On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:26 PM, John Burwell
wrote:
> Erik,
>
> The following is the response I received from infra about managing
> emeritus committers:
>
> commit bits are...binary bits, they can be 1 or they can be 0. We
> don’t
> operate with trinary bits here, sorry
>
>
Erik,
The following is the response I received from infra about managing emeritus
committers:
commit bits are...binary bits, they can be 1 or they can be 0. We don’t
operate with trinary bits here, sorry
If you want to have emeritus committers, your best bet is to remove
If their addresses are not valid? It would be a security measure for/from
my part.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:23 PM, John Burwell
wrote:
> Daan,
>
> I disagree with automatically placing someone in emeritus status. I think
> it is very important that some explicitly requests the status.
>
> Than
Daan,
I disagree with automatically placing someone in emeritus status. I think it
is very important that some explicitly requests the status.
Thanks,
-John
>
Regards,
John Burwell
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
Guys, one thing is to ping their apache known forwarding address if we
suspect they are no longer active. Some might have still addresses of
former employers listed and those are emeritus when found, if I may have
that opinion.
Erik,
Good question about the mechanics. I agree that removal of accounts would not
be correct. It should only be the removal/suspension of the CloudStack commit
bit and karma. In terms of LDAP, my (naive) expectation is that since other
projects have this status, infra already has a way to
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John Burwell
wrote:
> All,
>
> As I am sure many have observed, we have a large number of committers [1]
> who are no longer active. Currently, we no status that continues to
> recognize someone’s committer merit while allowing them to declare inactive
> in the
All,
As I am sure many have observed, we have a large number of committers [1] who
are no longer active. Currently, we no status that continues to recognize
someone’s committer merit while allowing them to declare inactive in the
project. To address this gap, I am proposed amending our projec