Any info about ACS 4.11 ?

2017-09-29 Thread Haijiao
Hi, Dev team Not see much info about the next version of CloudStack. Keen to know as we are evaluating the proper version to upgrade this year. 1. Will ACS 4.11 be the next LTS version according to road map ? 2. What's the design targets and key features to be included in 4.11? 3. Who i

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

2017-09-29 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
That sounds like another one to wait for until code freeze. :) On Sep 29, 2017, at 7:45 AM, Daan Hoogland mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: ohw dear Mike, I am changing the log4j version, brr. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Tutkowski, Mike mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>> wrote:

Re: Advice on converting zone-wide to cluster-wide storage

2017-09-29 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Mike, thx for that info, that is exactly what I also see as DB differences, but was also wondering if anyone played with it in Production :) Will wait for some more reply hopefully ! Cheers Andrija On 29 September 2017 at 15:27, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > Hi Andrija, > > I just took a look a

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

2017-09-29 Thread Daan Hoogland
ohw dear Mike, I am changing the log4j version, brr. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > I wonder if it wouldn’t be best to wait on this until master is in code > freeze. At that point, it seems like we could add whatever rules we’d like > and have almost no impact on p

Re: Advice on converting zone-wide to cluster-wide storage

2017-09-29 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Hi Andrija, I just took a look at the SolidFire logic around adding primary storage at the zone level versus the cluster scope. I recommend you try this in development prior to production, but it looks like you can make the following changes for SolidFire: • In cloud.storage_pool, enter the ap

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

2017-09-29 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
I wonder if it wouldn’t be best to wait on this until master is in code freeze. At that point, it seems like we could add whatever rules we’d like and have almost no impact on pending master PRs. For me personally, although I haven’t opened it yet, I have a large PR I plan to open in the coming

Advice on converting zone-wide to cluster-wide storage

2017-09-29 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi all, I was wondering if anyone have experience hacking DB and converting zone-wide primary storage to cluster-wide. We have: 1 x NFS primary storage, zone-wide 1 x CEPH primary storage, zone-wide 1 x SOLIDFIRE orimary storage, zone-wide 1 zone, 1 pod, 1 cluster., Advanced zone, and 1 NFS regul

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

2017-09-29 Thread Rafael Weingärtner
I am in favor of that. I only have a comment to add. We are already checking code style when validating PRs. So, it is only a matter of adding more checks to the check-style plugin that we are already using. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote: > The checkstyle rules can

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

2017-09-29 Thread Marc-Aurèle Brothier
The checkstyle rules can be imported in pretty much any IDE to help during coding and to display the errors immediately. To speed up the detection of checkstyle errors, we could edit the post commit hooks to run a mvn command only for the checkstyle rules, and then do the usual stuff. I'm not in f

Re: Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

2017-09-29 Thread Daan Hoogland
I am a fan of convention and think everyone should have some. Strict enforcing of non-functionals, I'm not to big on. I see what you want to achieve here but am reluctant not to -1 any strictness. If we do it with a post-commit-hook (or if such a thing exists a post-merge-hook) we will allow for co

Checkstyle / code style / reformatting

2017-09-29 Thread Marc-Aurèle Brothier
Hi everyone, Would you think it's worth tightening the checkstyle rules and run a reformatting pass on the code base to align everything slowly? I know it will hide changes using the blame functionality, and would force people to edit some PR. Is the trade-off worth it for you? The idea would be