[ASK] Quotes on new features in CloudStack & advice upcoming features in CloudStack

All, I'm preparing for my talk on What's new in CloudStack, for CCC2024 [1] - may I request the community if they want to share any specific quotes for any upcoming feature in v4.20 they're excited about, or if they want me to include what they may be working on targeting the next release (v4.2

Re: [Proposal] Disable API (apikey/secret-key) for users, accounts and domains

Potential use-cases could be when there are organisations who want to disable API-based access using external auth integrations like LDAP, SAML or OAuth2. In such setups, sometimes when a user leaves the org - admins would block the auth from the external system (LDAP/SAML etc.) but they may con

New PMC member: Suresh Anaparti

manager for CloudStack releases 4.16.1.0 and 4.19.1.0. Please join me in congratulating Suresh Regards, Rohit Yadav

Re: Have ARM, Intel and AMD in same cluster hosts

Hi Sanjay, 1. No, each cluster should be of the same arch/distro/hypervisor. You may mix Intel & AMD, but not ARM. Though it's assumed/advisable to have hosts in a cluster homogenous & identical to avoid migration etc issues. 2. Yes, you can have Intel & ARM hosts based clusters in the same

Re: Object Storage Framework integration for Cloudian HyperStore

Hi Tom, In addition to what has been answered and what you've found, here are some useful links for reference: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/tree/main (self-learning dev material) https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#contributing-to-cloudstack https://github.com/s

Re: After restart the service of acs it's showing [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) DB version = 4.18.1.1 Code Version = 4.18.1.0

restart the service of acs it's showing [c.c.u.DatabaseUpgradeChecker] (main:null) (logid:) DB version = 4.18.1.1 Code Version = 4.18.1.0 Hi Jithin, Thanks for the help! I have one more question, can go with 4.18.1.1 or upgrade to 4.18.2.2? I read some blogs by Rohit Yadav and found some sec

Re: [PROPOSAL] Update the 4.20.0.0 release schedule

Thanks Joao. Your proposed schedule LGTM. I agree that we need to draw the line somewhere and call it a freeze sooner than later. That said we've been awfully busy with quite a few security issues and usually we've been trying to do two major releases a year, with first in Q1/Q2 and second one

Re: Management server cannot connect to KVM host on AlmaLinux 9

I had tested against RHEL9 in the past, my notes with x86/KVM are here, see if it helps: https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/fc401a0fe8e8ea16b4b3a4e3d149ce0c#file-el9-or-rhel9-acs Network configuration was the tricky bit for me and I had to use nmcli to configure that. As I can see your clo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.19.1.0

Thanks Suresh for leading the release effort, and everyone involved in the release, Well done! And congratulations everyone on the much awaited maintenance release. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 16:29 To: dev Subject: [A

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CVE-2024-41107: SAML Signature Exclusion

Thanks Abhishek for leading the effort, Lucian and everyone involved in the release, well done! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Friday, July 19, 2024 15:35 To: dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CVE-2024-41107: SAML Signature Exclusion Apache C

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Repeated all of RC1 testing, the blockers are fixed now. Upgraded my homelab from 4.19.1.1 RC1 to RC2, no issues. Tested VM, volume, systemvm, VR lifecycles. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 19:14 To: dev ; user

Re: stored procedures and versions (Was: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1))

OTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1) > > > > Rohit, > > > > That's a very good point about the routines, thanks for sharing how to > > restore them. ... > > On 2024-07-11 12:52, Rohit Yadav wrote: ... > > > * > > > I hit an issue with idemp

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

___ From: Nux Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 02:44 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1) Rohit, That's a very good point about the routines, thanks for sharing how to restore them. Hope your marriage is intact after this little adv

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

+0 (binding) * Tested fresh installation of EL8 packages, deployed VM from newly created template on a newly created network; tested VM, volume & network lifecycles using both mbx & health check tests passing w/Trillian/BO * Tested upgrade from 4.19.0.2 EL8 to 4.19.1.0 RC1 EL8 pkgs using mb

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.1.0 (RC1)

Jimmy, I usually test using packages and in VMs that support nested virtualisation manually or use mbx https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx Regards. Regards. From: Jimmy Huybrechts Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 6:39:30 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev

Re: CCC2024 Funding - Important

- Important Totally agree with you Rohit... already have started reaching out to our customer and partner ecosystem for sponsorships. We will definitely get a few to back the event. The show MUST go on! Best, Sunando Apiculus website<http://www.apiculus.com> | Try Apiculus<https://try.ap

Re: CCC2024 Funding - Important

Hi Ivet, all, Thanks for starting this thread. While my work organisation, ShapeBlue, has been participating and sponsoring the CCC every year, I think it's important for all organisations who use CloudStack and benefit from CloudStack to make such conferences and events sustainable and funding

Re: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem as a First Class Feature

Proposed design doc largely LGTM. I've some additional suggestions and feedback to make requirements & the first phase implementation more clearer and simpler: * +1 on implementing it in a hypervisor and storage agnostic manner. * Let's have the FS VMs owned by the caller (account or pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

lease (4.20 and onwards). Regards. From: João Jandre Paraquetti Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 21:43 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors I agree with Rohit, EL7 i

Re: Help with spring dependency injection

HI Davide, CloudStack has its own module loader and within each component or module, classes are instantiated via spring context xml rules. You can refer to: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/hack/service.md (and other chapters) Regards. Fr

Re: Issue in Setup KVM host with agent 4.18.1

Hi Sanjay, Generally speaking, we do support ARM-based KVM hosts with CloudStack, but not platforms may work out of the box and is largely due to libvirt/kvm/qemu support on them. ARM systems aren't homogenous in the sense how libvirt/qemu manages to produce the domain XML on them and how qemu

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 Hi all, After 120 hours, the vote for Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 person (Rohit, Wei, Nux) +1 (non binding) 1 person (Kiran) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

r 10.105.61.120 10.0.54.125 > 80:31053/TCP 7m37s > > > > 5. Delete the nginx service. > Public IP is released > > Regards > Kiran > > From: Rohit Yadav > Date: Thursday, 20 June 2024 at 12:04 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org , > us...@cloudstack.apac

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

...@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors By all means, remove CentOS7 and any EOL OS or component from the matrix and recommendations! Regards On 2024-06-20 11:45, Rohit Yadav wrote: > + Users > > Just to be clear, what this

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

it yet. > > On the rest +1 > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 11:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and > hypervisors > > All, > > Refer

[DISCUSS] Deprecate/remove support for EOL distros and hypervisors

All, Referencing https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.0/releasenotes/compat.html, some of the distros and hypervisors we support have reached or reaching EOL by end of this month. Please review and advise how we should deprecating/remove the following for the next 4.20 release (i.e. c

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

Lucian, The convenience binary in case of this sub-project is the docker/container image, users can test RC1 builds from: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tags Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 04:03 To: dev@cl

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Source code, checksum and signature OK. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 12:20 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider 1.1.0 RC1 +1 (bindin

Re: Api docs

Hi Ahmed, What issue have you found? You may share here or report it as an issue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/issues Thanks and Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 18:00 To: ahmed.awl...@sue.nl.invalid Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstack-kubernetes-provider v1.1.0

Thanks Vishesh for volunteering and glad to see a new maintenance release for the sub-project. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 16:20 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for cloudstac

Re: Unable to download DevCloud image file

Hi Lohit, DevCloud isn't maintained or used anymore, the apache folder was removed long back. You can try mbx https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx or Simulator based development (https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#simulator-based-development) instead. Regards. _

Re: [REVIVE][DISCUSS] Closing issues & PR after a certain time

I like the general idea but at the same time want to weight in that we also do the right thing in handle issues and PRs. Sometimes there are genuine issues and PRs, however, we make no progress on them for one reason or another. As of last week, I've triaged all the outstanding Github issues tha

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0

hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.18.2.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Daan Hoogland Nux (Lucian) Rohit Yadav +1 (non binding) Bryan Lima Jithin Raju 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC2

+1 (binding) I've built and uploaded the 4.18.2.0 RC2 packages here for people's convenience - http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.18.2.0-rc2/ * Tested upgrade from 4.18.1.1 to 4.18.2.0 RC packages -ok * Rebuilt systemvms (ssvm and cpvm) - ok * Restart network - ok * New VM deployment

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

/109#issuecomment-2058519817 The only note for future release manager is to avoid publishing the artifacts before voting is closed, or to delete an already published release. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 13:15 To: dev Subject: Re

Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

for registry workaround okay, given the situation your proposal seems right Rohit. Like Daan asked, if we can prevent this situation in future we need to document it also. Regards, Harikrishna From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 4:50 PM To: dev

[DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

All, The recent Terraform provider release v0.5.0 has a problem with the Terraform registry website. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/109 The registry support isn't able to provide a resolution now, their manual resync button on the provider isn't fixing the issue

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

r CKS Rohit, It is possible to install CAPC on a CS 4.16 ? Le jeu. 11 avr. 2024 à 12:03, Rohit Yadav a écrit : > Hi Benoit, > > The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what > you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a differen

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

(PMC / binding) 5 persons (Rohit, Daan, Boris, Hari, Nux) +1 (non binding) 2 persons (Jithin, Suresh) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. Regards, Kiran Chavala

Re: ACS 4.16 - Change SystemVM template for CKS

Hi Benoit, The CKS feature has been improving over versions, I don't know if what you're trying to achieve is possible with it. Maybe try a different version of the data iso: http://download.cloudstack.org/cks/ Alternatively, you can also have a look at the CAPC project: https://cluster-api-cl

Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva

Welcome aboard Slavka! Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 6:16:00 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva Congratulations Slavka! R

New Committer: Kiran Chavala

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited Kiran Chavala (kiranchavala) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Kiran has been a long time CloudStack contributor and has created over a hundred issues on Github. Being a committer e

[ADVISORY] Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1

Apache CloudStack security releases 4.18.1.1 and 4.19.0.1 address the CVEs listed below. Affected users are recommended to upgrade their CloudStack installations. 1. CVE-2024-29006: x-forwarded-for HTTP header parsed by default Severity: moderate Description: By default the CloudStack managemen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

+1 (binding) Tested vm deployment using 0.5.0-pre. Regards. From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 2:55:40 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0 Hi ALL

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer

Congratulations Rene! Regards. From: Ruben Bosch Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 2:30:51 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer Congratulations Rene! On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 9:12 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > devs and

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0

# Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey v6.4.0 Release Apache CloudStack, proven as one of the most scalable, free and open source cloud computing operating system for large scale private, public, and hybrid clouds, today announced the availability of the latest release of Apache CloudMonkey v6.4.0, the l

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. And I'll publish the Github release as latest. Regards, Rohit Yadav On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 16:08, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following > artifac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

All, Reminder - cmk 6.4.0 RC1 is up for testing and voting. Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 4:08:29 PM To: dev ; users Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1 Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 relea

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador

in me in congratulating Daniel, the new CloudStack PMC Chair / VP. Best Regards, Rohit Yadav

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1

Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commit/df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 Commit: df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 GitHub pre-release (cont

Re: [DISCUSS] Next cmk release

All, Since we haven't heard of any issue/feature requests and the ones in the current milestone are all done. I'll start a vote on this today. https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/milestone/5 Thanks and regards. ____ From: Rohit Yadav Sen

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

ssues/regressions at https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 18:34 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Pro

Re: Re-Introduction

Welcome back Sina! Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 21:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Re-Introduction Welcome back Sina! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Sina Kashipazha Date: Sunday, 17 March 2024 at 18:10 To:

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

regressions or issues here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues Thanks and regards, Rohit & Kiran From: Kiran Chavala Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 17:29 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [PROPOS

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

simple way to warn of > API disruptive changes - but that warning can be given in other ways (in > documentation , a compatibility matrix, etc) *If* it ever happened, we would > be using the first number for bothand > > > > Kind Regards > Giles > > > &

Re: [PROPOSE] upgrade paths for 4.19 and 20

I think it would be most likely that we work towards releasing 4.19.1 before 4.20.0. Then, it would be sensible to have 4.19.0 -> 4.19.1 -> 4.20.0 upgrade path. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, March 8, 2024 14:50 To: dev Subject: [PROPOSE] upgr

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

n8rzljv On 3/5/24 15:10, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi Rohit, thank you > > So to recap; > > Semantic versioning goes (in our use): > . . . > > > And as I understand it you're looking to go > > . . > Starting from 20 > > I'd ask the question -

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

As I understand Daan's vote proposal and from the previous discussion thread, the current scheme that results in a release like 4.20.x.y would simply become 20.a.b, wherein "a" is for maintenance release (counter, starting with 0) and "b" is only used for security releases (counter, starting wit

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider

Thanks for stepping up and sharing your plan. Regards. From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 5:36:55 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for Cloudstack Terraform Provider +1, on the ti

Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh)

Congratulations Vishesh! Regards. From: Daman Arora Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 8:59:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh) Congrats Vishesh! On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, 10:29 a.m. Ruben Bosch wrote: > Congr

Re: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20

+1 Regards. From: m...@swen.io Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 18:29 To: 'dev' Subject: AW: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20 +1 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daan Hoogland Gesendet: Montag, 19. Februar 2024 13:50 An: dev Cc: users Betre

Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.

