Re: New features

On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:50 AM, nfoata@orange.com wrote: > Hello Cloudstack, > > Sometimes ago, I wrote and submitted two new features with the following > identifiers (see below) : > > 1) JIRA > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3701 (VM instantiation: > Sending networ

com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException what wrong?

com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|14e221fe-1285-49b7-b18f-4911bdfa2880]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.reserveVirtualMachine(VMEntityManager

Re: Review Request 13992: (CLOUDSTACK-4405) additional patch for bridge name and firewall rules issues after KVM upgrade to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13992/#review26344 --- Commit a0988780ad88bb56becb0a13efedcd79c1bee142 in branch refs/head

com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException what wrong?

DeployDestination dest; try { dest = _dpMgr.planDeployment(vmProfile, plan, exclude); } catch (AffinityConflictException e) { throw new CloudRuntimeException("Unable to create deployment, affinity rules associted to the VM conflict"); }

Re: Review Request 13992: (CLOUDSTACK-4405) additional patch for bridge name and firewall rules issues after KVM upgrade to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13992/#review26346 --- Commit 258118efa67b426611dc87c66b4891924641772b in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13992: (CLOUDSTACK-4405) additional patch for bridge name and firewall rules issues after KVM upgrade to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13992/#review26348 --- Commit 7b4f84622051b532a7e272dc1ed87310ea119cbc in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13992: (CLOUDSTACK-4405) additional patch for bridge name and firewall rules issues after KVM upgrade to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13992/#review26347 --- Commit e325fb66ab1fa0796ade6b5d3d70c688b57e5409 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13992: (CLOUDSTACK-4405) additional patch for bridge name and firewall rules issues after KVM upgrade to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13992/#review26345 --- Commit 164e3e33b414861d4c49457df66dbd7a73830303 in branch refs/heads

[ACS4.2.1] Moving 4.2 tickets to 4.2.1

Animesh, Is there are quick way to move 4.2 tickets to 4.2.1, now that 4.2 is out ? -abhi

Re: xenserver tools

For including xstools in systemvm we will be modifying the scripts. The gpl¹d binaries are not part of the distribution. That keeps us in clear as far as licensing is concerned. -abhi On 19/09/13 6:41 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > >yes, if someone can tell me if we can include gpl'd binaries in

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On 09/24/2013 06:21 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: This vote has passed with no -1 votes. +1 votes were from (with * binding): Chiradeep*, Hugo*, Chip*, Milamber, Amogh +0: Marcus* Marcus agreed to change his VOTE to +1 with a Release Note change that he will make. Wido can yo

Re: community testing

due to lack of response, I might add. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 11:58 PM >>> T

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

touching on thread hijack but; How does this work relate to the css modularization going on at the moment as well? It is proposed there to do merging at build time. Try to beat me if I am to much off topic, Daan On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Ah right, okay. So your t

Re: xenserver tools

meaning that we cannot solve this as proposed bu Joris. What should we do about making sure hte xenserver tools are on the system vms. should they go in the template or in the systemvm.iso? The question is kind of rethorical, the real question is; Are they a standard requirement that we want availa

Re: xenserver tools

The GPL binaries should be provisioned in the template (using tools/appliance/ scripts) and should not be part of the systemvm.iso. The scripts in the iso can be modified as per the provisioned binaries. Xenserver tools can be made available for all and will facilitate features like dynamic scalin

Configuration table changes and database update

Hey all, Noticed an interesting problem today. I was trying to start a management server based on the latest sources in master, but failed. The reason was that the configuration threw an exception that a certain column in the database fit not exist. This column is added during the database upgr

Re: Configuration table changes and database update

I ran a fresh installation on devcloud just now, it works. some records in configuration table are introduced by sql files, and ConfigurationServerImpl will check and insert the records if not exist. 2013/9/24 Hugo Trippaers > Hey all, > > Noticed an interesting problem today. I was trying to s

[ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack

Hi, I am quite pumped to announce a Google Compute Engine (GCE) interface to CloudStack. Ian Duffy, Darren Brogan and myself worked on this on github over the last month. Our latest branch: https://github.com/NOPping/cloudstack-gce/tree/refactor Has been uploaded to pypi: https://pypi.python

