Does anybody experience this test failure on the latest master?
Results :
Tests in error:
getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest)
getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could not initialize class
com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy
isPersistable(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could no
After running mvn install -P developer,systemvm
Error:Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on
project cloud-core: There are test failures.
How to solve this error?
I am encountering the same.
Thanks
-min
On 12/3/13 4:41 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
>Does anybody experience this test failure on the latest master?
>
>Results :
>
>Tests in error:
> getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest)
> getColumnName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could not initialize
Hi,
I wrote those tests a few weeks ago, it may be my mistake. It works for me
after git rebase. Could you send me a full log from the build + testcase
output txt/xml file?
Thank you,
Laszlo
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Min Chen wrote:
> I am encountering the same.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On
o:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:34 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: test failures
Hi,
I wrote those tests a few weeks ago, it
>>
> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
> mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>"
> mailto:
Priyanka,
what branch? Did you look into the surfire-reports to find out what
the test failures are?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Priyanka Deepala
wrote:
> After running mvn install -P developer,systemvm
> Error:Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-pl
n.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) on
project cloud-core: There are test failures.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] Please refer to
C:\cygwin64\home\priya\cloudstack-oss\cloudstack\core\target\surefire-reports
for the individual test results.
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Priyanka Deepala
wrote:
> C:\cygwin64\home\priya\cloudstack-oss\cloudstack\core\target\surefire-reports
in this directory you should find files with stacktraces for the following:
Failed tests:
testFirewallRulesCommand(com.
cloud.agent.resource.virtualnetwork.Vir
ya I got the file and xml document also. The content in the file is
---
Test set: com.cloud.agent.resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResourceTest
--
You can cut and paste it to the java stacktrace console in eclipse to
query the stack for the origin of the error. To determine whether it
is an error in the test or in the tested code you would need to have
your version of the checked out code.
Did you run it repeatedly and bumped into the same e
Ya I run it several times but it is displaying the same error.I'm using
Cygwin terminal in Windows7
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> You can cut and paste it to the java stacktrace console in eclipse to
> query the stack for the origin of the error. To determine whether i
on the latest master?
I run on a mac and it passes. I'll give it a try on windows later.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Priyanka Deepala
wrote:
> Ya I run it several times but it is displaying the same error.I'm using
> Cygwin terminal in Windows7
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Daan H
Priyanka,
I just ran this on a windows machine in cygwin with latest master. It
passed the server package without problems. I am afraid you are on
your own at this point unless you can give more data.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> on the latest master?
>
> I run on a m
I just updated my source from the master repository. I am now seeing failures
with cloud-plugin-hypervisor-ovm3. The failures are having to do with the
tests that OVM3 are running. I ran the ovm install command to clear the old
databse
mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb
But when
Now that my OWM3 test failures are fixed I figured I would also alert the world
to failures I am seeing on the midonet tests. Again I am building in Cygwin on
a windows 7 system. I am attaching a text file of the errors I am seeing.
Roger
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO
@rhtyd
Could something be done to avoid confusing people pushing PR to have
trillian test failures, which apparently are know to fail all the time or
often? I know it's hard to keep the tests in good shape and make them run
smoothly but I find it very disturbing and therefore I have to admi
H Roger,
I hope you are missing something but can't say for sure. The jenkins
master build [1] seems not to have your problem. So please expand on
your problems.
[1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/master-slowbuild/
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
> I just updated my sou
t 7:03 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply. Please find attached a text of the build errors I
> am getting for OVM3
>
> Roger
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:28 PM
> To:
:103)
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:23 PM
To: dev
Cc: Funs Kessen
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
Roger, I've been browsing through your output and can't find an obvious root
cause. I am cc'ing th
, March 26, 2015 2:23 PM
To: dev
Cc: Funs Kessen
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
Roger, I've been browsing through your output and can't find an obvious root
cause. I am cc'ing the author of the ovm3. In the meanwhile i'll be compiling
master and run the dbdeploy target. What
split
command isn't getting 3+ string in the array but rather just 1 (st Size = 1).
