Re: Logo?

Hi Folks, Took a min or two to whip up a graphic for consideration. It's quite plain and maybe you guys want to have something a bit more imaginative. I've attached it here but you can also find it on line http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/open_climate_workbench_logo.png On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9

European Agencies

Hi Folks, Are there currently any European organizations using ocw? Are there known existing channels of communication with other end users and/or producers of climate related datasets? Thanks Lewis

Sample Datasets for WebApp

Hi Folks, Does the WebApp come with sample data sets? Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Cannot Run OCW-UI Jasmine Test Suite

Hi Folks, As above LMC-032857:scripts lmcgibbn$ ./test.sh Starting Karma Server --- ERROR [config]: Invalid config file! ReferenceError: JASMINE is not defined at Object. (/usr/local/apache/climate/ocw-ui/frontend/config/karma.

[REQUEST] RCMET/Open Climate Workbench Papers/Presentations

Hi Folks, Can people please edit the following wiki page [0] adding EVERYTHING currently published relating to OCW and RCMES involving OCW. It will really help to have it all in the one place. Thanks Lewis [0] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/editpage.action?pageId=40512583 -- *Lewis*

User Interface Functionality Wiki Page

Hi Mazi, Regarding the OCW-UI page [0] you've added tot he wiki, is there any way that you can substantiate here on what is being described? Is this page meant to describe: * what is currently supported * what is planned for the UI? e.g. roadmap * a list of issues which are being worked on? *

Observations with easy-ocw install from scratch

Hi Folks, I thought it best to post this to the list for others who may be in the process of installing OCW over the next while as we push it forward. I've been overhauling the OCW wiki [0] and arrived at the easy-ocw wiki page [1]. It turns out that this page will soon most likely be deleted. If y

Re Decide on naming for OCW

Hi Cam, On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:46 AM, wrote: > > I agree and thanks for bringing it up. As someone who has been around the > project for a long time I am guilty of using the terms to mean the same > thing. > > The truth is they are no longer one and the same. OCW was extracted from > the RC

[ANNOUNCE] Overhauld of Open Climate Workbench WIki + Website Documentation

Hi Folks, I've been addressing CLIMATE-414 [0] recently and we now have a wiki with up-to-date, structured documentation. Some important notes: the wiki is now structured in the following dead simple manner * *Open Climate Workbench User and Developer One Stop Shop

Decide on naming for OCW

Hi Folks, This thread is my intention to reduce the amount of vocabulary and acronyms within the OCW documentation. With specific focus on RCMET and OCW... can we please change every occurence of RCMET to OCW? The use of effectively two different naming conventions for the same thing is really unti

[DISCUSS] Roadmap for 0.4 OCW Release

Hi Folks, Any ideas about establishing a roadmap? There are some 108 issues marked for 0.4... this is a very large number of issues for a project not long out of the incubator. Possible to set a realistic time frame? Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: Failing OpenDAP tests

Thanks Mike On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:56 AM, wrote: > As some of you have no doubt noticed, the ocw.data_source.dap tests are > failing lately. There seems to be some issue with the opendap servers. The > other day these were completely down and unavailable. At the moment, I have > occasional su

WIKI Documentation and README

Hi Folks, Just a quick note to say that the Wiki documentation, README and generally the codebase is looking less confused and much more approachable. Want to say thanks to all folks who have contributed documentation and also helped add documentation more recently it is a huge help for new comers

Apache OCW on opensource.com

Hi Folks, Please see http://opensource.com/life/14/6/NASA-Earth-science-open-source for a recent article on Apache OCW use at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and beyond. I would like to emphasize the thanks to all users and developers of OCW past and present... Congrats folks. Lewis -- *Lewis*

Important Issue for OCW

Hi Folks, Can someone please refer me to an issue or two that I can get cracking on for OCW? I am looking to get my hands dirty with something that requires some TLC or cranking in general. Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Update Apache OCW with Lund Workshop

Hi Folks, Is it possible to update the Apache OCW [0] site with some detail on the Lund workshop please? It would be great to kee the announcements up-to-date as well as promote the work that everyone is doing in this area. If someone(s) can even send some content they would like included to me (or

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.4 Release

Hi Mike et al., On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Michael Joyce > To: dev@climate.apache.org > Cc: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:13:00 -0700 > Subject: [DISCUSS] 0.4 Release > With the recent resolution of CLIMATE-342 [1] I think we're at

Re: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release

Thank you Paul for running with this. On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, wrote: > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release > Hi Folks, > > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OCW 0.4 release. The > source code is at: > > http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/ > Th

Re: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release

en by all means go. I would please arge you to wait and consider some of my points however. Thanks again for puttign OCW 0.4 together. Brilliant. Lewis On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you Paul for running with this.

