> repository. I never met the guy but want to take the occasion to
> > congratulate him and all other contributors with the 5th aniversary of
> our
> > repository.
> >
> > :beer::cake::clappinghands:
> >
>
--
Regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
rror. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is
> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
--
Regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
ission process. Whether contributions are development-related or
> >> otherwise, it is a recognition of a contributor's participation in the
> >> project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way.
> >>
> >> Please join me in congratulating Gaurav
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >> on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
> >
>
--
Regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
he PMC.
> >>
> >> Please join me in congratulating him.
> >>
> >> On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>
--
Regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
ape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a
> company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of
> South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is
> a registered trademark.
>
>
--
Regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
@widodh.nl>
> > > > > >>> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>> >
> > > > > >>> >>> >
> > > > > >>> >>> > On 16-02-15 15:38, Logan Barfield wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>> >> I like this idea a lot for Ceph RBD. I do think there
> > > > > >>> >>> >> should
> > > > > >>> still be
> > > > > >>> >>> >> support for copying snapshots to secondary storage as
> > > > > >>> >>> >> needed
> > > > > (for
> > > > > >>> >>> >> transfers between zones, etc.). I really think that
> > > > > >>> >>> >> this
> > > > could
> > > > > be
> > > > > >>> >>> >> part of a larger move to clarify the naming
> > > > > >>> >>> >> conventions used
> > > > for
> > > > > >>> disk
> > > > > >>> >>> >> operations. Currently "Volume Snapshots" should
> > > > > >>> >>> >> probably
> > > > > really be
> > > > > >>> >>> >> called "Backups". So having "snapshot" functionality,
> > > > > >>> >>> >> and a
> > > > > >>> "convert
> > > > > >>> >>> >> snapshot to backup/template" would be a good move.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >>> >
> > > > > >>> >>> > I fully agree that this would be a very great addition.
> > > > > >>> >>> >
> > > > > >>> >>> > I won't be able to work on this any time soon though.
> > > > > >>> >>> >
> > > > > >>> >>> > Wido
> > > > > >>> >>> >
> > > > > >>> >>> >> Thank You,
> > > > > >>> >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >>> >> Logan Barfield
> > > > > >>> >>> >> Tranquil Hosting
> > > > > >>> >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >>> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Andrija Panic <
> > > > > >>> >>> andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> BIG +1
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> My team should submit some patch to ACS for better
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> KVM
> > > > > snapshots,
> > > > > >>> >>> including
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> whole VM snapshot etc...but it's too early to give
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> details...
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> best
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> On 16 February 2015 at 13:01, Andrei Mikhailovsky <
> > > > > >>> and...@arhont.com>
> > > > > >>> >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> Hello guys,
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> I was hoping to have some feedback from the
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> community on the
> > > > > >>> subject
> > > > > >>> >>> of
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> having an ability to keep snapshots on the primary
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> storage
> > > > > where
> > > > > >>> it
> > > > > >>> >>> is
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> supported by the storage backend.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> The idea behind this functionality is to improve how
> > > > snapshots
> > > > > >>> are
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> currently handled on KVM hypervisors with Ceph
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> primary
> > > > > storage.
> > > > > >>> At
> > > > > >>> >>> the
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> moment, the snapshots are taken on the primary
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> storage and
> > > > > being
> > > > > >>> >>> copied to
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> the secondary storage. This method is very slow and
> > > > > inefficient
> > > > > >>> even
> > > > > >>> >>> on
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> small infrastructure. Even on medium deployments
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> using
> > > > > snapshots
> > > > > >>> in
> > > > > >>> >>> KVM
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> becomes nearly impossible. If you have tens or
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> hundreds
> > > > > >>> concurrent
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> snapshots taking place you will have a bunch of
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> timeouts and
> > > > > >>> errors,
> > > > > >>> >>> your
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> network becomes clogged, etc. In addition, using
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> these
> > > > > snapshots
> > > > > >>> for
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> creating new volumes or reverting back vms also slow
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> and
> > > > > >>> >>> inefficient. As
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> above, when you have tens or hundreds concurrent
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> operations
> > > > it
> > > > > >>> will
> > > > > >>> >>> not
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> succeed and you will have a majority of tasks with
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> errors or
> > > > > >>> >>> timeouts.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> At the moment, taking a single snapshot of
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> relatively small
> > > > > >>> volumes
> > > > > >>> >>> (200GB
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> or 500GB for instance) takes tens if not hundreds of
> > > > minutes.