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

Animesh, I'm going to publish the current download page to include CloudMonkey now. I'll then stage a new version for the 4.2 release, which can be published after you move the artifacts (today?) and we wait 24 hours for the mirrors to sync. -chip On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:21:19AM +, Anime

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release. Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility for interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides an interactive shell

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.0.0 release. Apache CloudStack's CloudMonkey is a Python-based command line utility for interacting with Apache CloudStack IaaS clouds. The software provides an interactive shell

Review Request 14319: CLOUDSTACK 2238: Automation - Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14319/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Harikrishna Patnala, venkata swamy babu budumuru

Re: [GSoC] Pencil down on Sept 16th

Dear Nguyen, Ian, Meng and Shiva, Firm pencil down was yesterday. So make sure that all your last patches have been submitted, even if there are issues with them we can look at them on review board. Final evaluations are due now and the deadline is Sept 27th. Mentors submit evaluations but you

Re: Configuration table changes and database update

I ran into this as well, As I did some change to schema-420-430.sql I was my primary suspect. It does not have to do with my field though. Still looking, Daan On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > I ran a fresh installation on devcloud just now, it works. > some records in configurat

Re: Configuration table changes and database update

works in the latest version On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I ran into this as well, As I did some change to schema-420-430.sql I > was my primary suspect. It does not have to do with my field though. > Still looking, > Daan > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Wei ZHOU w

RE: community testing

I'm certainly interested. > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 5:12 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: community testing > > due to lack of response, I might add. > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Sebastien Goasguen

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Yes Indra, It is confirmed. We have tested using below names only. It was my fault that I overlooked it during documentation. Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.o

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Hi Indra, Yes this steps are not needed for 4.1.x to 4.2 upgrades, they are needed only during upgrade from previous versions. Thanks and regards, Abhinav -Original Message- From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:14 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apac

Re: Review Request 14299: fix rpm/deb build error caused by moving systemvm to its own maven project

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14299/#review26353 --- Ship it! Applied to master. Thanks for the patch! commit 91aee8bc

Re: Managed storage with KVM

I stull haven't seen your agent.properties. This would tell me if your setup succeeded. At this point my best guess is that "cloudstack-setup-agent -m 192.168.233.1 -z 1 -p 1 -c 1 -g 6b4aa1c2-2ac9-3c60-aabe-704aed40c684 -a --pubNic=cloudbr0 --prvNic=cloudbr0 --guestNic=cloudbr0" failed in some fa

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajesh Battala to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and e

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

For a resolution without breaking possible flows, I'd like to add the value of 'executeInSequence' to the global setting. Is there any reason not to do this? Thanks Alex Ough On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Alex Ough wrote: > All, > > After a little more investigation, I found that the 'Migr

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Hey Kelven - This topic was discussed briefly in the past [1]. Are you able to provide any thoughts on Alex's ideas below? -chip [1] http://markmail.org/message/fznrszaswruvlmuy On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0500, Alex Ough wrote: > For a resolution without breaking possible flows, I'd

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Congrats Rajesh! > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:30 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:25 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or reva

Re: Managed storage with KVM

This is what a fresh agent.properties file looks like on my system. I expect if I try to add it to a cluster, the empty, localhost, and default values below should be filled in. I plan to try to add it to a cluster in a bit. # The GUID to identify the agent with, this is mandatory! # Generate wi

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I guess I'm in the minority though, since we're the > only ones discussing it. No you are not. Personally, I'm thinking about this problem a bit before adding my 2 cents. Don't take that silence as thinking we are "ok". Short ve

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

I thought executeInSequence of 'true' made it go serially, or sequentially. In my codebase for 4.1,4.2,master it's been 'true' since August of 2010: 2010-08-11 09:13:29 -0700 19) public class MigrateCommand extends Command { 2010-08-11 09:13:29 -0700 20) String vmName; 2010-08-11 09:13:29 -070

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:21:19AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > This vote has passed with no -1 votes. > > +1 votes were from (with * binding): > Chiradeep*, Hugo*, Chip*, Milamber, Amogh > > +0: Marcus* > > Marcus agreed to change his VOTE to +1 with a Release Note change

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Congratulations Rajesh. Best Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:00 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala The Project Management Committee (PMC) for

