Hello,
We are pleased to release the first draft version of FUEL-CLOUD.
FUEL-CLOUD is a collection of commonly used entries for localization of
cloud computing related software and docs.
Today, Cloud is very new to this world and is an emerging technology to the
future. Lots of companies are
On July 21, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Ship It!
please add bugid.
- Santhosh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23609/#review48224
On July 21, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Ship It!
Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
please add bugid.
88f3517..4596ae9 master - master
- Santhosh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that she
has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
Congrats Rajani .. well Deserved ..
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
On April 29, 2014, 12:29 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Ship It!
Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
If we don't have any review issues pending, can some body with commit
rights push this patch?
Saurav,
Please update BugId and Branch fields. This review submission is pending since
long.
I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon
releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all.
+1 if you are in favor of not releasing
0 if you are in favor of just not releasing 4.4
-1 if you are very sorry you didn't vote, will better your life and
volunteer to be the next RM
kind
welcome Rajani, have fun
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Shweta Agarwal
shweta.agar...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Rajani .. well Deserved ..
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject:
Congrats Rajani.
-Original Message-
From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.com]
Sent: 22 July 2014 11:57
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
Congrats Rajani .. well Deserved ..
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna
Congrats Rajani :)
cheers!
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com
wrote:
Congrats Rajani.
-Original Message-
From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.com]
Sent: 22 July 2014 11:57
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE]
Congratulations Rajani :)
-Harikrishna
On 22-Jul-2014, at 12:11 pm, Punith S punit...@cloudbyte.com wrote:
Congrats Rajani :)
cheers!
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.com
wrote:
Congrats Rajani.
-Original Message-
From: Shweta Agarwal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23793/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7137
Congratulations Rajani.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: 22 July 2014 11:53
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani
Karuturi to become a
On July 21, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg, line 133
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/diff/1/?file=636739#file636739line133
Is this change required, compared to earlier devcloud cfg, it was a
working cfg for devcloud.
That would
On July 21, 2014, 1:58 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg, line 133
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/diff/1/?file=636739#file636739line133
For devcloud deployments the mgtSvrIp should be .10 as the management
server is running on the devcloud
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 7:24 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 7:24 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
Congratulations Rajani !
2014-07-22 8:23 GMT+02:00 Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
she
has accepted. Being a committer allows many
Congratulations Rajani !
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani
Karuturi
Congrats Rajani.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani
Karuturi to
Congrats Rajani!
Regards,
Gaurav
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Saksham Srivastava
saksham.srivast...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Rajani.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23750/#review48350
---
Santosh, you can commit this directly right? Just make individual
On July 21, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 1099
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/diff/1/?file=636741#file636741line1099
Instead of this, can we make logger node under devcloud.cfg as
similar to setup/dev/advanced.cfg. We
On July 22, 2014, 8:01 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Santosh, you can commit this directly right? Just make individual commits
of each file/component so its easy to track down any issues later.
Sure, i will commit, but please do a review and i want to be sure that no
regression issues are
Congrats Rajani!
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2014 11:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani
Karuturi to
Congrats Rajani!
On 22 July 2014 09:12, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Rajani!
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2014 11:53 AM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23750/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 8:34 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22805/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 8:39 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n
Congrats Rajani !
On 22/07/14 11:53 am, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
she
has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to
Congrats Rajani !!
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:11 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
Congrats Rajani !
On 22/07/14 11:53 am, Prasanna
On 07/22/2014 07:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking Wido knows the answer to this, but - of course - anyone feel
free to chime in. :)
Hehe
I was looking at this video of Wido's from CCCEU13 in Amsterdam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57voBP_zdf8feature=youtu.be
In it, Wido
On 07/22/2014 08:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon
releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all.
So this is not a good thing. Honestly, yes, I didn't vote, I'm truly
sorry for that, but didn't I see other votes come along?
For me
Santhosh, these coverity findings should unveil hidden regression
possibilities and that's alright. I think you should just commit them
with a marker like 'coverity:'. we'll have to deal with the
regressions when we encounter them (and write appropriate unit tests
as they come along)
On Tue, Jul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 9:15 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
On July 17, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 960
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/diff/1/?file=634289#file634289line960
Why is it made create=true when it is not a BaseAyncCreate cmd ?
create=true should be added only when
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2014 08:28 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon
releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all.
So this is not a good thing. Honestly, yes, I didn't vote, I'm
Hi Vihar and all,
Thanks, managed to resolve this problem. After checking agent.log, I found
out that the /var partition on the VR is full, due to verbose log I enabled
when troubleshooting the DNS service issue on another thread.
