On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:48 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you be more specific ? what fixes required a re-vote ?
There was a security vulnerability reported in the release of
sufficient severity to cause the security team to request Abhi hold
off on publishing the release and to
-sebastien
On Nov 14, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Chip Childers
chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:
Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing +
voting
during doc finalization. If we announce before docs, it hurts us.
I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in
poor
shape
done
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
Looking to add hackathon entry over here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CCC+Europe#
But unable to do so as it seems the wiki edit access permissions are not
there.
Yep - that's the deal... I gave some initial designs, we got some
feedback... would love for someone to take a crack at round 2
options.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:33 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
This is really a follow on to that request.
Chip commented to me on IRC that he was
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:29:31AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjeev
Neelarapu to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:42:11AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Anyway we can wait next week to release.
quite a few of us will be together in Amsterdam, we can dedicate a hackathon
session to 4.2.1 , make sure RN are good, upgrade path etc…then test….
I'd recommend keeping the vote
have been broken out specifically to deal with this type of situation
actually.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:42:11AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Anyway we can wait next week to release.
quite a few of us
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:06:41PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Ok, i don't want to press for a release. We'll see (i think we are at
+2 binding???)
1 - mine
Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing + voting
during doc finalization. If we announce before docs, it hurts us.
I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in poor
shape.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:
Except that the separation only helps if it allows RC testing + voting
during doc finalization. If we announce before docs, it hurts us.
I'm against another announcement that goes out with the docs in poor
shape.
On Thu
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com wrote:
This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance release.
For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested apart from
regression tests and BVTs.
Around 175 bugs
decide who is the representative. Daan could do it and Nguyen
could be the substitute ?
On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't mind being involved if needed.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri
IMO - having this as a requirement for a build is a bit of an issue.
First, we can't distribute it (obviously). Second, it's a bit of an
esoteric requirement if you are using a JDK that doesn't include it
automatically. This will lead to confusion.
Is there a way that we can re-work the tests
Email it to me directly, and I'll add it to our KEYS file.
-chip
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:59:15AM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
I have uploaded my gpg keys as requested. Can anyone help in adding these
to Apache Server ?
-abhi
On 06/11/13 8:35 pm, Abhinandan Prateek
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:33:51PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:54PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance
release.
For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested apart
Weller swel...@ena.com wrote:
The list of changes URL is returning a 404. It doesn't look like this has
been branched yet.
From: Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
The format of apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5 doesn't match the gpg
output.
See this:
localhost :: /tmp/cloudstack gpg --print-md MD5
apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2
apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:58:17AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
2013/11/7 Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
While I appreciate the confidence, there are weekly calls to attend.
The particularly interesting one (MANO WG) happens on Wednesdays at 6am
PST.
I've tried but there's
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:52:13PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
Sudha,
We can still cut RC but will wait for GA till Daan and others have done
their testing.
Abhi,
An RC here is really a release artifact that's being voted on, so
no... please don't do that until you are satisfied that
, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
It may be an admin burden, but it has to be optional. There are other
ways
to achieve global sync (e.g., LDAP/AD/Oauth).
A lot of service providers who run
: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 9:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feature freeze this Friday
11/08
One thing to note, and perhaps this becomes a minor exception to the
merge timing. IP Clearance
I was off - this morning it cleared. Sorry.
Merge away.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@gmail.com wrote:
Please wait for tomorrow morning US time. 72 hours is not up yet.
On Nov 7, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Chip
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
It may be an admin burden, but it has to be optional. There are other ways
to achieve global sync (e.g., LDAP/AD/Oauth).
A lot of service providers who run cloudstack have their own user database
/ portal. In
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 06:59:25PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
mvn --projects='org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack'
org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.8:check
s/0.8/0.10 if you want the latest
4.2 but specifically the 4.2.0 tag
On Nov 6, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote:
Is it master or any other branch?
Thanks
Alex Ough
One thing to note, and perhaps this becomes a minor exception to the
merge timing. IP Clearance for the RDP client won't be done until the
morning of the 7th.
I'd propose that it is brought in to master at that time. I won't
have time to do the actual commit myself, but perhaps someone can own
, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
wrote:
Permission added.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:19:23PM -0500, Alex Ough wrote:
And I'd like to write the design document in the wiki page, but I
don't
seem to have a permission to create pages.