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Roger Crerie [mailto:roger.cre...@hds.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Funs Kessen
Subject: RE: OVM3 test failures
From what I
]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:43 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Funs Kessen
Subject: RE: OVM3 test failures
Just to clear up a few more things. I am building in Cygwin on a windows
system. I through in some more debugging and found that the split command
isn't doing what is e
mailto:roger.cre...@hds.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:33 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Funs Kessen
> Subject: RE: OVM3 test failures
>
> From what I am seeing in the surefire reports though it looks like I am
> running into an ArrayIndexOutOfBounds
her just 1 (st Size = 1).
>
> Roger
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Crerie [mailto:roger.cre...@hds.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 2:33 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Funs Kessen
> Subject: RE: OVM3 test failures
>
> From what I am seei
mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:23 PM
To: dev
Cc: Funs Kessen
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
right, so your second example means that the string has to be split according
to both separators, it seems
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
> So I have
y a Cygwin on windows issue BUT the wiki does say to use
> Cygwin when developing on windows. Thoughts?
>
> Roger
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:23 PM
> To: dev
> Cc: Funs Kessen
> Subject: Re
d not '\' as defined by
>> File.serparator.
>>
>> Again this is probably a Cygwin on windows issue BUT the wiki does say to
>> use Cygwin when developing on windows. Thoughts?
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Funs Kessen wrote:
> Hi Roger/Daan,
>
> Sorry for coming late to the party, and my apologies in advance!
that's alright, i learned something about cs;)
...
> The second part of the booboo is in the tests themselves actually as you’ve
> noticed, so I’ll have to p
m] On Behalf Of Funs Kessen
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:36 PM
To: Daan Hoogland; Roger Crerie
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
Hi Roger/Daan,
Sorry for coming late to the party, and my apologies in advance!
You’re right as the base value for “getVirtualDiskPath” is hardcod
k...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Funs Kessen
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:36 PM
> To: Daan Hoogland; Roger Crerie
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
>
> Hi Roger/Daan,
>
> Sorry for coming late to the party, and my apologies in advance!
>
> On 26 Mar 2015, at 21:41, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Funs Kessen wrote:
>> Hi Roger/Daan,
>>
>> Sorry for coming late to the party, and my apologies in advance!
>
> that's alright, i learned something about cs;)
>
Ditto!! :)
> ...
>> The second part of the b
Hi Daan,
Had a fix ready yesterday, but after having slept on it, I crushed the fix as
it was wrong. I’ve fixed it by setting the separator hard, and not to
File.separator.
The logic behind is that the Agent runs on Linux and not on Windows so using
File.separator will just break things instea
Funs, I commented on it, I think it has a typo in it.
Roger, can you apply that patch and test (after looking at my comment)?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Funs Kessen wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> Had a fix ready yesterday, but after having slept on it, I crushed the fix as
> it was wrong. I’ve fix
Hi Daan,
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 11:58, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Funs, I commented on it, I think it has a typo in it.
> Roger, can you apply that patch and test (after looking at my comment)?
I replied to you, that’s why the pull request contains two commit IDs ;)
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11
/me not being smart enough to use pull requests.
I am pulling it now.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Funs Kessen wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
>> On 27 Mar 2015, at 11:58, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>
>> Funs, I commented on it, I think it has a typo in it.
>> Roger, can you apply that patch and test (afte
Nah you are smart enough, it’s just that I was lazy and did a search and
replace and then noticed I broke something and fixed it with another commit.
thanks!
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 12:12, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> /me not being smart enough to use pull requests.
>
> I am pulling it now.
>
> On
Daan Hoogland
Cc: Roger Crerie; dev
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
Nah you are smart enough, it’s just that I was lazy and did a search and
replace and then noticed I broke something and fixed it with another commit.
thanks!