(+ users) All, Generally speaking, any versioning/styling change can be perceived as a big or concerning change by users (those existing or new ones trying/adopting). So, we must get our message across properly and correctly. I'm not for or against cosmetics change in versioning, but I'm reall

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.19.1.0

Thanks for volunteering Suresh. Agree as Daan has mentioned, community would benefit to have the 4.18.2.0 first with some gap to then have 4.19.1.0. The 4.19.1 RC by May end or early June LGTM. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 5:2

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] web site publishing procedure

Thanks Daan, LGTM - though, if website isn't going to get too many activity and updates (except for couple of blogs a month), we may simplify publishing from main in future. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 17:39 To: dev Cc:

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

384 may be good enough. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 13:00 To: Rohit Yadav Cc: dev Subject: Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3 Hi Rohit, Thanks. I will revert the changes then. If the users think 512MB will lead to large memory cons

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

I would advise we should move to 512 MiB. Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 4:14:06 PM To: Rohit Yadav ; dev Subject: Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3 Hi Rohit, I tested the VRs of a VPC (with 2 tiers

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

. ..But yeah, need to be conscious of the overall memory overhead in large clouds. On 2024-02-08 07:44, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Indeed the memory consumption could be an issue, especially for the > users > who have thousands of virtual routers.

Re: Discussion: CloudStack upgrade to JRE17 and Debian12/python3

Hi Wei, all, Thanks for the thread, I've no objections to either of the options, but option2 is preferred as Debian 11 security will EOL mid of this year. So, if not in 4.20, eventually we'll need to migrate systemvmtemplate base OS to Debian 12 at some point in future. The bigger implication

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.2.0

improvements - First week of February: accept only blocker and critical bug fixes, aiming to stabilize the branch. - Second week of February: start cutting RCs, vote and finish release work. What do you think? Best regards, João Jandre. On 12/9/23 17:22, Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 > > Given, 4.

Re: new website is life

Fantastic! Great to see the new website finally go live after a decade, congratulations everybody! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 13:52 To: dev ; users Subject: new website is life People, we brought the new website. Please

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 LTS Release

Congratulations everyone! Great work Abhishek and everyone involved in the release work. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 17:06 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 LTS Release The A

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0

, After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.19.0.0 *passes* with 7 PMC + 3 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) * Daan * Rohit * Nicolas * Nux * Harikrishna * Boris * Wei +1 (non binding) * Vladimir * Pearl * Suresh 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the

Re: [VOTE] go life with new website(design)

+1 (binding) Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 18:02 To: dev Subject: [VOTE] go life with new website(design) LS, I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions before,but I would like to start a lazy consent vot

Re: Introduction and Greetings

Welcome Abhisar! Regards. From: Suresh Anaparti Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 19:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Introduction and Greetings Welcome Abhisar! Regards, Suresh From: Abhisar Sinha Date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 at 6:12 P

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4

+1 (binding) Tested 4.19.0.0 RC4 packages with EL8 (Alma Linux) + KVM using mbx. Tested the following: Registered new template Registered ssh public key Created isolated network in VM deploy form Deployed VM as root admin Allow egress rules for isolated network Created PF and FW rules, was able

[DISCUSS] Next cmk release

All, Anybody have any feature/improvements requests and bugs to report for the next cmk release? (RM/release timeline yet to be discussed/determined). Please add them here - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/issues Regards.

Re: CentOS 7 is reaching EOL

Like we've done for EL6, starting some CloudStack release we'll need to consider the following for EL7: - drop the EL7 packging support (this can be either from the next major release this year) - change default smoketests against the next (EL8) as the new default - fix our CI/CD to assume/use t

Re: [VOTE] drop first version number and continue with semantic versioning

Agree with Daniel, I would prefer to discuss this further too. I think we're moving too fast with the voting. Regards. From: Guto Veronezi Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 20:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] drop first version number an

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC3

Thanks Abhishek and all involved for your hard work - it's not uncommon to create multiple RCs for a major .0 release - hope to get there with the next one. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 18:55 To: users ; dev@cloudstack.apache.o

Re: new website design

t to deploy this in the coming weeks? > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:31 PM Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> >> devs and users, >> >> back in august we had a small discussion about a new website design, >> led by Ivet [1]. In the meanwhile Rohit had investigated usi

