Re: Git question about applying patch files

The 'cleanest cleanest' way is to use rebase as Sheng recommends but I know people who've used git successfully with just doing merge. It's (rebase) one of those features of git you discover only after using-abusing it for long enough. But if you're adventurous .. :) Do NOT do a rebase if you've

Re: Review Request: Fix for NPE during ip range creation

> On June 13, 2013, 5:34 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > LGTM. Thanks for patch! Committed the patch to master. Commit: ff0a524bd689cc89f7ca48db84e6591edcd7c47c - Sateesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vi

Re: Git question about applying patch files

Mike, The cleanest way have found to create these patches is actually create a temporary work branch from master, merge the feature branch into it with the squashed option, and then generate the patch. This gist (https://gist.github.com/jburwell/5771480) is the shell script I used to generat

Re: Git question about applying patch files

I use "git diff master" and "patch -p1 <*.patch" to generate and apply the patches. 2013/6/13 Sheng Yang > You should use git-rebase rather than git-merge if the patches are in > relatively small numbers. I doubt git-format-patch would get the correct > result if your patches are not the top co

Re: Review Request: Fix for NPE during ip range creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11850/#review21838 --- Ship it! LGTM. - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On June 12, 2013, 8:22 p.m

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

No problem, John. Thanks for taking the time! I've addressed most issues in the review tonight and should be able to complete the remaining tomorrow. Talk to you later! On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:21 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > I just published my review @ https://reviews.apache.org/r/1

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi John, I've put comments below in red. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:51 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > First and foremost, we must ensure that these two features are mutually > exclusive in 4.2. We don't want to find a configuration that contains both > hypervisor and storage IOP

Re: Review Request: SolidFire storage plug-in and enhancements to the storage framework and GUI

> On June 12, 2013, 11:15 p.m., John Burwell wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/offering/DiskOffering.java, line 70 > > > > > > Is the notion of burst IOPS standard across QoS storage systems or > > specific to a product? W

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, First and foremost, we must ensure that these two features are mutually exclusive in 4.2. We don't want to find a configuration that contains both hypervisor and storage IOPS guarantees that leads to non-deterministic operations. Restricting QoS expression to be either hypervisor or sto

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi, Yeah, Alex, I think that's the way we were planning (with storage tags). I believe John was just throwing out an idea that - in addition to storage tags - we could look into these allocators (storage QoS being preferred, then hypervisor QoS if storage QoS is not available, but hypervisor QoS i

Re: Git question about applying patch files

You should use git-rebase rather than git-merge if the patches are in relatively small numbers. I doubt git-format-patch would get the correct result if your patches are not the top commits. So you maybe want: git checkout master git pull git checkout solidfire_plugin git rebase master git format

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: fixed if/else logic to address redundant entires, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata rewrite rule

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11582/ --- (Updated June 12, 2013, 11:54 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer

[ACS42] Release Status Update

Folks The status for features or improvement is depicted in table below |-+---+---| | New Features / Improvements | This Week | Last Week | |-+---+---| | Closed | 7 | 6 |

RE: help on db code wanted

Dan, Looks like the problem is with the DB layer. It doesn't actually retrieve the value stored in the vo object but instead records the value passed to the vo object when the set method is called. So it assumes the value being passed is the value is stored. For now, best to make the change

RE: help on db code wanted

Dear readers, I have some logging stating that I change the value in the VO, and then a db update using the double quotes anyway, as if the VO is not the actual object used for the update. Note the two 2F2F (double 2F's) in the template_host_ref.install_path in the last log line. 2013-06-13 01

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, I just published my review @ https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/. I apologize for the delay, -John On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > No problem, John. > > I still want to re-review it by myself before coming up with a new patch > file. > > Also, maybe I should firs

Re: Review Request: SolidFire storage plug-in and enhancements to the storage framework and GUI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/#review21347 --- api/src/com/cloud/offering/DiskOffering.java

RE: help on db code wanted

Ok, 2013-06-13 00:54:21,841 INFO [cloud.utils.LogUtils] (main:null) log4j configuration found at C:\Users\dhoogland\cloudstack\cloudstack\client\target\cloud-client-ui-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT\WEB-INF\classes\log4j-cloud.xml This is from the vmops.log. guess this must be the one. -Original Message-

RE: help on db code wanted

When you're debugging, you should modify the log4j-cloud.xml that jetty is reading. I can't remember where it is by default. I have to find this file everytime but it's not any of the files you find in the source as it is copied to some jetty deployment directory. Maybe someone knows where th

RE: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi All, I didn't follow this thread as much so maybe it's already been discussed. If so, let me know. I don't see why these limits should be used as a way to do allocation. CS already supports storage tiering through tags. Why not reuse that concept? A use case would be. An admin wants to u

RE: help on db code wanted

Glad to be teaching for a change;) quite common greeting in dutch if you don't know how to start. About the log4j-cloud file. There is a lot of them. I suppose I chose the one from secondary-storage and they all get picked up? I also see some .in files. No need to worry about those? -Orig

RE: help on db code wanted

Nice...learn something new every day. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:36 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: help on db code wanted > > Thanks Alex, > > I didn't think of live stock

RE: help on db code wanted

Thanks Alex, I didn't think of live stock yet, but that is a good backronym as well. The original is latin : lectori salutem (I hope I have the inclinations right) meaning readers be greeted -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: donderdag 13 juni 2013

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

We'd also have to recognize that if the Min value is filled in and Storage QoS is not available that Hypervisor QoS (rate limiting here) cannot satisfy that constraint. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Yeah, this is interesting. > > We'll h

RE: help on db code wanted

Daan, You can enable trace logging on the category "com.cloud.utils.db.Transaction.Statement" in log4j-cloud.xml. It will log every SQL statement sent to the DB. Look for update to the specific table, that will give you an indication what the db layer thinks is being set. The logs grow very

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Yeah, this is interesting. We'll have to wait and see what Wei's thoughts are on this. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:17 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > Yes. To your point, the appropriate logic would be to check the Volume > allocated by the StorageAllocator. If it doesn't support a QoS, the

Git question about applying patch files

I have a branch, solidfire_plugin, off of master in my local repo. I wanted to submit a patch to Review Board. Essentially, I followed these steps (where upstream is the official CS repo): git checkout master git fetch upstream git reset --hard upstream/master git checkout solidfire_plugin g

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, Yes. To your point, the appropriate logic would be to check the Volume allocated by the StorageAllocator. If it doesn't support a QoS, then the VM allocator would attempt to fulfill the QoS through the hypervisor. Another question would be -- what would be in the behavior in the event

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

It looks like Wei has four new fields: Max Read IOPS, Max Write IOPS, Max Read BPS, and Max Write BPS I have two: Max IOPS and Min IOPS Mine can be set by the admin or the admin can choose to have the end user fill in these values. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow

help on db code wanted

LS, I am trying to remove a double slash from the field install_path in the table template_host_ref. It would seem to me that this can be done by removing it in the VMTemplateHostVO, that gets used by the VMTemplateHostDao to write to the database. I added a fixPath function that I stole from som

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

As far as compressing read and write IOPS fields into one value (one for Min and one for Max), that is Wei's area as my feature does not distinguish between read and write IOPS. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I see, John. > > That is an i

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

I see, John. That is an interesting idea. We'd also have to change the storage allocator(s) to favor QoS-supported storage if those fields are filled in. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:09 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > My thought is that we present the min/max IOPS fields for read/write > ope

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, My thought is that we present the min/max IOPS fields for read/write operations for all compute and disk offerings. When the VM is allocated, we determine the best way to fulfill that QoS. It sounds like storage level guarantees would always be preferred. If no storage is available to

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

I agree with your "None" radio button point, John. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I hate to say it, but I believe Storage QoS with a Min and Max will always > be optimal over hypervisor rate limiting. > > The only time you'd want to use h

