Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Damoder Reddy
release docs? > @Hugo: can you create the RPM/systemVM > > Are we releasing the windows MSI? And who can create those? > > regards, > Daan > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: > Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM > Subject: Git Push Summary > To: comm...@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Repository: cloudstack > Updated Tags: refs/tags/4.4.0 [created] 726b9884a > > > >

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Rajani Karuturi
those? regards, Daan -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM Subject: Git Push Summary To: comm...@cloudstack.apache.org Repository: cloudstack Updated Tags: refs/tags/4.4.0 [created] 726b9884a

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
can you finalize the release docs? >> @Hugo: can you create the RPM/systemVM >> >> Are we releasing the windows MSI? And who can create those? >> >> regards, >> Daan >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: >> Date: Tue, Jul 22,

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Wido den Hollander
Code-wise it's the 4.4.0 tag. Wido @Pierre-Luc: can you finalize the release docs? @Hugo: can you create the RPM/systemVM Are we releasing the windows MSI? And who can create those? regards, Daan -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM Subject

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
om: > Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM > Subject: Git Push Summary > To: comm...@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Repository: cloudstack > Updated Tags: refs/tags/4.4.0 [created] 726b9884a > > > -- > Daan >

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
m? >> @Pierre-Luc: can you finalize the release docs? >> @Hugo: can you create the RPM/systemVM >> >> Are we releasing the windows MSI? And who can create those? >> >> regards, >> Daan >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From:

[ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Daan Hoogland
-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM Subject: Git Push Summary To: comm...@cloudstack.apache.org Repository: cloudstack Updated Tags: refs/tags/4.4.0 [created] 726b9884a -- Daan

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Hugo Trippaers
being pulled in to 4.4, we might as well cut >>> branch a little later where approved merge queue is cleared. >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Friday, March 14, 20

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Marcus
lso in this time zone? >> If specific features are being pulled in to 4.4, we might as well cut branch >> a little later where approved merge queue is cleared. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Since a lot of devs are basing their features that have not yet been placed in Git off of master (which is now 4.5), we need to make sure it is clear not to rebase yourself beyond 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db or 4.5 code that should not be in 4.4 could be brought into 4.4. On Fri, Mar

Re: [ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Hugo Trippaers
[mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch > > Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the master > and commit there features. > -1 for the

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Thanks Hugo ! Saw your reply bit late. On 14/03/14 8:34 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it >shouldn¹t be a surprise. > >But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the >ML i see no problem with merging it in i

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-03-14 Thread Murali Reddy
On 14/03/14 8:24 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey Muralli, > >The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i¹m not >going to recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number >are already updated. > >Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash it it wil

[ACS4.4] RE: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:56 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the master and commit there features. -1 for the timing to cut the branch ! On 14/03/14 8:19 pm, "M

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Hugo Trippaers
I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it shouldn’t be a surprise. But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the ML i see no problem with merging it in in the next few hours because of the trouble with master. Just make sure it hits both mast

Re: Git Push Summary : 4.4 feature branch

2014-03-14 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the master and commit there features. -1 for the timing to cut the branch ! On 14/03/14 8:19 pm, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" wrote: > >>Repository: cloudstack >>Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/4.

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-03-14 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey Muralli, The branch is already cut and the jenkins builds are setup. So i’m not going to recreate the 4.4 branch from master as all the version number are already updated. Which merge request are you merging in? If you can squash it it will be easy to pull into master and 4.4. Cheers, H

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-03-14 Thread Murali Reddy
On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" wrote: >Repository: cloudstack >Updated Branches: > refs/heads/4.4 [created] 3ee1fc28d > Hugo, I was holding off merge to master, as it seems to be broken now. I see that you already created 4.4 branch. Can we wait till master is ready to be checked-in an

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

2013-08-21 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Yes but do send an email to list and cc me for picking up docs > -Original Message- > From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:44 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: G

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

2013-08-21 Thread Jessica Tomechak
AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary I will also cherry-pick doc commits > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:55 AM > To: dev@clou

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

2013-08-21 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
I will also cherry-pick doc commits > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:55 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

2013-08-21 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
How about documentation ? Reviews are still going on. -Radhika -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:ke4...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary Per our earlier discussion

RE: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

2013-08-21 Thread Rajesh Battala
Sure. Thanks for the info. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:ke4...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:28 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary Per our earlier discussion 4.2-forward

4.2-forward branch created - Fwd: Git Push Summary

2013-08-21 Thread David Nalley
ssage -- From: Date: Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM Subject: Git Push Summary To: comm...@cloudstack.apache.org Updated Branches: refs/heads/4.2-forward [created] d019388bf

RE: Git Push Summary

2013-07-30 Thread Saksham Srivastava
Isaac, I tried some of your changes. Looks good. Regards, Saksham -Original Message- From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM To: Pranav Saxena Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Git Push Summary Hi all, I've been wo

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-07-24 Thread Isaac Chiang
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM > To: Pranav Saxena > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Git Push Summary > > Hi all, > I've been working on re-factoring the dedication UI code in these > days and just finished. > I discussed the req

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-07-24 Thread Pranav Saxena
t; >> the master branch or replace the entire system.js file in your branch > >> in the master assuming you forked your branch out of master and there > >> haven't been other changes in system.js file . First option is a safer > approach though !! > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Pranav

RE: Git Push Summary

2013-07-24 Thread Saksham Srivastava
Not there in 4.2? -Original Message- From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:12 PM To: Pranav Saxena Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Git Push Summary Hi all, I've been working on re-factoring the dedication UI code in

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-07-24 Thread Isaac Chiang
irst >> option is a safer approach though !! >> >> Thanks, >> Pranav >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Isaac Chiang wrote: >> >>> Hi Pranav: >>> I just pushed part of modified code in to the branch. >>&g

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-07-18 Thread Isaac Chiang
013 at 8:18 AM, Isaac Chiang wrote: > >> Hi Pranav: >> I just pushed part of modified code in to the branch. >> Please have a look if the commit fix the issue as expected. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Regards >> >> >> -

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-07-17 Thread Pranav Saxena
cted. > > Thanks, > > Regards > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Pranav Saxena > Date: Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:52 PM > Subject: Re: Git Push Summary > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, jessica.w...@citrix.com, > sonny.ch...@citrix.com > Cc: comm.

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-07-16 Thread Pranav Saxena
Thanks Isaac for creating this branch. I'll keep an eye on the commits you make your here . Once the code for handling nested query API calls are ready , you can merge it into master. @Jessica - I have had conversations with Isaac and he is in the process of re-factoring the code for dedicated res

RE: Git Push Summary

2013-06-18 Thread Jessica Wang
Chip, > all my fixes that I've put to this branch, were originally committed to > master. Me, too. Jessica -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:32 PM To: Chip Childers; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Jessica Wang; Min Chen Subject: R

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-06-18 Thread Min Chen
Yes, my commit is also pushed master. Thanks -min On 6/18/13 12:34 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Gotcha! > >So are you folks using this branch to do some testing now? Sounds like >a great idea to start testing before the last big merges come in. > >-chip > >On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:32:10PM +00

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-06-18 Thread Chip Childers
Gotcha! So are you folks using this branch to do some testing now? Sounds like a great idea to start testing before the last big merges come in. -chip On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:32:10PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Chip, all my fixes that I've put to this branch, were originally committed

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-06-18 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
Chip, all my fixes that I've put to this branch, were originally committed to master. I cherry-picked them to the master-6-17-stable. commit 5d0a1cee13fb3006f3e35cd221e553587ea20ce2 Author: Alena Prokharchyk Date: Mon Jun 17 16:10:12 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-2883: create default network offe

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-06-18 Thread Chip Childers
Min, Jessica, Alena, What's going on in this branch? The commits are curious. Are these fixes going into master? On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:37:52PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > David, this is a temporary scratch branch to perform some integration > testing since atm the master looks stable.

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-06-17 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
David, this is a temporary scratch branch to perform some integration testing since atm the master looks stable. On 6/17/13 11:57 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >What is this branch for? >On Jun 17, 2013 1:27 PM, wrote: > >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master-6-17-stable [created] fc16e29f9 >>

Re: Git Push Summary

2013-06-17 Thread David Nalley
What is this branch for? On Jun 17, 2013 1:27 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master-6-17-stable [created] fc16e29f9 >