Re: Setup Linstor Plugin for ACS

Hi, I got my rough notes here; https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/7844bfa8cbc9586408ce3596c71caa50 And there is a guide here - https://linbit.com/drbd-user-guide/linstor-guide-1_0-en Regards. From

Re: [PROPOSE] Upgrade JDK from 11 to 17

Thanks Vishesh. Good initiative. I think moving the codebase to build against JDK17 could be more work, than making cloudstack pkgs/builds work with JRE17. Given the next Debian release (12) only supports JRE17, the first step (maybe within scope of 4.20) could be to ensure that CloudStack can

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release

Thanks Abhishek, looking forward to RC1. Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 6:14:43 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.19.0.0 release Hi all, I would like to announce the cod

Re: New Object Storage - Huawei OBS

Hi Ronald, If it helps, there are some CloudStack dev learning guide around how to create a plugin and manage dependencies: https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook Looking forward to see your new object storage plugin (if you decide to contribute upstream). Regards. _

Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov

Congratulations and well done Vladi ! Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 15:27 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov Well done, Vladi! :) On 2023-12-12 09:52, Daan Hoogland wrote: > community, >

Re: Question about ObjectStoreDriver for implementing Ceph driver

Hi Wido, I think when the minio object storage plugin was written we didn’t have the limitations or foresight on how to structure the code, I would agree in refactoring the interface enough to allow what you’re trying to achieve. Typically to a plugin you don’t want to pass database objects (Da

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

t new discussions: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8343 Regards. From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 14:50 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt G

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

on and voting. Regards. From: Pearl d'Silva Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 22:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum +1 Regards, Pearl Dsilva _____

Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.2.0

+1 Given, 4.18 branch is benefitting from maintenance work already, I wouldn't mind if you want to push it earlier to even say end of Jan, and target release in Feb 2024. Regards. From: João Jandre Paraquetti Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 23:32 To: dev@cloud

Re: 4.20 plans

Hi João, Glad to hear about your interests and I will fully support your effort to release manage the next major release 4.20. In fact you can also help us with 4.18.2.0 maintenance release which will be relatively low-effort release and in doing so you can learn the logistics of release manag

Re: 4.20 plans

Wrt regular maintenance work, I think we can discuss the following for next year releases (4.20/4.21): * Support python 3.10, including Marvin, VR scripts (**that's still on python2 that we must upgrade) and smoketests and other misc scripts * Java 17 or 21 LTS (we'll need to look at wh

Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum

: Rohit Yadav Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum Personally I'm against that, as it will dilute the community and once the mailing lists will get inactive they'll stay that way. Also github/discussions is a proprietary platform at Microsoft's whim, I think th

[VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum

All, Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as users forum [1], I put the following proposal for a vote: 1. Adopt and use Github Discussions as user forums. 2. The Github Discussions feature is tied with the us...@cloudstack.apache.org mailing list (PR: https://g

[DISCUSS] Adopting Github Discusssions Users Forum

All, It's been a while since I had last proposed adopting and trying the Github Discussions feature for our users community. Since then, the ASF infra seems to have enabled integration and allowing Discussions integrated with mailing lists: https://github.com/search?q=.asf.yaml+discussions&type

Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar

Congratulations Abhishek, well deserved! Regards. From: Daman Arora Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2023 17:46 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar Many congrats Abhishek! On Thu, Nov 23, 2023, 9:25 p.m. Wei ZHOU

Re: [DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

Thanks all, since there have been no objections I've got a new repository created here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-csbench Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 15:13 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav Su

Re: Can't upload ova file format

Hi, OVA templates aren't supported for KVM. You could convert the ova/vmdk to qcow2/img to be able to use it with KVM. Regards. From: Technology Rss Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 11:25 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Can

[DISCUSS] New benchmarking tool

All, I want to kickstart a discussion of developing a new tool - csbench, that can help with generating resource load and measuring the performance and efficiency of Apache CloudStack APIs. Much like cmk, this tool can be written in Go and can be useful for anybody to benchmark CloudStack API

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Mockito & phasing out powermock

Good work Vishesh! Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 20:23 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Mockito & phasing out powermock Great work Vishesh, thanks! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.18.1.0

Congratulations everyone on the new release, and thanks Wei and everyone involved in the release and voting process. Regards. From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 20:36 To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Wei ZHOU Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT]

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >