Re: Review Request: updated cloud-early-config to wait for the interfaces to IP come up

> On April 20, 2013, 4:33 a.m., Anthony Urso wrote: > > Ship It! committed - Abhinandan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10647/#review19502

Re: Unable to add XenServer host to basic zone

Sure prasanna. Will submit the patch. Thanks Sent from Samsung tablet prasanna wrote: On 19 April 2013 16:29, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing the following issue on the MASTER build. Currently I filled it > with priority set to "critical". If anyone else seeing the

Re: Review Request: updated cloud-early-config to wait for the interfaces to IP come up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10647/#review19502 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Anthony Urso On April 19, 2013, 12:06 p.m.,

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 81e1ba3

On 20/04/13 1:09 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Marcus Sorensen >wrote: > >> Er, I guess you're asking about the mkdir specifically. I have no idea >>why >> we'd be doing that in the first place, I'd also be interested in knowing >> that. >> > > >One of the hacks to

Re: Review Request: Storage motion changes for xenserver

Yes, I think you should propose Devdeep and few others to be a committer. The others I will discuss with Alex when he is in Hyd on Monday. On 19/04/13 10:40 PM, "Edison Su" wrote: >Sorry, I don't realize you are not a committer yet. BTW, let me nominate >you as a commiter. > >> -Original Mes

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101 OVS support in KVM

ASF 4.1 cloudstack with openvswitch support for RHEL 6.3 KVM test configuration setup: After completing http://nullworks.wordpress.com/2012/09/19/kvm-and-openvswitch-on-centos-6-3-minimal/ to setup RHEL 6.3 openvswitch, encountered following problems: 1. In this scenario, after servic

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

yea, so you can play with that and see if it makes any difference. Iptables may be blocking access to your consoleproxy's service, or something else. On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Output: > > [root@gizmo scripts]# cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge* > 1 > 1 > 1 > 0 > 0 >

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

Output: [root@gizmo scripts]# cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge*11100[root@gizmo scripts]# On Apr 19, 2013, at 07:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:what do you see in: cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge* ? I think I've seen issues with these being set to 1, but I think it might need to be set to 1 if you'

Re: DnsNotifier Example

Thanks, that fixed my problem. -Soheil On 4/18/13 11:50 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: > >Since its a example class, its not added in the client war file that jetty >runs. Please add a dependency in client/pom.xml as below > > > org.apache.cloudstack > cloud-plugin-example-dns-notifier > ${pro

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

what do you see in: cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge* ? I think I've seen issues with these being set to 1, but I think it might need to be set to 1 if you're using security groups. On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > What do you see in : > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

What do you see in : On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > I've tried it with them disabled (iptables get written) and enabled (the > same issue) > > The cron job seemed to do the trick, until someone just mentioned to try: > > iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 5900:6

Re: ebtables

I don't remember exactly, but if you look at what IS allowed in the ebtables output, this will show you example rules. On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Great -- My ebtables rules are back in place. Now, how can I go about > dropping the rule to allow a secondary IP traffi

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013, at 04:43 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Sadly -1 (binding) > nonoss doesn't build with the release tarball. > I think the problem is version in the vmware-base pom not being updated. Ac

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

Thanks for your response Chiradeep. 2013/4/19 Chiradeep Vittal > Increasing cores won't get you much since the current VR (4.1) linux > 2.6.32 where the networking tends to be single-core only. Otherwise YMMV ! > Increasing memory also does not give you much -- the bottleneck is the > memory us

RE: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 6:41 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Chan wrote: > > > > > -Original Message

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

-1 for the same reason David mentions below. Changing the vmware-base pom version from 4.0.2-SNAPSHOT to 4.0.2 fixes the build for me. - Original Message - From: "David Nalley" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 4:43:31 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apach

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

> > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > Sadly -1 (binding) nonoss doesn't build with the release tarball. I think the problem is version in the vmware-base pom not being updated. --David

Re: [ACS41] Quick update on status

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:17:27AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > My plan is to cut the RC on Monday for 4.1.0. > > I'm waiting for final word on the fix that Hugo's working on for > CLOUDSTACK-2092, which he says he'll be done by COB his time today. This is done. > > I have a task

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

Increasing cores won't get you much since the current VR (4.1) linux 2.6.32 where the networking tends to be single-core only. Otherwise YMMV ! Increasing memory also does not give you much -- the bottleneck is the memory used to store conn track connections -- 512mB will get you about 1 million co

Re: ebtables

<<< text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII: Unrecognized >>>