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 12:12, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> /me n
: Re: OVM3 test failures
Nah you are smart enough, it’s just that I was lazy and did a search and
replace and then noticed I broke something and fixed it with another commit.
thanks!
> On 27 Mar 2015, at 12:12, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> /me not being smart enough to use pull requests.
age-
> From: Funs Kessen [mailto:fozzielumpk...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Funs Kessen
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:21 AM
> To: Daan Hoogland
> Cc: Roger Crerie; dev
> Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
>
> Nah you are smart enough, it’s just that I was lazy and did a search and
essen; dev
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
You should be able to do 'git pull' in your working dir, from the shell.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
> Having never pulled anything from cloudstack but the master how would I go
> about getting this fix?
>
>
Tests passed after I fixed the audit failures. Good on you :).
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Roger Crerie [mailto:roger.cre...@hds.com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:51 AM
To: Daan Hoogland
Cc: Funs Kessen; dev
Subject: RE: OVM3 test failures
I'm getting audit failures now.
om]
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:51 AM
> To: Daan Hoogland
> Cc: Funs Kessen; dev
> Subject: RE: OVM3 test failures
>
> I'm getting audit failures now. See attached text file. I'll fix them in
> code and run again but wanted to alert you to this.
>
> Rog
:)
so you did do a clean etc, didn't you?
thanks for allerting us
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
> Now that my OWM3 test failures are fixed I figured I would also alert the
> world to failures I am seeing on the midonet tests. Again I am building in
&g
Sorry for the false alarm . The mvn clean seems to have done the trick.
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:41 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: midonet test failures
:)
so you did do a clean etc, didn't you?
t
]
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:41 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: midonet test failures
>
> :)
>
> so you did do a clean etc, didn't you?
>
> thanks for allerting us
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
>> Now that my OWM3 test failures
, March 27, 2015 7:47 PM
To: Roger Crerie
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Funs Kessen
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
Shame on me, oh the public humiliation. will fix and submit, thanks
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
> Tests passed after I fixed the audit failures. Good on
k.apache.org; Funs Kessen
> Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
>
> Shame on me, oh the public humiliation. will fix and submit, thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Roger Crerie wrote:
>> Tests passed after I fixed the audit failures. Good on you :).
>>
e planning to do will address this issue?
>>
>> Raj
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:47 PM
>> To: Roger Crerie
>> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Funs Kessen
>> Subjec
che.org/job/cloudstack-marvin/1723/console
>>>
>>> Daan, not sure if the change you were planning to do will address this
>>> issue?
>>>
>>> Raj
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>>&
ing due to ovm3 audit failures.
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-marvin/1723/console
>>>>
>>>> Daan, not sure if the change you were planning to do will address this
>>>> issue?
>>>>
>>>> Raj
>>>> -Orig
t; the builds are failing due to ovm3 audit failures.
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-marvin/1723/console
>>>>>
>>>>> Daan, not sure if the change you were planning to do will address this
>>>>> issue?
>>>>>
&
Cool, thank you for the update! Will check out this in the morning.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 2:10 AM
To: Funs Kessen
Cc: Raja Pullela; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: OVM3 test failures
Funs, so you were
s to include management server
(and agent) logs in the marvin log zip that is put as part of the result on the
github pr.
- Rohit
From: Marc-Aur?le Brothier
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 6:26:05 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Known trillia
Hi Marc-Aurèle, (and everyone else)
The title probably is slightly incorrect. It should really say known Marvin
test failures. Trillian is the automation that creates the environments to run
the tests in, the tests are purely those that are in Marvin codebase so anyone
can repeat them. In
regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier [mailto:ma...@exoscale.ch]
Sent: 20 December 2017 12:56
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Known trillian t
Dear Developers of the Apache Accumulo project,
My name is Kevin van den Bekerom and I am currently doing my Master's
research on the topic of false alarms in test code. I would like to ask the
input of the Cloudstack development team categorizing test code bugs.
My research is based on a rec
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@borisstoyanov could you please amend the first line of commit 62f4826 to
be : ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-41
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Reran tests with fixed tests:
Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_router_dhcphosts | Success | 248.223
test_isolate_network_password_server | Success | 59.451
---
I
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-42
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-43
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
The same concerns about macchinina template remains. Since it doesn't have
correct E1000/vmxnet3 driver embedded any smoke test in Vmware environment will
continue failing.
---
If your project
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 raises a good point. @rhtyd do we explicitly need that commit to
get the smoke tests to pass? As I understand, the macchininia template is
(very nice) performance optimization.
---
I
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell you need both the url fix (as the original file type was not
valid) AND the macchininia template to have the e1000 driver in it. for the
tests to work on vSphere.
Nux said t
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
I agree with @PaulAngus on URL fix. So if we want to have this PR to get in
asap I am on board but some smoke tests will continue failing until driver
issue in the template is addressed
---
If
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell we may ignore that specific test, or retest the vmnet3 test on
vmware against the default built-in (centos5 based) template. @NuxRo ping, can
you help fix the macchanina template to incl
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-88)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 24192 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@PaulAngus @jburwell I've created a tinycore linux basd template here with
e1000, e1000e and vmxnet3 driver loaded (lsmod to confirm). Once started, it
ships only with openssh server and dhcp ena
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-89)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 26541 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell based on the latest result results, the errors have significantly
gone down. We will still need to re-investigate some of the error (which I
thought were fixed, but still failed).
---
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Hi guys, sorry this has caught me in my holidays so no ability to do
anything about it.
In the following week I'll work on a new minimal kernel with improved
support for VMware stuff.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-90)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 29144 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releas
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Thanks @NuxRo
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Wrt failure, an issue was found with env where common.py from Marvin failed
to patch correctly causing some test failures. Re-ran the tests manually to get
them working:
Env: pr1692-t88-kvm-centos7-marvin
Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_extendPhysicalNetwor
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-44
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-45
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Based on today's test runs and fixes, most tests run fine on kvm. At the
moment, several fixes were done to several tests to ensure they run on vmware
and xenserver as well. I've kicked a new pkg
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-46
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Can you guys let me know if this runs OK on all your HVs? I've rebuilt the
kernel
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/testing/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
[mailto:notificati...@github.com]
Sent: 03 October 2016 14:11
To: apache/cloudstack
Cc: Paul Angus ; Mention
Subject: Re: [apache/cloudstack] Fix Smoke Test Failures (#1692)
Can you guys let me know if this runs OK on all your HVs? I've rebuilt the
kernel
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@NuxRo Thanks, I'll test and confirm for xen and kvm in few hours. Can you
also update the repo on how anyone can build the templates from source?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Sure, though I may not have the time to do it today, but soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-91)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 22521 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-96)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 12351 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releas
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
I am LGTM on this now. Thanks @NuxRo @PaulAngus @rhtyd for fixing maccinina
template. VPN_VPC and INTERNAL_LB test work for Vmware
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-98)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30313 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-100)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30113 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/relea
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
BTW failure of test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot is due to PR571 which
modified marvin test to succeed against incorrect functionality.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 #571 has no Marvin test case changes and fixes the CPVM. How does
it address the `test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot` error?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell Sorry my bad. It is PR 871 . The reason the test fails is:
```
After running test_vm_snapshots.py we're getting exception on
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot as it was expected be
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@serg38 @abhinandanprateek diagnosed the same issue earlier today.
Reviewing #871, it is composed of commits
fbc2e2e983938e6a16b7e44eb19db9e659b7a570 and
7147627aa2756c21d28560c1d126c2cdc5cfe
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@blueorangutan test centos6 kvm-centos6
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + kvm-centos6) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Fixed and re-ran tests on Env `pr1692-t100-xenserver-65sp1-marvin`:
Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.317
test_02_revert_vm_sn
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
Trillian test result (tid-103)
Environment: kvm-centos6 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 26470 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
