Sry for the late response. +1 from me as well.
Regards,
Bjoern
August 16, 2019 2:32 PM, "Roy Lenferink" wrote:
> It is probably due to the holidays that responses slowed down a bit, but a
> reminder that this vote is still open.
> If we want to accept the donation we still need another (bind
+1 - great work!
Björn
July 19, 2019 8:30 AM, "Roy Lenferink" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quite soon after accepting the HTTP admin donation we now received
> another donation.
>
> A couple of hours ago Roy Bulter created a pull request for adding a new
> pubsub admin to Celix [1]. This pubsub ad
Seems like I made a mistake as well, zlib is downloading fine by now ;)
Regards,
Bjoern
On 28.01.2018 17:04, Bjoern Petri wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> I identified some minor issues, but none of them are sufficient serious
> to block the release:
>
> - android docker bui
+1 (binding)
I identified some minor issues, but none of them are sufficient serious
to block the release:
- android docker build seems to be broken due to zlib dependency
- NOTICE year needs update
Besides, I checked that signature+hashes are correct using
the keys from https://dist.apache.o
Hi Pepijn,
Good Idea - separating documentation into a dedicated
git repo could give us more flexibility e.g of the organization
of the docs which in turn will help users to pick it up more easily.
So definitely no objections from my side.
Anyway, I wanted to point you to hugo[1] as an alternat
Welcome aboard Roy!
Glad to already have the second new committer this
year - I hope we're keeping this pace :)
Regards,
Bjoern
On 11.02.2017 00:05, Roy Lenferink wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the warm welcome to the Apache Celix team.
> Can't wait to commit my first fix on my own ;)
>
>
Hi Erjan!
I am very glad to hear such good news -
also from my side a warm welcome.
As Gabriele already mentioned: Finally :)
Greetings,
Bjoern
On 01.02.2017 16:34, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Erjan
> Altena to becom
+1 from me, great work guys!
Greetings,
Bjoern
Am 18/10/16 um 22:12 schrieb Pepijn Noltes:
Hi All,
Finally I think we are ready for a new release :), so without further ado:
This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.0.0
This release solves 196 issues. Most of them bugs, some of t
That was long overdue ;) Nice to
see that is has finally happened!
Welcome also from my side!
Bjoern
Am 23/05/16 um 20:28 schrieb Pepijn Noltes:
Hi All,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix
has asked Gabriele Ricciardi to become a committer and we are pleased
to announ
Hi Anupam,
Although it is still our latest release, it is actually somewhat
outdated. Hence, there is a high chance that this issue is already
solved. As you might have seen, there will be a new release Celix 2.0
soon. In case you do not want to wait that long anymore, consider taking
the cu
Hi Pepijn,
Sorry for not being that active at the moment - you can imagine that
I've a lot of other things in mind at the moment. Nevertheless, I wanted
to come back to this: I'd appreciate if you take over the role as
release manager. I actually think you've more or less done it before
any
Nice to see that we can finally
build in parallel!
+1 from my side
Bjoern
On 04.02.2016 14:44, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been working on a revamp of the Celix specific CMake commands. The
> main reason to do this was to get rid of the deploy.cmake files.
> At the moment the
Hi Menno,
This should ease gdb debugging a lot and we can actually
re-use this for other types as well! Quite useful in my
opinion - Thanks a lot for your effort!
Best regards,
Bjoern
On 29.01.2016 15:54, Menno van der Graaf wrote:
> Hello,
> Menno van der Graaf here, you might have seen
project. Can't you keep it on
> your github? Other option is the Inaetics github.
> Gerrit
> Op 21 jan. 2016 12:26 schreef "Pepijn Noltes" :
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Nice work Daan & Marco.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:04 AM Bjoern Petri
with celix-bootstrap? Any suggestions on this?
Regards,
Bjoern
On 20.01.2016 22:29, Bjoern Petri wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Summer last year the celix support on Android was
> created in form of a Dockerfile which can be used
> to cross-compile Celix for armv7 platforms.
>
> I am
Hi!
Summer last year the celix support on Android was
created in form of a Dockerfile which can be used
to cross-compile Celix for armv7 platforms.
I am glad to announce that - thanks to the two students
Daan Veldhof and Marco Jansen - there is now a Celix
Android App. It uses JNI to both, star
requiring board attention at this time
>>
>> ## Activity:
>> - Preparation for next release is ongoing. An alpha tag has been created.
>> We are expecting a new release within two months.
>> - Apache Celix was presented @ ApacheCon Europe by Bjoern Petri and
>> Pep
Pepijn,
I could not agree more! I just created CELIX-330, so
we can start adding some documentation.