> > > > > >>> Taking
> > > > > >>> >>> a
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> snapshot of the same volume on ceph primary storage
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> takes a
> > > > > few
> > > > > >>> >>> seconds at
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> most! Similarly, converting a snapshot to a volume
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> takes
> > > > tens
> > > > > if
> > > > > >>> not
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> hundreds of minutes when secondary storage is
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> involved;
> > > > > compared
> > > > > >>> with
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> seconds if done directly on the primary storage.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> I suggest that the CloudStack should have the
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> ability to
> > > > keep
> > > > > >>> volume
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> snapshots on the primary storage where this is
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> supported by
> > > > > the
> > > > > >>> >>> storage.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> Perhaps having a per primary storage setting that
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> enables
> > > > this
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> functionality. This will be beneficial for Ceph
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> primary
> > > > > storage
> > > > > >>> on
> > > > > >>> >>> KVM
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> hypervisors and perhaps on XenServer when Ceph will
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> be
> > > > > supported
> > > > > >>> in
> > > > > >>> >>> a near
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> future.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> This will greatly speed up the process of using
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> snapshots on
> > > > > KVM
> > > > > >>> and
> > > > > >>> >>> users
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> will actually start using snapshotting rather than
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> giving up
> > > > > with
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> frustration.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> I have opened the ticket CLOUDSTACK-8256, so please
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> cast
> > > > your
> > > > > >>> vote
> > > > > >>> >>> if you
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> are in agreement.
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for your input
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>> Andrei
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> --
> > > > > >>> >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>> >>> Andrija Panić
> > > > > >>> >>>
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >> --
> > > > > >>> >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > >>> >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > >>> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > >>> >> o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > >>> >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > > > >>> >> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> > --
> > > > > >>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > >>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > >>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > >>> > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > >>> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > > > >>> > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > >> o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > > > >> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > > > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Ian Rae*
> > > > PDG *| *CEO
> > > > t *514.944.4008*
> > > >
> > > > *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions
> > > > Experts
> > > > w cloudops.com <http://www.cloudops.com/> *|* 420 rue Guy *|*
> > > > Montreal *|*
> > > > Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > > >
> > > > <https://www.cloud.ca/>
> > > > <
> > > >
> >
> http://www.cloudops.com/2014/11/cloudops-tops-deloittes-technology-fast-50/
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
>
> If I could do that, then I could take a SolidFire snapshot of the
> SolidFire volume and issue commands to XenServer to have it change the
> UUIDs of the original SR and the original VDI. I could then recored the
> necessary UUID info in the CS DB.
>
> *** End of e-mail ***
ly working on equivalent support in ESXi.
>
>
> On Sunday, February 15, 2015, Punith S wrote:
>
>> thanks for the info mike.i'll go through your commits of 4.6.
>>
>> the updated plugin i pushed for 4.5 used to only take backend storage
>> snapshot in cloud
>> XenServer.
>>
>> ESXi is a bit better here since it allows you to re-signature a datastore
>> (so taking a backend snapshot should work nicely in 4.6 once I finish the
>> code).
>>
>> If you are talking about NFS, it's probably okay if you just take
gh to just
clone the particular volume on the storage side ? so that the vmdk also be
reproduced again!
on the default primary storage i'm guessing, cloning will be just a copy of
a vmdk file on the same primary datastore!
thanks
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
ue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
> > the
> > >> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> based
> > >> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
> > sender
> > >> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
> is
> > a
> > >> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
> is
> > a
> > >> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
> > Blue
> > >> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> > Brasil
> > >> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty
> Ltd
> > is
> > >> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded
> under
> > >> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Todd Pigram
> > http://about.me/ToddPigram
> > www.linkedin.com/in/toddpigram/
> > @pigram86 on twitter
> > https://plus.google.com/+ToddPigram86
> > Mobile - 216-224-5769
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from Windows Phone
> >
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
; type storage?
>
> Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> If you're OK with this, do you have time to check it in to Git?
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> punith s wrote:
> hi marcus,
>
> yes it's a 1:1 mapping between a qcow
--
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25772/#review55480
-------
On Oct. 6, 2014, 9:52 a.m., punith s wrote:
>
> --
e.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/09/18/86449aef-17f3-49fb-b087-be74fade231a__ACS_cloudbyte_integration_with_KVM_for_guaranteeing_QoS_at_VM_level.__.jpg
Thanks,
punith s
join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he
> > has accepted.
> >
> > Join me in congratulating Pierre-Luc!
> >
> > -chip
> > On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
MC and we are pleased to announce that he has
> > accepted.
> >
> > Join me in congratulating Ian!
> >
> > -chip
> > On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
-b087-be74fade231a__ACS_cloudbyte_integration_with_KVM_for_guaranteeing_QoS_at_VM_level.__.jpg
Thanks,
punith s
ystem testing done
File Attachments
architecture
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/09/18/86449aef-17f3-49fb-b087-be74fade231a__ACS_cloudbyte_integration_with_KVM_for_guaranteeing_QoS_at_VM_level.__.jpg
Thanks,
punith s
gt; the list of people who I can assign tickets to).
> > >
> > > Does anyone know who can give this to him?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -- Forwarded message --
> > > From: Punith S
> > > Date: Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:55 AM
> >
> On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:14 p.m., punith s wrote:
> > engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/CloudOrchestrator.java,
> > line 200
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/25647/diff/1/?file=689316#file689316line200>
> >
> > yes m
d/service/ServiceOfferingVO.java df68fb8
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/DiskOfferingVO.java 152fa2c
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25732/diff/
Testing
---
system testing done
Thanks,
punith s
://reviews.apache.org/r/25647/diff/
Testing
---
dry run only.
Thanks,
punith s
run only.
Thanks,
punith s
/diff/
Testing
---
dry run only.
Thanks,
punith s
user about this awareness
and the sizes to be given for the corrensponding templates.
- punith s
On Sept. 15, 2014, 7:41 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https:
efined iops were not
being set.
and yes, this issue is not related to this S3 bug, but i thought it to be a
minor one, so i clubbed it with this review.
- punith s
On Sept. 15, 2014, 7:41 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
,
punith s
bit before 4.5 goes out.
>>
>> Thanks for your time and effort on this, Punith!
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Punith S
>> wrote:
>>
>>> yes mike,
>>>
>>> i'm fixing the issue w.r.t option 2.
>>>
>>> te
ling this one. I am not too worried about the option, as
>> long as it fixes SF integration for 4.5 :)
>>
>> FG
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the info, Punith!
elar...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> You are right. Template gets copied to (secondary-storage) NFS before
>>> being copied to primary storage
>>>
>>> -Sanjeev
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Mike Tu
-40g) for people using the templates from S3.
any feedback's ?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi Punith,
>
> Have you been able to make any progress with regards to this Swift/S3
> issue?
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:
>
> Hugo
>
> On 4 sep. 2014, at 11:27, Punith S wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > i have been working on building noredist of master for vmware,
> >
> > since i'm using mvn commands and jetty for deploying cloudstack
> >
> > i'm building
i'm guessing there was no patch up between agent specific code !
am i missing out something here ?
thanks!
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
Gaudreault"
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like your SSVM cannot reach Internet properly?
> >
> > FG
> >
> > On 2014-08-26, 11:14 AM, Punith S wrote:
> >
> >> hi francois,
> >>
> >> since i'm not having a swift setup, i'm us
hi francois,
since i'm not having a swift setup, i'm using the s3 bucket.
and as you recommended i got the SSVM up with seeded nfs storage,
post that i removed the nfs secondary storage and added the S3 with staging
nfs store as the new sec storage, since you cannot have any nfs secondary
storag
te:
>
>> Punith,
>>
>> We are using Swift. We have a tmpauth proxy.
>>
>> FG
>> On Aug 26, 2014 2:48 AM, "Punith S" wrote:
>>
>>> sure mike,
>>>
>>> since i don't have a S3 account, i'm getting one today.
>
>
> > I highly anticipate the same issue with S3... it shares a lot of code
> with
> > swift.
> >
> > My focus would be swift, but we should fix for both :)
> >
> > FG
> > On Aug 25, 2014 6:33 AM, "Punith S" wrote:
> >
> > > than
3 GB.
> >> >>
> >> >> This is not an issue with NFS. In that situation, the two sizes are
> >> >> correctly accounted for.
> >> >>
> >> >> What later can happen is the template is downloaded from Swift and
> >> takes
> >> >> up an unexpected amount of space on the XenServer storage repository
> >> >>(SR).
> >> >>
> >> >> If there is enough space on the SR, this isn't too big of a deal.
> >> >>However,
> >> >> for so-called managed storage plug-ins (examples are SolidFire and
> >> >> CloudByte), this will lead to them dynamically creating a SAN volume
> of
> >> >>the
> >> >> wrong size.
> >> >>
> >> >> Francois opened up the following ticket:
> >> >>
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7406
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Mike Tutkowski
> >> >> Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.
> >> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> >> >> o: 303.746.7302
> >> >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> >> >> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
>>> These two tasks were completely fulfilled, and I hope that they will be
>>> useful for the CloudStack admins.
>>>
>>> I would like to thank my mentor, Mike Tutkowski, for his help and
>>> guidance
>>> during the project. I would also like to thank the "Apache Cloudstack
>>> Community" members for their helpful answers.
>>>
>>> The GSoC experience was very good overall, with especially a lot of
>>> learning. That being the case, I'll probably apply next year for another
>>> project.
>>>
>>> Beyond GSoC, I am thinking of modifying the URL input on the "Add Primary
>>> Storage" form to make it more user friendly by accepting "key-value"
>>> inputs.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone,
>>>
>>> Seif
>>>
>>
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
ng, but I thought we compressed JS files now.
> >
> > This used to work:
> >
> > mvn -P developer -pl :cloud-client-ui -DskipTests=true
> >
> > Unfortunately it no longer does.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Punith S
> wrote:
>
fire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
eded.
>
> - Mo
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
>
> Please join me in congratulating Rajani
>
> --
> Prasanna., on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
>
>
> Powered by BigRock.com
>
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
hanks mike :)
- punith
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23410/#review48107
---
On July 15, 2014, 7:48 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> --
on't see the
> "provisioningtype" parameter in createDiskOffering API. Any idea why? I can
> see it defined in CreateDiskOfferingCmd.java file.
>
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
operation is provided by
plugin implementation!
is Quiesce VM is a limitation of XEN hypervisor or is it not implemented
by xen agent in cloudstack ?
how is third party primary storage plugin related to hypervisor feature ?
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
eviews.apache.org/r/23410/#review47858
---
On July 15, 2014, 7:48 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://revie
/util/ListElastistorVolumeResponse.java
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23410/diff/
Testing
---
system testing done.
Thanks,
punith s
.org/r/23410/#review47724
---
On July 11, 2014, 6:12 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.or
PI to allow for IOPS control and to extend what it can do
>> with volume sizes.
>>
>> Talk to you later!
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Punith S wrote:
>>
>>> hi mike,
>>>
>>> now this updateStoragePool
.java fbcb1f4
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23410/diff/
Testing
---
system testing done.
Thanks,
punith s
hanks,
punith s
nning on
> >
> > host 5
> > 2014-07-10 16:43:16,732 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (HostReservationReleaseChecker:ctx-0828f975) Cannot release reservation,
> > Found 1 VMs Running on
> >
> > host 6
> > 2014-07-10 16:43:16,732 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl]
> > (HostReservationReleaseChecker:ctx-0828f975) Done running
> > HostReservationReleaseChecker ...
> >
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
I configured the My Book Live Device, to the IP of
> http://XXX.XXX.1.20. I am able to mount this device to linux dir and view
> files on it.
>
> The CS 4.1 was installed before mounting this external My Book Live
> Device.
>
> Now I want to change the primary storage of the IP address from
> http://XXX.XXX.1.5 to http://XXX.XXX.1.20. Also, I need to change the
> primary storage directory.
>
> Can, anybody provide insights, on which Mysql table, should I update for
> CS 4.1 setup. Or is there a procedure, to change the primary storage
> settings via the CS 4.1 web interface gui?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> D.Giriprasad
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
Congrats Will :)
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Congratulations Will !
>
>
>
> PL
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
the unavailable
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
> volume.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I also think it's only a problem for XenServer for the VDI to have
>>>>>>>> its size changed dynamically.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I plan to draw a flowc
un 24, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Pradeep Cloudstack <
pradeepcloudst...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Punith,
> yes; the properties file contains custom key value pairs
>
> We have decided move this file out of our jar. So, no issues now
>
> -Pradeep
>
>
>
> _____
gt; are bundled in the jar, but our JuniperNetworkGuru.properties will not get
> bundled
>
> -Pradeep
>
>
>
>
> From: Punith S
> To: cloudstack ; Pradeep Cloudstack <
> pradeepcloudst...@yahoo.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24,
t; We followed the approach that was taken for vxlan and created artifacts on
> similar lines.
