Hi Daan,
Can you please cherry pick the following commit to 4.4
commit 45f6bac727bf6631153ac8e17dd7b074759052eb
CLOUDSTACK-6714: monitor script echo service command is added with quotes
Thanks,
Jayapal
On May 19, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi Pierre,
These changes look great to me. My only concern is how long you think it
would take to implement being that we've probably only got a couple weeks
until a RC (assuming all of our blockers can be
CloudStack 4.2 (KVM) System Vm Upgrade
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.2+(KVM)+System+Vm+Upgrade
isn't what you looking for?
- Radoslaw Smigielski
On May 19, 2014, at 11:11 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Additional notes: if newer CloudStack management server supports 'apikey'
in the HTTP request args, for backward compatibility let's allow 'apiKey'
in the args as well.
Regards.
I might need vacation, but I thought
I guess above mail was lost in the flood, so bringing this to your
attention again.
Kindly take your time to read and reply.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Gaurav Aradhye
gaurav.arad...@clogeny.comwrote:
Hello all,
Re-iterating over what Santhosh has asked before. Is there
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/887/changes
Changes:
[muralimmreddy] CLOUDSTACK-6712: NPE in findJobInstanceUuid() in ApiDBUtils
--
[...truncated 18336 lines...]
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
H Karl,
Did you get anywhere yet with the redundancy of the vpc routers, yet?
We just got a new use case for it. We want to prevent having to
instantiate two vpc's for redundancy's.
We are planning some work on it now and I would like to bundle
development power and not do double work.
--
Daan
To me this looks like an enhancement rather than a feature, however I'd be
happy to say that enhancements are worthy of specifications/unit tests.
I'm working on a few small enhancements now and have written up a spec for
each. I think it helps focus the mind on the task and enables people to
Min,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
As we proposed earlier in community, since IAM feature is not ready for 4.4
release due to backwards compatibility issue, we need to disable IAM on 4.4.
I have checked in commit
is in
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
Please pull-in commit 497f5e53725c30442040805a3ad42a81ee926f50 from
4.4-forward to 4.4
CLOUDSTACK-6712: NPE in findJobInstanceUuid() in ApiDBUtils
Branch: refs/heads/4.4-forward
Commit:
Gaurav, to avoid confusion: these look like integration tests. Is that
what you mean?
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Gaurav Aradhye
gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com wrote:
Hello Yoshikazu,
Please take a look at this patch (https://reviews.apache.org/r/21682/).
These are the unit tests I am
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
45f6bac727bf6631153ac8e17dd7b074759052eb
is in
--
Daan
Yes. Integration smoke test.
Regards,
Gaurav
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Gaurav, to avoid confusion: these look like integration tests. Is that
what you mean?
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Gaurav Aradhye
gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21431/
---
(Updated May 20, 2014, 9:05 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21621/#review43465
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On May 19, 2014, 7 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21685/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21685/
---
(Updated May 20, 2014, 9:58 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21685/#review43467
---
test/integration/smoke/test_routers.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21685/#review43468
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
On May 20, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21685/#review43469
---
This patch is not applying cleanly on master and 4.4-forward.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21431/#review43470
---
Ship it!
applied both versions 2 and 3 of the patch to 4.4:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/888/changes
Changes:
[jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-6714: monitor script echo service command is added with
quotes
[aprateek] CLOUDSTACK-6563: Integrating setuptools for python into MSI
--
+1
It looks good interface to support several version users.
Go Chiba
E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:
On May 19, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi Pierre,
These changes look
Thanks for replies,
Hi Pierre,
These changes look great to me. My only concern is how long you think it
would take to implement being that we've probably only got a couple weeks
until a RC (assuming all of our blockers can be resolved in that
timeframe).
Do you know how long this
Jayapal, you closed issue CLOUDSTACK-6485 as Can't reproduce. You
should first consult with the author to make sure the problem is bkac.
