Review Request 15610: CLOUDSTACK-5185: test_egress_fw_rules - failed the test case if vm deployment failed instead of going on executing rest of the test case

2013-11-16 Thread Ashutosh Kelkar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15610/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: Review Request 15610: CLOUDSTACK-5185: test_egress_fw_rules - failed the test case if vm deployment failed instead of going on executing rest of the test case

2013-11-16 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15610/#review29007 --- Commit 02c15528c8ad5a40998cc8d910560ce759c5d039 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15610: CLOUDSTACK-5185: test_egress_fw_rules - failed the test case if vm deployment failed instead of going on executing rest of the test case

2013-11-16 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15610/#review29008 --- Commit 249f853484f88f59bfeb2ccd114206c1ccd77bb8 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15610: CLOUDSTACK-5185: test_egress_fw_rules - failed the test case if vm deployment failed instead of going on executing rest of the test case

2013-11-16 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15610/#review29009 --- Commit 80dfd0f97ec611d8dee63ad74f6f1ecf74647b99 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15610: CLOUDSTACK-5185: test_egress_fw_rules - failed the test case if vm deployment failed instead of going on executing rest of the test case

2013-11-16 Thread Girish Shilamkar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15610/#review29010 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On

Re: CloudStack.next

2013-11-16 Thread Nux!
On 12.11.2013 23:41, Steve Wilson wrote: Hi All, As we ramp towards freeze on 4.3 and start talking about 4.4, I thought it would be fun to queue up a discussion here on the list before Collab next week. What do you envision in the next MAJOR release of CloudStack? Call it 5.0 or whatever you

Review Request 15611: CLOUDSTACK-5186: Increasing the waiting time for router to come up

2013-11-16 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15611/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: Review Request 15610: CLOUDSTACK-5185: test_egress_fw_rules - failed the test case if vm deployment failed instead of going on executing rest of the test case

2013-11-16 Thread Girish Shilamkar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15610/#review29011 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On

Re: Review Request 15611: CLOUDSTACK-5186: Increasing the waiting time for router to come up

2013-11-16 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15611/#review29012 --- Commit ac160079f1d6c775eebdbc1f83bddfa423527354 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15611: CLOUDSTACK-5186: Increasing the waiting time for router to come up

2013-11-16 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15611/#review29014 --- Commit 438cf4ea63873d422ea23ff2ff4810e122770230 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15611: CLOUDSTACK-5186: Increasing the waiting time for router to come up

2013-11-16 Thread ASF Subversion and Git Services
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15611/#review29013 --- Commit 04807f2b51242172d1a87f34cb096aef8149f1d9 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15611: CLOUDSTACK-5186: Increasing the waiting time for router to come up

2013-11-16 Thread Girish Shilamkar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15611/#review29015 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2, 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

2013-11-16 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Hi I have not signed up for Upgrade. I read in the ML it is going to be taken up during the hackathon at Collab Conf. -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:45 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath Su

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

2013-11-16 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Could someone please file a documentation bug on this issue ? -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:49 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 As long

{Responsiveness report] users 2013w45

2013-11-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
http://markmail.org/message/lzm7ezmtzfh2qbpl Strange info on secondary storage after upgrade to CloudStack 4.2.0 by Indra Pramana http://markmail.org/message/7de72fsstk5tmgst Incorrect diskoffering id when creating disk from template by Lennert den Teuling http://markmail.org/message/xsgr2k57lurjg5

[Responsiveness report] dev 2013w45

2013-11-16 Thread Daan Hoogland
http://markmail.org/message/e5nuyfxgiysvkz2c lxc about cloudstack4.2 by Du Jun http://markmail.org/message/othlvwzfyu5v4ld7 zone-wide primary storage: 2 possible UI bugs by Ryan Lei http://markmail.org/message/dj7xklp3fzzcqebu template inheritance from domains to subdomains, new feature? by Octavia

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

2013-11-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Radhika, if you already have info on how to do the upgrade to 4.2.1, can you commit it to the docs repo ? that we just need to review, test... On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi > > I have not signed up for Upgrade. I read in the ML it is going to be taken up > duri

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

2013-11-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
cc Alex Huang to get his attention: On Nov 15, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Alex, Could you just do a git blame on the file and copy the emails of > people who changed that bit of code? They may be able to help if Cc-ed > directly. > > Thanks, > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01: