Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:36:53AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 9103984d3

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 6:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: Review Request 13803: CLOUDSTACK-4491: Added NS setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13803/#review25601 --- Commit 6334b738d048591c6ded39f9ad3f448a2454b03d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13803: CLOUDSTACK-4491: Added NS setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13803/#review25600 --- Commit 239281a401f09df9519bb8e8637c2060b9be019b in branch refs/head

Re: [BUG] vSphere - VMs are force powered off by ACS

During MS restart as part of host connect, vm sync happens. This may be stopping VMs if there is a mismatch in actual state and what is present in the database. Do you see anything useful in the MS logs? -Koushik On 27-Aug-2013, at 4:20 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > I've been trying to figur

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/

Re: Writing to volume attached to VM

Hi Suresh/Sanjeev, Thanks for the inputs. I tried making partition manually and it works, the new partition is then listed. However it is little complex through doing that through test case. Simple reboot does the same thing, it is listing out the new partitions after the reboot. Apparently the

Re: Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 6:20 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Review Request 13803: CLOUDSTACK-4491: Added NS setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13803/#review25599 --- Ship it! Ship It! - venkata swamy babu budumuru On Aug. 26, 201

Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4482 Reposito

Re: Review Request 13805: CLOUDSTACK-3806: OS Preference can not be set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13805/#review25598 --- Commit bdbdfd401b0fcd40244e6aedf2ae853853e75e1a in branch refs/heads

Review Request 13841: Missing tests from QA repo to ASF - 3 tests from test_vmware_drs.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13841/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Prasanna Santhanam. Reposit

Re: Review Request 13701: Automation Tests for HA Proxy Stickiness

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13701/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 5:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, suresh sadhu

RE: Templates via Vagrant Provider and Veewee

Something David mentioned in past which I feel in love with, there is a project called BoxGrinder that creates templates for redhat based systems. Of the box, supports AMI/EC2, VMWARE, XEN and KVM. Really simple to use.. -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@

Re: Review Request 13806: CLOUDSTACK-4407: Use extractTemplate API to get hypervisor specific template information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13806/#review25551 --- tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py

Re: Review Request 13821: CLOUDSTACK-4510 Move NS scripts to appropriate suite to avoid failures

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13821/#review25596 --- Ship it! thanks for the refactor. applied to master and 4.2-forward

Re: Review Request 13805: CLOUDSTACK-3806: OS Preference can not be set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13805/#review25597 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On Aug. 26, 2013, 8:14

Re: Review Request 13821: CLOUDSTACK-4510 Move NS scripts to appropriate suite to avoid failures

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13821/#review25595 --- Commit f7df3ef9f1d6127d5438e58af7dccfbd1f58461c in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 13821: CLOUDSTACK-4510 Move NS scripts to appropriate suite to avoid failures

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13821/#review25594 --- Commit f1c6535f6ee0e5f9b4e6a3435ad2c1dd322a8074 in branch refs/heads

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:17:58AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:27:43PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an > > official release. Here's what I believe needs to be done: > > > > 1) Le

Re: Templates via Vagrant Provider and Veewee

Quagga was just an experiment. On 8/26/13 9:28 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >Aminator looks cool. I've been working on a cloudstack builder for a >tool named packer [1] that does the same but cross-provider. It has >support for AMIs, vmware, digital ocean and virtual box so far. And it >has a

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:27:43PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an > official release. Here's what I believe needs to be done: > > 1) Legal doc check (I think we're good here, since I just added the > NOTICE file) > >

Re: Templates via Vagrant Provider and Veewee

Oh, and the reason to move away from veewee + vagrant was the newer versions of vagrant have broken support [1] for veewee unfortunately. [1] http://www.juliandunn.net/2013/04/11/reviving-veewee-after-vagrant-1-1/ On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 09:58:03AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Aminator look

Re: Templates via Vagrant Provider and Veewee

Aminator looks cool. I've been working on a cloudstack builder for a tool named packer [1] that does the same but cross-provider. It has support for AMIs, vmware, digital ocean and virtual box so far. And it has a plugin model for extending other builders. Is Quagga going to be for extending/repla

please

dev@cloudstack.apache.org 发自 Windows 邮件

RE: why 2 spaces for xml?