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

is this work a workshop to get at least a core group of us in line. We all have ideas and a lot of good ones are buried under an ton weighing archive of mails. Daan On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> I guess

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Congratulations! 2013/9/24 Chip Childers > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Rajesh Battala to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that they have accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more > autonomously. Fo

Re: Review Request 14231: Don't check implementation verion of Object for DatabaseUpgradeChecker

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14231/#review26355 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java

Review Request 14320: add boolean option httpModeEnabled to the service offering for use in haproxy conf

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14320/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4328 Repository: cloudstack-g

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:00:32AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> I guess I'm in the minority though, since we're the >> only ones discussing it. > > No you are not. Personally, I'm thinking about this problem a bit > before adding my 2 c

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

> > 1 - Finish the docs (release notes especially) and publish them to > cloudstack.apache.org/docs > > *We need someone to own this* I can do this, but it may be tomorrow before it gets done. > > 2 - Build the DEB packages > > Wido has this one > > 3 - Build the RPM packages > > *We need s

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:21:36PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > 4 - Move the source artifacts from dist/dev to dist/release and stage > the download page changes > > A PMC member needs to do this. I'll take this one. Done: http://cloudstack.staging.apache.org/downloads.html And Done: svn m

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Hearty Congratulations Rajesh:) Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 24 September 2013 21:00 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for

Re: New features

I did reopen the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3128. Will get fixed for the next release, thanks Nicolas and Sebastien for following up. -Alena. From: Sebastien Goasguen mailto:run...@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:13 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Congrats, Rajesh. -min On 9/24/13 9:40 AM, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi" wrote: >Hearty Congratulations Rajesh:) > >Regards, >Sateesh >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: 24 September 2013 21:00 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: [A

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Congratulations! - Original Message - From: "Min Chen" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:46:43 AM Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala Congrats, Rajesh. -min On 9/24/13 9:40 AM, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi" wrote: >Hearty Congratulations Raj

CloudMonkey Release Process now documented

FWIW - I created this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudMonkey+Release+Procedure To document the process of releasing a new cloudmonkey version.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Rajesh, congratulations! -Alena. From: Kelcey Jamison Damage mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:50 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack

Wow. Nice! On 9/24/13 6:04 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: >Hi, > >I am quite pumped to announce a Google Compute Engine (GCE) interface to >CloudStack. > >Ian Duffy, Darren Brogan and myself worked on this on github over the >last month. Our latest branch: > >https://github.com/NOPping/cloudstack-gce/tree/

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Oh, sorry for the confusion. I must have reversed the flags. As Kelven pointed, it is set as 'TRUE', which makes the process as sequential. So my questions are 1. If there is any reason why the method have been defined to return '*TRUE*' always? 2. Do we expect any side effects and/or malfunctioni

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

Congrats Rajesh. -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:00 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Raje

RE: [ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack

This looks awesome :) > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:59 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Ian Duffy; Darren Brogan > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack > > Wow. Nice! > >

RE: [ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack

Take a look at source. Clean and lightweight implementation. Awesome. I hope our AWS someday can go this way someday, a separate web server in separate repo and using some dynamically language which makes smaller code > -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

We have commercial releases on top of existing code base and there are lots of testing efforts behind it, dramatic switch means $ cost, the major concern for me is not about how beautiful vijava is or how bad a direct wsdl approach would be. it is about to get things move smoothly. It looks like t

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

I was a bit hesitant to keep pushing this because there doesn't seem to be a lot of support for it, but - as Marcus pointed out - I was quite alarmed by the number and criticality of bugs checked in right before we cut our first RC for 4.2. We simply were not ready. To me, it felt like something o

RE: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:32 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth > round) > > > > > 1 - Finish the docs (release not

RE: [Merge] Minimal Hyper-V Plugin

On paternity leave, so I don't get to these emails right away... > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: 20 September 2013 06:40 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Merge] Minimal Hyper-V Plugin > > Thanks for the preliminary

Re: Review Request 14290: KVMFencer cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14290/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 7:51 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, FrankXH Fran

Re: Review Request 14289: unit test for KVMFencer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14289/ --- (Updated Sept. 24, 2013, 7:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, FrankXH Fran

