of other comments:
>>> - are we going to handle the case of secondary IP addresses?
>>> - DNSAPI sounds generic, but it actually refers to one specific API
>>> architected by Globo. To avoid confusion, would it make sense to rename it
>>> GloboDNSAPI? Alternately,
gt;> From: David Nalley mailto:da...@gnsa.us>>
>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
>> Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM
>>
gt;
> Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Implementation of DNS Provider for Bind
>
>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Implementation of DNS Provider for Bind (for
4.5)
I tend to agree
I tend to agree with Erik, flexibility solves the problem for more
people, while solution 1 is likely the easiest to implement. I am not
sure that it makes sense for most people though - and would really
only work for greenfield deployments or clouds that had all of the DNS
entries relating to inst
To push that choice over to the operator you could add it as a
global/zone/network option.
As an operator i would prefer to have my own logic to handle cleanup, but
this varies for everyone hence the option :-)
Erik
3. juli 2014 21:45 skrev "Silvano Nogueira Buback"
følgende:
> Hi guys,
>
>
Hi guys,
I think you are busy because 4.4 release tasks, but I'm worried about
the time to 4.5 feature freeze. I put the documentation of feature in wiki
as requested and I hoped people read there and make some comments here.
To help, I will put design issues that are in document, one by one,
Thank you David.
I put design documents on wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Bind+and+PowerDNS+integration+by+Globo+DNSAPI.
I create an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6998 too.
I look forward to hearing your feedbacks.
[]'s,
Silvano Buback
On
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Silvano Nogueira Buback
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>I finish the first version of design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kbPQJrBC87ZtR-t7LwHFDzAmT436ShtjwKE84FVfByM/pub
> .
>
>Someone could give me access to put design documents in wiki? Bellow the
you three have access to the wiki
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Silvano Nogueira Buback
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>I finish the first version of design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kbPQJrBC87ZtR-t7LwHFDzAmT436ShtjwKE84FVfByM/pub
> .
>
>Someone could give me access to put
Hi guys,
I finish the first version of design document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kbPQJrBC87ZtR-t7LwHFDzAmT436ShtjwKE84FVfByM/pub
.
Someone could give me access to put design documents in wiki? Bellow the
username of people work with Cloudstack in Globo.com and need access.
snbub
Of course, I forgotten my account info:
snbuback / silv...@corp.globo.com
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Silvano Nogueira Buback <
> silv...@corp.globo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Rohit,
> >
> > I started the documentation and I think on nex
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Silvano Nogueira Buback <
silv...@corp.globo.com> wrote:
> Hi Rohit,
>
> I started the documentation and I think on next wednesday I'm with the
> first version ready for community feedback. I will put the details of how
> plugin work with DNSAPI and how DNSAPI
June 13, 2014 at 6:53 AM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Implementation of DNS Provider for Bind
> (for 4.5)
>
> Hi Silvan
Hi Rohit,
I started the documentation and I think on next wednesday I'm with the
first version ready for community feedback. I will put the details of how
plugin work with DNSAPI and how DNSAPI work with bind.
I don't have permission to create new pages on wiki. I submit the
documentation
Hi Erik,
At Globo, network domain always have exclusive names, based on zone name
and vlan number, so there is no conflict.
At the point of view of plugin, if domain exists it will be used. If a
record exists, it will be overwritten. When you delete a network, dns
domain will be deleted too
Hi Ilya,
I put the plugin code in
https://github.com/globocom/cloudstack/tree/4.3.0-globo/plugins/network-elements/dns-api.
We use it with Shared/Advanced network zones. But in order to communicate
with other networks (bind server network, for example), it is necessary to
define and implement a
t;>
Date: Friday, June 13, 2014 at 6:53 AM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Implementation of DNS Provider for Bind (for
4.5)
Hi Silvano,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:51 AM
Hi Silvano,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Silvano Nogueira Buback <
silv...@corp.globo.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
> I work at Globo.com, a media company in Brazil. Here we use a cloudstack
> private network with an advanced zone setup (isolated vlans).
>
> For some couple of reasons, the nam
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Silvano Nogueira Buback <
silv...@corp.globo.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
> I work at Globo.com, a media company in Brazil. Here we use a cloudstack
> private network with an advanced zone setup (isolated vlans).
>
> For some couple of reasons, the name of virtual m
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Silvano Buback wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I work at Globo.com, a media company in Brazil. Here we use a cloudstack
> private network with an advanced zone setup (isolated vlans).
>
> For some couple of reasons, the name of virtual machine needs to be
> available not o
Hi Silvano,
I really liked what you did.
I'm curious if this DNS provider will work with non-isolated/shared
advanced network zones as well.
Otherwise, great approach to solving the last DNS puzzle. I now wonder
how easy it would be to add other DNS Providers support into CloudStack
besides B
Hi there,
I work at Globo.com, a media company in Brazil. Here we use a cloudstack
private network with an advanced zone setup (isolated vlans).
For some couple of reasons, the name of virtual machine needs to be
available not only on virtual router network context, but on our internal
DNS serve
Hi there,
I work at Globo.com, a media company in Brazil. Here we use a cloudstack
private network with an advanced zone setup (isolated vlans).
For some couple of reasons, the name of virtual machine needs to be
available not only on virtual router network context, but on our internal
DNS server
24 matches
Mail list logo
