reminder: @author tags in codebase

The latest list is on the bug report: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1253 Please consider removing them (and fixing your IDE) if you own the code. Thanks, -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com

Re: KVM development, libvirt

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:26:22AM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > Prasanna, > > What if we made passing the Jenkins tests a pre-requisite to open > voting? In such a scenario, the test report from the Jenkins build > would be attached to the voting email. > Absolutely, We already do check that a

Re: Review Request: Fix for test case failure test_network.py:test_delete_account - CLOUDSTACK-2898

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11713/#review21612 --- no diff here. did you forget to attach? - Prasanna Santhanam On J

Hello (Upgrade to 4.1)

I just wanted to follow up, seems as though the communcation has stopped. I am presetly utilizing CS 4.0.2 | KVM | CentOS 6.3 I would like to go ahead and upgrade to CS 4.1 / CentOS 6.4; however, prior to doing so, it would be suggested to pause all containers (instances) as it seems it will

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

Installed the oneiric Ubuntu haproxy for ours and it seems to work. On May 28, 2013 4:07 PM, "Milamber" wrote: > Hello Chiradeep, > > Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0): > http://lists.debian.org/**debian-backports-changes/2013/**05/msg00050.html

Re: haproxy on VMWare systemVM template

This is now done. http://s.apache.org/wy On 5/28/13 3:35 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >Thanks. I'll wait for the i386 bits to land as well. > >On 5/28/13 3:07 PM, "Milamber" wrote: > >>Hello Chiradeep, >> >>Please note, haproxy has been backported in Debian Wheezy (7.0): >>http://lists.debia

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 9fe7846

Seems to be a 4.2 feature commit 10b6c1c6c8f8c2ec49145a901fb083e7f362f3a1 Author: Harikrishna Patnala Date: Tue Apr 30 16:41:25 2013 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-741: Granular Global Parameters Added parameters to cluster level cluster.storage.allocated.capacity.notificationthreshold cluster.storage.ca

Re: Quick DB Question

Thanks, guys! On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati < vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com> wrote: > Thanks for the info Alex! Btw there are two VolumeVO.java files in the src > and Edison will be removing one of them when he merges the object store > branch into master.. you'll ne

RE: Quick DB Question

Thanks for the info Alex! Btw there are two VolumeVO.java files in the src and Edison will be removing one of them when he merges the object store branch into master.. you'll need to use engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeVO.java. Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Alex Huan

RE: Quick DB Question

Mike, The Data Access Layer page[1] have the answer to this. Specifically this particular part in the example. // getters and setters must follow the Java // convention of putting get/set in front of // the field name. public String getText() { return text; } get_i

Re: Quick DB Question

Hi, Yeah, I should have been more explicit in what problem I was seeing. :) What I'm seeing is that I set the field with a string (IQN) that is not null, but it doesn't make it to the DB. I have other, similar "sets" and all is well with them (their data make it to the DB just fine). Perhaps it

RE: Quick DB Question

Hi Mike, You're probably calling those setter methods in the constructor and I don't see any problem having an '_' in the function name. What is the problem you're seeing? Also I don't see this iscsi_name in VolumeVO.java on master - I'm guessing you're working off a private branch. I'm yet t

Quick DB Question

Hi, I'd like to place an IQN in the "iscsi_name" field available in the cloud.volumes table after I create an appropriate iSCSI target on a SAN. For some reason, we don't seem to be using this column in the VolumeVO class, so I went ahead and added access to it. I've successfully added columns t

Re: [DISCUSS] NFS cache storage issue on object_store

Edison, Please see my commons in-line below. Thanks, -John On Jun 6, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] >> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 7:47 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NFS

Re: Contributing as a non-committer

As a non-committer follow these steps: http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-committer.html hope that helps. - Original Message - From: "Paul Angus" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "Sebastien Goasguen" Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 1:55:17 PM Subject: Contributing as a non-committer

Contributing as a non-committer

Guys, I'm just trying to get up to speed with how I can contribute more (starting with a minor doc fix) but the link http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-contributors.html is broken. Can it be fixed pls (does it count as a bug that I need to report). Is there an alternate link for the tim