>
> Can you pls help on what we are missing ?
>
>
> -Pradeep
>
>
>
>
> From: Punith S
> To: cloudstack ; Pradeep Cloudstack <
>
I plugin ?
ref -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+Plugin+Tutorial
thanks
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
do we register our plugin here?
>
> -Pradeep
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
not forgotten about this review.
>
> I plan to check the code in once I finish up something else I'm working on
> over the next day or so.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
>
> - Mike Tutkowski
>
> On June 17th, 2014, 9:28 a.m. UTC, punith s wrote:
> Review reques
.java:1329)
... 3 more
any thoughts to fix this issue?
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
14 at 4:10 AM, Seif Eddine Jemli <
> seifeddineje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Punith!
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-21 10:38 GMT+01:00 Punith S :
>>
>> > hi seif,
>> >
>> > its cool you took this up, this would make admins to creat
-
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/#review45762
---
On June 17, 2014, 2:58 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
&
the cloudstack volume is
resized to 20G in the DB.
hence now i'm mapping the vdi size to cloudstack volume size.
thanks.
- punith
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache
va 9b034e9
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/diff/
Testing
---
system testing done.
Thanks,
punith s
e volume's protocoltype.
jira id - CLOUDSTACK-6916
Diffs (updated)
-
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
9979802
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/diff/
Testing
---
system testing done.
Thanks,
punith s
rator.java
eea931e
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
9979802
server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java 9b034e9
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/diff/
Testing
---
system testing done.
Thanks,
punith s
t; > contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project
> > and
> > the Apache Way.
> >
> > Please join me in congratulating Pierre-Luc!
> >
> > PS: Nice work on the documentation
> >
> > -Sebastien, on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
> >
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
wrote:
> Sounds good - let me give some thought as to how we should break up the
> work.
>
> My GSoC student from Tunisia will be helping us, as well.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Punith S wrote:
>
>> yes it sounds good, thanks for the proposal mike,
>
Stack API. I think
>>>> NetApp did this for one of their storage features in the recent past. This
>>>> way vendor-specific capabilities can be more easily offered without making
>>>> it look like all vendors support those particular features.
>>>>
>&g
make this all work
>> the way things work today when the user wants to change an existing Compute
>> Offering and/or Disk Offering.
>>
>> For example, the user would pick a new Compute Offering (with presumably
>> has different key/value pairs) and CloudStack could inform the
orage providers.
any suggestions and feedbacks ?
thanks
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
s going to say.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Any time a set of CloudStack volumes share IOPS from a common
>> > pool,
>> > > > you
>> > > > > > > cannot guarantee IOPS to a given Clo
d-@? s+(++):+(++) !a C++++()$ ULC(++)$ P L++(+++)$
> E
> !W N* o+ K w O- M V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t 5 X R tv+ b+(++)>+++ DI- D+ G
> e++(+++) h-- r(++)>+++ y-
> --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
230d94ea-0e2f9ac5--2075--8e1e--bd46--709c230d94ea
268G 2.4G 252G 1%
/var/run/sr-mount/0e2f9ac5-2075-8e1e-bd46-709c230d94ea
*10.10.171.121:/kimivolnfs*
* 47G 2.5G 45G 6%
/var/run/sr-mount/7bd9654c-18f3-f8af-de23-ebfc68709e89 --> my mounted
nfs prima
the *size* is going *NULL!! instead it should go 2500MiB.*
*hence the VDI is not getting created.*
*in the **copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh file , i can see this query *
*size=$($VHDUTIL query -v -n $vhdfile) *
*i also reffered this blog by ian *
http://dlafferty.blogspot.in/2013/08/using-cl
t works just fine.
> >>
> >> At the moment, this is blocking a test case I'm trying to execute to
> >> verify code I had to write in Xenserver625StorageProcessor.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >
storage server from hypervisor is working fine.
is this vhd-util obsolete ?
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
ava:921)
i can see my primary storage mounted successfully in host as SR
*069d1983-b2a2-2a6b-f16b-5fb44cdd2f6a,*
can ping the nfs server from host.
but there seems to be while creating a vdi in sr, not sure why ?
thanks.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Punith S wrote:
> hi,
>
> i man
iance/dist/systemvm64template-master-xen.vhd.bz2
<http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-master-xen.vhd.bz2>
-h
xenserver -F*
*is there any alternative link ?*
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Punith S wro
; Do you have vhd-util binary present in your xenserver?
