Hello,
I had downloaded the nightly build cocoon-2.1_20040731161331. But what I
got after compiling was cocoon-2.2.0dev? Heahh? Is the snapshot
algorithm wrong?
Regards
Stephan
to jar basename: [cocoon-tests]
-DEBUG- Jar [cocoon-deprecated.jar] identifier set to jar basename:
[cocoon-deprecated]
-DEBUG- Dependency on avalon-framework exists, no need to add for property
avalonapi.jar.
-INFO- Made directory
[/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/cocoon-2.1/build/cocoon-20040801
On 31 Jul 2004, at 17:31, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 31 Jul 2004, at 02:26, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 28 Jul 2004, at 19:00, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Personally, I like it as XML. :-)
Don't get me wrong, it's not that I don't like it... but many
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30356.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Stephan Coboos dijo:
Hello,
I had downloaded the nightly build cocoon-2.1_20040731161331. But what I
got after compiling was cocoon-2.2.0dev? Heahh? Is the snapshot
algorithm wrong?
Nope. After 2.1.5 release the version number was changed to 2.2-dev. I
know this is confusing a little bit
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 31/lug/04, alle 03:29, Stefano Mazzocchi ha scritto:
Same thing as the previous proposal but with the whiteboard name,
playground kinda sucks and research would scare people way
because it feels too serious.
Whiteboard sounds fine. We already have a scratchpad in the
Steven Noels wrote:
On 30 Jul 2004, at 12:07, Vilya Harvey wrote:
A scripting language feels like overkill for simple pipelines, but
the XML syntax is very awkward for more complicated ones. The
appropriate choice comes down to how soon you feel that cutoff
occurs, for the kind of sites you
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Reinhard Poetz dijo:
Ugo Cei wrote:
Il giorno 31/lug/04, alle 03:29, Stefano Mazzocchi ha scritto:
Same thing as the previous proposal but with the whiteboard name,
playground kinda sucks and research would scare people way
because it feels too serious.
Whiteboard sounds fine. We already
On 01.08.2004 15:03, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
I had downloaded the nightly build cocoon-2.1_20040731161331. But what I
got after compiling was cocoon-2.2.0dev? Heahh? Is the snapshot
algorithm wrong?
Nope. After 2.1.5 release the version number was changed to 2.2-dev. I
know this is confusing a
On 01.08.2004 15:20, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
In order to summarize:
- whiteboard
...
- branches
...
- scratchpad (block)
...
WDOT?
+1
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
After agreeing on the things that we want to become part of
Cocoon 2.2, we should define milestones so that our users
have an idea where we want to go and when we think we will arive.
Thoughts?
We have started to discuss the roadmap for 2.2 some time ago and
the
12 matches
Mail list logo