I disabled back the debugging and delete the log file which is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 9:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
Even, i agree, the effort from people adding features, fixes and others like RM
should not go in vain, and not set something as a wrong precedent of abandoning
a release.
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Wido den Hollander [w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/#review48356
---
The patch applies cleanly now, thanks for rebasing.
Can you have a
1. If EX: 20 check-ins happens between two runs, and say 2 test cases failed
for a given run, how do we know which check-in caused the failure in an
automated CI environment which runs automatically from start to end?
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Sudha
Santhosh - In the current model no need to know. All 20 check-ins are
considered culprits. That subgroup of check-ins need to be reviewed and
responsible developer need to fix.
Ideally CI should be run for each check in however given the time it takes to
run the Marvin automation, it is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23614/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 12:11 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh
Hii,
I installed cygwin from http://cygwin.mirrors.hoobly.com.. I'm following
the cheatsheat for setting up the environment. Can anyone please help me
what is meant by
- mklink mkisofs.exe genisoimage.exe
- mklink python.exe python2.7.exe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22805/#review48358
---
test/integration/component/test_ss_domain_limits.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23614/#review48359
---
test/integration/component/test_escalations_instances.py
-1 (here is my vote for this thread :-P)
Shouldn't we improve release management process instead? Look like
releasing 4.4 is a huge pain, I guest it shouldn't be that way.
Could we have a discussion session regarding Release management at the next
CCCEU14? There was one at Denver and I think the
Those links allow one .exe to be substituted for another.
For instance, mkisofs.exe is not really available on windows; however,
genisoimage.exe offers the same functionality and takes the command line
parameters. Using mklink mkisofs.exe genisoimage.exe, you create a file system
entry for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23617/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 12:35 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
It might help to ask what's stopping people from voting.
It would seem the correct approach is to only vote for an RC if you've been
part of the QA process either formally by having overseen the build validation
infrastructure or informally by having installed the RC and run some tests.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7155 and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23805/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Ilia Shakitko.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Hi All,
I've added a bug for VXLAN to JIRA -
CLOUDSTACK-7157https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7157
If I add a guest traffic type of VXLAN it changes the Public network to using
VXLAN as well (regardless of what you have previously set)
Regards,
Paul Angus
Senior Consultant /
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23807/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7156
Tanq
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753194.aspx
~Rajani
On 22-Jul-2014, at 5:41 pm, Priyanka Deepala priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com
mailto:priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hii,
I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 1:20 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23808/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 1:24 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23805/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 1:39 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Ilia
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23805/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 1:39 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Ilia
-1 on abandoning 4.4
If you are not getting VOTEs, ping the private@ and ask PMCs to vote, you only
need 3 pmc vote to release.
I am inundating by emails and did not even see the new VOTE thread, I left it
as the last VOTE that got -1 within 24 hours.
As to why this is happening, I expressed
For completeness, the original email:
http://markmail.org/message/3yknkjr2gnvfcqxb
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 July 2014 14:46
To: dev
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*
Sebastien, this is not about git. And the last
+1 on release
ps: the vote does not have to be closed.
On Jul 21, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
Pierre-Luc,
I¹ve closed the bug as invalid. Here is the explanation why:
The first attempt to upgrade failed because the new system template wasn't
You are right, Sebastien. Emotion got the better of me.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on release
ps: the vote does not have to be closed.
On Jul 21, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
wrote:
+1
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right, Sebastien. Emotion got the better of me.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
+1 on release
ps: the vote does not have to be
Ship it! :)
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
this is maybe not according to proceedings as defined, but this is a
result of +3 binding after more then 72 hours.
anyone for drinks?
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski
I pushed the tag 4.4.0 on the latest RC to the central repo.
@Wido: can you create the deb packages and upload them?
@Pierre-Luc: can you finalize the release docs?
@Hugo: can you create the RPM/systemVM
Are we releasing the windows MSI? And who can create those?
regards,
Daan
--
Thanks, Wido!
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2014 07:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking Wido knows the answer to this, but - of course - anyone feel
free to chime in. :)
Hehe
I was looking at this video of Wido's from CCCEU13
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23812/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7147
also,
What about SystemVM template. I still don't know if we need to upgrade
them in 4.4 and what should be the URL for them?
Thanks,
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
I will update the RN and make the 4.4.0 available later today.
What about the API doc? a huge amount of api got modified. How could I
build and update the api doc at: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23813/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7044
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23814/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7148
-1 We should release 4.4
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon
releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all.
+1 if you are in favor of not releasing
0 if you are in favor of just not
Hi,
Apologies for not getting much involved with 4.4, I had zero time to test
anything, so couldn't vote blindly.
