Daan, yes this sounds reasonable, I suppose who would like to fix, could do custom build for himself...
But still it should be aknowledged somehow, if you use several cidrs for network, don't use v6, or don't upgrade to 4.11 because things will stop running well. 11 янв. 2018 г. 1:00 пользователь "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> написал: Ivan, I was composing an answer but i think we agree: Only if that functionality worked in the past. ipv6 support is still rather new and must be considered experimental. I think we should fix it in a maintenance release and not block the release for it. If it was working before and broke, it should go in. To put it less mildly, I expect more then ACS can deliver and we can't wait until all my wishes are implemented. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> wrote: > Sorry, to clarify, I mean (if I correctly understand) that if someone has > a network with several CIDRs in the basic zone and, lets say, 4.9.3 > upgraded to 4.11, which results that VMs stop getting DHCP announces for > additional CIDRs from VR, it's a blocker thing... > > 2018-01-11 0:52 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>: > >> I suppose the bug, reported by Wido prevents adding additional CIDRs to >> Network if IPv6 configured? If so, it's definitely a blocker thing because >> everyone expects it's possible, because the function is implemented in ACS. >> >> 2018-01-11 0:41 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>: >> >>> +1 what Dasn said. >>> >>> Wido - are you seeing (upgrade) failure, or something fails to work >>> without this fix in basic zone? >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:50:22 PM >>> To: dev >>> Cc: Rohit Yadav >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >>> >>> I think that we agreed in th3 past that a blocker is either something >>> that prevents ACS to start or upgrade, or something that breaks prior >>> functionality. >>> >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl >>> <mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/10/2018 05:47 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> >>> I want to thank all the reviewers, contributors and PR authors for their >>> hard work, support and collaboration. We managed to review, test and merge >>> more than 100 PRs towards the 4.11 milestone! >>> >>> >>> Out of 11 open PRs on Monday, the list is down to 2 now which were >>> recently added features: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/3 >>> >>> >>> To keep up with the release schedule, I think it's time we should focus >>> on stabilizing master, testing it, fix any regressions and blockers. >>> >>> >>> I'll cut 4.11 branch on Monday (15th Jan) and start RC1 as per the >>> schedule and master will be open for PRs with following merge criteria: >>> >>> - Blocker fixes, especially those blocking the release >>> >>> - Test failure and regression fixes >>> >>> - Release related fixes for example - upgrade blockers, database path, >>> packaging and systemvmtemplate related etc. >>> >>> >>> Thoughts, objections? >>> >>> >>> Awesome! >>> >>> I'm looking for the definition for a blocker, I recently found this one: >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2396 >>> >>> For us this is a big problem as we keep running into it, but probably >>> nobody else. I don't want to promote my own PR as a blocker, but what is >>> the definition? >>> >>> Because it's my own PR I didn't add the 4.11 milestone. >>> >>> Looking forward to 4.11! >>> >>> >>> Wido >>> >>> >>> - Rohit >>> >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com<mailto: >>> kmooss...@cloudops.com>> >>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 8:59:30 PM >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >>> >>> +1 Daan and Rohit >>> >>> Khosrow Moossavi >>> >>> Cloud Infrastructure Developer >>> >>> t 514.447.3456 >>> >>> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Boris Stoyanov < >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes let’s do that. >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> On 8 Jan 2018, at 14:41, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl<mailto: >>> w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/08/2018 01:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> All, >>> Thank you everyone for your feedback. Given we're in agreement with >>> Daan's proposal, I'll summarize and add strategy: >>> - We'll freeze the 4.11 milestone to only these 9 PRs: >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/3 >>> - In addition, only blocker, test fixes, and release/packaging related >>> fixes may be accepted in master now. >>> - If we don't hear from authors within a day, the PRs may be removed >>> from the milestone. >>> - We'll re-assess the list again by EOD, Wed 10 Jan 2018. >>> Does this look agreeable? Thanks. >>> >>> Yes, it does! When the first RC comes out we should be able to run >>> tests, fix what's broken and focus in the release and 4.12 afterwards. >>> >>> Wido >>> >>> - Rohit >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto: >>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> >>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:21:00 PM >>> To: dev >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >>> slow display of arrogance in reacting this time ; yeeaahhh >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> You again faster than me ))) >>> >>> 2018-01-08 12:21 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>> :D tnx ) >>> Updated by my colleague already >>> >>> 2018-01-08 12:06 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailt >>> o:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Updates posted to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389 >>> Can you please review? >>> >>> 2018-01-08 11:57 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>> Sure. Got it. >>> >>> Will post update soon >>> >>> 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailt >>> o:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>> Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be >>> argued >>> that >>> it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is >>> unthinkably >>> late, >>> but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads >>> to a >>> plethora of last minute PRs to include. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/clou >>> dstack/pull/2389 >>> into 4.11 >>> PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours. >>> >>> As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch. >>> >>> 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov < >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> : >>> >>> +1 Daan >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland < >>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Rohit, Ivan, >>> >>> I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone >>> can >>> still >>> go >>> in as long as active work on them continues. I have not >>> looked >>> at >>> Ivan's >>> PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is >>> actively >>> working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A >>> bigger >>> concern >>> is that some of the remaining PRs in that milestone are >>> potentially >>> conflicting. So we feature freeze now and work only to get >>> the >>> set >>> list >>> in >>> (and blockers). >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev < >>> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com<mailto:kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Rohit, Devs, >>> >>> just consider adding: >>> >>> CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/ >>> cloudstack/pull/2362 >>> [resouce >>> accounting blocker bug] >>> CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/ >>> cloudstack/pull/2350 >>> [security >>> fix, enchancement] >>> >>> They are ready (we think so) for some time, but *no final >>> review* >>> yet. >>> >>> >>> 2018-01-08 14:47 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav < >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> : >>> >>> All, >>> >>> >>> As per the previously shared schedule [1], by EOD today (8 >>> Jan >>> 2018) >>> we >>> would freeze master after which we'll only accept >>> critical/blocker >>> fixes, >>> stabilize master and start a voting thread on 4.11 RC1 >>> (est. >>> by >>> 15 >>> Jan >>> 2018). >>> >>> >>> I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable to >>> everyone >>> as >>> there >>> are still few outstanding feature PRs that I understand >>> authors >>> have >>> worked >>> hard to get them in. >>> >>> >>> Please share your thoughts, comments. If you're the author >>> of >>> such >>> an >>> existing PR, please work with us, address outstanding >>> issues. >>> >>> >>> In case of no objections, it will be assumed that the plan >>> is >>> acceptable >>> to everyone. Thanks. >>> >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/mszlluye35acvn2j >>> >>> >>> - Rohit >>> >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev >>> Bitworks Software, Ltd. >>> Cell: +7-923-414-1515 <+7%20923%20414-15-15><tel:%2B7-923-414-1515> >>> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev >> Bitworks Software, Ltd. >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515 <+7%20923%20414-15-15> >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> >> >> > > > -- > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > Bitworks Software, Ltd. > Cell: +7-923-414-1515 <+7%20923%20414-15-15> > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> > > -- Daan