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:12:15PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > 6 - Publish the website and announce the release (using the finished > > > announcement) after 1 through 5 are done. > > > > > > This can be any committer, but Animesh you'd probably want the > > honors! > [Animesh>] Chip f

RE: VmWare SDK to vijava

Agree. Given current CloudStack code base changing something to another thing is really not a good way. As Darren is working on modular spring, why not construct a new VMWare plugin separately using vijava? Then we can reduce the risk of surprising existing customer and switch to new module when

looks like listConfigurations by zoneid is broken in 4.2

Alex, If you do a listConfigurations passing a zoneId you get the following NPE rver] (ApiServer-7:ctx-c8cdd77a ctx-bdeb07fe) unhandled exception executing api command: listConfigurations java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.server.ConfigurationServerImpl.getConfigListByScope(Configur

Re: looks like listConfigurations by zoneid is broken in 4.3

Sorry, I meant to say 4.3. I don't think this change is in 4.2. Alex can confirm. Darren

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

Someone please check this, as I'm not familiar with the doc layout, especially trying to decipher it in xml. commit to 4.2 branch: da56b6212bbcf9e363ba1add180516584a3d695b On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I think I'll wait until the vote passes, just to be sure that it w

Re: New features

I've closed the CLOUDSTACK-3128. There is no need to add more fixes in addition to what was done originally. Nicolas, please see my latest comments. -Alena. From: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> Date: Tuesday, Sept

Review Request 14324: basic test for ApiDispatcher

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14324/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:47 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round) > > Someone please check this, as I'm not familiar with the doc layout

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

It is about the interface layer between CloudStack and VMware, Spring can only help to what it can, ultimately, we need to refactor the interface layer to take in vijava as one of its implementations. We also need to consider of another situation, with the latest vSphere 5.1 API, although VMware c

RE: VmWare SDK to vijava

Emm, I am saying totally creating new VMWare resource/discover/manager/guru as a plugin where each component for example VMWareResource is a module in plugin. This matches Darren's plugin proposal. and you (Kelven) could continue maintaining current implementation for backward compatibility. And

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

Mike, rest assured you and Marcus are not the only ones. More guarantee on a stable master is a general concern. Personally I don't feel we need more control on what is in the next release, if we make unit tests and automated integration tests a priority. That is kind of a claim I do have 'the' sol

Re: [PROPOSAL] move away from time-based releases and/or revamp release process

I think a distributed Jenkins setup would be great. If we had really awesome test coverage, I would be less frightened of last-minute checkins, as well. :) On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Mike, rest assured you and Marcus are not the only ones. More guarantee on > a stab

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

I'm fine with that, but I'd say that modular boundary like this is too blurring that may end up to too much code divergency. If we can't state clearly about the boundary, then the cut will drag other pieces along with it. there are other logic being built between CloudStack and VMware API in resour

Re: Libvirt-java 0.5.0 has been released

Hi, libvirt-java 0.5.1 is released, and I tried to upgrade it to 0.5.1, diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml index a8778f1..1c85bc4 100644 --- a/pom.xml +++ b/pom.xml @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ 0.9.8 0.10 build/replace.properties -0.5.0 +0.5.1 0.1.3 target 1.0.10 -- 1.8.3.ms

Re: Libvirt-java 0.5.0 has been released

java 7 is needed. you can get the maven/java information by "mvn -v"

RE: VmWare SDK to vijava

So this discussion took a big turn that I did not expect. I am very strongly against creating a "plugin" layer just to interface with VmWare. I appreciate both the effort from Darren and Hugo and each hold some merit. I think we should discuss this out and drive a consensus rather than spendi

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

On 9/24/13 4:22 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >So this discussion took a big turn that I did not expect. I am very >strongly against creating a "plugin" layer just to interface with VmWare. > I appreciate both the effort from Darren and Hugo and each hold some >merit. I think we should discuss this

Review Request 14325: Contrail network virtualization plugin.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14325/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Libvirt-java 0.5.0 has been released

Sorry, 'with libvirt 0.5.1, I received following error:' I wrote in the last mail is incorrect. It was with libvirt 0.5.0. Wei, I thought libvirt-java 0.5.1 fixed the java 1.6 compatibility problem. http://www.libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-java.git;a=commit;h=5d84874d99ee399276873fb52625303ec3a3f39

RE: VmWare SDK to vijava

> -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:23 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: VmWare SDK to vijava > > So this discussion took a big turn that I did not expect. I am very strongly > against creating a "p

Problem creating VirtualRouter on XenServer 6.2 due to problem with copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh

Environment: - 4.3 master (synced with master 08/28/2013 08:43 AM) - XenServer 6.2 I have a problem creating a Virtual Router on XenServer 6.2, here are the symptoms, vmops.log and SMlog don't tell you much, but when I run the copy command native I get an error like the copy_vhd_from_secondaryst

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

So at this moment we have the following tally, Darren, Alex, Kelven opt for the wsdl route Hugo opts for the vijava route I'm perfectly ok with ditching my work on the vijava in favour of the wsdl route. The arguments presented in the last few mails make a lot of sense. So i say the wsdl route

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

On 9/24/13 4:54 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:23 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: VmWare SDK to vijava >> >> So this discussion took a big turn that I did not

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

On 9/24/13 5:27 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >So at this moment we have the following tally, > >Darren, Alex, Kelven opt for the wsdl route >Hugo opts for the vijava route > >I'm perfectly ok with ditching my work on the vijava in favour of the >wsdl route. The arguments presented in the last fe

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

My extensive testing consisted of "it compiles!" So somebody needs to validate it, I don't have a vmware setup handy. The wsdl generation route is not feasible unless legal says it's okay. Somebody want to email legal@? Darren > On Sep 24, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > So at

RE: Problem creating VirtualRouter on XenServer 6.2 due to problem with copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh

The error with copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh is due to a problem with secondary storage, vhd_util returning a negative number to a query as the file does not exist. I am not sure why 34b74283-916e-4562-82fd-082b387b51c5.vhd versus 170c3425-6078-479e-8843-3f8fdc02aaf3.vhd is referenced, that

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:47 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (sixth round) > > Someone please check this, as I'm not familiar with the doc layout

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

Darren, you can probably work with Prussians to get it through the bvt suite. That would be a nice start. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone > On 25 sep. 2013, at 09:06, Darren Shepherd > wrote: > > My extensive testing consisted of "it compiles!" So somebody needs to > validate it, I don't

RE: VmWare SDK to vijava

Agreed. If we can do it is the big question. Although, AFAIK, vijava is also generated from the same set of wsdl. So if we can't get the license, I have to wonder how did vijava get their BSD license? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

Ha! Prussians == Prasanna? Godawful autocorrect. On 9/24/13 6:47 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Darren, you can probably work with Prussians to get it through the bvt >suite. That would be a nice start. > >Cheers, > >Hugo > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On 25 sep. 2013, at 09:06, Darren Shepherd >> wr

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

Hahah, Yeah indeed, awful autocorrect. Sent from my iPhone > On 25 sep. 2013, at 10:01, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > > Ha! Prussians == Prasanna? > Godawful autocorrect. > >> On 9/24/13 6:47 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >> >> Darren, you can probably work with Prussians to get it through the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack

I got this running earlier today and was really impressed with it, good job! Our current AWS is just SOAP right? How about when we do the query api we do it as a separate python project just like this. Darren > On Sep 24, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Frank Zhang wrote: > > Take a look at source. Cle

Re: VmWare SDK to vijava

That clears up a lot, I didn't know how to get in touch with Prussia. Darren > On Sep 24, 2013, at 7:09 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Hahah, > > Yeah indeed, awful autocorrect. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 25 sep. 2013, at 10:01, Chiradeep Vittal >> wrote: >> >> Ha! Prussians == Pras

RE: VmWare SDK to vijava

Wow good guess...Hugo had me scratching my head on that oneIs Prussian some code name for Apache legalShould I askWould it make me look stupid if I askedall sorts of doubts going through my mind. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit.

Re: Cloud Bar Camp in San Francisco

Hi All, Is there anyone who would like to join? On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I am from Apache Stratos project. we are in the process of organizing a > Cloud Bar camp in San Francisco @ Mission Bay Conference Center on October > 28th, 2013. There's

RE: [ANNOUNCE] A GCE interface to CloudStack

Nice work you guys ! Darren, our current AWS has support for both query and SOAP. Thanks, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 8:08 AM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ia

  1   2   >