Failed to create basic zone in 4.3 build

Failed to create basic zone in 4.3 build, created defect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5856 Observed below error INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (Job-Executor-7:ctx-9fb354aa) Add job-11 into job monitoring INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (Job-Executor-7:ctx-9fb354aa)

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Thanks everyone ! --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:34 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi Congrats Sanjay! -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Neela

RE: [ACS 4.3] RC update

Folks Today is the scheduled RC date for ACS 4.3 We are very close with just a few lingering issues below. | Jayapal Reddy| CLOUDSTACK-5848 : [Upgrade3.0.6-4.3]"Unable to parse VLAN tag" message when network associated with SRX external firewall device is rebooted.

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2088

Hugo Can you check the build machine? Animesh -Original Message- From: Amogh Vasekar [mailto:amogh.vase...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 6:32 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Hugo Trippaers (trip...@gmail.com) Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist

Recordings from CloudStack Bangalore Meetup

Hi All, Recording from the December Meetup is posted: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLb899uhkHRoYsF2rDwX6X0rVsFPQAt4Wi Thanks David/Karen for the help -Radhika

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2088

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) on project cloud-awsapi: Compilation failure: Compilation failure: [ERROR] error: error reading /jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/axis2/mex/1.5.4/mex-1.5.4-impl.jar; error in opening zip f

devcloud system VMs problem

Hello, guys I'm trying to run cloudstack with Xen devstack VM, I follow all instructions but still get this errors in log and system vms doesn't start. Could you help me please. 2014-01-10 18:16:06,289 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:ctx-5e8562a3) Could not find suitable

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

Hi Sheng, Its my mistake. I just updated review with new file fixes.patch. Please find the attached one. This is same. Thanks, Suresh From: Sheng Yang mailto:sh...@yasker.org>> Reply-To: Sheng Yang mailto:sh...@yasker.org>> Date: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:53 PM To: Suresh Balineni mailto:sbal

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2093

See Changes: [marcus] CLOUDSTACK-5843 -- [...truncated 5504 lines...] [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cl

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16642/#review31576 --- Ship it! Looks good now. Applied to 4.3 branch. - Sheng Yang On

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2092

See Changes: [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-5840: UI > Secondary Storages > remove "prepareObjectStoreMigration" action (since prepareSecondaryStorageForMigration API has been removed from server-side). [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

> On Jan. 11, 2014, 12:53 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > The attached file is also the same file like others. > > > > Please check your uploaded file. Hi Sheng, Its my mistake. Please use the just updated file. - Suresh --- This is an au

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16642/ --- (Updated Jan. 11, 2014, 12:59 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16642/#review31568 --- The attached file is also the same file like others. Please check y

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

> On Jan. 11, 2014, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > Applied to 4.3 branch. Thanks. > > But need a patch for master branch as well. > > Sheng Yang wrote: > Reverted from 4.3 branch. > > It cannot compile. > > Suresh Balineni wrote: >

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16642/ --- (Updated Jan. 11, 2014, 12:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

> On Jan. 11, 2014, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > Applied to 4.3 branch. Thanks. > > But need a patch for master branch as well. > > Sheng Yang wrote: > Reverted from 4.3 branch. > > It cannot compile. Hi Sheng, I submitted revisi

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16642/ --- (Updated Jan. 11, 2014, 12:44 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2091

See -- [...truncated 566 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (351244/462297), 150.52 MiB | 226 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (351244/462297), 150.68 MiB | 234 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75%

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

> On Jan. 11, 2014, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > Applied to 4.3 branch. Thanks. > > But need a patch for master branch as well. Reverted from 4.3 branch. It cannot compile. - Sheng --

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #367

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2090

See -- [...truncated 581 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (367856/462286), 214.60 MiB | 552 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (367856/462286), 215.00 MiB | 521 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79%

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #366

See Changes: [marcus] CLOUDSTACK-5502 createVlanIpRange, allow untagged to be accepted per previous use, [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-5492: UI > Routers > Group by zone/pod/cluster/account > (1) fix a bug that requiresUpgr

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

> On Jan. 11, 2014, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! Applied to 4.3 branch. Thanks. But need a patch for master branch as well. - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.or

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #365

See -- [...truncated 240 lines...] Receiving objects: 39% (184557/462168), 32.27 MiB | 1023 KiB/s Receiving objects: 40% (184868/462168), 32.27 MiB | 1023 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16642/#review31556 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Jan. 7, 2014, 11:40 p.m., Sure