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

I've tried it with them disabled (iptables get written) and enabled (the same issue) The cron job seemed to do the trick, until someone just mentioned to try:   iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 5900:6100 -j ACCEPTThat's not working, so I am going back to my cronjob!- MauriceOn Apr 19, 2013,

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

Marcus, here is that output you mentioned -- To avoid this from happening, I run a cronjob to clear the tables ever so often, as to not repopulate and cause issues.Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 13136 packets, 71M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source   destination

Re: no tinyLinux template

Yeah, the VHD file at that location is about 50 MB. On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, I generally revert to the DevCloud2 initial state whenever I > create a > > new CS data

[Discuss] UI for the Dedicated VLANs per Tenant

Hi, I am doing the QA for the feature Dedicated VLANs per Tenant and I had some queries about what kind of UI will be there for this feature. In the current implementation after introduction of Non-contiguous VLANs we have the following : 1. If there is an existing VLAN range IP1 - IP10

Re: CS 4.0.0 - mysql server connections aborted

Hello Chiradeep, Thanks for your response, i'm going to look this more precisely. I'm going back when got more results. Regards, Benoit. 2013/4/18 Chiradeep Vittal > There should be a way for MySQL to log the connections that get aborted. > At least it will tell you if it was the client t

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

Hello Chiradeep, So with a VR running on a x5550 hexacore with not enough noisy neighboors with a computing offering with 4 core, 4 gb ram, i can hope to run 20 vlans with a total troughput of 2 gb max with 10 ip load balanced (each onto 3 vms) for a total amount of 3k connections (max, avg at 500

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 81e1ba3

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Er, I guess you're asking about the mkdir specifically. I have no idea why > we'd be doing that in the first place, I'd also be interested in knowing > that. > One of the hacks to make sure a file does not get created on a *nix fs is to r

Re: no tinyLinux template

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Yeah, I generally revert to the DevCloud2 initial state whenever I create a > new CS database...just to be on the safe side. > > I see this folder: > > /opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/5/ (the path is a

Re: no tinyLinux template

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Edison Su wrote: > The default ttylinux template does not pre-installed in latest devcloud2 > virtualbox image, and the system vm can't access public network, thus, > can't download tty template. > Either it should be fixed by Rohit and upload an new image to his

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: Fix bash if/else logic to avoid redundant entries in htaccess file, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata RewriteRules

I wonder what I'm doing wrong. I've attempted to submit a second patch to address Chiradeeps comment, use Update Diff, placed parent and child diffs, and review board - died yet again. > -Original Message- > From: ilya musayev [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of ilya > musa

KVM host ( CentOS 6.3 ) can't back from down

Hi Cloudstack v. 4.0.1 KVM host : CentOS 6.3 libvirt 1.0.1 qemu 1.2.0 After power loss server can't back online ( UP) still in status "Down" with following error in agent log : 2013-04-19 22:12:35,932 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] (Agent-Handler-1:null) Executing: /usr/lib64/c

Re: no tinyLinux template

Yeah, I generally revert to the DevCloud2 initial state whenever I create a new CS database...just to be on the safe side. I see this folder: /opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/5/ (the path is a little different from yours) It has a VHD file in it. I looked at devcloud.cfg in the hopes that

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

That's reflected by this line: ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywheretcp dpts:vnc-server:synchronet-db Although we don't know what interfaces it applies to because we don't have an 'iptables -L -v' If stopping iptables fixes Maurice's problem it would be interesting to kno

RE: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

This rule will reject all the ingress activities: "REJECT all -- anywhere anywherereject-with icmp-host-prohibited" You can try: iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 5900:6100 -j ACCEPT to allow console access. From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com] S

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: Fix bash if/else logic to avoid redundant entries in htaccess file, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata RewriteRules

> On April 18, 2013, 11:36 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > patches/systemvm/debian/config/root/userdata.sh, line 79 > > > > > > why is this needed? shouldn't the first rewrite rule be sufficient? > > See comments abo

RE: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

> -Original Message- > From: Jason Pavao [mailto:jason.pa...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 8:50 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Maurice Lawler; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console > > Maurice, > I was having the same issues, I

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: Fix bash if/else logic to avoid redundant entries in htaccess file, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata RewriteRules

> On April 18, 2013, 11:36 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > Is the fundamental problem that the data is available under > > /latest/metadata instead of /latest/meta-data ? > > cloud-init (as of 0.7.2) uses the uripath '/latest/meta-data' (meta-data is the default in the boto APIs and the clou

RE: no tinyLinux template

The default ttylinux template does not pre-installed in latest devcloud2 virtualbox image, and the system vm can't access public network, thus, can't download tty template. Either it should be fixed by Rohit and upload an new image to his devcloud2 link(http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudst

Re: ebtables

you can go back and disable security groups in the zone if you don't care about the ebtables rules, or you can start up ebtables and then restart any associated VMs through cloudstack. The rules are dynamic, so they're not going to be saved anywhere on the host to be reinstated, they have to be rea

RE: [MERGE] Mixed zone management

Mixed zone management functionality is now ready and merged to master. Thanks! Brian -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:58 PM To: Chip Childers Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sonny Chhen; Jessica Wang; Pra

Re: what are the technical reason for not supporting security groups on ovs?

Security groups are stateful firewalls -- currently it is not possible to do stateful firewalling inside OVS (you could write a controller or buy one that does it however). KVM (linux v 3.2 onwards) now has the ability to chain OVS and bridge so technically it should be possible only on those hyper

Re: ebtables

Anyone know how to correct my mistake? - Maurice On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:01 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Perhaps this was not the best thing, now my ports are open; how can I revert > back to eatables. > > Along with that, when reverted, how can I drop rules for a particular VM to > allow com

RE: Review Request: Storage motion changes for xenserver

Sorry, I don't realize you are not a committer yet. BTW, let me nominate you as a commiter. > -Original Message- > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:44 AM > To: Edison Su; Anthony Xu; Abhinandan Prateek (aprat...@apache.org); > Alex H

Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > > Pardon my ignorance of project management, but it appears to me we are > talking of managing a release after half way through the cycle. May be > this is orthogonal discussion, but how about taking approach of planning a > release e

Re: no tinyLinux template

FWIW, I always revert to the initial snapshot of devcloud2 before switching contexts. You should also check select * from template_host_ref where template_id = 5; And inside DevCloud2 ls /opt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/5/ And, inside the SSVM ps -ef | grep java On 4/18/13 9:54 PM, "Mike Tutkowsk

Re: New Committer: Go Chiba

Congrats On 4/17/13 11:56 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go >Chiba to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they >have accepted. > >Go has contributed tremendously to the Japanese translations of the >docu

Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

So while I will agree that in person communication is faster, and has higher throughput, it's not without problems for decision making for this community. First it dramatically raises the barrier to participation. This is supposed to be a meritocracy. But shifting decisions, especially important d

Re: [SCREENCAST] 4.0.2 testing procedure

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:53:14AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > I just uploaded an HD screencast that shows me testing the 4.0.2 release: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvgIkF1e1QE&list=PLb899uhkHRoZCRE00h_9CRgUSiHEgFDbC&index=1 > > Check it out and do it yourself, then vote !!! >

Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 08:40:48AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > I like this idea too, this will be a much better channel for community to > understand features to be planned. +1 to this. > > -min > > On 4/19/13 7:02 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: > > >On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, Mura

RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

If you do additional tests or update any results, you can edit that page and update it. Otherwise I just copied your email, If you don't mind, can you add a note to the ticket on the testing done and close them. Thanks -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphi

[SCREENCAST] 4.0.2 testing procedure

Hi, I just uploaded an HD screencast that shows me testing the 4.0.2 release: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvgIkF1e1QE&list=PLb899uhkHRoZCRE00h_9CRgUSiHEgFDbC&index=1 Check it out and do it yourself, then vote !!! -Sebastien

Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

I like this idea too, this will be a much better channel for community to understand features to be planned. +1 to this. -min On 4/19/13 7:02 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: >> >> Pardon my ignorance of project management, but it a

Re: failing mvn -P deps in CS 4.0.1

okay... thanks for your suggestion. i'll try it and post the conclusion later 2013/4/19 Chip Childers > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:47:58PM +0700, Ajimangun lintang mas wrote: > > how about your internet connectivity? with proxy or vpn too or not? > > Sorry, but I never access the internet via p

Re: failing mvn -P deps in CS 4.0.1

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:47:58PM +0700, Ajimangun lintang mas wrote: > how about your internet connectivity? with proxy or vpn too or not? Sorry, but I never access the internet via proxy or vpn. You'll have to look for help on general maven functionality when through a proxy. This is definite

Re: failing mvn -P deps in CS 4.0.1

how about your internet connectivity? with proxy or vpn too or not? 2013/4/19 Chip Childers > On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Ajimangun lintang mas > wrote: > > > yes, my pc connected to vpn for internet connectivity. this problem comes > > from maven/pom configuration or about internet connectiv