--
Daan
Hi Daan,
I intended to close CLOUDSTACK-6084 because CLOUDSTACK-6485 is reverted,
mistakenly
resolved the CLOUDSTACK-6485 which is opened in other tab.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 20-May-2014, at 4:49 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jayapal, you closed issue CLOUDSTACK-6485 as
On May 20, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
We are running continuously using CI in our environment on 4.4-forward. May
be more steps as what followed here would help to check.
Are we using https\http mode? Check this in advanced.cfg or cfg
If https flag under cfg is not set, then request package version on this
machine, or python version could be an issue( 2.7.x is required) . I just
tried one more time on simulator after this mail and it worked.
Santhosh
From: sebgoa [run...@gmail.com]
On May 20, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
If https flag under cfg is not set, then request package version on this
machine, or python version could be an issue( 2.7.x is required) . I just
tried one more time on simulator after this mail and it
installing marvin from the code might help. I am not sure if the pip repo is
updated.
$sudo python tools/marvin/setup.py install
~Rajani
On 20-May-2014, at 5:41 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
If
Thanks, David!
It is awesome to have my work with VSCC recognized at Synergy, but the
real shout-out goes to this community. None of what David and I
created would have been possible without the community's help. So
thanks to everyone for making it possible!
-Chris
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:04
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21686/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Repository:
2 pulled
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
Please cherry-pick below commits in 4.4-forward into 4.4.
CLOUDSTACK-6721: VolumeApiServiceImpl is sending wrong type for
updateAsyncJobAttachment
Branch: refs/heads/4.4-forward
Commit:
I do:
sudo pip install ./tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-0.1.0.tar.gz
After a successful build
On May 20, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
installing marvin from the code might help. I am not sure if the pip repo is
updated.
$sudo python tools/marvin/setup.py
1. The below error in message you pasged shows up the requests package you are
using is outdated or does not have verify argument.
2. On my machine requests version shows up 2.2.1 as below.
import requests
requests.__version__
'2.2.1'
3. Install latest requests package to fix this issue.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21686/
---
(Updated May 20, 2014, 6:03 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh
On May 20, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
1. The below error in message you pasged shows up the requests package you
are using is outdated or does not have verify argument.
2. On my machine requests version shows up 2.2.1 as below.
import requests
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21686/#review43481
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On May 20, 2014, 12:33
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/889/changes
Changes:
[Daan Hoogland] A slightly more reliable way of extracting the device name.
Thanks John.
[muralimmreddy] CLOUDSTACK-6721: VolumeApiServiceImpl is sending wrong type for
[muralimmreddy] CLOUDSTACK-6720: Async
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21696/
---
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Ian Duffy, Rohit Yadav, and Hugo
Running CloudStack 4.1.1 I am trying to understand the relationship between
CloudStack’s snapshots that it keeps on secondary storage and what XenServer
sees in the VHD chain on the SR.
Here is my VHD chain with 3 VDIs; a base copy, a snapshot, and the active vdi
for the VM.
[root@pd1-xh4 ~]#
Hey All,
I plan to work on cleaning up the formatting of the documentation files in
the Administration Guide today. I am not going to change any content and I
am note (yet) going to split any more files. I am going to just do a once
over on as many docs as I can get through to clean up all of
On May 20, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
Hey All,
I plan to work on cleaning up the formatting of the documentation files in
the Administration Guide today. I am not going to change any content and I
am note (yet) going to split any more files. I am going to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21685/#review43486
---
Commit c7f5077ab18031e5601eb04f1ff7010b214861fe in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21682/#review43488
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Yoshikazu Nojima
On May 20, 2014, 5:15
Hi Daan,
What is the conflict? Do you need me to resolve the conflict? Sorry,
just
realized that the URL is internal to citrix, not visible to outside.
