Hi Vladimir
You need to build the RPMs *on* CentOS 6 machines to be able to have el6 in
the name.
Or as an alternative you can use
https://khos2ow.github.io/cloudstack-rpm-builder/ which contains all the
required tools to build RPMs.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:59 AM Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Cor
Congratulations Paul!
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:29 AM Boris Varbanov wrote:
> Congratulations Paul!
> Excellent news! Definitely well deserved!
>
> Best,
> Boris Varbanov
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:16 AM Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As
As Rafael mentioned this was a known issue and fixed (the commit he sent).
You can check the version of java running in the build tools like:
docker run -it --entrypoint environment-info.sh
khos2ow/cloudstack-deb-builder:ubuntu1404
java version: openjdk version "1.8.0_171" OpenJDK Runtime Enviro
shapeblue-4.5.2-00 -> shapeblue-4.5.2-00
* [new tag] shapeblue-4.6.0-00 -> shapeblue-4.6.0-00
* [new tag] shapeblue-4.6.1-00 -> shapeblue-4.6.1-00
Cheers
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infrastructure Developer
t 514.447.3456
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
database too.
Please let us know if you have any questions, comments, concerns about this
removal or if
you are willing to revive the project in some shape or form.
[1]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2613
[2]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2817
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud
I sort of agree with Marc-Aurèle and Will, and like github issues way
better than Jira.
It definitely is easier that both the issues and fix for those issues live
in the same place
and easily can be referenced from one another. The only thing is that we
need to come
up with good set of labels (for
Mike
I have no idea about your issue on OS X but if you only need and care to
build the artifacts,
you can use docker based cloudstack-deb-builder[1] or if you only want to
run maven phases
(test, verify, etc) you can override docker image entrypoint, such as:
docker run -it ... --entrypoint
That's awesome! Congratulations!
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:19 PM Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
> Congratulations, guys! :-)
>
> > On May 2, 2018, at 9:58 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > As noted in the press release[1] John Kinsella and Wido den Hollander
> > have been elected to
t; 1) Please consider decoupling it from cloudstack-management server - and
> > release it as server plugin
> > 2) Test coverage must be sufficient enough to validate the functionality
> > (perhaps mock vault endpoints and response)
> >
> > Regards,
> > ilya
>
rspective of the
> proposal.It is an interesting integration of CloudStack VPN service with
> Vault PKI feature.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
>
> > One of the things Vault does is essentially one of the thing Let's
> > Encrypt d
There is one other thing I do not understand. This Vault thing that you
> mention, how does it work? Is it similar to let's encrypt?
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> > rafaelw
d and install the Root CA on their local machine and
open
up VPN connection with strongSwan client of the correspondning OS they're on
import the Root CA, and their credential (EAP on VPN side), and that's it.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Khosrow Moossavi
yPair methods, I do believe you should only return
> the private key once. Therefore, you should not store it in ACS.
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Community
> >
> > I want to open up a discussion around the new Remote Access
esign document here[1], and share your feedback. I will
open up a PR -as is- soon to be able
to have a source code to discuss around it as well.
[1]:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VPN+Implementation+based+on+IKEv2+backed+by+Vault+as+PKI+Engine
Thanks
Khosrow Moossavi
I can help as well.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> I can support this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 12:39 PM Tutkowski, Mike, >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As you may be aware, this coming September in Montreal, the CloudStack
> > Community w
aintainers which have
the source code at their disposals. I'm gonna wait for others
feedback/suggestions before enhancing this though.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 03/26/2018 06:21 PM, Khosrow Moossavi wrote:
> > Hi community
> >
&
builder
[3]: https://hub.docker.com/r/khos2ow/cloudstack-deb-builder/
[4]: https://hub.docker.com/r/khos2ow/cloudstack-rpm-builder/
Thanks
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infrastructure Developer
t 514.447.3456
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
+1
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, <
> nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > From: Dag Sonstebo
> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 5:06:29 AM
> > To: us...@cloudstac
ns*
> Chief Technology Officer
> c 514.826.0190
>
> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Khosrow Moossavi >
> wrote:
>
> > Somehow related, the tweet sent out earlier today, has the date wrong.
> >
> > https://twitter.com/Clou
Somehow related, the tweet sent out earlier today, has the date wrong.
https://twitter.com/CloudStack/status/976819870426902530?s=19
On Mar 22, 2018 10:37, "Will Stevens" wrote:
> Hey Everyone,
> We need your help to promote the visibility of the CCC conference we are
> running later this year
Thanks Rohit, that's a really great sum-up of proposition!
According to the private issue topic, as far as I understand, we don't have
any private issue per se, unless they are security, vulnerability
or CVE related and the process of reporting them -being really private
until they are fixed- are
Congratulations Dag!
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> hey Dag, keep up the good work, thanks and welcome
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Simon Weller
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Dag, much deserved!
> >
> >
> > From: John Kinsella
> > S
Congratulations Gabriel!
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> nice going Gabriel and congratulations to PCextreme!
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
> gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, guys :)
> >
> > 2018-03-20 16:23 GMT-03:00 Wei ZHO
we need to agree on any of those CP libraries
and implement, the
same way we chose for example log4j or slf4j over one another, or any other
_library_ we use.
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Nicolas Vazquez <
nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Thanks
"Closes NUMBER") directly from commit or PR body.