So can anyone give me the permission
+1
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
I volunteer you.
We need to do this.
-Sebastien
On 5 Nov 2013, at 20:28, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Network Functions Virtualisation (NFV) is an effort to utilize server
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:33:07PM +0100, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey John,
That would be my idea.
Make it mandatory for new (maven) projects coming into the code base and
slowly start working on fixing the existing projects. The current checkstyle
setting is very relaxed, just a few
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:49:29AM -0500, Will Stevens wrote:
Anything I can do to help get this patch into 4.3.0?
Thanks,
Will
If it's in master, it'll be in 4.3... so help by testing during the 4.3
test cycle!
-chip
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:59:30AM -0500, Will Stevens wrote:
Well its not in master yet. That is the intent of this thread...
I can definitely do some testing for the 4.3 test cycle.
Will
Shoot, I misread Sheng's email. Sorry about that. I thought he said
that he Checked *in* the code,
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:19:12PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote:
I would like to be able to leverage the existing apidoc tools to generate
apidoc for my plugin’s exposed APIs. However, gen_toc.py expects all APIs to
fall into one of the hard coded ‘known_categories’. Since my APIs don’t
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:13:18AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] I just emailed the signed SGA to secretary@ and private@
This was ack'ed. I have started the vote on general@i.a.o. In 72
hours (or there abouts), I'll close that acceptance thread and we can
import the patch.
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 08:12:00PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H Abhinandan,
At the moment a patch for pluging vpc private gateways is in
master/4.3. At Schuberg Philis we have it running as a special in
4.1.1 as well. Is it alright to port this to the public branch of
4.2.1? otherwise we
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:19:57AM +0800, Gavin Lee wrote:
Done with jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5029
This tool was not accepted by the project. See [1].
I believe that the documentation was primarily a copy / paste from Citrix
commercial product documentation.
Permission added.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:19:23PM -0500, Alex Ough wrote:
And I'd like to write the design document in the wiki page, but I don't
seem to have a permission to create pages.
So can anyone give me the permission?
My account in the wiki is alex.o...@sungard.com
Thanks in
(dropping users@ - try not to cross post please)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:13:18PM -0500, Alex Ough wrote:
All,
While I'm waiting for the permissions, I'd like to bring up a discussion on
the overall architecture to support this feature.
There can be 2 different approaches as below.
1.
Noah,
The last time I checked, markmail still had all traffic against the incubator
list names. If that has changed, great. If not, then incubator needs to remain
the target of the search.
On Oct 29, 2013, at 6:13 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Bump.
On 25 October 2013
Yeah, we can make this change IMO.
Darren, note that my sungard.com address no longer finds me. Please use my a.o
or gmail.c address. ;)
On Oct 24, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chip,
Do you care if we switch to GNU coreutils format for the
Ahmad Emneina
Rajesh Battala
Kelven Yang
Chip Childers
Clayton Weise
John Kinsella
Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Ryan Shafer
+0
Wido den Hollander
Daan hoogland
The next stage is to put in place IP clearance paper work in advance before
the code can go into a branch of master. I
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of
source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated
with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
Yes, either moving the line to constructor or using a local SearchBuilder
will fix it - however the S3 APIs part in awsapi project is not supported or
updated for a long time and may have many other issues to get it
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Animesh Chaturvedi to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they
have accepted.
Join me in congratulating Animesh!
-The CloudStack PMC
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Ram,
The next step is to have the community decide on the donation.
Therefore, I have sent out an email to kick off the VOTE for accepting the
code into a separate branch from master.
DL
Awesome. Thanks
Hey folks,
Just an FYI. I'm going to be switching to use my apache.org address
for all ASF project activities. That'll be the best way to reach me
now.
chipchild...@apache.org
Thanks!
Hey all,
Just a reminder that we have our collaboration conference coming up in
Amsterdam on November 20 through 22.
It would be great to get as many members of the development community
there as can make it!