Re: quick systemvm question

Marcus, Please have a look at findSystemVMTemplate in VmTemplateDaoImpl.java -Wei 2013/6/7, Marcus Sorensen : > Thanks, I'm looking at it from a different perspective, not a CS > upgrade, but say we have to roll a new systemvm template for an > existing CS version. Say we rolled 4.2, with a new te

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 9fe7846

4.1 is the same, but it does away with the router.template.kvm config parameter. It literally just matches the last row in the vm_template field that is type 'SYSTEM' and your hypervisor type. It also has a router.template.id field that seems to do nothing. I'm assuming the other system vms work

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 9fe7846

Ok, here's what I've figured out so far (for master branch, 4.1 seems different): Specifically for routers, given the hypervisor KVM, it searches the table vm_template for type='SYSTEM' and hypervisor_type='KVM' and chooses the last registered template. There is a 'router.template.kvm' config opt

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 9fe7846

Ok. That gives me a place to start digging to figure out how to do this. I'll update the thread when I find out, just for future reference. On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > _configServer.getConfigValue(Config.RouterTemplate***.key(), > VMTemplateVO templ

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 9fe7846

_configServer.getConfigValue(Config.RouterTemplate***.key(), VMTemplateVO template = _templateDao.findRoutingTemplate(hType, templateName); On 6/7/13 8:55 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >I'm not sure if this fits in the discussion, I was asking Wei how >cloudstack cho

Review Request: Fix for test case failure test_network.py:test_delete_account - CLOUDSTACK-2898

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11713/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Girish Shilamkar. Descrip

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Edison, It appears that the S3 clients have a quirk in their behavior for multi-part uploads. I have created a defect for Riak CS (https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/issues/585). Once a patch has been merged merged into master, I will provide instructions for building from source (it is very e

RE: Object based Secondary storage.

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 7:54 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Kelly McLaughlin > Subject: Re: Object based Secondary storage. > > Thomas, > > The AWS API explicitly states the ETag is not guaranteed to b

Re: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse

Maybe attribute is not accurate in this sense, but it is just some metadata related to a storage pool. Just like tags, or statistics (For example, AccountResponse), display to user flag (for example, displayVm in UserVMResponse) we have created for any other CloudStack Entity. We didn't need to cre

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Hi John, Although AWS API states the ETAG is not guaranteed to be an integrity hash, its internal code assumes a special format of ETAG for object uploaded through multi-part, like TransferManager. This is reflected in AmazonS3Client's api implementation "getObject" below: /* (non-Javadoc)

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 9fe7846

I'm not sure if this fits in the discussion, I was asking Wei how cloudstack chooses the system vm template during normal operation. I get how the upgrades work, but I don't get how cloudstack chooses the system template to use when actually deploying: I'm looking at it from a different perspectiv

Re: quick systemvm question

Thanks, I'm looking at it from a different perspective, not a CS upgrade, but say we have to roll a new systemvm template for an existing CS version. Say we rolled 4.2, with a new template, and then two months later we realize that the template is missing dnsmasq or something, and we have to have e

Re: KVM development, libvirt

Prasanna, What if we made passing the Jenkins tests a pre-requisite to open voting? In such a scenario, the test report from the Jenkins build would be attached to the voting email. Thanks, -John On Jun 7, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:48:14PM -060

Re: migrateVirtualMachine

Got it. Cool, thanks. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer Citrix Solutions NetApp 919.476.5042 dlamo...@netapp.com On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:28 AM, kel...@backbonetechnology.com mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com>> wr

Re: migrateVirtualMachine

Migration is only achievable in a cluster. It is hypervisor dependant. Migration is used only for CAP management and HA. In order to cross the hypervisor barrier you need to automate the 'create template > export template > convirt template > import template > provision' process. Sent from my H

migrateVirtualMachine

Anybody know a bit more in depth what that API call really does? From the API docs it "Attempts Migration of a VM to a different host or Root volume of the vm to a different storage pool". Does this mean if the VM is on XenServer and I want to move it to vShpere, it does VHD to OVA (VMDK?) con

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Thomas, The AWS API explicitly states the ETag is not guaranteed to be an integrity hash [1]. According to RFC 2616 [2], clients should not infer any meaning to the content of an ETag. Essentially, it is an opaque version identifier which should only be compared for equality to another ETag v

Re: Orphaned libvirt storage pools

There is already quite a bit of logging around this stuff, for example: s_logger.error("deleteStoragePool removed pool from libvirt, but libvirt had trouble" + "unmounting the pool. Trying umount location " + targetPath

