Thanks, Paul!
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 12:49 AM, Paul Angus wrote:
>
> I'll have a look @ mike
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Fr
I'll have a look @ mike
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Tutkowski, Mike [mailto:mike.tutkow...@netapp.com]
Sent: 11 January 2018 07:31
To: dev@cloudstack
Hi,
While I was running some tests related to 4.11 tonight, I noticed the following
discrepancy with regards to the IP address given to a VM of mine:
https://imgur.com/3ODXHNe
According to CloudStack, the IP address should be 10.117.40.28. However, when I
run ifconfig, I get 10.117.40.115.
In
Certainly better to find the references and remove them if you can get
that done in a single effort.
Just a technical question: Could one not just add the Warning to the
constructor?
Might have to create a null (log warning only) constructor.
Ron
On 10/01/2018 3:58 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
We can add log messages to each of the methods in StringUtils but I do not
think that is a good way to go. Any method you touch you can reform or
remove anyhow.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Agreed about deprecation.
> A logged WARNing would be detected during testing as
Agreed about deprecation.
A logged WARNing would be detected during testing as well as at run-time.
Ron
On 10/01/2018 3:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Ron, we could but that would only log during compile-time, not on
runtime. I am doing some analysis and commenting in Wido's ticket.
On Wed, Jan 1
Can someone update the important technical sections - Key Features,
Supported Hypervisors and Bare Metal Hosts.
It looks like Cloudstack stopped being worked on in 2012.
Can these sections be replaced by a link to the correct CloudStack wiki
pages so we do not have to keep updating this info?
Ron, we could but that would only log during compile-time, not on runtime.
I am doing some analysis and commenting in Wido's ticket.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Is it possible to mark it as deprecated and have it log a warning when
> used?
>
> Ron
>
>
> On 10/01/2018 2:
Is it possible to mark it as deprecated and have it log a warning when used?
Ron
On 10/01/2018 2:26 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I think we could start with giving it an explicit non standard name like
CloudStackLocalStringUtils or something a little shorter. Making sure that
we prefer for these ty
I think we could start with giving it an explicit non standard name like
CloudStackLocalStringUtils or something a little shorter. Making sure that
we prefer for these types of utils to be imported from other projects.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/201
I hope we understand each other correctly: No-one running an earlier
version then 4.11 should miss out on any functionality they are using now.
So if you use ipv6 and multiple cidrs now it must continue to work with no
loss of functionality. see my question below.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:06 PM,
Daan, yes this sounds reasonable, I suppose who would like to fix, could do
custom build for himself...
But still it should be aknowledged somehow, if you use several cidrs for
network, don't use v6, or don't upgrade to 4.11 because things will stop
running well.
11 янв. 2018 г. 1:00 пользователь
Ivan,
I was composing an answer but i think we agree:
Only if that functionality worked in the past. ipv6 support is still rather
new and must be considered experimental. I think we should fix it in a
maintenance release and not block the release for it. If it was working
before and broke, it shou
Sorry, to clarify, I mean (if I correctly understand) that if someone has a
network with several CIDRs in the basic zone and, lets say, 4.9.3 upgraded
to 4.11, which results that VMs stop getting DHCP announces for additional
CIDRs from VR, it's a blocker thing...
2018-01-11 0:52 GMT+07:00 Ivan Ku
I suppose the bug, reported by Wido prevents adding additional CIDRs to
Network if IPv6 configured? If so, it's definitely a blocker thing because
everyone expects it's possible, because the function is implemented in ACS.
2018-01-11 0:41 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav :
> +1 what Dasn said.
>
> Wido - ar
+1 what Dasn said.
Wido - are you seeing (upgrade) failure, or something fails to work without
this fix in basic zone?