I have always preferred two spaces because xml can be indented so far so quickly that often the main part of the xml must be scrolled horizontally to read but I'm open to have it at four. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] > Sent: Mo

RE: [ACS42] cherry pick commit 5b319ba0cb46160451ec05de32a8409b44a08f5b

Done will be in RC2 > -Original Message- > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:50 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS42] cherry pick commit > 5b319ba0cb46160451ec05de32a8409b44a08f5b > > Hi Animesh, > > This is a fix for

RE: Please cherry pick 4 doc fixes

Done will be in RC2 From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi Subject: Please cherry pick 4 doc fixes >From 4.2-forward (1) Commit: ecbd9ed93d71284c9764c191fd94c5f9cf63dd6d [ecbd9ed] Paren

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 [Cancelled]

Thanks, guys! I should have done a rebase. Sorry about that. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > I am cancelling this VOTE and I will start another VOTE thread when I have > a new RC build available shortly > > Edison is helping me out

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Hi Sheng, Thanks for reviewing. The name change is also necessary for 4.2. Since the code changes are entirely restricted to plugin code (all within the midonet dir), I think it's a very safe change. Thanks, Dave. On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I've taken

Re: why 2 spaces for xml?

On Aug 26, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:12:30AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: >> On 08/26/2013 09:22 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: >>> All the XML documentation I have seen has been 4 spaces for indent, what >>> XML files are you talking about? >> >> I couldn't

[VOTE][CANCELLED] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Cancelling this VOTE officially. I will start a new VOTE soon > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 11:55 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > Hi All, > > I'

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Hi Dave, I've taken a look at the patch. The dhcp capability fix is pretty simple, but the name changing part involved much more modifications. Can the name change done after 4.2? It should reduce the patch size a lot. --Sheng On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi, > > I re

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Your patch is in review board and not committed yet. It needs to be reviewed and committed in a branch before it can be picked up for 4.2 RC build. Copying Hugo (called out as reviewer in review board) and Chiradeep Thanks Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah..

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Animesh, You can just pick up the single commits. e.g. commit 13a415fe8a3917a49dae5a1f3998f5ae78a61da3 Author: Mike Tutkowski Date: Mon Aug 26 15:33:39 2013 -0600 Not everyone wants to use Mutual CHAP with VMware - make it optional. --Sheng On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Animesh Chat

Re: Review Request 13804: CLOUDSTACK-4495: systemVM template URL is pointing to old template location in upgrade file.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13804/#review25583 --- Commit 208507a42a4db252dc3d7cf299c146315423a071 in branch refs/heads

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Hi, I reported CLOUDSTACK-4466 4 days ago and submitted a patch. It's restricted to plugin code, so should be a simple and isolated change to grab. Although my vote would be non-binding, I would be -1 without the change, as it fixes DHCP functionality which was broken by a recent commit in core c

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 [Cancelled]

I am cancelling this VOTE and I will start another VOTE thread when I have a new RC build available shortly Edison is helping me out with the git merge issue. There are a number of fixes that I would like to pick up so as well merge the branch from 4.2-forward Thanks Animesh > -Original M

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and instead pick the one from Jessica? Thanks Animesh From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM To: Brian Federle Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Jessica Wang

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this > commit below yours: > > ** ** > > commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48 > > Author: Jessica Wang

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this commit below yours: commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48 Author: Jessica Wang Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure physical network > edit traf

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

I probably should have done a rebase instead of a merge. I think her changes were merged into my local 4.2-forward branch and then I pushed my branch. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Yeah, that is interesting. > > My changes are only thes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Yeah, that is interesting. My changes are only these: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=13a415fe8a3917a49dae5a1f3998f5ae78a61da3 On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Mike the commit message shows it is

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward" Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread. From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi Cc: dev@cloudstack.ap

[ACS42]Cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-3405

Hi Animesh, Can you cherry-pick commit 5a11fe77bae1966c986e541e484ae3d56485d78f for CLOUDSTACK-3405? The commit is in 4.2-forward branch. Thanks -min

[ACS42] Cherry pick CLOUDSTACK-4495

Hi Animesh, Can you cherry-pick the following patch to 4.2: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13804/ Commit hash: 208507a42a4db252dc3d7cf299c146315423a071 Contained in branches: 4.2-forward Thanks, Prachi

RE: [GSoC] Branch Merge Request LdapPlugin and Master

Chip, Will do. Regards Ilya > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 11:51 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [GSoC] Branch Merge Request LdapPlugin and Master > > Ilya, > > Can you handle doing his mer

[BUG] vSphere - VMs are force powered off by ACS

I've been trying to figure out an issue where some of my VMs will go offline if I restart cloudstack management service. After digging for a bit, I found a culprit. If you don't have vmware tools installed, ACS checks the state of vm (I.e. running or stopped, as well as agentState) If VM state

Re: Review Request 13804: CLOUDSTACK-4495: systemVM template URL is pointing to old template location in upgrade file.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13804/#review25579 --- Ship it! Looks correct. Applied using: Commit hash:208507a42a4

Re: Review Request 13804: CLOUDSTACK-4495: systemVM template URL is pointing to old template location in upgrade file.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13804/#review25578 --- Commit 208507a42a4db252dc3d7cf299c146315423a071 in branch refs/head

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

I don't understand how those got in there. I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin. They are not related to my fix. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6f

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac I see a few changes to Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me. Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutko

[ACS42]Cherry-pick several commits

Hi Animesh, Here are several commits that need to cherry pick to 4.2: f814bdfd404749bd1cbf4209fedc9a9d0f22 CLOUDSTACK-4468:template created from snapshot is destroyed... f501c7bbe1ba3fca4071daa520230a34323900cb CLOUDSTACK-4481:API: listEventTypes returns nothing... c6928f2f5390420ea3f578ff

Re: [Doc] Please review: Mapping VMware Datacenter to Zone doc

+cc Sateesh On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Jessica Tomechak < jessica.tomec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > New doc on VMware Datacenters and zones is ready for review. You can view > the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and > 4.2-forward. > > Please provide your

[Doc] Please review: Mapping VMware Datacenter to Zone doc

Hi, New doc on VMware Datacenters and zones is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2-forward. Please provide your feedback. Since the doc is very short, I have just placed the text right in the Bug. Bug: https://issues.apache.

[Doc] Please review: Zone-wide primary storage doc

Hi, New doc on zone-wide primary storage is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the links below. Or -- since there were several changes -- simply read the files docs/en-US/primary-storage-add.xml and about-primary-storage.xml. Please provide your feedback. Diffs: By Jessica T (in m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

OK, Animesh. My changes are in 4.2-forward now. Thanks! On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there. > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:58 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > On 08/26/2013 10:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > >>> [Animesh>] Wido I am

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

No problem - I'll let you know when it's there. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM > > To: dev@clou

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:05 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:13:34PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] I wil

Doc] Please review: 3rd party storage plugin architecture doc

Hi, New doc on 3rd party object store plugin architecture is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2-forward branch. Please provide your feedback. Diffs: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ecbd9ed and htt

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:31:33PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Does the release require voting? Absolutely. If it's a release from the project, it's just like any other release. > > On 8/26/13 10:27 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >I'm looking at what it's going to take to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:13:34PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] I will create a new RC and start a new VOTE. If this is the only > change (mostly textual) does the VOTE has to be open for still 72 hours? Yes. It's important to note that voting is a method of community engagement

Please cherry pick 4 doc fixes

>From 4.2-forward (1) *Commit:* ecbd9ed93d71284c9764c191fd94c5f9cf63dd6d [ecbd9ed] *Parents:* 9a6f2de70e *Author:* Jessica *Date:* August 26, 2013 1:47:41 PM PDT *Commit Date:* August 26, 2013 1:49:42 PM PDT *Labels:* HEAD origin/4.2-forward 4.2-forward CLOUDSTACK-4334. Documentation for

Re: 4.3 Code Freeze

Thank you. :) ws On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Last week of october > > > -Original Message- > > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On > > Behalf Of Will Stevens > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

IMO: JFDI On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an > official release. Here's what I believe needs to be done: > > 1) Legal doc check (I think we're good here, since I just added the > NOTICE file) > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On 08/26/2013 10:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: [Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing fixes from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO looking through that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1. I also sent a cherry-pick request last week for a fi

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

John, I mentioned before I'd been thinking up some ideas that go along with some of the things you've proposed here. I'm working through a lot of different ideas right now, but I've thrown up some notes in a totally random part of the CloudStack wiki. Take a look, this is a complete work in

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > Hi Animesh, > > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i). > > The 4.2 cod

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

Does the release require voting? On 8/26/13 10:27 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an >official release. Here's what I believe needs to be done: > >1) Legal doc check (I think we're good here, since I just added the >NOTICE

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

> >> > > [Animesh>] Wido I am going to cut another RC to pick up licensing > fixes from Chip. Do you have a fix for the issue reported? IMO looking > through that issue it can be covered in 4.2.1. > > > > I also sent a cherry-pick request last week for a fix which is in > 4.2-forward: 829dbaccb47

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Hi Animesh, It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i). The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP. It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in co

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On 08/26/2013 10:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 -1 (binding) I am aware of Ceph bugs which are stil

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:22 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > I have actually received some critical info from VMworld about how > people what to

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:24 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > -1 (binding) > > I am aware of Ceph bugs which are still open for 4.2, like migrating > from