Re: OCW1.0

Yep Mike sounds great. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:19 AM, wrote: > > Thanks for bringing this up. I've been meaning to send an email to the list > for some while now regarding a change to our versioning scheme and to start > a discussion about a release roadmap. > > I would like to see the project

Outstanding Issues for 0.4

Hi Folks, Please see *http://s.apache.org/blB * These issues are outanding... no blockers but outstanding none-the-less. Can someone bump these on to 0.5? Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 RC2 Release

Hi Mike, On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:37 AM, wrote: > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 RC2 Release > Hi all, > > The second release candidate for Apache Open Climate Workbench 0.4 is now > available. > > ... > > [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.4 > > Sigs all checkout fine. There is litt

Deprecation of rcmet package in OCW

Hi Folks, So post CLIMATE-523 [0] (still to close off but waiting for Jira Karma) I am in hot pursuit of in particular CLIMATE-535, 536 and 537. These all relate to the use of some now deprecated code contained within the rcmet paackage. Can someone please advise of * what I should be upgrading t

Climate @ NSF Polar Cyberinfrastructure DataVis Hackathon - November 3 - 4, 2014, NYC

Hi Folks, Post integration of Kim's mccsearch work, I proposed a track [0] at the forthcoming hackathon. My aim is for us to hook up with some Polar scientists with the aim of finding a 'topic' of sorts which would benefit from the type of analysis and visualization that OCW currently/would want

Re: Deprecation of rcmet package in OCW

Hi Mike, On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:48 AM, wrote: > Hi Lewis, I think the biggest hurdle for the deprecation of the stuff in > /rcmet is to > > 1: Make sure all of the existing code base code doesn't import from there > (I think we're already at that point, but I'm not positive) > mccsearch rel

Where are builds taking place?

Hi Folks, Where are we testing OCW nightly? Are we doing this at all? Where do the messages come from which are shadowed to Github? I see no build defined within builds.apache.org Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: Where are builds taking place?

Hi Mike, On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:18 PM, wrote: > > Subject: Re: Where are builds taking place? > Builds are run on an external Jenkins with each PR, not nightly. > > > OK. I understood that builds were being triggered on every commit. I am just puzzled as to what is being tested? Are builds su

[DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

Hi Folks, There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW. Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application is now in the codebase. Is it possible for us to collectively define a roadmap for the 0.5 release? Right now everything is tagged as 0.5 release. We've attacked and resolved 21 of 93

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5

Hi Mike, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:07 AM, wrote: > > I've merged pull requests for both of the above issues. Sterling Sir > I believe there are > still some mcsearch license issues being worked in an issue. I think we're > going to be good to go once we get those dealt with. I am all over

Set Definitive Roadmap for 0.5

Hi Folks, As of today we have addressed 40 of 102 issues marked for 0.5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel It would be great to bump everything that we don't intend to release in 0.5 to $next_release. This can easily be

Re: Set Definitive Roadmap for 0.5

to step up to the plate and take release manager role on. On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > As of today we have addressed 40 of 102 issues marked for 0.5. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira

Re: [VOTE] Apache Open Climate Workbench 0.5 RC1 Release

Hi Mike, Excellent effort in getting this out so quickly. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:35 AM, wrote: > > The tag for this release is available at: > http://s.apache.org/JTzz > Tag looks fantastic, I am never surprised at how much work this small community fo develoeprs does. https://git-wip-us.apa

Building Climate Docs

Hi Folks, After getting back a beautifully clean laptop, I tried to build the climate docs with Running Sphinx v1.2.2 under Python 2.7.8 lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 /usr/local/climate(master) $ cd docs && make html sphinx-build -b html -d build/doctrees source build/html Making output directory... Runni

Re: Building Climate Docs

t to address this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-562 Thanks folks Lewis On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > After getting back a beautifully clean laptop, I tried to build the > climate docs wit

Pushing 0.5 RC#1

Hi Folks, I am on digest emails so I have lost the thread in my email, however looking at the VOTE thread for the 0.5 release it would appear that we are good to go with the release http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40climate.apache.org/msg02480.html Is there anything which is blocking this (apart fr

[VOTE] Apache Open Climate Workbench Logo

Hi Folks, I would like to call a VOTE on the logo for OCW. We have been blessed that Christopher Hawley developed some kick ass logo's for us. It is now about time we made use of the effort which went in to this. So, the VOTE is as follows, as per Jira issue CLIMATE-30 [0] we have amongst 4 logo's

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Science and Healthcare Track @ApacheCon NA 2015

Hi Folks, Apologies for cross posting :( As some of you may already know, @ApacheCon NA 2015 is happening in Austin, TX April 13th-16th. This email is specifically written to attract all folks interested in Science and Healthcare... this is an official call to arms! I am aware that there are man

Re: Pushing 0.5 RC#1

Hi Mike, On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:10 AM, wrote: > > We're missing a +1 on the release still I believe. Damn > I think everything got a > bit buried over the holidays :) > > No joke. My liver is the size of a largish seal pup. Would be fantastic to see someone else review this candidate. For

[RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache Open Climate Workbench Logo

chael Joyse Chris Mattmann [1] ocw-logo-variant-sm-02-01.png [2] Maziyar Boustani* [1] ocw-logo-variant-sm-03-01.png [3] Lewis John McGibbney* [0] ocw-logo-variant-sm-04-01.png [4] *PMC binding SO, I am happy to say that logo #1 wins by quite a margin. I'm going to start general thread on how a

Climate Website

Hello Folks, Now that the project logo VOTE is finished I wondered it we could start a thread here in an attempt to move on. What do we want to do? New website? 'Just' implement the logo? What do you guys think? Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: Pushing 0.5 RC#1

Hi Paul, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:11 PM, wrote: > > "largish seal pup" Love it :). > > ;)

Re: [RELEASE] Apache Open Climate Workbench 0.5

Hi Mike, Good job with this. Good job Sir. Lewis On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:31 AM, wrote: > > Hi all, > > Apache OCW 0.5 has been released. It's available at [1] for the moment. I > will update the website once the mirrors update. Thanks for all the hard > work everyone! > > [1] https://dist.apa

Updating setup.py

Hi Folks, Are the updates to the version in setup.py to be done post release? Do we currently have any procedure for this? If not can we update and formally document it within the release procedure? Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

OCW Mater Jenkins Build

Hi Folks, I'm in the process of getting a Jenkins job on builds.apache.org sorted out *http://s.apache.org/G6w * As I expected with Python project of this nature, there are a number of issues I am encountering but I'll update here once I've got it sorted out. We can then

Re: Updating setup.py

Hi Mike, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:10 PM, wrote: > > We should definitely add a step to the release docs (if it's not already > there). I'm pretty positive I forget to update this along with the DOAP for > the last release. > > > DONE. This is an easy one to forget. Now it is in release docs we

[DISCUSS] Google Summer of Code

Hi Folks, Does anyone have any decent ideas for a GSoC project for OCW? Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: Discussions mostly in Github?

Hi Folks, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, wrote: > > I notice that most of the discussions around dev for the project > are occurring on Github issues. I think if they are architecturally > relevant and things like that, they should happen here on dev, > with a noticeable subject line and requ

Re: Project Workflow

Hi Jimmy, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, wrote: > Since this has been brought up a few times on various tickets I thought now > would be a good time to go over our project workflow and make sure it's > working for us. > Excellent idea! > > A general overview of the workflow that we use is

Re: Project Workflow

Hi Chris, Responses inline On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, wrote: > > I don’t think we should dictate everything be code reviewed. 72 hours seems pretty permissive to me. I would comment that I see it as a different case where comments are provided and not addressed. I also don't think that

Re: Project Workflow

Hi Kyo, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:05 PM, wrote: > > This debate just wastes my time. > ! Why ! > I am not simply talking about the advantages or disadvantages. Advantages or disadvantages of what? The Workflow? > The old one > has serious problems. The old what? The Workflow? It is if t

Re: Project Workflow

Hi Chris, Please see replies inline On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:10 PM, wrote: > > I’m honestly not sure what you are talking about, Not even one wee bit ;) maybe some of my replies will bridge the gap between you not being sure about what I am talking about Vs disagreeing with what I am trying t

Re: Project Workflow

I am hoping we can remove the barriers and enable you to commit your contributions as you should have been able to do ages ago. On Tuesday, May 12, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > Hi Chris, > Please see replies inline > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:10 PM, > > wrote: &g

Re: dev Digest 25 Jun 2015 12:50:50 -0000 Issue 382

Hi Omkar, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:50 AM, wrote: > > > > I am a newbie to the project. Someone please help me to get > started. > > You can get started with OCW by picking up, trying and testing (for your own scientific use case) the code at http://climate.apache.org/downloads.html

Re: Getting Started.

