Hi all:
Can we also have the coding convention for javascript on WIKI page?
I found there are many tab indents and less styled code blocks in the UI
code.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Alex Huang
Donal,
Our coding convention says 180. It was discussed about a week or two back.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventions
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:02 AM
To:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 08:02 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
Can we loosen/ignore this rule when readability becomes an issue?
Alex raised this issue last week:
http://markmail.org/message/z2hzz7efujgmhfnh
I didn't see many responses to that particular part of his email,
though.
Personally, I
My mistake. I'll have to update my style rules.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: 16 July 2013 2:54 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source
Donal,
Our coding convention
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 08:53 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
Donal,
Our coding convention says 180. It was discussed about a week or two
back.
So, I am surprised that it's already been changed. I noticed the comment
when I was doing the weekly news - but it was buried in an email with
the subject
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: 16 July 2013 3:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 08:02 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
Can we loosen/ignore this rule
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
I updated the wiki because several people asked me to post my eclipse
preference file which includes 180 column widths. There's also a follow
up mail thread after I checked it in. The column width was not
questioned. I can send out a