Regards,
Bjorn
On 15.12.2015 13:47, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to discuss the option to document more using markdown files in
> a documents subdir.
>
> Since our git
Hi Miroslav,
I was quite busy within the last days, so sorry for my late response.
Nevertheless - Welcome to the Mailing list - its nice to see you here! I
didn't find the time yet to take a look at your code, but holidays (and
hence some free time) are coming :).
Regards,
Bjoern
On 20
Hi Gerrit,
looks good. Thanks for the work!
Regards,
Bjoern
On 2015-11-16 22:27, Gerrit Binnenmars wrote:
Hello,
Just for information, added a patch for topology manager to be able to
restrict the import and export scope of remote services. See CELIX-284.
Greetings Gerrit
Configuration:
in case CMake 3.3. is used an message is printed asking the user to
switch the CMake Version and the build is aborted.
Regards,
Bjoern
On 21.09.2015 14:45, Bjoern Petri wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> It seems that celix cannot be build using cmake 3.3.1 (which ha
Hi everyone,
A while ago we started using Travis CI to ensure that Celix including
all bundles is still building after a commit has been pushed. Within the
last week we committed some patches to fix the current unit testing
setup and there are some more to come (Thanks to Menno!). Therefore, I
al
Hi everyone,
It seems that celix cannot be build using cmake 3.3.1 (which has been
rolled out with the latest update of fedora 22). Trying to build it ends
with an message saying "Error: could not load cache". I'll look into
this later. For now I'd suggest staying with cmake < 3.3.1.
Regar
Hi Frank,
there are in general no ready-to-use binaries available. But it is quite
easy to compile Celix on your own. Take a look at either the webpage or
at https://github.com/apache/celix/blob/master/BUILDING .
The memory footprint is obviously dependent on the used bundles, but
the framework
Hi Pepijn,
+1. Good planning! Just one question: I think the removal of APR
could be done is almost no work if we decide to not include the
shell_bonjour and the event admin into this release.
While first is probably not a big deal, I am not aware of the
status of the event admin at all. I woul
Solved and fixed. Our website is fine again.
Seems that some infra update didn't work
with our currently used css.
Regards,
Bjoern
On 09.07.2015 15:01, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
Hi All,
Just for info the Apache Celix website [1] is currently broken due to an
issue in in infra.
Bjoern already
Hi!
While it is not a big deal to cross-compile Celix for ARM platforms
which experience major support like the raspberry pi, it is more
difficult to circumvent the dependencies when cross-compiling for
Android. With the removal of APR, Celix now got rid of one of the
main obstacles making it
run for some time an alpha
> release (for sure not the latest) can be promoted to an "official" release.
>
> I know that a lot is going on in Celix, and it would be nice if this became
> more visible.
>
> Curious for reactions,
>
> Greetings Gerrit
>
Hi everyone,
A while ago I stumbled over Travis CI. Travis is a continuous
integration service which automatically detects when a commit
has been pushed to a GitHub repository. It can be configured to
trigger a build or do some tests runs, when this happens.
After asking Apache Infra to enable t
Hi Pepijn,
I actually have to admit that I've been a bit jealous when looking how
easy the serialization can
be done with Java. For C there is always additional effort in adapting
the proxy/endpoint
bundle. So, if this works as expected it would be from great benefit!
Looking at the code yo
Hi everyone,
For several of our bundles we use the same approach to control
additional threads within
a bundle:
A boolean variable is used to indicate whether the thread is supposed to
run. The
according thread function regularly checks whether this variable is set
(e.g.
threadIsRunning ==
Hi Gerrit,
On 13.05.2015 21:51, Gerrit Binnenmars wrote:
Hello all,
Good to hear that a release is planned. Just some questions for the
release
- Will the dependency manager be included in the release?
- What about the config manager and the event admin?
- Will remote service discovery with
Hi Pepijn,
I think cog is awesome and a easy way to start celix bundle developing
by generating the needed code. So, in my opinion you should add it
to the Apache Celix git as soon as possible (and maybe some documentation
as well?).
Regards,
Bjoern
On 08.05.2015 15:31, Pepijn Noltes wrot
Hi all,
Specifying the unused attribute via "__unused" seems to not work with
my Linux gcc. According to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html, a different
syntax should be used __attribute__((unused)). While this works for
Linux, I have no idea whether this is fine fo
No problem. If only everything would be that easy to fix.
On! 02/11/2015 04:10 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Whoops, that is done in one of my commits while removing APR.
Thanks for noticing and fixing.
2015-02-11 16:08 GMT+01:00 :
Author: bpetri
Date: Wed Feb 11 15:08:14 2015
New Revision
Hi Alexander,
My proposal would be to remove them for now, but add them again
if someone volunteers to bring them up-to-date again.