Thanks
-min
On 5/20/14 1:16 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Min,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:30 AM,
I ran into same issues in analyzing automation test. The related
integration tests are merged into 4.4-forward along with marvin test
framework merge, but this patch does not exist in 4.4-forward, so we
should either disable these two integration tests, or pull that patch code
into 4.4-forward.
Below mentioned tests were already disabled under 4.4-forward.
Santhosh
From: Min Chen
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:26 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Yoshikazu Nojima; Marcus Sorensen; Rayees Namathponnan; Santhosh Edukulla
Subject: Re: Patch
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/12
Fixed the formatting of lists and notes and such for all files
I fixed the following:
- extra line breaks in all lists
- correctly wrapped 'note' blocks
- put 2 line breaks
On May 20, 2014, 4:16 p.m., Yoshikazu Nojima wrote:
Ship It!
Oh, it's already shipped.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=f278c537d527aa0a9cf0e20cf80dd48e1d85ec82
- Yoshikazu
---
This is an
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/890/changes
Changes:
[girish] Fixing issues in regression test suite test_accounts.py
--
[...truncated 18339 lines...]
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO]
Hi All,
I was trying to use the Simulator on the 4.3 branch earlier today.
On doing the deployment of advanced.cfg using nosetest it failed around
creating the cluster.
Can anybody confirm success/failure with the 4.3 branch? Any idea what has
to be done to fix it or if its fixed in the 4.4
Thanks for fixing this!
I was trying to use them on 4.3 earlier with no joy.
On 20 May 2014 13:39, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Santhosh Edukulla
santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote:
1. The below error in message you pasged shows up the requests package
you
Ian,
It works in 4.3 as well. I would recommend to use 4.4-forward , which contains
good fixes for both simulator and other framework to deploy and run.
We kept a wiki for 4.4-forward branch with all information on how to run and
use simulator, deploy and test.
That is correct Mike. Thanks to you and Marcus for confirming this.
On 13/05/14 8:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks, Marcus
So, it sounds like when you upgrade your CloudStack Management Server(s),
you need to update all of your KVM hosts anyways, so you get the
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/891/
--
[...truncated 18336 lines...]
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO] cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:cobertura (default-cli) @ cloud-awsapi
[INFO]
[INFO] ---
Sorry Min,
I didn't check the conflict, just aborted.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
What is the conflict? Do you need me to resolve the conflict? Sorry,
just
realized that the URL is internal to citrix, not visible to outside.
Ok. Let me try. Can I cherry pick this into 4.4 after resolving the
conflict?
Thanks
-min
On 5/20/14 1:44 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Min,
I didn't check the conflict, just aborted.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
Hi Daan,
The cherry pick error is due to a deleted iam test since we disabled IAM
feature:
# Unmerged paths:
# (use git add/rm file... as appropriate to mark resolution)
#
# deleted by them:test/integration/smoke/test_vm_iam.py
So the fix is to run git rm
Hugo without putting certain rules we are not going to get out of the
situation. I think it may seem draconian but stating No merges are allowed
without a successful run of the automation is beneficial for everyone. It
forces focus on automation and helps mitigate regression. If we run into
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/892/
--
[...truncated 18350 lines...]
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO] cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:cobertura (default-cli) @ cloud-awsapi
[INFO]
[INFO] ---
GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/11
rnotes.rst split into multiple files
* upgrade folder created containing all upgrade instructions per version
* add section labels in upgrade instructions
* split into include
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/11#issuecomment-43702606
preview available:
http://cs44-rn-test.readthedocs.org/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/893/changes
Changes:
[jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-6729: UI - create compute offering/create disk
offering - determine whether to pass certain data to API comamnd upon
isCustomized checkbox/isPublic checkbox's value.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-slowbuild/894/
--
[...truncated 18336 lines...]
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO] cobertura-maven-plugin:2.6:cobertura (default-cli) @ cloud-awsapi
[INFO]
[INFO] ---
65 matches
Mail list logo