More info can be found here:
http://cloudstackcollab.org/
Register here:
If allowed, I'd make it disabled by default. Otherwise operators may be
surprised by their user's actions... ;-)
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Working from the idea that cloudstack may be deployed as a component of a
larger infrastructure
I just opened a request with infra for that (and for cloudmonkey):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6857
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote:
Hi,
I want to submit CloudStack Plugin guide for VXLAN Plugin,
but there isn't cloudstack-doc repo in
Adding Phong, who was the original author of the LXC plugin. Phong, can
you help Francois out?
-chip
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:04:31AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote:
I posted on the users list, but no one responded. I am trying here :)
In addition to this, I tried to add an LXC cluster
+1 from me too.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
Here's the BVT result from spring-modularization branch: Failures that
are listed exist on master as well. So the branch doesn't break
anything additionally.
+1 to merge
clearance process complete.
- Chip Childers
On Sept. 24, 2013, 11:38 p.m., Pedro Marques wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14325
As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail
branch.
I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new files
in that branch. I think we have to complete the following in order to
merge into master.
1) I'd like to see the package structure changed to
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:59:24PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
3) I'd love if we could get some consensus on what additional tests and /
or changes to the test approach are needed. Prasanna - as with Hugo and
Chiradeep
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:05:32PM +, Frankie Onuonga wrote:
Hi guys ,
From my fundamentals of security I do not think returning a public key is
wrong .
What is sensitive is the private key.
As long as that is bit exposed in any way then all should be well.
+1 to Frankie's comment
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 06:14:39AM +, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
May I get access to edit pages as well?
username: rajanik
Looks like this was already taken care of.
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Whomever wants to take the lead for 4.3 should probably (IMO), start a
discussion on (1) coordination of work and
[Animesh] Since we are getting closer to code freeze date and we cannot find
overall release management I
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:43:39AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote:
Chip,
On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail
branch.
I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new files
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:44:43PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Hi,
I see the KVM install guide says:
tcp_port = 16059
I'm wondering if this is correct or if it should be 16509, which is what is
in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf by default.
Which doc version?
I found these bug reports,
Careful which branch you are working on Mike. I think that David's plan is
that we are baselines on 4.2 in the new docs repo, and he was going to then
pull from 4.2 into master (again, in the new repo).
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
I have
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Laszlo Hornyak to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:55:27PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:51 AM
To: dev
!
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:55:27PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:51 AM
To: dev
for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 03:55:27PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent
thanks for the comments, seems fair!
– Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 4, 2013, at 5:28 PM, edison su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/
On October 4th, 2013, 8:23 p.m. UTC, *Chip Childers* wrote:
api/src/org/apache
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:52 PM, David Ortiz dpor...@outlook.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to get edit permission? Username is dortiz.
Thanks, David Ortiz
Done
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.comwrote:
On Thursday 03 October 2013 08:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
Description
---
added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:11:32PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
Question to JIRA experienced admins, we can preserve assign to me option,
and if unassigned goto component maintainer?
Absolutely. Initial assignment does not equal the actual assignee.
Component-based assignment is just a way to
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:40:06PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] Chip does that mean you are open to folks assigning tickets to
others? Should this be posted in the original thread
http://markmail.org/thread/btovj6t6opqxge5q. because the threads where Ilya
reopened the
FYI - We have received the SGA for this plugin, and the 72 hours of lazy
consensus over at general@incubator.a.o has started.
I'll update this thread when we have cleared that hurdle, allowing us to
accept the patch into the repo.
-chip
- Forwarded message from Chip Childers chipchild
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:43:16PM +, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
Hi guys,
Not arguing against it, but I would be very much interested in your reasoning
behind why having docs in a separate repo makes them easier to work on. What
have we experienced since this time last year which has led us
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:55:58PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] Chip I get the principle behind the reasoning in thread[2] which
should be maintained but at the same time not being able to assign the issues
is a big hindrance in running a release. I am not sure if you saw my
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and
destroy.
For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA ticket (rest
call) to track the decomision process.
When VM is deployed, we may
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:21:03PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
We would like to add additional operations in ACS when we do deploy and
destroy.
For example, when VM is destroyed, we want to make create a JIRA
/#comment52000
Unit tests for this if logic?
- Chip Childers
On Oct. 4, 2013, 12:57 a.m., Chris Suich wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477
I some outstanding questions I just posted to the review.
Any thoughts on those questions?
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:07 PM, edi...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master c9f41d404 - 180cfa19e
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's actually really easy to turn this off. If you look at the last
commit of the branch you'll see what changes to turn it on. So you can
just reverse that one commit to disable it.
I'd rather merge this
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:55:14AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
I believe both can exist independently. The framework should have more
flexibility and facilitation to run features\test cases based upon a given
release and version on a given test bed. It should be intelligent enough to
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:58:03AM +, Bharat Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
any one please grant me the edit or add page permission to cwiki. my user
name is bharat.kumar
Done
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:31:50AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
Description
---
added the connection and socket timeout parameters for SMTP and sending
message in new thread so that HA doesn't get blocked beacause of hang in
sending email alert
Wouldn't a better approach be to ensure
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:47:57AM +, Kishan Kavala wrote:
During CS upgrade, VRs are required to be upgraded to use newer systemVm
template .
The current VR upgrade procedure has following limitations:
- takes 'long' time and the time exponentially increases with the size of
the
of cs 4.0.0)
mvn clean install
I got always the same errors.
2013/10/3 Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:21:57AM +0200, benoit lair wrote:
A precision, the linux centos 6.3 i used is a ghost of the centos 6.3
environment i use for compiling
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:24:57PM +0200, benoit lair wrote:
Hi Wei,
What is the result expected with mvn -P developer ?
It will intent to give me rpms usable for a production environment ?
No, it's intended to test that maven builds are functional for you.
If you just want the RPMs, have
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:44:46AM -0500, Alex Ough wrote:
I'm not sure what else commands 'MigrateCommand' actually execute in
addition to 'Start/Stop/CopyCommand', but can we include 'MigrateCommand'
if it consists of only those 3 commands?
Thanks
Alex Ough
In the case of VMware, the
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:26:19PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
Hi,
May I get access to edit/add pages as well?
My username is imduffy15.
Added
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:33:14PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I'm not seeing any links for editting permissions either. id == dahn
You have space admin rights...
Do this:
1) go to any page in the space (this will do:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home )
2) click on
On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
I was thinking along the same lines that a offering could have a generic
key/value map (where the value could be a string/json string/whatever).
CloudStack core wouldn't have any idea about the semantics of the
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:48:34PM +, Manan Shah wrote:
My id is manans. Can someone grant me access?
Done
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:55:41PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
a model for extensions like that makes perfect sense.
This model sound fine indeed. It makes no sense for httpClose however.
My personal
Welcome Steve!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson steve.wil...@citrix.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
I just wanted to take a second and introduce myself. I recently joined
Citrix as the VP of Cloud Engineering, and I'm responsible for the Citrix
CloudPlatofrm (powered by Apache
://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.6/api_3.0.6/user/associateLun.html
API set the LUN mask on the filer for that LUN. Then the ISCSI initiator
on the bare metal host / vm can login to the LUN.
On 9/23/13 10:32 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:44:51PM +
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:12:40PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
I've also tried to disconnect marvin from depending on CloudStack's
build and repo. This will help split marvin from CloudStack which I
will discuss in a seperate thread.
Should we just use this branch as the source for a new
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:38:33PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever use
newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the benefit?
I can understand it for cloudmonkey because cloudmonkey is an admin cli tool
Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I did should be all
set.
So committers / contributors = provide your confluence ID's if you can't
add / edit pages. PMC folks - help add them please.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
There were
Animesh,
I've not moderated the emails through, hoping that I can get you to re-send
them to include URLs for our site and the download page.
-chip
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:26:11AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote:
Did you guys tagged the release yet? I don't see the tag on git...
Francois
Thanks for the reminder. I've tagged the release and pushed.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/4.2.0
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Daan Hoogland to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that they
have accepted.
Join me in congratulating Daan!
-The CloudStack PMC
With 13 +1 votes, and no other votes, this passes.
I'll work with Pedro and Juniper to complete the donation.
-chip
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:13:07PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
Hi all!
As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a
Contrail plugin to Apache CloudStack
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:27:57AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
The proposal does
not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger the
AGPL.
The proposal talks about using it, and that's enough to trigger the
AGPL. This is a *very bad* thing IMO. For example, $dayjob
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:54:55AM +, Likitha Shetty wrote:
Hi,
Currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files
containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file
containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template,
101 - 200 of 1022 matches
Mail list logo
