See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1151/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1152/changes
Changes:
[rajesh.battala] CLOUDSTACK-7929: While creating network offering if one
specifies negative value for network rate then we will convert that value to 0
i.e. unlimited
--
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1153/
Hi,
ACS 4.3 branch and both 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 were rock solid releases. Before 4.5.0
is out or a stable and well-tested 4.4.x release, should we go through issues
reported for affects version 4.3.0/4.3.1 but a fix version that is
4.4.x/4.5.x/4.6.x [1] and backport on 4.3 branch.
Should we do a
Two points of concern, Rohit;
1. Doing this is making a promise for the future. Can and will we keep this?
2. don't port anything to 4.3.2 that you don't apply to the 4.4 branch as well.
otherwise I'm all for it.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/40
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20492616
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/141/changes
Changes:
[rajesh.battala] CLOUDSTACK-7688, CLOUDSTACK-7747: restricted various
operations for VM with VM snapshots which breaks VM snapshots.
[rajesh.battala] CLOUDSTACK-7767: fixed events are not generated for snapshot
creation
Thanks, Marcus.
I was eyeing shared mountpoint as well, but was hoping for something better. I
guess it will have to do.
Cheers :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
To:
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20492860
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39#issuecomment-63441065
I dont see a case when it could return false then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/142/
--
[...truncated 1655 lines...]
[INFO] Deleting
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/orchestration
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO]
[INFO] ---
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28163/
---
Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
Heya,
Who would be interested in working on Coverity, FindBugs and/or PMD fixes
during CCCEU? Happy to introduce people to the Coverity interface and discuss
option to fix the reported issues.
It’s a great way to get involved with the CloudStack development processes
without requiring an
GitHub user joshk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43
Use the new build env on Travis
faster vm boot times
more cpu cores and ram
better network
caching is available
docs coming soon
You can merge this pull request into a Git
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Nov. 17, 2014, 9:44 p.m., Brian Federle wrote:
I am getting conflicts in the properties file applying to the latest master
(my HEAD is @ eba7cc78da751cc25994a5a736a87ce2e83c394e). There were a lot
of changes lately to the localization strings, which is probably why it is
4.3.1 is out. is this really what we want, Rohit? seems this revert
shouldn't happen.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:35 AM, bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: cloudstack
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.3 e615f218a - e6d00bcc6
Revert Updating pom.xml version numbers for release
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43#issuecomment-63452207
Thanks for this @joshk we will merge once it's green. thanks to TravisCI
for your help
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/1
keep colons in the request to ACS
ACS does not decode %3A to colon and thus some requests break
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Might be a stupid suggestion - but adding one more record inside database,
storage_pools table - would that work ?
On 18 November 2014 10:04, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Thanks, Marcus.
I was eyeing shared mountpoint as well, but was hoping for something
better. I guess it will have to do.
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/1#issuecomment-63455032
is there a jira issue for it ? if yes we will need to close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user imduffy15 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43#issuecomment-63457295
Hi @joshk this is going to cause issues as we use sudo to install packages
within the before_install script.
Is it possible to have sudo access and the
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/1#issuecomment-63458765
I didn't create a ticket for it. Will do if you want me to :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Nov 2014, at 12:13, runseb
I tried again to update from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1 with centos management server and
xenserver 6.2. Here is the logs from the management server and the catalina.out
http://pastebin.com/mS0wjug7
http://pastebin.com/gwVCitvb
I did fresh install with a single vm witg the db and management server on the
Looks like those pastes have been removed, please repost them.
(make sure to anonymise IPs, keys, usernames etc)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Midgett clouds...@trick-solutions.com.INVALID
To:
I think there are more things tying into the DB for storage, merely adding one
more entry would probably just break stuff.
I wouldn't dare to try it, thanks for trying to help though. :-)
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/1#issuecomment-63460966
Created CLOUDSTACK-7935 for documentation purposes. See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7935
You can close this issue when
On Nov. 17, 2014, 9:44 p.m., Brian Federle wrote:
I am getting conflicts in the properties file applying to the latest master
(my HEAD is @ eba7cc78da751cc25994a5a736a87ce2e83c394e). There were a lot
of changes lately to the localization strings, which is probably why it is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28168/
---
Review request for cloudstack, bharat kumar and Kishan Kavala.