Re: 4.1 Build Stalls

Thanks for looking into that! :) On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I took a look at the NioTest y'day but forgot to email back. It seems > like there is server created and a client and until the client link > comes up we wait on a never ending while loop. Sometimes th

Re: [ACS42][QA]Issues with latest Master Build (Xenserver)

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:47:04PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > When I deploy a Vm with service offering that has memory requirement > set to 200.00 MB , Vm is in "Running" state but it actually has > kernel panic. > > I am able to deploy Vms successfully only using "Small Instance" > servi

RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

Hy Sudha Both tickets can be closed. I am not sure what to do with the page you created for me. Do you want me to copy the table below, with the fail changed to pass, in a new child page there? Regards, Daan Hoogland -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@ci

Re: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:19:12PM +, Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > > Hugo fixed the issue in the nicira code that I came up with: commit > 44097eecef0a8695946efc9f62d2373945c79f7b contains the fix. The issue now has > a unit test, com.cloud.network.element.NiciraNvpElementTest to assure it

RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

LS, Hugo fixed the issue in the nicira code that I came up with: commit 44097eecef0a8695946efc9f62d2373945c79f7b contains the fix. The issue now has a unit test, com.cloud.network.element.NiciraNvpElementTest to assure it remains working properly. CLOUDSTACK-2092 will be closed by Hugo. Regard

Re: 4.1 Build Stalls

I took a look at the NioTest y'day but forgot to email back. It seems like there is server created and a client and until the client link comes up we wait on a never ending while loop. Sometimes that clientLink doesn't initialize when this stalling happens. I'll have to see how wireless affects th

Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:16:35AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > > Pardon my ignorance of project management, but it appears to me we are > talking of managing a release after half way through the cycle. May be > this is orthogonal discussion, but how about taking approach of planning a > release e

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1647: IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:51:56AM +, Saksham Srivastava wrote: > > > > On April 18, 2013, 5:21 p.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java, line 1888 > > > > > > > > >

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1647: IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/#review19453 --- These new methods are *prime* candidates for having unit tests. Ple

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013, at 08:12 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tested : > * Clean installation on clean Xen Hypervisors > * Upgrade from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 with clean database > * Upgrade from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 with copy of a production database > * Nicira L2 Features (QA NVP 001-006 and NVP

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013, at 07:25 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > tested based on procedure (except the comparison with git) > tested ec2 functionality as well. Thanks! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I tested based on the procedure outlined in the test document (after > editing it a bit). I did not test the EC2 functionality, but I did > explore outside of the standard functional path. Thanks for taking the time to te

Re: failing mvn -P deps in CS 4.0.1

On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:01 AM, Ajimangun lintang mas wrote: > yes, my pc connected to vpn for internet connectivity. this problem comes > from maven/pom configuration or about internet connectivity? I can tell you that I'm not having any issues. > > 2013/4/18 Chip Childers > >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2

Re: Review Request: add state change in createVolume back to Allocated if anything fails

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10623/#review19452 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On April 19, 2013, 4:59 a.m.,

[ACS41] Quick update on status

Hi all, My plan is to cut the RC on Monday for 4.1.0. I'm waiting for final word on the fix that Hugo's working on for CLOUDSTACK-2092, which he says he'll be done by COB his time today. I have a task to modify our release procedure to account for some of the changes we can make after graduation

RE: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

+1 (binding) Tested : * Clean installation on clean Xen Hypervisors * Upgrade from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 with clean database * Upgrade from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2 with copy of a production database * Nicira L2 Features (QA NVP 001-006 and NVP 101-106) General test procedure: Setup zone (with XenServer) Crea

Re: [VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

+1 (binding) tested based on procedure (except the comparison with git) tested ec2 functionality as well. On Apr 18, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I tested based on the procedure outlined in the test document (after > editing it a bit). I did not test the EC2 func

Re: Review Request: updated cloud-early-config to wait for the interfaces to IP come up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10647/#review19451 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On April 19, 2013, 12:06

Review Request: updated cloud-early-config to wait for the interfaces to IP come up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10647/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Anthony Urso, Abhinandan Prateek, and edison su.