Having said that, -1 on abandoning, getting 4.4 out of the door, even if it's
crappy, will get more people interested to test it which will hopefully lead to
a great 4.4.1.
I
(mostly for schuberg philis internal, but CC to cloudstack as fyi in case
someone is following our github)
Hey folks,
Just discussing with Daan. Now that we’re figuring out our plan for writing the
code a bit, I think we have to reflect that in source code management.
First, for reference,
Congratulations!
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
she
has accepted. Being a committer allows many
Congratz!
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer
Thanks everyone !!
~Rajani
On 22-Jul-2014, at 2:15 pm, Sanjeev Neelarapu
Thanks Leo
From: Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.commailto:lsim...@schubergphilis.com
Date: Monday, July 21, 2014 at 7:24 AM
To: Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.commailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com,
dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
I am not sure if we have any document for ACS 4.3. But you may be able to
reference the old document, and just remember that we have replaced the
following old 3 tables:
template_host_ref - template_store_ref
volume_host_ref- volume_store_ref
snapshot_host_ref - snapshot_store_ref
And
Hi Chandan,
Great initiative from FUEL project. Congratulations !
I will take a look at it and come back with my feedback.
Of course, thank you for your interest in CloudStack :-) (
Thanks and Regards
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: chandan kumar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23819/
---
Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
Congrats Rajani !!
On 22/07/14 10:04 AM, Demetrius Tsitrelis
demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com wrote:
Congratz!
-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:53 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23793/#review48385
---
Commit 45888e214c949d1e48d800339b366c42a7990641 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23793/#review48386
---
Commit 8d8190ea4e00edb0f7ce9665535adcc7a5b5097d in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23814/#review48389
---
Commit 981becc73585c9a789b377e18af623c325b0bc7f in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23814/#review48390
---
Commit dd138ceec5faa5d5b0fcdfe5cc655199b8f9187b in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23813/#review48393
---
Commit 613eb12104af5c27935091127a1a19941f96e336 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23812/#review48401
---
Commit 2c0765195a4a01ee51973c48d0561261d4fb01c6 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 7:19 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo
On July 22, 2014, 9:57 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
The patch applies cleanly now, thanks for rebasing.
Can you have a look at the following findbug findings:
[INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:2.5.3:check (cloudstack-findbugs) @
cloud-plugin-network-vcs ---
[INFO] BugInstance size
I was testing on a recent 4.4 build today and noticed that volume resizing
for RBD volumes is not working as intended.
In LibvirtComputingResource.java the 'getResizeScriptType()' function
doesn't have logic for type = RBD and format = RAW or QCOW2, so it returns
'null' and the resize operation
Hey,
I tried to set up a dev environment on Windows. My advice to you is don't. Get
an Ubuntu VM or go Mac based.
I know it's possible and good to at least establish that it does work on all
platforms, however if you are doing dev work, it's just painful. Well, it was
for me.
If you do get
I have been working for the last few months on standing up a production
environment based on CloudStack, and it seems like we are constantly
waiting for features or fixes in the next release. It's looking like we
will need to implement (and commit) fixes, and just build custom packages
in order
On 07/22/2014 09:53 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
I was testing on a recent 4.4 build today and noticed that volume resizing
for RBD volumes is not working as intended.
In LibvirtComputingResource.java the 'getResizeScriptType()' function
doesn't have logic for type = RBD and format = RAW or
Wido,
I appreciate the confirmation. Would you mind posting an update here when
you've submitted the patch? As I mentioned in another post we will
probably end up just having to go into production with a non-official
build. We won't be able to wait for 4.5 or 4.4.x unfortunately.
Thank You,
On 07/22/2014 10:13 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
Wido,
I appreciate the confirmation. Would you mind posting an update here when
you've submitted the patch? As I mentioned in another post we will
probably end up just having to go into production with a non-official
build. We won't be able to
Hi,
we will be updating the Big Switch Network plugin for Cloudstack, targeting the
4.6 release. The design doc for the proposed update can be seen at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/BigSwitch+Networking+Plugin.
This is a first draft, any questions and suggestions for
On 07/22/2014 04:56 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I pushed the tag 4.4.0 on the latest RC to the central repo.
@Wido: can you create the deb packages and upload them?
I'm building the packages right now. I had to modify the
debian/changelog file however to generate the 4.4.0 packages.
Wido,
Excellent. As long as it passes testing we'll be golden.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:13 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
Wido,
I appreciate the confirmation. Would you mind
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/
---
(Updated July 22, 2014, 9:44 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