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

I hate to say it, but I believe Storage QoS with a Min and Max will always be optimal over hypervisor rate limiting. The only time you'd want to use hypervisor rate limiting is if storage QoS is not available. We currently have no way to know what storage the root or data disk will be deployed to

Re: [NOTICE] CloudStack 4.1.1 release

That sounds better. Don't know 4.1 is not in controlled commit Kelven On 6/12/13 2:49 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Or just commit it. ;) > >On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > >> Let me apply it to 4.1 branch and send the review request then >> >> Kelven >> >> On 6/12/13 1:32 PM,

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, Please see my comments/questions in-line below. Thanks, -John On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi Wei, > > So, not entirely sure I follow. > > Will what I wrote earlier work? Here is a copy of what I wrote: > > Let's just called these radio buttons 1) Hypervisor Q

Re: Test halting build every now and then

This is what nslookup 127.0.0.1 brings up for me: Server: 172.16.1.2 Address: 172.16.1.2#53 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa name = localhost. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > I have the same configuration (Mac OS X Lion) but do not see the issue.

Re: Test halting build every now and then

I have the same configuration (Mac OS X Lion) but do not see the issue. Wonder what nslookup 127.0.0.1 shows on your host. On 6/12/13 2:39 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Ah, too bad. :) > >So, it's not a huge deal. I just thought if we already had a solution out >there that I missed that maybe

RE: Test halting build every now and then

Sheng, I can reproduce it on macosx at home (where I should be right now) but I also do not consider it high prio for now, just irritating. However It seems more consistent on my machine. I do not get past the NioTest unless I disable it. It listens for a client that never connects, so the race

Re: [NOTICE] CloudStack 4.1.1 release

Or just commit it. ;) On Jun 12, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > Let me apply it to 4.1 branch and send the review request then > > Kelven > > On 6/12/13 1:32 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 05:18:37PM +, Kelven Yang wrote: >>> I just fixed a critical bug that

Re: [NOTICE] CloudStack 4.1.1 release

Let me apply it to 4.1 branch and send the review request then Kelven On 6/12/13 1:32 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 05:18:37PM +, Kelven Yang wrote: >> I just fixed a critical bug that could cause XenServer host to be out of >> service. I would like the fix to be merge

Re: Test halting build every now and then

Ah, too bad. :) So, it's not a huge deal. I just thought if we already had a solution out there that I missed that maybe I could implement it. I would consider it a low-priority issue. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > I've added clean, still unable to reproduce. >

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi Wei, So, not entirely sure I follow. Will what I wrote earlier work? Here is a copy of what I wrote: Let's just called these radio buttons 1) Hypervisor QoS and 2) Storage QoS for the purpose of this e-mail. By default, neither radio button is selected and no QoS fields are visible. If the

Re: Test halting build every now and then

I've added clean, still unable to reproduce. If we can reproduce it in Eclipse, then it would be very easy to track down what's wrong indeed. Otherwise we may need to print debug info everywhere. --Sheng On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, John The Disk I/O Throttling works like: (1) For User VM, (1.1) root disks: service offering -> default value in global configuration (1.2) data disks: disk offering -> default value in global configuration (2) For System VM root disks: service offering -Wei 2013/6/12 John Burwell > M

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

OK, we will have to wait for Wei on that one. My guess (and that's all it is is a guess) is since Wei's four new fields have been added to both the Add Compute Offering and the Add Disk Offering dialogs is that Hypervisor QoS is on a disk-by-disk basis. Otherwise you could have conflicting informa

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, That is one possibility. The other possibility is that hypervisor is going to throttle I/O on all disks attached. Therefore, we need answers to the following questions: 1. Is I/O throttling applied to the root disk or all disks attached to the VM? 2. If I/O throttling i

Re: Test halting build every now and then

In my case, I see it when running mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install from the Terminal in Mac OS X. Removing clean seems to give it a better shoot at not halting. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Eclipse didn't complain for me. > > BTW: I am using Linux as developmen

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hey John, Perhaps I don't fully understand how Wei's feature works. I guess I thought if you choose Hypervisor QoS, you do so on Compute Offerings (root disks) and/or Disk Offerings (data disks). >From my thinking, you're root disk could be under Hypervisor QoS, but your data disk could be under

Re: Test halting build every now and then

Eclipse didn't complain for me. BTW: I am using Linux as development environment. --Sheng On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Macosx? > Eclipse? > > I will try on windows sometime soon (with wireless). > > -Original Message- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, As I understand these two patches, the throttled I?O settings are applied from the hypervisor side, and possibly defined in a compute offering where provisioned IOPS are defined on the storage side through disk offerings. I don't see how the management server could enforce this mutual ex

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi John, So, maybe I'm wrong about this, but what I was thinking is that we'd build two radio buttons into the Add Disk Offering dialog (we can ignore Compute Offerings for 4.2 since my feature doesn't yet support them). Let's just called these radio buttons 1) Hypervisor QoS and 2) Storage QoS f

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, Looking through the code, I am trying to understand how CreateDiskOfferingCmd would have the context to identify the conflict. Naively, it seems to me that this rule would need to be enforced when a virtual machine is being deployed. Looking through the code, it seems like we should add

RE: Test halting build every now and then

Macosx? Eclipse? I will try on windows sometime soon (with wireless). -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: woensdag 12 juni 2013 22:37 To: Subject: Re: Test halting build every now and then I tried to look into this, but it's really hard for me to reprodu

RE: tests for projects

Dan, It's tough to write unit tests for engine-schema because the requirement is for all unit tests to work without a DB so testing DB access without a DB is kinda useless. The tests themselves probably won't be very interesting anyways. All of the classes are actually based off one class, Ge

Re: Test halting build every now and then

I tried to look into this, but it's really hard for me to reproduce it(I've run the case for 50 times and no show of the issue). The bash command I used is: for i in {1..50}; do mvn -Dtest=NioTest test -pl utils; done >From the log, it looks like server is up but client didn't connect to the serv

Re: [NOTICE] CloudStack 4.1.1 release

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 05:18:37PM +, Kelven Yang wrote: > I just fixed a critical bug that could cause XenServer host to be out of > service. I would like the fix to be merged into 4.1.1 release > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2925 > > > Kelven In cherry-picking this into

RE: Please run with assert on when you're developing...

Some (ok one) have asked me what is MAVEN_DEBUG_OPTS. That's my bad for not being clear. Adding "-ea" to MAVEN_OPTS will cause assert to be on for maven and maven's plugins as well. That means during clean, install stages, you might hit some weird asserts (according to others experience on th

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi John, So, here's what I was planning to do. Of course feel free to correct me on this approach. I think it's OK if Wei merges his code into master and then I can draw from the main repo and merge master into mine locally. 1) Once I get Wei's code and merge, I plan to add a little GUI code to

Re: [ACS42] Ceph Storage Integration with Cloudstack -

Wido, These expunge operations should like general maintenance processes that should be implemented in the storage engine. It feels like we could implement the algorithm to identify unused templates and delegate to storage driver to remove them. It also feels like we d something similar for v

Review Request: Fix for NPE during ip range creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11850/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, bharat kumar, and Min

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, Yes, these server-side rails need to be defined and implemented before either patch can be merged. From my perspective, I would like to see the rule implemented in the hypervisor as part of the validation of the virtual machine definition. We also need to make sure that this mutual excl

VMware - Unable to login to ssvm

Hi Wido / Hugo In VMware we are unable to login to ssvm from management server , due to permission issue with /cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/systemvm/id_rsa.cloud, Currently this file's permission is 644, and not allowing to login; need to change this to 600; Looks like it's a packaging issue,

tests for projects

LS, When I look at engine-schema I don't see a test source folder. Is this because tests for db objects are not done or because this code should go somewhere else, or maybe because there are no tests yet and should go and make some? Thanks, Daan Hoogland

assigning jira tickets

I made a ticket about an internal user issue and want to assign it to me. Can I? I don't seem to have the right in jira. (the number is 2968) a small patch will be appearing soon.