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Punith S [mailto:punit...@cloudbyte.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 5:07 PM
> To: cloudstack
> Subject: SSVM's are NOT RUNNING !
>
> hi guys,
>
> i have fresh insta
a:761)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.advanceStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:745)
my primary storage is seen mounted successfully on the hypervisor(host)
is the ssvm template got corrupted ?
thanks.
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
s to be done differently in order
> to take advantage of this?
> > Thank you for your time,
> > Matt
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Suich
> 919-334-8193
> csui...@gmail.com
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
it.
>
> Thanks
> Rajesh Battala
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Punith S [mailto:punit...@cloudbyte.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:59 AM
> To: cloudstack
> Subject: unable to create a instance in 4.3 using new devcloud and solution
>
> hi,
>
> i&
nable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
>
> Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
>
> --
> David Grizzanti
> Software Engineer
> Sungard Availability Services
> e: david.grizza...@sungard.com
> w: 215-446-1431
> c: 570-575-0315
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
e for router from 4.2 to 4.3 in devcloud , is
there any new template we need to seed in secondary storage ??
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
tter
> > > on the Apache Cloudstack project and that he accepted,
> > > >
> > > > Join us in welcoming and congratulating Paul Angus,
> > > >
> > > > -Sebastien on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
> > >
> >
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> *(tm)*
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:351)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:178)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:267)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
> 2014-04-02 15:18:30,920 DEBUG [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:ctx-4d6c3938) Cleaning up resources for the vm
> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-5-VM] in Starting state
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Tejas
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
e-cloudstack-4.2.1-src/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/
> >>
> com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase$XsLocalNetwork.class
> >>
> >>
> >> and restart cloudstack-management, unfortunately, still uses the old
> >> classes.
> >>
> >>
> > You should remove the same file without the -SNAPSHOT in the name. It's
> > probably reading that file on boot.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > Thank you.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Tomasz Zięba
> Twitter: @TZieba
> LinkedIn:
> pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zięba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/<http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/>
> <http://pl.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-zi%C4%99ba-ph-d/3b/7a8/ab6/>
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
cess$000(ApiServlet.java:54)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:118)
>
> Any idea how to get it working?
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
62416351:old update
> count=2]
> 2014-03-18 09:15:44,213 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] (catalina-exec-1:null)
> Transition:[Resource state = Enabled, *Agent event = AgentDisconnected*,
> Host id = 2, name = nfs://10.129.151.51/vol/secondary]
> 2014-03-18 09:15:44,245 DEBUG [cloud.host.Status] (catalina-exec-1:null)
> Agent status update: [id = 2; name = nfs://10.129.151.51/vol/secondary;
> old
> status = Alert; *event = AgentDisconnected; new status = Alert;* old update
> count = 2; new update count = 3]
> 2014-03-18 09:15:44,494 INFO [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl]
> (catalina-exec-1:null) server resources successfully discovered by
> SecondaryStorage
>
>
> Regards,
> Tejas
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
;>
> > >> >> http://i.imgur.com/Jz2swFS.png
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > >> >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > >> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > >> >> o: 303.746.7302
> > >> >> Advancing the way the world uses the
> > >> >> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > >> >> *(tm)*
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > EOF
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Daan
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > EOF
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>
--
regards,
punith s
cloudbyte.com
hi guys,
i have resolved all issues with fixes and refactoring of plugin code, its
good to go now ,
i'll submit once i get the ship it message. thanks for the review.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM, punith s wrote:
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19021/#review37123
-------
On March 13, 2014, 2:46 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an aut
eletion of a
> > SAN volume. Have you had a chance to create a root disk and/or a data disk
> > on such a storage pool and then delete it?
>
> punith s wrote:
> thanks mike.
>
> yea of course, i have tested all volume related api's such as
> c
-82e6-bf0f82959ba8
zonename = DevCloud0
jobresultcode = 0
jobresulttype = object
jobstatus = 1
userid = 819b856e-a9d3-11e3-a500-f46d04ee0527
*deleting a volume
cloudmonkey# delete volume id=e079281e-d822-4b90-9e85-9648350a0369
success = true
Thanks,
punith s
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
