RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

+1 binding. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:48 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

+1 Tested with Management Sever on CentOS 6.4 and Xen > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:48 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > Hi All, > > I've

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

+1, tested on the same environment and at the same time. > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:08 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 3:14 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > +1, tested on the same environment and at the same time. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Hello, +1 Tested on CentOS 6.4 + KVM + CLVM Build RPM with success on CentOS 6.4 Milamber Le 28/05/2013 14:47, Chip Childers a ecrit : Hi All, I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote. The changes from round 4 are related to DEB packaging, some translation st

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

+1 (binding) Since the changes are only Deb related in this case I'm basing my vote on previous rounds. I verified the Deb packages this time and both the Management server and AWS API install cleanly now. I'm not an expert on the AWS API, but I see the Mgmt server listening on port 7080.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

-0. I don't believe we should be shipping a release with known clock sync issues (see CLOUDSTACK-2492). Since the community voted to go forward, I will not cast a -1. However, I feel it is important to highlight operational issues that, in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote. > > The changes from round 4 are related to DEB packaging, some > translation strings, and a functional patch to make bridge type > optional

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

John, I clearly see your concern, please review my response under CLOUDSTACK-2492. Thanks ilya > -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 10:10 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

John, note that releases are majority approval, so -1 votes are not vetos. We'd only abort the vote if we failed to get three binding +1 votes, or there were more -1 votes than +1 votes. On 29 May 2013 15:09, John Burwell wrote: > -0. I don't believe we should be shipping a release with known

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > John, note that releases are majority approval, so -1 votes are not vetos. > We'd only abort the vote if we failed to get three binding +1 votes, or > there were more -1 votes than +1 votes. Or if there was something horribly wrong tha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Or that... ;) Generally, the RM is free to abort for any reason! (Though, typically, we'd expect it to be a good one.) On 29 May 2013 19:39, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > > John, note that releases are majority approval, so -1 votes are no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:41:08PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > Or that... ;) Generally, the RM is free to abort for any reason! (Though, > typically, we'd expect it to be a good one.) Yeah, that's just my personal bar. ;) > > > On 29 May 2013 19:39, Chip Childers wrote: > > > On Wed, May 29,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote. > +1 Checked sigs and hashes Built Packaged RPMs for EL6.4 (using nonoss profile) Did some basic testing --David

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Uh, we may have a problem. I deployed a fresh 4.1 two days ago, it worked, and then I deployed current 4.1 on a separate test system (on top of existing, but redeployed the db) and got this: 2013-05-30 09:51:30,975 ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-19:job-19) Unexpected except

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

cc'ing prachi On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Uh, we may have a problem. I deployed a fresh 4.1 two days ago, it > worked, and then I deployed current 4.1 on a separate test system (on > top of existing, but redeployed the db) and got this: > > 2013-05-30 09:51

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

I think we need to add an 'mvn clean' to the cloud.spec prior to building. Normally, I can build RPMs, do a pull or change some code, then build RPMs, and the changes are reflected and everything is fine. However, after running 'git clean -fxd', then rebuilding the same code, reinstalling, the pro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:23:31AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I think we need to add an 'mvn clean' to the cloud.spec prior to > building. Normally, I can build RPMs, do a pull or change some code, > then build RPMs, and the changes are reflected and everything is fine. > However, after runni

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

013 9:48 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Prachi Damle Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:23:31AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I think we need to add an 'mvn clean' to the cloud.spec prior to > building. Normally, I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

or popping up, except that as you say cleaning the repository > is needed. > > -Prachi > > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:48 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Prachi Damle &g

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:38 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > John, note that releases are majority approval

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Check the by laws for the project. On May 30, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:38 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:24 PM > To: > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round) > > Check the by laws for the project. [Animesh>] Thanks Chip > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Tue, May 28, 2013, at 08:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 (binding) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

+1 Built nonoss RPMS from source release. Installed and configured on 6.3 Provisioned CLVM primary storage Provisioned advanced networked zone Provisioned project Provisioned test VMs under project. - Original Message - From: "Chip Childers" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Hi all, I'm going to keep this vote open until sometime tomorrow. Prasanna wants some time to be sure that the BVT runs all complete successfully with the proposed release artifact, and I'd like to have his test results as part of the vote. If he's +1 (doesn't find any blockers that would cause m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Chip, My vote: +1 (binding) Thanks for allowing the extension. Hadn't had time to run the complete set of tests. Results here are posted for Advanced Zone with KVM in one cluster and XenServer in another. I took the chance to run some additional tests for regression, some are still running. Overa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Thanks! I'll close the vote out this afternoon (US ET). On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:07 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Chip, > > My vote: +1 (binding) > > Thanks for allowing the extension. Hadn't had time to run the complete set of > tests. Results here are posted for Advanced Zone with KVM in one clu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On 06/01/2013 02:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Thanks! I'll close the vote out this afternoon (US ET). -1 manager will not start due to recent updated tomcat6 RPMS in distros. The reason is an upgrade to tomcat6 in yum distros; * Wed May 15 2013 David Knox 0:6.0.24-55 - Related: rhbz#955976 C