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> I agree with the relaxation as Rohit pointed out. At this point we should
> ask if Jira is really needed. Most people here I believe agree that it is
&
ting to use Spring Boot in
general and Spring Boot Data in particular
rather than only changing the CP functionality, and slowly refactor/retire
the DAO layer in favor of Spring Boot equivalent
implementation.
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Nicolas Vazquez <
nic
Cool! +1
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> fixed
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Daan
> >
> > I just noticed filter for issues on gsoc2018 [1] doesn't show all of them
> > when filter
ster first.
[1]: http://s.apache.org/gsoc2018ideas
Khosrow Moossavi
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> devs,
>
> Google Summer of Code is coming again. Apache is applying as organisation
> and we can hitch on that.
> I know we h
ase.
>
>
> Let me fix that.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Khosrow Moossavi
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:46:36 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: POM versio
Hi
While working on a PR, Rafael and myself noticed that the POM version of
4.11 branch
is 4.11.0.1-SNAPSHOT and not 4.11.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
Was this planned? Shouldn't we be on micro version rather than patch
version?
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
fellow colleagues,
> >
> > I might be a bit late with this email...
> >
> > I'd like to introduce Khosrow Moossavi, who recently join our team and
> his
> > focus is currently exclusively on dev for Cloudstack with cloud.ca.
> >
> > Our 2 current
a PR that modifies the build.sh script to handle exporting appliances to
> custom name (but as a general option, not specific to systemvmtemplate).
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
> From: Khosrow Moossavi
ard compatible as well, the build process has
> been changed from virtualbox+veewee/ruby based to packer+qemu/kvm based so
> the old script/jobs are broken as well.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
&
nyway.
if [ "systemvmtemplate" != "${appliance_build_name}" ]; then
instead of:
if [ "${appliance}" != "${appliance_build_name}" ]; then
[1]
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/3839239a21fc14a64acc18900ae303961036ef91#diff-68ae31f5f30dae8f541e26b8acbd75eeL247
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
Awesome! Good job everyone +1
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infrastructure Developer
t 514.447.3456
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
> Congratulations, everyone!
>
> On 2/5/18, 3:09 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>
> C
ish
the custom
built packages from community build ones just by looking at the file name.
If POM version contains branding string (x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]) it will
generate
packages like: cloudstack-package-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
Rafael,
It got changed on this PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749/files#diff-6eeb1a2fb818cccb14785ee80c93a561R560
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
wrote:
> That is correct Mike. The quoted part above was misleading, it should have
> been "at any giv
omething like:
1) snapshot-01 (at rest)
2) snapshot-01, snapshot-02 (while taking snapshot-02 on primary storage
and sending to secondary storage)
3) snapshot-02 (at rest again, after successful)
OR
3) snapshot-01 (at rest again, after failure)
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infrastructure Developer
t
exception happens during the transfer from
> primary to secondary storage.
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
>
> > Hi community
> >
> > We've found [1] and fixed [2] an issue in 4.10 regarding snapshots
> > remaining on p
Hi community
We've found [1] and fixed [2] an issue in 4.10 regarding snapshots
remaining on primary storage (XenServer + Swift) which causes VDI chain
gets full after some time and user cannot take another snapshot.
Please include this in 4.11 milestone if you see fit.
[1]: https://issues.apach
+1 Daan and Rohit
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infrastructure Developer
t 514.447.3456
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Boris Stoyanov wrote:
> Yes let’s do that.
>
>
> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Ga
+1
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
On Jan 2, 2018 14:07, "Nicolas Vazquez"
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> From: Simon Weller
> Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 3:38:00 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Clean up ol
+1 on API versioning and make it really RESTful (cherry on top).
I'm willing to participate on this change if voted for.
Khosrow Moossavi
CloudOps
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > All,
> >
&
@Paul you can assign CLOUDSTACK-9862 to me, we already have it fixed in our
own fork.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Paul Angus
wrote:
> Hi All, here is an updated summary of the open Critical and Blocker Issues
> in Jira.
> If you are working on any of these issues, please whether you beli
Apparently XenServer "xen-tools" has been renamed from version 7.0 onward
to "guest-tools".
https://docs.citrix.com/content/dam/docs/en-us/xenserver/xenserver-7-0/downloads/xenserver-7-0-quick-start-guide.pdf
(Section 4.2, point 3)
And this comment:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Community
> > >
> > > I would like to start the discussion around deleting old and obsolete
> > > branches
of corresponding release branch. (I,
personally, like the second approach better)
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infrastructure Developer
t 514.447.3456
<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> also I think we can tolerate collective work on our repo.
ira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10169
I would appreciate your questions, comments, suggestions.
Thanks
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infrastructure Developer
CloudOps
Not at all, I'll open one soon.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This seems to be interesting. Would you mind opening a PR?
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
>
> > No c
<
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This seems to be something interesting to be used. Do we need to make
> changes to our pom.xml files to use it? Or is it only a matter of
> protocol/guidelines?
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Khosrow Moossavi
> wrote:
>
Well basically anywhere (either manual or in scripts/CI) maven is required
to do something with ACS.
Basically using *"./mvnw foo bar -Pbaz" *instead of *"mvn foo bar -Pbaz"*
in which mvnw is an executable file in the repo not installed in the OS.
Khosrow Moossavi
Cloud Infr
Hi
I'm new to ACS community, so I'm not sure if this topic has already come up
before.
I wanted to suggest using Maven Wrapper (
https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper) and actually check it in in the
repo rather than relying on existence of it on dev, ci, build, host, etc
machine.
With this we
52 matches
Mail list logo