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

I have actually received some critical info from VMworld about how people what to use the SolidFire plug-in. It is a small, but important change. Can I put my fix in? On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message-

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 9:38 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013

RE: 4.3 Code Freeze

Last week of october > -Original Message- > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Will Stevens > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:28 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: 4.3 Code Freeze > > Can someone please let me know what the code fre

4.3 Code Freeze

Can someone please let me know what the code freeze date for 4.3 is? Thanks, Will

Review Request 13833: Added missing getters to UserVmResponse

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13833/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Log files on add ISOs/Templates

In 4.2, template_host_ref is deprecated, you should use template_store_ref. Thanks -min On 8/26/13 10:46 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >From the db >select id, unique_name, name, type, created, state from vm_template; >select id, template_id, download_state, error_str from template_host_ref >wh

VMware error

Hi, I was wondering if one of our VMware experts out there might be able to comment on why I'm getting the following exception when trying to add a static iSCSI target to an ESXi host of mine: Operation failed, diagnostics report: iScsiLibException: status(c000): Invalid parameter; Message= I

Re: Log files on add ISOs/Templates

>From the db select id, unique_name, name, type, created, state from vm_template; select id, template_id, download_state, error_str from template_host_ref where template_id= On 8/26/13 1:06 AM, "Amit Das" wrote: >Hi folks, > >Are there any specific success/error log statements on adding ISOs or

Review Request 13821: CLOUDSTACK-4510 Move NS scripts to appropriate suite to avoid failures

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13821/ --- Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru and Prasanna Santhan

[DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

Hi all, I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an official release. Here's what I believe needs to be done: 1) Legal doc check (I think we're good here, since I just added the NOTICE file) 2) Release process document 3) Add an initial pre-cache file to the repo itself

Re: Templates via Vagrant Provider and Veewee

The stuff in tools/appliance is easy to customize. I built a Quagga template with slight mods. Methinks we can use it like Aminator https://github.com/Netflix/aminator On 8/25/13 10:11 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >All our systemVMs come from veewee + vagrant. > >see tools/appliance > >On Su

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, the down side will be that the semantics of the versioning are > confusing when cloudstack 5 comes and the version numbers don't match. > still a +1 from me though. I find it confusing as well, but am OK with a stable 5.x line be

Re: why 2 spaces for xml?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:12:30AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: > On 08/26/2013 09:22 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: > >All the XML documentation I have seen has been 4 spaces for indent, what > >XML files are you talking about? > > > > I couldn't find documented on the ACS web page or website that the >

Re: why 2 spaces for xml?

On 08/26/2013 09:22 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: All the XML documentation I have seen has been 4 spaces for indent, what XML files are you talking about? I couldn't find documented on the ACS web page or website that the standard was 2 spaces, but I swear I saw it written somewhere. Regardless, I

Re: why 2 spaces for xml?

On Aug 26, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Marty Sweet wrote: > All the XML documentation I have seen has been 4 spaces for indent, what > XML files are you talking about? in the documentation I don't think we have been very consistent... > > Marty > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Darren Shepherd

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:02:32PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > > vote: > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > https://git-wip-us

Re: why 2 spaces for xml?

All the XML documentation I have seen has been 4 spaces for indent, what XML files are you talking about? Marty On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Darren Shepherd < darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> wrote: > I hate discussions about coding conventions, but I just have to ask. Why > is XML two spaces?

why 2 spaces for xml?

I hate discussions about coding conventions, but I just have to ask. Why is XML two spaces? Java, JavaScript, Python, all 4 spaces for indent. But XML is 2. Why is it special? Darren

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:55:03PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 > Commit: 06f287

Re: [GSoC] Branch Merge Request LdapPlugin and Master

Ilya, Can you handle doing his merge request into master? -chip On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:23:30PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Ian > > I want to leave you with 1 last thought, this plugin will be used on daily > basis by hundreds (if not thousands) in the near future - all thanks to you >

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 26, 2013, 3:42 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

RE: [GSoC] Branch Merge Request LdapPlugin and Master

Ian I want to leave you with 1 last thought, this plugin will be used on daily basis by hundreds (if not thousands) in the near future - all thanks to you and GSoC. Thank you for your contribution. It is greatly appreciated! Regards ilya PS: If you can complete the part that was out of scope

Review Request 13810: [ZWPS] attaching an uploaded volume to a VM is always going to first primary storage added

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13810/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Ram Ganesh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4475

Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: Cloudstack-4498 Reposito

Review Request 13806: CLOUDSTACK-4407: Use extractTemplate API to get hypervisor specific template information

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13806/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4407 R

  1   2   >