yes :( found it in my latest experiment :)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 27-07-15 15:36, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>> H,
>>
>> aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics.
>>
>> Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should
On 27-07-15 15:36, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H,
>
> aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics.
>
> Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should not
> be depending on the sdk anymore or is there some other stuff that
> still needs it?
>
Yes, the S3 Secon
H,
aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics.
Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should not
be depending on the sdk anymore or is there some other stuff that
still needs it?
--
Daan
