On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Donal Lafferty
wrote:
> It makes a lot of sense to write the ServerResourse for Hyper-V in C#,
> because there's a lot of frameworks written in the Microsoft ecosystem with
> C# in mind.
>
> If that's the case, then it also makes sense to use the Microsoft compil
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 26 March 2013 4:02 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin &
ix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: rohityada...@gmail.com
o:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2013 12:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance
>
> Better to write the C# component doing Hyper-V specifi
ix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:50 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance
>
> The terminology for plugins has unfortunate overloading when it com
ernal REST endpoint.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:50 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hype
Sent: 26 March 2013 2:07 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance
>>
>> Think of the external C# component as external to CS. It exposes a REST
&
Comments inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2013 2:37 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2013, at 1
> 1. Does dependence on the Microsoft compiler mean that the source end
> up in the non-OSS build?
I don't think so.
>
> 2. Is the plugin able to participate in the BVT?
>
BVT must be able to accommodate this. We need to figure out a way for the
build system to accommodate for thi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> 1. Does dependence on the Microsoft compiler mean that the source end
>> up in the non-OSS build?
>
> I don't think so.
No it doesn't.
>
>>
>> 2. Is the plugin able to participate in the BVT?
>>
> BVT must be able to accommodate
>
> Since this is pretty radically different work (different tools,
> platform) do we want to make the C# a different repo/ git submodule?
The controller portion should go inside the plugin portion of CloudStack. The
hypervisor part (ServerResource) should go on a separate repo. Just look at
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>>
>> Since this is pretty radically different work (different tools,
>> platform) do we want to make the C# a different repo/ git submodule?
>
> The controller portion should go inside the plugin portion of CloudStack.
> The hypervisor part (Se
On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>>
>> Since this is pretty radically different work (different tools,
>> platform) do we want to make the C# a different repo/ git submodule?
>
> The controller portion should go inside the plugin portion of CloudStack.
> The hypervisor part (Se
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Since this is pretty radically different work (different tools,
>>> platform) do we want to make the C# a different repo/ git submodule?
>>
>> The controller portion should go i
> and the C# part is for the ServerResource, right ?
>
> I won't code this, but it would be nice to minimize languages used in
> CloudStack and try to be consistent across hypervisors (as much as possible).
> Introducing another language and some framework that may or may not
> have proprietary mo
On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> and the C# part is for the ServerResource, right ?
>>
>> I won't code this, but it would be nice to minimize languages used in
>> CloudStack and try to be consistent across hypervisors (as much as possible).
>> Introducing another language and s
On 27 March 2013 13:51, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
>>> and the C# part is for the ServerResource, right ?
>>>
>>> I won't code this, but it would be nice to minimize languages used in
>>> CloudStack and try to be consistent across hypervisors (a
> -Original Message-
> From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com]
> On Behalf Of prasanna
> Sent: 27 March 2013 8:47 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance
&
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> Let me bring the conversation back to the subject line...
>
> WRT to ServerResource implementation, I'd suggested using a RESTful API to
> hide ServerComponent and ServerResource implementations from each other [1]
+1
>
> This l
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013, at 05:27 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> WRT to licensing, I was looking for bright line rules [2]. E.g. the
> Master repo only gets donated code. A process for developing rules for
> tools and frameworks is what I'm looking for.
Unless I'm mis-understanding the question, I beli
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 27 March 2013 1:49 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44A
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:24:39PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: 27 March 2013 1:49 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hype
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> > > Right, and I believe that people agree that the KVM agent needs to be re-
> > written in non-Java. Could we agree on how to do this, and do the same for
> > Hyper-V ?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Is Iron Python a possibility? Should be su
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Donal Lafferty
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com]
>> On Behalf Of prasanna
>> Sent: 27 March 2013 8:47 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