Re: assigning jira tickets

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I made a ticket about an internal user issue and want to assign it to me. Can > I? I don't seem to have the right in jira. (the number is 2968) a small > patch will be appearing soon. Your user (dahn) now has appropriate karma - feel free

RE: Want to contribute

Also another area to consider is to fix automation test case failures / automating test cases as it is heavy python based framework. -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subjec

Re: Want to contribute

Here is a good place to start: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Iliyas > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:04 PM, iliyas shirol >wrote: > > > Greetings Team ! > > > > Hope you al

Re: Want to contribute

Hi, I've been involved with CloudStack for about six months now. That's still pretty new compared to many others out there, but the experience of starting from scratch with CloudStack is still fresh in my head. Feel free to ask me. Talk to you later! On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:04 PM, iliyas shi

Re: Want to contribute

Hi Iliyas On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:04 PM, iliyas shirol wrote: > Greetings Team ! > > Hope you all are doing good. Btw, this is Iliyas an OpenSource evangelist > and Cloud lover :) I have been promoting GNU/Linux and FOSS since when I > was introduced to it. By hobby I write code in BASH and Py

Re: Want to contribute

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013, at 02:04 PM, iliyas shirol wrote: > Waiting for a postive response from you folks. No need to wait, jump right in. (But if you need an "invite," consider this it.) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

London CloudStack Meetup on July 4th

Hi everyone, I am planning on heading to London to speak at a CloudStack Meetup on July 4th and was curious if anyone on the list was planning on attending, as well. I figured this would be a good opportunity to meet more CloudStack people in person. :) Talk to you later! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *

Want to contribute

Greetings Team ! Hope you all are doing good. Btw, this is Iliyas an OpenSource evangelist and Cloud lover :) I have been promoting GNU/Linux and FOSS since when I was introduced to it. By hobby I write code in BASH and Python. I'm a regular CloudStack user and have deployed it for multiple custom

Re: Chip and David elected ASF Members

Awesome. Congrats Chip and Dave On 6/12/13 1:31 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Congratulations to Chip and David for being elected members of the ASF: > >https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_w >elcomes2 > >-Sebastien

Re: Chip and David elected ASF Members

Congratulations, guys! On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:02 AM, John Burwell wrote: > Big congrats to Chip and David, and a great addition to ASF. > > > > > On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > Congratulations Chip and David. > > > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >>

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Currently they are not yet implemented. We have to make sure they are implemented in the GUI from a usability standpoint, but the API must check for consistency and throw an exception if necessary. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:03 AM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > Are the checks only implemente

Summary of IRC meeting in #cloudstack-meeting, Wed Jun 12 17:08:56 2013

Members present: Animesh, sudhap, dahn, topcloud, kelveny, chipc, ke4qqq, jzb Meeting summary: 1. Preface 2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status 3. Active Feature Release QA Status 4. Active Feature Release: Doc Status 5. Active Feature Release: Additional

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1960: Key remapping fails to input the keys \ | ? of UK Keyboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11650/#review21807 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Fang Wang On June 5, 2013, 8:09 a.m., Sanjay

Re: [Discuss][Proposal] Configurable option for egress firewall rules default policy

+1 -Wei 2013/6/12 Sanjeev Neelarapu > +1 > > Mathias Mullins wrote: > > > VERY +1 on this feature. > > > From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:18 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Chiradeep Vittal >

RE: [Discuss][Proposal] Configurable option for egress firewall rules default policy

+1 Mathias Mullins wrote: VERY +1 on this feature. From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:18 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Chiradeep Vittal Subject: Re: [Discuss][Proposal] Configurable option for egress

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, Are the checks only implemented in the UI? Thanks, -John On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi John, > > Wei and I have discussed making the two features mutually exclusive. We > agree with you that only one should be active at a time. We plan to > implement in the G

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Hi John, Wei and I have discussed making the two features mutually exclusive. We agree with you that only one should be active at a time. We plan to implement in the GUI a mechanism (maybe radio buttons) to turn his feature on and mine off and vice versa. I was thinking if I wait until he checks