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #364

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-ceb in workspace

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2089

See -- [...truncated 576 lines...] Receiving objects: 78% (363569/462137), 193.14 MiB | 599 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (365089/462137), 193.83 MiB | 636 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79%

Re: [jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-5722) [Automation] Basic zone deployment failed while creating createVlanIpRange

Sorry guys, this one slipped my attention, the fix Animesh mentioned was because of this issue (I think in another ticket). On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Rayees Namathponnan (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2088

Hi Hugo: I notice you upgrade Jenkin recently, now below error happens very often. It looks like either Jenkin's git plugin has some problem or our git repo has instable network. Do you have any idea? > -Original Message- > From: jenk...@cloudstack.org [mailto:jen

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2088

See -- [...truncated 566 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351311/462061), 171.12 MiB | 731 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351314/462061), 171.60 MiB | 681 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76%

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2087

See -- [...truncated 577 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351312/462042), 178.66 MiB | 549 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351313/462042), 179.34 MiB | 599 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76%

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 released

On 10 January 2014 22:14, David Nalley wrote: > Doh, can't believe I missed that one on index.html. > > My apologies for the multiple problems. > > Thanks Sebb, Don't thank me for that one; I was just reforwarding the OPs mail. Looks like it was not moderated (yet ?) onto the dev list, and unfor

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 released

Doh, can't believe I missed that one on index.html. My apologies for the multiple problems. Thanks Sebb, --David On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:08 PM, sebb wrote: > As already mentioned below, the home page (inded.html) still says > > Latest Announcement > Announcing Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 > > Get

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 released

As already mentioned below, the home page (inded.html) still says Latest Announcement Announcing Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 Get CloudStack Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 is out! This looks bad, and ought to be fixed ASAP please. On 10 January 2014 17:32, Prodosh Banerjee wrote: > Also on http://cloudsta

Re: Review Request 16774: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-5053; KVM QEMU need to be present in agent hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/#review31545 --- Commit 0d24d323c0b01e3443e1f499c28e7a2d5863ea16 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16774: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-5053; KVM QEMU need to be present in agent hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/#review31546 --- Ship it! ship in master/4.3 - Frank Zhang On Jan. 9, 2014, 11:11

Re: Review Request 16774: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-5053; KVM QEMU need to be present in agent hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/#review31544 --- Commit db02388eb06721d1c995198625f9e43a87b07a50 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16758: vlan="" should end up as untagged vlan URI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16758/#review31542 --- Ship it! Ship It! - daan Hoogland On Jan. 10, 2014, 7:10 p.m., M

Re: SSL and Nagle

Yes On 1/10/14 1:13 PM, "Demetrius Tsitrelis" wrote: >There are many small packets during the TLS handshake and for some of the >features such as Console Proxy so this might be worth investigating. Do >you believe it warrants opening a bug? > > >-Original Message- >From: Chiradeep Vitta

RE: SSL and Nagle

There are many small packets during the TLS handshake and for some of the features such as Console Proxy so this might be worth investigating. Do you believe it warrants opening a bug? -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2086

See -- [...truncated 564 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (351137/462035), 154.41 MiB | 465 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (351140/462035), 155.03 MiB | 425 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75%

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #361

See

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #360

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358365/462035), 189.07 MiB | 380 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358656/462035), 189.21 MiB | 352 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #359

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351171/462023), 161.09 MiB | 598 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351172/462023), 161.51 MiB | 477 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #358

See -- [...truncated 562 lines...] Receiving objects: 73% (339356/462023), 120.07 MiB | 440 KiB/s Receiving objects: 73% (340136/462023), 120.64 MiB | 489 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #357

See -- [...truncated 560 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350843/462023), 150.21 MiB | 401 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350844/462023), 150.49 MiB | 426 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: SSL and Nagle

Is it? Google search indicates that it is "sometimes" a problem (with small packets). When CS is the SSL client, the TCP_NO_DELAY should be set by the server (in this case hypervisors). But the nature of the interaction is not high bandwidth nor latency sensitive, so it shouldn't matter. When it is

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #356

See -- [...truncated 560 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (351110/462023), 151.57 MiB | 372 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (35/462023), 151.57 MiB | 372 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2085

See -- [...truncated 565 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350935/462023), 142.04 MiB | 339 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350935/462023), 142.57 MiB | 397 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75%

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #355

See -- [...truncated 569 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351311/462023), 177.25 MiB | 560 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351313/462023), 177.79 MiB | 531 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2084

See -- [...truncated 569 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351273/462023), 171.39 MiB | 463 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351276/462023), 171.93 MiB | 479 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76%

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #8

See

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #354

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 73% (340176/462013), 120.82 MiB | 252 KiB/s Receiving objects: 73% (340176/462013), 121.04 MiB | 191 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: deployVm with data disk

OK, thanks for logging it! On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > too late :-) > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Yeah, I agree. I can log a bug for this later and include the contents of > > this e-mail. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #353

See -- [...truncated 560 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351148/462013), 159.40 MiB | 543 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351148/462013), 159.61 MiB | 532 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #7

See Changes: [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-5840: UI > Secondary Storages > remove "prepareObjectStoreMigration" action (since prepareSecondaryStorageForMigration API has been removed from server-side). [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-5840: UI > S

Re: Review Request 16758: vlan="" should end up as untagged vlan URI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16758/ --- (Updated Jan. 10, 2014, 7:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogl

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #352

See -- [...truncated 560 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350863/462013), 130.14 MiB | 484 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350863/462013), 130.52 MiB | 474 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2083

See -- [...truncated 548 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350909/461995), 139.07 MiB | 329 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350909/461995), 139.36 MiB | 350 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75%

Re: Review Request 15932: Add support for Primary Storage on Gluster using the libvirt backend

> On Dec. 4, 2013, 4:17 p.m., John Burwell wrote: > > > > Niels de Vos wrote: > Thanks John! I'll have a go at impoving the patch and will update it > (hopefully) soon. Reminder - Hi, This review has been pending for long. Please do update the patch so it may be shipped soon. Thanks! -

Re: Review Request 15933: Add Gluster to the list of protocols in the Management Server

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15933/#review31527 --- Reminder - Hi, This review has been pending for long. Please add re

Re: Review Request 12659: Removed unused script scripts/storage/qcow2/cleanupmyvms.sh

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12659/#review31526 --- Reminder - Hi, This review has been pending for long. Please close

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.2 #52

See

Re: Review Request 12646: Truncated trailing/double spaces.

> On July 17, 2013, 4:31 p.m., Wido den Hollander wrote: > > Ship It! Reminder - Hi, This review has been pending for long. Please close and mark as submitted if this has already been committed. Thanks! - Amogh --- This is an automati

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #351

See -- [...truncated 562 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (351026/461975), 149.56 MiB | 829 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (351052/461975), 150.51 MiB | 876 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #2082

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #51

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350820/461975), 133.86 MiB | 338 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350820/461975), 134.00 MiB | 335 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350820/461975

Re: deployVm with data disk

too late :-) On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Yeah, I agree. I can log a bug for this later and include the contents of > this e-mail. > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> This should be simple enough to fix by making sure the avoid object

Re: deployVm with data disk

Yeah, I agree. I can log a bug for this later and include the contents of this e-mail. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > This should be simple enough to fix by making sure the avoid object > references pools matching the current tag, and only the current tag, > every tim

Re: CentOS Special Interest Group

I can probably be there by noon. If that doesn't work, let me know and I'll look at changing flights. --David On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:27 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Milamber wrote: > >> >> Le 09/01/2014 09:11, Sebastien Goasguen a ecrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> With the recent

Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

Unless there was a white space change I didn't detect in the upstream version of the file, I was under the impression upstream and my local copy were the same in this regard except for the extra new line I placed between statements. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Mike,

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #350

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351124/461957), 164.37 MiB | 584 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351125/461957), 164.59 MiB | 562 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #50

See -- [...truncated 564 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350801/461957), 131.55 MiB | 365 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350801/461957), 131.85 MiB | 368 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350801/461957

Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

Mike, the problem that git has is that both you and upstream changed these lines. Now you have to decide which change to keep. Seems kind of silly in this case of course. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Oh, and to clarify, my first e-mail about this where I showed some di

Re: Review Request 16729: CLOUDSTACK-4904: Unable to see a derieved template if the parent template is deleted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16729/#review31522 --- Commit 7a39b0a2e18f5694df6d55c27b691c168d41d402 in branch refs/heads

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #349

See -- [...truncated 564 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351052/461899), 158.25 MiB | 363 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351052/461899), 158.78 MiB | 410 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #49

See -- [...truncated 550 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351132/461899), 164.41 MiB | 626 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351134/461899), 164.64 MiB | 606 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351135/461899

