months. I created a draft here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2012 Any edits are welcome. John, you are new to this process, so to explain it: the PMC must give a short report to the board each quarter

Re: Apache Cayenne March Board report

Sorry about that - I dropped the ball on that one a bit. Created the stub, then kept getting distracted by work/etc. One thing I noticed, though, is this page is not updated now: https://cwiki.apache.org/CAY/board-reports.html Do we have to edit the DocBook now for this to change? Thanks,

Re: Apache Cayenne March Board report

I had to clear my cache and reload the page. It was showing the old one for me. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: Sorry about that - I dropped the ball on that one a bit.  Created the stub, then kept getting distracted by work/etc. No

Apache Cayenne March Board report

Apache Cayenne(TM) is an open source persistence framework licensed under the Apache License, providing object-relational mapping (ORM) and remoting services. Development * Active work on Cayenne 3.1 release continues. * We are discussing the first Beta release of Cayenne 3.1. * DocBook

Re: December Board Report

committership was processed in June. BTW, something happened to the Confluence rendering template. Powered by.. footer overlaps with content making it unreadable at least in Firefox. Andrus On Dec 5, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: I stubbed out the December Board Report at: https

Re: December Board Report

On Dec 12, 2011, at 4:04 AM, Michael Gentry wrote: Should 3.1 (ALPHA) actually be 3.1 (Release Candidate)? I'd keep it as ALPHA. It may become Beta soon, but for now it is ALPHA. Whatever happened to the GSOC? I kind of lost track of that. The project was finished, we have a working and

Re: December Board Report

On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: Well, given that there have been several milestone releases, I was thinking alpha is old news. Maybe use Milestone 4, then? M4 still means Alpha in our terms (Alpha, meaning the new API is not frozen). I am fine if we call it M4

Re: December Board Report

OK, just did some updates, including tweaking the user list section. Thanks, mrg On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik and...@objectstyle.org wrote: On Dec 12, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: Well, given that there have been several milestone releases, I was thinking

Re: December Board Report

the December Board Report at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2011 I'll try to work on it more tomorrow, but if anyone else wants to touch upon it, please do. Thanks, mrg

December Board Report

I stubbed out the December Board Report at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2011 I'll try to work on it more tomorrow, but if anyone else wants to touch upon it, please do. Thanks, mrg

Re: September Board Report

, Michael Gentrymgen...@masslight.net wrote: The September Board Report is due. I haven't had time to work on it this week, but just created the initial page (with the last report's content): https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2011 I won't be able

Re: September Board Report

I just tweaked the content a bit, but feel it is incomplete. Please review, edit, or provide feedback. Thanks! mrg On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Michael Gentry mgen...@masslight.net wrote: The September Board Report is due.  I haven't had time to work on it this week, but just created

  1   2   >