Hey Omkar, On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:14 AM, wrote: > > I have already forked the git repository and started working on it. Great > No, I > don't have any research problem in mind, I am new to open source > development and this is my first contribution. Congratulations! > I think I have f

[DISCUSS] Release/Roadmap for 1.0

Hi Team, A number of issues have been addressed since 0.5 was released. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel In fact 45 of 146. So thats a whack. Anyone want to make an effort as specifying a roadmap for 1.0 release? I have

Re: [DISCUSS] Release/Roadmap for 1.0

Hi Folks, Well I bumped all remaining issues (>100) over to 1.1 for fix version. There have been 45 issues fixed in 0.5 --> 1.0 development drive so congratulations folks. Quite an undertaking to those who have been hammering away week after week on addressing important issues. Good work. Does any

[VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

Hi all, The second release candidate for Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0 is now available. The tag for this release is available at: *http://s.apache.org/1.0.0rc1 * Release artifacts are available for review at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/climate/1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

Nudge folks. Anyone else able to VOTE on this release? Guidance for voting on releases can be found at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list Thanks in advance. Lewis On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

eview process is probably THE most important thing that a member of the community can do. Thanks very much in advance. Lewis On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nudge folks. > Anyone else able to VOTE on this release? > Gu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

Hi Team, I am going to push this VOTE out to the Incubator community with he aim of obtaining some VOTE's. I'll wait until the end of today until I put the VOTE through to the Incubator community. Thanks Lewis On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gma

Fwd: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

would like to utilize and leverage the resources of the IPMC to review and determine the outcome of OCW 1.0.0. Thank you IPMC for your review, please direct any issues to dev@climate Lewis (on behalf of OCW PMC) [0] http://climate.apache.org/ -- Forwarded message -- From: Lewis John

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

Hi Justin, John D. and others, On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:47 PM, wrote: > > > Ok... read a little more. > > OCW is no longer a podling under incubation. It has its own PMC. The > IPMC's votes are not binding on the release, I would think. Apache OCW is a graduated project which currently r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

ttp://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#jkim> Jinwon Kim *joyce <http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#joyce>* * Michael James Joyce* lcarriere <http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#lcarriere> Laura Carriere *lewismc <http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html

Re: dev Digest 23 Sep 2015 16:49:12 -0000 Issue 411

Hi Kyo, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, wrote: > > -1 Do not release the package because there are many important pull > requests under pending now. >I just wonder if there are any reasons to expedite the release. > > Thanks, > Kyo > > Thanks for taking the time to VOTE. I would urge you to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

aniel Gruno [1] -1 Kyo Lee* *OCW Project Management Committee binding VOTE Lewis On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kyo, > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, > wrote: > >> >> -1 Do not release the pa

[RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

Lewis On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > Can everyone please have a look at the authoritative source on how the > VOTE'ing structure works. > http://apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > This is

[DISCUSS] Setting Roadmaps for OCW Moving Forward

Hi Folks, I would like to kick off a very important and long overdue conversation here on list, with anyone watching, monitoring and/or reading their OCW mail, about how we can set more realistic, strategic roadmap's for releasing the project software as official Apache releases. Some thoughts on m

Re: [DISCUSS] Setting Roadmaps for OCW Moving Forward

to be realistic on what the capabilities of the PMC are when those who are active on the project struggle for close to 1 month to get a release VOTE'd on. Thanks very much for reading. I hope the above provides us with some talking points. Lewis On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Le

Description of Metrics

Hi Folks, I can't find a description... anywhere... of the metrics available within OCW. Apart from the Python documentation (which is not publicly available and needs to be built manually) is there ANY resource which states which metrics we have. I am aware that RCMES references some metrics [0],

