Hi,
I've created a patch, and attached it in this mail. Do I need to put it
in bugzilla (it's just a very very small patch)??
Bart.
-Original Message-
From: Bart Molenkamp
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CForms] Change proposal in
Leszek Gawron wrote:
BTW the patch I submitted already passes the service manager to custom
bindings that implement Serviceable. It doesn't change anything for
existing custom bindings. Maybe useful for custom bindings in general?
I have no vote here but it would be very usable for me and
Bart,
I had some troubles with eclipse + subclipse but was working on the same
my commit and your patch just crossed.
I noticed you loosened the access on the inner class to public, just
shout if you need it.
-marc=
Bart Molenkamp wrote:
Hi,
I've created a patch, and attached it in this mail. Do
-Original Message-
From: Marc Portier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CForms] Small scope patch in
JXPathBindingBuilderBase.java
(was: RE: [CForms] Change proposal in Custom bindings)
Bart,
I had some
Yes, unbelievably so!
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:17:57 +0200, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a test, wondering why the list is so silent lately. Is everyone busy?
Sylvain
Siesta time :)
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Just a test, wondering why the list is so silent lately. Is everyone busy?
Sylvain
Hi, while cheking for some updates, I found that the xmldb site is down:
http://www.xmldb.org/
Can someone tell where is the site now?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi, while cheking for some updates, I found that the xmldb site is down:
http://www.xmldb.org/
Can someone tell where is the site now?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xindice-usersm=108654200411626w=2
Guido
Hi,
I created ear file with about 6 war files. All war files are cocoon web applications
and thus have same WEB-INF/lib directories. The ear file has apx. 100MB due to
duplicity of libraries in WEB-INF/lib's. It seems reasonable to me to pull up those
duplicit libraries at ear level and share
On Sep 8, 2004, at 9:44 AM, URDINA Michal wrote:
I created ear file with about 6 war files. All war files are cocoon
web applications and thus have same WEB-INF/lib directories. The ear
file has apx. 100MB due to duplicity of libraries in WEB-INF/lib's. It
seems reasonable to me to pull up
-Original Message-
From: peter royal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sharing cocoon.jar between multiple web aplications
On Sep 8, 2004, at 9:44 AM, URDINA Michal wrote:
I created ear file with about 6 war
Hi,
If you compare latest 2.1 SVN with the end of the CVS development, it
appears the query directory has been missed out... but it is in the SVN
trunk.
SVN 2.1:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/
blocks/lucene/samples/?root=Apache-SVN
CVS:
On Sep 8, 2004, at 11:17 AM, URDINA Michal wrote:
The problem arise only when one web application calls other web
application to generate its output (via getRequestDispatcher.include()
- crosscontext must be enabled). Then both webapps use the same static
field instance in the same thread. And
Hi Andrew:
Andrew Savory dijo:
Is this an error, deliberate, or simply a case of no-one has backported
it to 2.1.6-dev yet?
It is simply a case of no-one has backported ;-)
Here is what still is missing in 2.1.6-dev:
http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/MergingBranches
Maybe you want to give us a
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:32:01 -0400, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 8, 2004, at 11:17 AM, URDINA Michal wrote:
The problem arise only when one web application calls other web
application to generate its output (via getRequestDispatcher.include()
- crosscontext must be enabled).
Is the linotype editor working for anyone?
I only constantly get errors on the javascript
console. None of the buttons (links, images,
styling,...) works for me.
...talking about latest trunk version.
cheers
--
Torsten
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Is the linotype editor working for anyone?
I only constantly get errors on the javascript
console. None of the buttons (links, images,
styling,...) works for me.
...talking about latest trunk version.
works for me, but my own version is not in synch with the one on the
Is the linotype editor working for anyone? I only
constantly get errors on the javascript console. None
of the buttons (links, images, styling,...) works for
me.
...talking about latest trunk version.
works for me, but my own version is not in synch with the
one on the trunk one of the items
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
When you run the example below, you get a ClassCastException,
when you make the change indicated by the comments, the example works fine
Should it be considered a bug or not?
-- def --
fd:field id=case-widget
fd:datatype base=integer/ !-- change this to string and it works --
/fd:field
fd:union
URDINA Michal wrote:
The problem arise only when one web application calls other web application to generate its output (via getRequestDispatcher.include() - crosscontext must be enabled). Then both webapps use the same static field instance in the same thread. And if both are calling method on
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
28 matches
Mail list logo