Re: Review Request 16729: CLOUDSTACK-4904: Unable to see a derieved template if the parent template is deleted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16729/#review31523 --- Commit 5bf78b82c01d213fd2ab4b4241c00ff2b22d2ad5 in branch refs/heads

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #348

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358907/461854), 187.38 MiB | 716 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358907/461854), 187.99 MiB | 674 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Review Request 16750: CLOUDSTACK-5651 deployVm: customparameters param name has to be changed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/#review31521 --- Commit 7053c222f989d2a9d1ae0ea8237a08e328fcb7c1 in branch refs/heads

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #347

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350773/461854), 140.71 MiB | 329 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350773/461854), 141.24 MiB | 390 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Review Request 16750: CLOUDSTACK-5651 deployVm: customparameters param name has to be changed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/#review31520 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On Jan. 10, 2014, 6:37 a.m

Re: Review Request 16750: CLOUDSTACK-5651 deployVm: customparameters param name has to be changed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/#review31519 --- Commit 35e09c81e623f59ae73cc1c17f50922da8436105 in branch refs/heads

Re: deployVm with data disk

This should be simple enough to fix by making sure the avoid object references pools matching the current tag, and only the current tag, every time. This means removing a matching pool from the avoid set if it exists in the current avoid set, after the state where all pools are set to avoid. On Fr

Re: CentOS Special Interest Group

On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Milamber wrote: > > Le 09/01/2014 09:11, Sebastien Goasguen a ecrit : >> Hi, >> >> With the recent CentOS announcement there is a call for Special Interest >> Group (SIG): >> http://www.centos.org/variants/ >> >> This might be an opportunity to create an official

Re: deployVm with data disk

Yeah, the object 'avoid' in the deployment planner is passed along throughout the whole chain and added to, so the non-matching data disk pool ends up in avoid when searching for a root disk pool, and at that point it will never be chosen. What's kind of interesting as well is that the opposite is

Re: deployVm with data disk

I added some debug, and do see some weird stuff, like: 2014-01-10 10:04:27,335 DEBUG [storage.allocator.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-14:job-22034 = [ 0946b816-2a5d-433f-a90b-853a465db45a ]) Found pools matching tags: [Pool[484|BSSAN]] 2014-01-10 10:04:27,336 DEBUG [storage.alloc

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

Not necessarily. You can still set the upstream to send a /60 to VPC X, and then just assign individual /64s from that /60 into the networks in that VPC. You can create a route upstream for each /64, but you can also just program the contiguous /60 route into the upstream. That gives you future e

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #346

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2081

See -- [...truncated 570 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (351069/461827), 169.64 MiB | 311 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (351069/461827), 169.98 MiB | 308 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76%

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #345

See -- [...truncated 571 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (358881/461827), 186.20 MiB | 507 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358881/461827), 186.92 MiB | 570 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Typo on downloads page

ack; fixed. Thanks! On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:43 AM, sebb wrote: > You can links to older releases of Apache CloudStack on the > > should likely be > > You can find links to older releases of Apache CloudStack on the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 released

Doh, forgot to push that change. Fixing now - Thanks Sebb! --David On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:38 AM, sebb wrote: > Unfortunately the download page still refers to 4.2.0, and all the > download buttons are broken. > > On 10 January 2014 14:01, David Nalley wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Typo on downloads page

You can links to older releases of Apache CloudStack on the should likely be You can find links to older releases of Apache CloudStack on the

Re: Review Request 16758: vlan="" should end up as untagged vlan URI

> On Jan. 10, 2014, 10:30 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > I am fine with this with the exception of one worry: 'vlan://untagged' may > > be compared to 'untagged' at some points in the system. I would like to > > include a change in NetUtils.java for this: > > if (VLAN_UNTAGGED.equalsIgn

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 released

Unfortunately the download page still refers to 4.2.0, and all the download buttons are broken. On 10 January 2014 14:01, David Nalley wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the 4.2.1 release > of the CloudStack cloud orch

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2080

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350739/461815), 141.86 MiB | 356 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350739/461815), 142.20 MiB | 346 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75%

Re: Weird Diffs Sometimes

Oh, and to clarify, my first e-mail about this where I showed some diff output was literally what Git gave me (I didn't modify it at all). It is an example of where Git was asking me to manually intervene in a situation where only a new line was added between two statements. Seems weird that it wou

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2079

See -- [...truncated 580 lines...] Receiving objects: 79% (368102/461815), 195.67 MiB | 522 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79% (368102/461815), 196.51 MiB | 585 KiB/s Receiving objects: 79%

  1   2   >