Repository:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/632/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] Revert Updating pom.xml version numbers for release
4.3.2-SNAPSHOT
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/650/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/
---
(Updated Nov. 18, 2014, 1:44 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
Hi Rohit,
It's a week almost w/o an answer from Kishan. Meanwhile, I've redone the patch,
removing some duplications (found 2 more places with same constant declared).
And decreased the limit to 1 (minimal logical range limit). So it was a good
feedback from you and Simon to actually let
Hi Min, hi Koushik,
Cloudstack is shouting at me:
NO EVENT PUBLISH CAN BE WRAPPED WITHIN DB TRANSACTION!
(full stack trace below). I've learned this is happening on our
systemvm-persistent-config feature branch because it has commit
ffaabdc13fde0f0f7b2667a483006e2a4b805f63 but it does not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27979/#review61917
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Simon Fiddaman
On Nov. 18, 2014, 1:44 p.m.,
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/1#issuecomment-63473873
LGTM, merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Thanks Nux I realized that after I posted but had to leave the office.
As I side note I did the upgrade again yesterday and it failed at starting the
bridge networking. I dropped the DB and set it up like a fresh install and
that worked. I uploaded the upgraded db and it still failed to start
Matthew, How big is the diff?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Matthew Midgett
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid wrote:
Thanks Nux I realized that after I posted but had to leave the office.
As I side note I did the upgrade again yesterday and it failed at starting
the bridge networking.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
It’s a few lines and Dan If you would like to view them I can send them to you.
The problem lies in the network part.
CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from
disclosure to anyone
please sand them to daan hoogland on gmail if it needs to be private
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Matthew Midgett
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid wrote:
It’s a few lines and Dan If you would like to view them I can send them to
you. The problem lies in the network part.
This broke deploydb and since we may not get time today/tomorrow I had to
revert. Our 4.3 release manager is well informed about this.
I hope when we change the version we should make sure CloudStack builds, and
normal operations such as deploydb should work. We should re-revert this once
This is why I introduced the branch on rc policy. I discussed it with
David this morning and we concluded that it is missing a merge back.
That doesn't mean that on each upgrade an emtpy upgrade path is
needed.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
This
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/653/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28179/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7928
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi Leo,
NO EVENT PUBLISH CAN BE WRAPPED WITHIN DB TRANSACTION! is along the
same line as NO AGENT COMMAND CAN BE WRAPPED WITHIN DB TRANSACTION!. The
rationale behind this is simple: event subscriber execution or agent
command handling at resource layer may take too long, and we don't want
Hi Min,
Thanks for a very clear answer!
However, I'm afraid I still don't get it :-). So...
...do you have any specific example or use case of an external IAM service to
integrate with? Is there some kind of design document for me to understand the
goals?
I ask because all the ones that I'm
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
For IAM feature design goal, you can take a look at our FS at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Identity+
and+Access+Management+%28IAM%29+Plugin. Also Prachi and I presented this
work at Denver Apache CloudStack Collab conference, you can also view our
slideshare at
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3814/
--
Started by upstream project build-master build number 1912
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/143/changes
Changes:
[jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-7498: UI ISO Register ISO action a javascript
error osTypeObjs is not defined comes and goes.
--
[...truncated 1658 lines...]
[INFO] Deleting
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3815/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/657/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/144/changes
Changes:
[jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-6624: UI create network offering cloudStack does
NOT support specifyIpRanges for isolated network - fix a bug that wrongly sends
specifyIpRanges=true to createNetworkOffering API.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/145/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/658/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/659/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28179/#review62071
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- sangeetha hariharan
On Nov. 18, 2014, 5:47
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28213/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7752
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28213/
---
(Updated Nov. 19, 2014, 5:03 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Rajesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28213/
---
(Updated Nov. 19, 2014, 5:17 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
Github user karuturi closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/42
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/661/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28217/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Repository: cloudstack-git
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
71 matches
Mail list logo