Re: Orphaned libvirt storage pools

Hi, On 06/07/2013 04:30 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Does this only happen with isos? Yes, it does. My work-around for now was to locate all the Instances who had these ISOs attached and detach them from all (~100 instances..) Then I manually unmounted all the mountpoints under /mnt so that

Re: Orphaned libvirt storage pools

I had seen something similar related to the KVM HA monitor (it would re-mount the pools outside of libvirt after they were removed), but anything using getStoragePoolByURI to register a pool shouldn't be added to the KVMHA monitor anymore. That HA monitor script is the only way I know of that cloud

Re: Orphaned libvirt storage pools

Does this only happen with isos? On Jun 7, 2013 8:15 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > Hi, > > So, I just created CLOUDSTACK-2893, but Wei Zhou mentioned that there are > some related issues: > * CLOUDSTACK-2729 > * CLOUDSTACK-2780 > > I restarted my Agent and the issue described in 2893 went awa

Orphaned libvirt storage pools

Hi, So, I just created CLOUDSTACK-2893, but Wei Zhou mentioned that there are some related issues: * CLOUDSTACK-2729 * CLOUDSTACK-2780 I restarted my Agent and the issue described in 2893 went away, but I'm wondering how that happened. Anyway, after going further I found that I have some "o

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2893) The Agent attempts to re-create a already existing Libvirt Storage pool when creating a volume

I did see this once, normally the agent keeps a map of which pools are installed. I believe it was triggered by putting the host into maintenance and then reconnecting without stopping the agent. Restarting the agent fixed the problem without further intervention, the agent discovered the existing

Re: KVM development, libvirt

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:48:14PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Ok. Do we need to call a vote or something to change our rules to > solidify that we should require at least two votes from each supported > platform, whether they be automated tests or contributor tests? > I'd encourage that. Tha

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2286: Volume created from snapshot state is in allocated state instead of Ready state which is letting Primary storage not to increment the resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11298/#review21575 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On June 7, 2013, 11:41 a.m., S

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2286: Volume created from snapshot state is in allocated state instead of Ready state which is letting Primary storage not to increment the resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11298/#review21574 --- Commit da5c4619c394eaedec55c277bc5e71de379d6600 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2286: Volume created from snapshot state is in allocated state instead of Ready state which is letting Primary storage not to increment the resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11298/ --- (Updated June 7, 2013, 11:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1647: IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/#review21572 --- Commit 5dc7387d3b6b1abd841abc92e3c76a3894213d82 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-869-nTier-Apps-2.0_Support-NetScalar-as-external-LB-provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/#review21571 --- Commit 5233e3216b11e69c7c7e051f0a6c3d0c6bf98803 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2167: The Vlan ranges displayed are not in ascending order.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11708/#review21570 --- server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1647: IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/#review21569 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On June 5, 2013, 11:39

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2286: Volume created from snapshot state is in allocated state instead of Ready state which is letting Primary storage not to increment the resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11298/#review21568 --- engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/Volu

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-869-nTier-Apps-2.0_Support-NetScalar-as-external-LB-provider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10858/#review21567 --- Commit bcc5baa1636037baa8c5ffbd3bbf70df8af4d024 in branch refs/heads

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2167: The Vlan ranges displayed are not in ascending order.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11708/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Description --- When mult

Re: Review Request: Add GSoC proposal to docs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11707/#review21565 --- Ship it! committed to master with e17a0c23b8d4d7cbbcbf4a95cf545b0d8

Review Request: Add GSoC proposal to docs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11707/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- Adde

Re: [ACS4.1.0]

Can you open a bug for it. (you could even submit a patch for it :) ) On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:06 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > Guys, > > The installation guide for 4.1.0 says that the convenience RPMs are located > in: > > baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.0/ > > they’re actually in >

[ACS4.1.0]

Guys, The installation guide for 4.1.0 says that the convenience RPMs are located in: baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.0/ they're actually in http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.1/ is the documentation wrong or have they been uploaded to the wrong place? Regards, Paul Angus Senior

Re: Review Request: Add docbook of GSOC native SDN controller proposal

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11678/#review21564 --- Ship it! Applied to master with 1bdb6266c6b263684db229accd4f0a4a330