Re: Chip and David elected ASF Members

Big congrats to Chip and David, and a great addition to ASF. On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Congratulations Chip and David. > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din [mailto:nour.moham...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:37 AM >>

RE: Chip and David elected ASF Members

Congratulations Chip and David. > -Original Message- > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din [mailto:nour.moham...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:37 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Chip and David elected ASF Members > > Congrats ;) > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, How have Wei and you resolved the issue of conflicting QoS mechanisms between the Hypervisor and Storage layers? Have the affected FSs been updated with that decision? In terms of merge timing, can you describe the dependencies between the patches? Thanks, -John On Jun 12, 2013, at 12

Re: Orphaned libvirt storage pools

Hi Wei, This was with both 0.9.8 as with 1.0.2 Haven't been able to dig into this deeper yet. Wido On 06/12/2013 06:26 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: Wido, Could you tell me the libvirt version? For our platform with this issue, the libvirt version is 0.9.13 -Wei 2013/6/7 Marcus Sorensen There is

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

No problem, John. I still want to re-review it by myself before coming up with a new patch file. Also, maybe I should first wait for Wei's changes to be checked in and merge those into mine before generating a new patch file? On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:40 AM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > I

Re: [MERGE] disk_io_throttling to MASTER

Mike, I just realized that I forgot to publish my review. I am offline ATM, but I will publish it in the next couple of hours. Do you plan to update your the patch in Review Board? Sorry for the oversight, -John On Jun 12, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi Edison, John, and Wei

Re: Orphaned libvirt storage pools

Wido, Could you tell me the libvirt version? For our platform with this issue, the libvirt version is 0.9.13 -Wei 2013/6/7 Marcus Sorensen > There is already quite a bit of logging around this stuff, for example: > > s_logger.error("deleteStoragePool removed pool from > libvir

Re: Test halting build every now and then

Hi Daan, Yeah, now that you remind me, I believe we did talk about a wireless setup possibly being behind this a while ago. :) When I'm working from home, I am on a wireless network. In the office, my primary connection is via cable, but I do have another connection to the Internet via wireless.

RE: UI Development

Soheil, Yes there is. Look under the plugins folder for all the current plugins. CloudStack plugins allow not only code to be inserted to add functionality but APIs can be added to facilitate new functionalities. I do ask everyone who are developing plugins to consider and discuss end user

RE: Chip and David elected ASF Members

Congratulations Chip and Dave! --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:31 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Chip and David elected ASF Members > > Congratulations to Chip and David for being elected m

Re: [GSOC] NullPointerException when deployVM using GRE isolation method. Help me!

@Chiradeep: I already implemented allocate() function to OvsGuestNetworkGuru. The above error is no more appear. Now I'll make OVS works with XCP 1.6. I tried and saw some new errors. However, everything is more clearly. 2013/6/12 Nguyen Anh Tu > @Chiradeep Vittal: I saw what happen on this er

RE: Hadoop cluster running in cloudstack

I thought about this a bit yesterday after Chiradeep talked to me. The first fix is definitely allow multiple local storage per host. That requires some work on cloudstack but I don't see it as a big problem. Then a storage-pool allocator can be written such that it always allocates separate l

Re: Review Request: add zone wide primary storage tests

> On May 31, 2013, 4:43 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/smoke/test_zwps.py, line 127 > > > > > > This test is not required. If I deploy a zone with zone-wide storage > > then the regular deployVM

Re: Review Request: fix the occurences of account.account. to account.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11677/#review21800 --- Ship it! 862b955 - Prasanna Santhanam On June 6, 2013, 4:34 p.m.

Re: Review Request: fix the occurences of account.account. to account.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11677/#review21799 --- Fails to apply :( ~/workspace/cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack/patch

Re: Review Request: Automation: Add testcases for Affinity/Anti-Affinity Rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11067/#review21798 --- Girish, I'm only able to apply patch 1 that adds the test_affinity_g

Re: Review Request: Automation: Network life cycle tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11835/#review21797 --- test/integration/smoke/test_network.py

  1   2   >