Regards,
Bjoern
On 01/29/2015 01:21 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Hi all,
With the "new" server based remote service discovery implementation, the
SLP and
Hi Alexander,
seems fine to me as well.
Regards,
Bjoern
On 01/06/2015 02:28 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Hi all,
Looking at this issue, both the bundle and the service_reference pointer
are stored in an log entry. Since log_entries are handled async, there is
no guarantee that these poi
estroyed.
Since
one bundle only has one log_service, that log_service is nog
"unget"ed.
Which results in the segfault.
A possible solution would be to pass the log_helper via the API to all
parts of the RSA bundle. Instead of retrieving it again for every
object.
Wdyt?
2014-12-2
lt.
A possible solution would be to pass the log_helper via the API to all
parts of the RSA bundle. Instead of retrieving it again for every
object.
Wdyt?
2014-12-22 16:04 GMT+01:00 Bjoern Petri :
Hi Alexander,
I see the same, but only with the latest commit. So I assume some of
your
(corre
Hi Alexander,
I see the same, but only with the latest commit. So I assume some of
your (correct) changes in the last commit is triggering this now. I'll
check whether I can figure out what's going on here ...
Regards,
Bjoern
On 2014-12-22 15:01, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Hi,
I'm work
Once more learned something new! In my opinion that is the way to go.
Adding a integer/boolean allows us to (at least) support a check whether
a thread has been already initialized and initialize it in a proper way,
respectively.
On 2014-12-10 21:40, Gerrit Binnenmars wrote:
Bjoern Petri
How about using a pointer to the celix_thread_t data type and put that
in the log struct?
On 2014-12-10 11:05, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
@Bjoern: I've changed the thread initialisation to NULL, but apparently
this is not portable (likewise -1 is not portable as well). As far as I
can
tell
Nowhere. I just replaced it.
On 2014-11-19 21:29, Daniel Parker wrote:
Where is CELIX_LOG_ENABLE_STDOUT_FALLBACK_PROPERTY_NAME declared?
Daniel Parker
-Original Message-
From: bpe...@apache.org [mailto:bpe...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 14:45
To: comm...@celix.apach
On 2014-11-19 13:06, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Op Wed Nov 19 2014 at 1:36:25 AM schreef Björn Petri <
bjoern.pe...@sundevil.de>:
Hi,
I am not sure whether we should add dependencies where actually not
needed.
I agree.
But we could at least change the code to use the log_service if
ava
Hi everyone,
It's been a while since we've discussed about the logging-mechanisms
within celix. Instead of plain printfs, the preferable way should be to
use a service tracker to pick up the logging service. In terms of code
reuse, it definitely would make sense to have the code located at on
Jep, you're right - my fault. sorry for the inconvience.
On 2014-10-27 15:15, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
I think it is installed, via the CMakeLists.txt in
remote_service_admin.
Unless you mean something else with "exported".
2014-10-27 15:13 GMT+01:00 Bjoern Petri (JIRA) :
Hi everyone,
Just finished removing apr from the remote_shell. Could someone do me
the favor and try whether this still works on MacOS ?
Thanks,
Bjoern
What do you think?
[1]:
http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-http-service.html#http-port-settings
2014-10-19 10:16 GMT-04:00 Bjoern Petri (JIRA) :
>
> [
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CELIX-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system
Hi Alexander,
thanks for testing - just committed the fix. Allocation on the heap is
needed as the discovery_etcd needs to pick up the port for its
annunciation.
Regards,
Bjoern
On 2014-10-17 16:50, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Hi Bjoern,
This change causes a crash when shutting down th
Ah - sorry, I just see that you refer to the commit from this morning. A
minute before I saw your mail, I committed some more changes which also
seems to fix this issue (at least I cannot reproduce it). I was already
wondering how fast you are checking commits :).
Regards,
Bjoern
On 201
Hi Alexander,
Currently, I cannot find the problem. The etcd_watcher.h should not
contain the function signature shown in the error message any more.
Could you do me the favor and shortly check whether the etcd_watcher.h
(rev 1632567) still contains this?
Regards,
Bjoern
On 2014-10-17
On 2014-10-15 13:21, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
2014-10-15 7:13 GMT-04:00 Bjoern Petri :
Hi,
It works fine with the WebUI, but not via the go-shell.
There I get an error saying that the ManifestVersion is missing.
Adding this manually allows me also to do the deployment
via the go-shell
version needed? It was never needed, and worked with the
current
bundles (as long as they are packaged using jar).
2014-10-15 7:06 GMT-04:00 Bjoern Petri (JIRA) :
Bjoern Petri created CELIX-163:
--
Summary: Add ManifestVersion to Manifest
Alexander, I just added the change for the "update" - could you do a
small test and verify whether this fixed the broken Amdatu/Celix
discovery?
Regards,
Bjoern
On 2014-10-07 21:23, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
2014-10-07 20:57 GMT+02:00 Bjoern Petri :
Indeed, an "updat
On 2014-10-07 20:42, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
2014-10-07 20:38 GMT+02:00 Bjoern Petri :
The Amdatu implementation does not yet support TTL. But is this
behaviour
as expected? I don't think a TTL update should trigger a "set" on the
other
ends..
What do you think?
Ind
On 2014-10-07 20:23, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
[..]
@Bjoern
I did some more digging, and I guess the problem is with how Celix
watches
for changes. After calling the "etcd_watch"
"etcdWatcher_addOwnFramework"
is called, which basically re-adds the values for that discovery (I
guess
to refres
On 2014-10-07 20:07, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
[...]
a. What are each of the BUILD_ bundles in CCMAKE and what are
they
used for? This might already be documented somewhere. Maybe just a
reference/link to that page would work.
The BUILD_ options can be used to enable/disable additional bundles
Hi Alexander,
the ttl specifies the specified time to live for the key in seconds. The
discovery_etcd announces itself with a ttl of 30 seconds. If the
etcd-watch of the amdatu discovery etcd-implementation (not the
endpoint_discovery_poller) takes more time than this, the described
behavior
On 2014-10-02 08:33, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Looking at the commit, I do have some remarks on the code.
The for loop for getting the address does not break if it finds a
match. So
if no interface is given, it will use the last one found, instead of
the
first one. And if a interface is give
via a property. The APR method
looks at the hostname to find the address, if the system's hostname is
not
in the hosts file, it won't work.
2014-10-01 17:06 GMT+02:00 Bjoern Petri (JIRA) :
Bjoern Petri created CELIX-160:
--
Summary: ip
Hi Alexander,
works almost out-of-the box on my fedora system.
It only seems that policy "CMP0045" is too new
for the CMake Version I am using. So I needed to
remove it to get the build working.
This is somewhat inconvenient as the latest fedora
comes with cmake 2.8.12 (for ubuntu its 2.8.7) a
On 2014-09-25 08:52, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
2014-09-25 8:30 GMT+02:00 Björn Petri :
[...]
I guess you mean tracking the log_service and not register/unregister,
since that is part of the log_service's implementation itself.
I am not so sure. The boilerplate code for getting the log_service
s
nfiguration properties (like the
rootpath), but those are just minor.
If I have some time, I'll try a bit more in the coming week, and either
add
a remark to this issue, or create new ones.
2014-09-19 17:29 GMT+02:00 Bjoern Petri (JIRA) :
Bjoern Petri c
On 09/10/2014 02:36 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Well then it seems that we - at least for the code style - agreed on
K&R including the following deviations:
- the use of spaces instead of tabs (and tab width of 4, I assume)
- the opening brace on the same line (as eclipse does
nted right now.
Gerrit
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Bjoern Petri
wrote:
Hi everyone,
After replacing a bunch of printf's through fw_log calls and integrating
the log_writer_syslog bundle, I was wondering why the fw_log isn't actually
a serviceTracker to also use the log_service
Hi everyone,
After replacing a bunch of printf's through fw_log calls and integrating
the log_writer_syslog bundle, I was wondering why the fw_log isn't
actually a serviceTracker to also use the log_service (when available).
Is there any reason for that? Wouldn't that make sense?
Regards,
On 09/02/2014 08:33 PM, Pepijn Noltes wrote:
[...]
For example, the Apache httpd code styleguide
https://httpd.apache.org/dev/styleguide.html could be used by us as well?
What do you think?
I do follow the Eclipse K&R style with one change, instead of tabs I use
spaces. I do know most C/C++
Hi everyone,
Some weeks ago, Jan mentioned that we are missing coding guidelines and
I think he has a point there. As I first approach to address this, I
think it would be a good idea to agree on a certain code style guide. As
this is mostly a subjective matter and therefore difficult to deci
Hi Alexander,
In my opinion a good idea, the change simplifies the implementation a
bit by basically reducing the API to request/reply. I can check that I
adapt the SHM implementation within the next days.
Regards,
Bjoern
On 07/25/2014 02:14 PM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Hi people,
Congratulations to everyone from my side as well! Being part of a top
level project feels great - therefore it would be a pleasure for me to
help with the graduation :)
Regards,
Bjoern
On 2014-07-17 14:07, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
Hi all,
Even though it has been a bit quiet on the ma
70 matches
Mail list logo