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:50:22 PM
To: dev
Cc: Rohit Yadav
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11
I thi
I think that we agreed in th3 past that a blocker is either something that
prevents ACS to start or upgrade, or something that breaks prior
functionality.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2018 05:47 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> I want to than
On 01/10/2018 05:47 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
All,
I want to thank all the reviewers, contributors and PR authors for their hard
work, support and collaboration. We managed to review, test and merge more than
100 PRs towards the 4.11 milestone!
Out of 11 open PRs on Monday, the list is down
Congratulations, waiting for RC to do UAT on our dev cloud and switching
cloudstack-ui to 4.11
10 янв. 2018 г. 23:48 пользователь "Rohit Yadav"
написал:
> All,
>
>
> I want to thank all the reviewers, contributors and PR authors for their
> hard work, support and collaboration. We managed to rev
All,
I want to thank all the reviewers, contributors and PR authors for their hard
work, support and collaboration. We managed to review, test and merge more than
100 PRs towards the 4.11 milestone!
Out of 11 open PRs on Monday, the list is down to 2 now which were recently
added features:
On 01/10/2018 01:09 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote:
Instead of creating a PR for that, we could do the bit by bit job
(hopefully one day we finish the job).
Every time we see a code using ACS's StringUtils, we check if it can be
replaced by Apache's one.
Yes, but that will slip from peoples at
You can always use a raw SQL.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Hmmm, I don't think the math works that way, multiplication and sum are not
> same order operations. Right now the only way I found is to fetch all rows
> with required fields from db and do computation in
Oups, my bad, very bad actually. I had in mind you had the same speed Mhz
You can always run a raw SQL query, there're a lot in the CapacityDao due
to the limitation on the mix of functions + group by.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hmmm, I don't think the math works
Hmmm, I don't think the math works that way, multiplication and sum are not
same order operations. Right now the only way I found is to fetch all rows
with required fields from db and do computation in the code, but it doesn't
look efficient though.
10 янв. 2018 г. 19:41 пользователь "Marc-Aurèle
Hmm, yeah that's what I realized after sending the email. With the DAO, you
can only apply function on a single column / entity attribute, therefore it
won't be possible as you want. Another way to achieve this would be to do
SELECT SUM(A), SUM(B) FROM T with the DAO, and on the Java side do the
mu
Hello, Marc-Aurele, thank you for the snippet, but it looks like the sum
usage everywhere in the codebase. It's aggregation over single field. What
I need is to pass multuplication of two fields (cores x speed) inside the
sum, but I don't understand how to do it with dao... Thank you.
10 янв. 2018
Have a look here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java#L347
Or you can search other example in the code base with this string
"Func.SUM": thttps://
github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/da
Instead of creating a PR for that, we could do the bit by bit job
(hopefully one day we finish the job).
Every time we see a code using ACS's StringUtils, we check if it can be
replaced by Apache's one.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2018 12:01 PM, Daa
On 01/10/2018 12:01 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I'd say remove as much functionality as we can from 'our' StringUtils and
phase them out asap.
Yes, but such a PR would be invasive and would be difficult to merge and
also break a lot of other code.
It's not easy since it will touch a lot, but
+1 to what Daan's said
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> I'd say remove as much functionality as we can from 'our' StringUtils and
> phase them out asap.
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Wido den Hollander
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have com.cloud.utils.StringUtils
I'd say remove as much functionality as we can from 'our' StringUtils and
phase them out asap.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have com.cloud.utils.StringUtils which has a few nice functions, but
> throughout the code I also see org.apache.commons.lang.St
Hi,
We have com.cloud.utils.StringUtils which has a few nice functions, but
throughout the code I also see org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils
They both provide about the same functionality, but which one do we prefer?
I'd say org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils as that allows us to remove
o
Hi all,
I think the criteria for any additional PRs to be considered for 4.11.0.0
release should be:
- Is it a blocker, especially blocking the release?
- Is is fixing any test failures or regressions?
- Is it release related, for example - packaging, systemvmtemplate, db-upgrade
path relate
Hello, colleagues, please could anyone guide me how to implement
aggregation SUM over two fields multiplication? Many thanks in advance.
I'm trying to achieve:
SELECT SUM(A * B) FROM T with DAO
--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks Software, Ltd.
Cell: +7-923-414-1515
WWW: http://bit
34 matches
Mail list logo