Re: failing mvn -P deps in CS 4.0.1

yes, my pc connected to vpn for internet connectivity. this problem comes from maven/pom configuration or about internet connectivity? 2013/4/18 Chip Childers > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:11:42PM +0700, Ajimangun lintang mas wrote: > > # mvn -P deps > > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > > Downlo

[ACS42][QA]Review Request : CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan

Hi, CISCO ASA 1000v Firewall Integration Test Plan : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CISCO+ASA+Firewall+Test+Plan Please review the test plan and provide the inputs. Jira ID: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742 FS: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/d

ReviewRequest: Storage XenMotion Test Plan

Please review the test plan for Storage XenMotion and post your comments if any. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+Xenmotion+Test+Plan Thanks, ~Talluri

Re: Unable to add XenServer host to basic zone

On 19 April 2013 16:29, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing the following issue on the MASTER build. Currently I filled it > with priority set to "critical". If anyone else seeing the same either you > can apply the workaround mentioned in the bug or you can raise the priorit

Unable to add XenServer host to basic zone

Hi, I am seeing the following issue on the MASTER build. Currently I filled it with priority set to "critical". If anyone else seeing the same either you can apply the workaround mentioned in the bug or you can raise the priority. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2115 - [BasicZo

Re: Review Request: NPE while migrating volume

> On April 19, 2013, 10:43 a.m., Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > Ship It! committed - Abhinandan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10539/#review19449 -

RE: what are the technical reason for not supporting security groups on ovs?

By mistake, hit the send button before writing the actual message Looks like cloudstack + Xen only supports SecurityGroups with bridge as backend. Can someone shed some light on the technical reasons behind we we don't support it on OVS? Thanks, SWAMY -Original Message- From: Venkata

Re: Review Request: NPE while migrating volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10539/#review19449 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On April 19, 2013, 9:34 a

what are the technical reason for not supporting security groups on ovs?

Thanks, SWAMY

Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

Pardon my ignorance of project management, but it appears to me we are talking of managing a release after half way through the cycle. May be this is orthogonal discussion, but how about taking approach of planning a release early in the cycle (at least for future releases)? Having a time window b

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1647: IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

> On April 18, 2013, 5:21 p.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java, line 1888 > > > > > > This code seems dueplicated because the logic to calculate reserved ip > > r

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1647: IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/ --- (Updated April 19, 2013, 9:45 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Murali Reddy

Re: Review Request: NPE while migrating volume

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10539/ --- (Updated April 19, 2013, 9:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and edison su

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1786: While reserving IPs in guest network, if guestvmcidr is a subset of network cidr but not a subset of cidr, exception is thrown.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10084/#review19447 --- Ship it! Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: ea893eaf338bfe914e1cb995

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1786: While reserving IPs in guest network, if guestvmcidr is a subset of network cidr but not a subset of cidr, exception is thrown.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10084/#review19446 --- Commit ea893eaf338bfe914e1cb99517a8429128a64152 in branch refs/heads

Re: Create rbd primary storage fail in CS 4.0.1

Hi, On 04/19/2013 08:48 AM, Guangjian Liu wrote: Ceph file system can added as Primary storage by RBD, Thanks. Great! Now I meet the problem in creating VM to Ceph. First I create computer offer and storage offer with tag "ceph", and define Ceph Primary storage with tag "ceph". Then I crea

Re: Review Request: Add docs for MidoNet networking plugin [CLOUDSTACK-996]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10136/ --- (Updated April 19, 2013, 8:35 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippae

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1786: While reserving IPs in guest network, if guestvmcidr is a subset of network cidr but not a subset of cidr, exception is thrown.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10084/#review19445 --- Ship it! Lookd good to me! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On March 22, 2

RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

H Rayess, The tests are mostly manual as of yet. I am working with Hugo now to investigate the problem and will report back here Daan Hoogland -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] Sent: vrijdag 19 april 2013 0:07 To: dev@cloudstack.apache

Re: ebtables

Perhaps this was not the best thing, now my ports are open; how can I revert back to eatables. Along with that, when reverted, how can I drop rules for a particular VM to allow communication via second IP address. On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Disregard, for now, I

Re: DnsNotifier Example

Since its a example class, its not added in the client war file that jetty runs. Please add a dependency in client/pom.xml as below org.apache.cloudstack cloud-plugin-example-dns-notifier ${project.version} On 19/04/13 5:58 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote: >I am trying to run the DnsN

Re: Create rbd primary storage fail in CS 4.0.1

Ceph file system can added as Primary storage by RBD, Thanks. Now I meet the problem in creating VM to Ceph. First I create computer offer and storage offer with tag "ceph", and define Ceph Primary storage with tag "ceph". Then I create VM use "ceph" computer offer, It display exception in Log. I