Re: [DISCUSS] Setting Roadmaps for OCW Moving Forward

Hi Paul, On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:16 PM, wrote: > > I haven't been active on this project but since merit doesn't expire I > wanted to make an observation here. While I know technically the vote > passed I think that having a -1 from one of the current core contributors > should have been give

Re: [DISCUSS] Setting Roadmaps for OCW Moving Forward

Hi Tom, What a pleasant surprise :) On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:16 PM, wrote: > > From an outsiders point of view, this whole OCW release has made > interesting viewing :) > > No joke ;) > Hopefully you wont mind me adding my 2c, and I don't use the platform so > this is purely hypothetical. >

Re: Description of Metrics

for any of this within OCW? Thanks Lewis On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > I can't find a description... anywhere... of the metrics available within > OCW. > Apart from the Python documentation (which is

[ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

Hello Folks, The Apache Open Climate Workbench community is pleased to announce the 1.0.0 release! This release addresses no less than 52 issues, bugs, and improvements. For a full breakdown of the work packaged into this release please see the release report .

Targeting OCW User Communities Post-Release

Hi Team, Anyone able to help me compile a list of communities who would be interested in hearing about our recent OCW release? So far I've got - ESGS Users: user@esgf - ESGS Developers: dev@esgf - NARCCAP: narccap@ucar*.*edu - NOAA lists - https://list.woc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/mailman/lis

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Open Climate Workbench 1.0.0

Hi Martin, Fixed. Thank you. Lewis On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > Hey Lewis > > http://www.us.apache.org/dist/climate/1.0.0/climate-1.0.0.zip > 404 > > is US down for the count? > > Please advise, > Martin Gainty > __ > > > >

Re: Targeting OCW User Communities Post-Release

takes the time to promote future releases and drive the word that we are releasing code. Thanks Lewis On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > Anyone able to help me compile a list of communities who would be > interested

Roadmap for 1.1

Hi Folks, Can we set a release roadmap for 1.1 with the aim of getting some key metrics in and pushing another release in the short term? I am going to focus on the issues assigned to me. That is all. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-562?jql=project%20%3D%20CLIMATE%20AND%20resolution%

Re: Help required in acquiring data for climate modelling in Sri Lanka

Hi Gayashan, On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:25 AM, wrote: > > I am a lecturer from the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, > University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. We are conducting a research on the > "Effect of climate change on wind power generation potential in North > Western coastal are

Re: Roadmap for 1.1

consensus on when the codebase is ready for release? Any thoughts? Thanks Lewis On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > Can we set a release roadmap for 1.1 with the aim of getting some key > metrics in and pushing ano

Re: Roadmap for 1.1

Hi Kyo, Please see replies inline On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:37 AM, wrote: > > I agree with that CLIMATE-611 is a critical issue. > > For me, these are important issues to be addressed before releasing a new > version. > > I. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-679 > : Without working

[ROADMAP] OCW 1.1 RELEASE ROADMAP

Hi dev@, A while ago we discussed maintaining a Roadmap for OCW. This way we can reach consensus on when a release is due. We use an issue tracker so that we can plan these things and work together to reach mutual goals which enable us to release stable code and build our community. I would like to

[DISCUSS] OCW 1.1. Release

Hi Folks, 50 issues have been addressed within the 1.1 development drive so far. There are some 15 open issues assigned against 1.1 meaning that we would need to resolve these issues before we could release. I noticed that there are 5 Blocking issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-61

ANNOUNCE] New Committer + PMC Member Omkar Reddy

Hi dev@, Really pleased to say that we welcome Omkar Reddy who has joined the OCW Project Management Committee and as a Project Contributor. We're pleased to have him join us. @Omkar, please feel free to say a bit about yourself if you want. Best Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: [DISCUSS] OCW 1.1. Release

at 10:53 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > 50 issues have been addressed within the 1.1 development drive so far. > There are some 15 open issues assigned against 1.1 meaning that we would > need to resolve these issues before we could re

Issue Tracking

Hi Omkar, Good job on committing CLIMATE-379. Here are some pointers to make your life a bit easier. 1. When you open a pull request in Github please name the issue after the issue created in Jira. E.g. CLIMATE-379 - Allows dataset customisation (you did this fine) 2. When you make a c

Re: [DISCUSS] OCW 1.1. Release

Hi Kyo, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:05 AM, wrote: > Last time, I heard that users could install OCW 1.1 and dependency via pip > or conda install. > This easy-to-install packaging is what I think the most important before > releasing 1.1 > Is there any progress in packaging OCW? Can I test? Ple

Apache Open Climate Workbench PoweredBy

Hi press@, Can we (OCW community), please get a powered by sticker? Out logo is here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/climate/site/trunk/content/images/ocw-logo-variant-sm-01-01.png Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: Apache Open Climate Workbench PoweredBy

Thanks Sally :) Thanks very much. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Sally Khudairi wrote: > Thanks, Lewis. > > I'll see if I can get this done by next week. > > Warmly, > Sally > > > > ------ > *From:* Lewis John Mcgibbney &g

INFRA-11149 Establish new VM at ocw-vm.apache.org

Hi dev@, I've requested us a VM in order to host the public service offering the ocw-ui. If you require/wish for access to the VM then please add your name and Apache email at the following ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11149 Thanks Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: Request for editing the wiki.

Hi Chris & Mike, Can you, as admins please grant Omkar and Michael write access to the OCW wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/ Thanks Lewis On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:23 AM, wrote: > > Hello @dev, >Can someone please grant me the rights to edit the > documenta

Re: Dataset Select Does Not Load

Hi Michael, Nice catch indeed! If you were able to submit a test for this all the better. Thanks On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:57 AM, wrote: > A spotted it! > > When the variable is set, it is a Boolean. > > $scope.fileLoadFailed = true; > > or > > $scope.fileLoadFailed = false; > > When it does

Re: GSoC Contribution

Hi Ibrahim, On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:42 AM, wrote: > > From: Ibrahim Jarif > To: dev@climate.apache.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:41:59 +0530 > Subject: GSoC Contribution > Hello Developers, > My name is Ibrahim Jarif and I'm from India. I wish to apply for GSoC'16 > for the Apache Ope

Re: Anaconda package in OCW

Hi Ibrahim, On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:42 AM, wrote: > From: Ibrahim Jarif > To: dev@climate.apache.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:51:28 +0530 > Subject: Anaconda package in OCW > Why does the easy-ocw/install-ubuntu.sh script install Anaconda (480 mb) ? > > All the packages are installed

Re: test_dap.py fails / setup_class vs. setUpClass

Hi Michael, First and foremost thanks to you (and anyone else) for looking in to the tests. It's been on my TODO for way too long now. Answers at bottom On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 PM, wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Michael Anderson > To: dev@climate.apache.org > Cc:

Re: Two More Minor Points On test_dap.py

Hi Michael, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 PM, wrote: > From: Michael Anderson > To: dev@climate.apache.org > Cc: > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:30:01 -0500 > Subject: Two More Minor Points On test_dap.py > Two more quick notes on test_day.py: > > def test_correct_time_shape(self): > self.assert

Re: Permission To Edit Wiki

Hi Michael, On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 PM, wrote: > Could I please get permission to edit this page: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31824167 > > I have some small corrections. > > Yes, please send me (lewis dot mcgibbney at gmail dot com) your wiki usernam

Re: esg-datanode.jpl.nasa.gov Is This A Valid Server?

Hi Michael, I was speaking with Luca last week, Luca is the primary JPL contact for the ESGF and he informed me that some aspect of the ESGF was attacked in some way. I will check in with him again and get him to update you here. If he doesn't then i will. Thanks Lewis On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:59

GSoC 2016 Ideas Overlap

Hi Ibrahim and Omkar, We have an overlap with regards to GSoC 2016. You both are interested in addressing [0]... which on one hand is absolutely GREAT. On the other hand however it may be best for us to work with the OCW community to get advice on other projects which may be appealing for GSoC 2016

Re: esg-datanode.jpl.nasa.gov Is This A Valid Server?

Hi Michael, Just checking in here. Did you manage to sort this out? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:48 AM, wrote: > From: Michael Anderson > To: dev@climate.apache.org > Cc: > Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 09:18:26 -0500 > Subject: Re: esg-datanode.jpl.nasa.gov Is This A Valid Server? > https://esg-datanode

Adding Apache OCW Master Branch Build to Apache Travic CI Queue WAS Re: Add Build Status to README.md

hi builds@, The OCW community wishes to have OCW master build configured on https://travis-ci.org/apache, we do not however know how to register the build. Can you help us out please? Thanks On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Ibrahim Jarif wrote: > Hey There! > > The Travis-CI build is working fine

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >