DaanHoogland merged PR #422:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/422
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
Hi all,
We are investigating security groups support in Advanced zones. it would be
nice to get your feedback.
Some background knowledge:
(1) there are 3 types of zones in cloudstack: Basic, Advanced, Advanced
with Security groups (support KVM and Xenserver. vmware is not supported)
(2) Admins
DaanHoogland merged pull request #220:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/220
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about
wido opened a new pull request #220:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/220
A few lines about IPv6 as this is supported with Security Grouping
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
rhtyd commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-668474375
PR https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/567 merged
This is an automated message from the Apache
rhtyd closed issue #555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
rhtyd commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-665540288
@davidjumani is this still an issue or fixed? cc @utchoang
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
davidjumani commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-664946788
@utchoang Could you look into this too
- Missing Guest VLAN ID in create zone wizard for Advanced Zone with SG
Enabled
- 'Fix Errors' button still present after fi
utchoang commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-664151324
@davidjumani OK. I've seen it now. Thanks.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
davidjumani edited a comment on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-664149819
@utchoang Could you test now ? After selecting the network, we can select
the SG
This is an aut
davidjumani commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-664149819
@utchoang Could you test now ?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
utchoang commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-664141602
@davidjumani I tried with SGAdvanced on
http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/
But I couldn't find the step security group when I switched from affinity
grou
davidjumani commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-664138700
Created `SGAdvanced` Zone
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
davidjumani commented on issue #555:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555#issuecomment-664132801
@utchoang Could you look into this ? Will create a zone with SG Enabled on
QA to test
This is an autom
davidjumani opened a new issue #555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/555
**Describe the bug**
While Deploying a VM in a Zone with SG Enabled, the option to select the
security groups is missing.
Ref Legacy UI :
![Screenshot from 2020-07-21
10-40-09
davidjumani commented on issue #549:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/549#issuecomment-661640125
Closing this since it is out of scope
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
davidjumani closed issue #549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/549
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
rhtyd commented on issue #549:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/549#issuecomment-661638010
Adv zone + SG must however work.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rhtyd commented on issue #549:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/549#issuecomment-661637941
Note don't pick any new big tasks for GA now, we're not supporting basic
zone creation now.
This is an auto
davidjumani commented on issue #549:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/549#issuecomment-661637005
@utchoang Could you look into this ?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
davidjumani opened a new issue #549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/549
**Describe the bug**
The option of adding a VM to a security group is missing in the deployVM
form for a basic zone. Ref the old UI
![Screenshot from 2020-07-21
10-40-09](https://use
rhtyd merged pull request #432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/432
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
blueorangutan commented on pull request #432:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/432#issuecomment-645819767
Packaging result: :heavy_check_mark:centos :heavy_check_mark:debian
:heavy_check_mark:archive.
QA: http://primate-qa.cloudstack.cloud:8080/client/pr/432 (JID-2
blueorangutan commented on pull request #432:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/432#issuecomment-645816391
@davidjumani a Jenkins job has been kicked to build primate packages. I'll
keep you posted as I make progress.
-
davidjumani commented on pull request #432:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/432#issuecomment-645816044
@blueorangutan package
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rhtyd commented on pull request #432:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/432#issuecomment-645814544
No need here @davidjumani - as we'll either have this API available or not.
This is an automated message
davidjumani opened a new pull request #432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/432
Fixes #404
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
davidjumani commented on pull request #432:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/432#issuecomment-645812689
@rhtyd is there a need to add a version check on this ?
This is an automated message from the Apac
vladimirpetrov removed a comment on issue #174: [BUG] Network > Security
groups: Search not working properly
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/174#issuecomment-589601099
@rhtyd Ok, I agree about the previous example, but what could be the reason
for t
vladimirpetrov commented on issue #174: [BUG] Network > Security groups: Search
not working properly
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/174#issuecomment-589601099
@rhtyd Ok, I agree about the previous example, but what could be the reason
for this:
![im
rhtyd commented on issue #174: [BUG] Network > Security groups: Search not
working properly
URL:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/174#issuecomment-589535439
@vladimirpetrov it's because the search string searches both the name and
description, if you try to sea
rhtyd closed issue #174: [BUG] Network > Security groups: Search not working
properly
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/174
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
vladimirpetrov opened a new issue #174: [BUG] Network > Security groups: Search
not working properly
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/174
**Describe the bug**
Search is not working for some strings, will investigate further
**To Reproduce**
Steps
rhtyd commented on issue #97: Security groups - Ingress + Egress tabs
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/97#issuecomment-572877233
@RitchieVincent merged, kindly follow this change. In most views, the
resource already has the item, and we can reuse it in tabs and custom
rhtyd merged pull request #97: Security groups - Ingress + Egress tabs
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/97
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
RitchieVincent opened a new pull request #97: [WIP] Security groups - Ingress +
Egress tabs
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/97
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/937#issuecomment-149943690
thanks @atrbgithub , please add the string "CLOUDSTACK-8976" to the title
of the PR. It will probably be merged in after 4.6 release.
---
If your project is se
Github user atrbgithub commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/937#issuecomment-149888063
Hi @DaanHoogland , I've raised jira ticket for this request:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8976
Cheers!
---
If your project is set up
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/937#issuecomment-149817205
@atrbgithub @rafaelweingartner LGTM with only code inspection. @remibergsma
@karuturi one to put on the great pile for batch testing. It is trivial and a
great
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/937#issuecomment-149743155
Nice work
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user atrbgithub opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/937
Sorting of security groups
Simple change to sort the security groups in alphabetical order within the
instance creation wizard.
This makes it much easier to find a security group when
Hi guys,
I notice that in Adv zone one can dedicate a network to a single account,
trying the same in Adv+SG fails miserably.
Is there any work around for this? We have a customer willing to move into our
deployment, but want to bring his own IPs as well.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant
request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
>
>
> Bugs: cloudstack-6282
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/cloudstack-6282
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Automated API calls for Templates, ISO's, S
x27;s branch
refs/heads/master from unknown
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=e9e8c65 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6282: Added Automated tests to test_escalations.py for Security
Groups, VPN Customer Gateways, Templates, ISO's CS API calls
Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Tallur
l 24, 2014, 11:38 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
>
>
> Bugs: cloudstack-6282
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/cloudstack-6282
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Automated API
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/cloudstack-6282
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Automated API calls for Templates, ISO's, Security Groups, VPN Customer
Gateways in test_escalations.py
Added utility functions/class in base.py which are not already present.
Added tests
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec. 31, 2013, 2:35 a.m., Amogh Vasekar wrote:
>> > Reminder -
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > This request has been pending for long. Please take the time to address
>> > the comments raised. Thanks!
>
> This request can be marked as abandoned.
oudstack and Hugo Trippaers.
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> This is initial version of API implementation of security groups within the
> NVP API
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
>
> plugins/network-elements/nicira-nvp/src/co
.org/r/11981/
> ---
>
> (Updated June 19, 2013, 9:28 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers.
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> This is initial version o
cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers.
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> This is initial version of API implementation of security groups within the
> NVP API
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
>
> plugins/network-elements/nicira-nvp
---
>
> (Updated June 19, 2013, 9:28 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers.
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> This is initial version of API implement
9:28 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers.
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> This is initial version of API implementation of security groups within the
> NVP API
>
>
> Diffs
>
?
Thanks.
On 09/13/2013 02:02 AM, Michael Phillips wrote:
So that is definitely going to be the issue. I missed that in the 8.2.7
section of the install guide.
From: sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Security Groups
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:19:16 +00
ael Phillips wrote:
>> So that is definitely going to be the issue. I missed that in the 8.2.7
>>section of the install guide.
>>
>>> From: sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: Security Groups
>>> Date:
t; section of the install guide.
>>
>>> From: sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: Security Groups
>>> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:19:16 +
>>>
>>> If you are using Xenserver hosts
ue. I missed that in the 8.2.7 section
of the install guide.
From: sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Security Groups
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:19:16 +
If you are using Xenserver hosts , can you make sure you have the CSP packages
installed?
-T
So that is definitely going to be the issue. I missed that in the 8.2.7 section
of the install guide.
> From: sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Security Groups
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:19:16 +
>
> If you are using Xenserver ho
If you are using Xenserver hosts , can you make sure you have the CSP packages
installed?
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Michael Phillips [mailto:mphilli7...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Security Groups
I
I posed this question in the user list, but I figured I would throw it out here
as well...So If I have created a zone with the
"DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService" network offering, then created a VM
using the default security group, which has 0 ingress rules, I should NOT be
able to do
Hi,
I've been testing the security groups in advanced zones with 'UK's largest
satellite broadcaster'. We've found that migrated VMs do not get their security
groups re-applied on the new host.
A error appears in the management log saying:
callHostPlugin failed fo
Hi Guys,
Does a 'Security Groups in Advanced Zones' zone support multiple physical guest
networks? You can't add them via the GUI as you receive an error saying you
need to have already set the tags on them - which you'd have to do via the api.
Regards,
Paul Angus
Senio
ssue CLOUDSTACK - 3452:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3452
>
> Addded check if security groups feature is enabled for basic zone before
> creating security group while creating VM.
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
> tools/marvin/marvin/integration/l
Santhanam.
Summary (updated)
-
Cloustack - 3452: Added check if security groups feature is enabled in basic
zone before creating any sec group
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description (updated)
---
Resolved issue CLOUDSTACK - 3452:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
;
> This is initial version of API implementation of security groups within the
> NVP API
>
>
> Diffs
> -
>
>
> plugins/network-elements/nicira-nvp/src/com/cloud/network/nicira/LogicalSwitchPort.java
> c571458
>
> plugins/network-elements/nicira-nv
initial version of API implementation of security groups within the NVP
API
Diffs
-
plugins/network-elements/nicira-nvp/src/com/cloud/network/nicira/LogicalSwitchPort.java
c571458
plugins/network-elements/nicira-nvp/src/com/cloud/network/nicira/NiciraAddressPairs.java
PRE-CREATION
> On May 23, 2013, 5:16 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > This looks super complete! Thanks for changing everything necessary!
> >
> > Since you are already a committer, would you like to commit this yourself?
I'll setup the advanced security group zone across KVM on
jenkins.buil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11332/#review20926
---
Ship it!
+1
This looks super complete! Thanks for changing everyth
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11332/
---
Review request for cloudstack and anthony xu.
Description
---
This patch i
om]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: Alena Prokharchyk; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers
> Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
> failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
> security grou
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Advance zone with SG is not in 4.1.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:37 PM
To
network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Anthony, do we even support Advance zone with SG in 4.1? I thought you've
checked it in in 4.2 only. If this is true, then:
* no upgrade support for SG enabled setups to 4.1 should be provided
* 4.1 UI shouldn't let
e.com
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to
>4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced
4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Thanks, Paul.
Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands Nicolas
listed in Description?
2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA)
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/ji
-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13656100#comment-13656100]
>
> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463:
>
>
> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an advanced
> zone with security groups.
>
> When attempting to enable the
Done.
Regards,
Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 13 May 2013 17:34
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Security Groups in Advanced zone
On Mon, May 13
> Paul Angus
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 13 May 2013 17:21
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Security Groups i
: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Security Groups in Advanced zone
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:33:42AM +, Paul Angus wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Now KVM is running ok I've added my hosts BUT when I try to enable the zone I
> get the following error:
>
> Cannot enable this Zo
ic=Public in the specified zone id
>
> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the option to
> add/configure a public network.
CLOUDSTACK-2463 has been opened to track this.
Guys,
Now KVM is running ok I've added my hosts BUT when I try to enable the zone I
get the following error:
Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical network with
traffic=Public in the specified zone id
As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn'
ed CLOUDSTACK-2307:
> --
>
> Assignee: Brian Federle
>
> Hi Pranv/Brian,
>
> This issue is not observed in the latest master.
> Please check this and update the bug.
>
> -Jayapal
>
>> E
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/#review20160
---
Patch has been merged with master - Commit:
http://git-wip-us.apach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/#review20158
---
Ship it!
The problem was that the API call was not invoked (since U
] Advanced Zone with Security Groups
Yes (in master branch)
-Original Message-
From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:34 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Query] Advanced Zone with Security Groups
Is Advanced Zone
Yes (in master branch)
-Original Message-
From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:34 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Query] Advanced Zone with Security Groups
Is Advanced Zone with Security Groups feature
Is Advanced Zone with Security Groups feature available for XenServer
deployments?
Thanks,
~Talluri
Is Advanced Zone with Security Groups feature available for XenServer
deployments?
Thanks,
~Talluri
Saxena.
Summary (updated)
-
CLOUDSTACK-2132 : The reload button doesn't work with Security Groups and
Statistic tab in instance detail view
Description
---
The reload button for security group tab and statistic tab doesn't actually
send a request to the back-e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10751/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena.
Description
---
The reloa
Security groups are stateful firewalls -- currently it is not possible to
do stateful firewalling inside OVS (you could write a controller or buy
one that does it however). KVM (linux v 3.2 onwards) now has the ability
to chain OVS and bridge so technically it should be possible only on those
From: Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru [mailto:venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013 3:56 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: what are the technical reason for not supporting security groups on
ovs?
Thanks,
SWAMY
Thanks,
SWAMY
91 matches
Mail list logo
