Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 09:32 +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Looks to me this is the perfect use case for union and class widgets in CForms. I had similar use-cases for an IDE-like webapp, and these widgets made wonders. Also, have you looked at the "form gui" and "swan" sam

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 06:34 +0100, Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 09:32 +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Also, have you looked at the "form gui" and "swan" samples where they are heavily showcased? I humbly request for permission to crawl back under a r

OutOfMemoryError using cocoon:/ protocol

Hi all, Small description of my use-case: I have a cron job that runs once every night to send emails to users of my application. The content of the mail is generated from a cocoon:/ source (which uses some flowscript and the JXTemplate generator to generate the content). Content is different for

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 09:39 +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote: Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Jonas Ekstedt wrote: What I meant was that in the scenario

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32266] New: - [Link] NameOfMyCocoonSite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 22:57 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Is setId necessary, or are you preparing for dependecy injection? I think there are cases when supplying a convertor with an id can be useful, especially when constructing error messages if conversions failed

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 09:52 +0100, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Jonas Ekstedt wrote: > > Suppose you have a list of tasks that can be viewed/edited. In > >edit mode all tasks you have been assigned will show a "Finished" > >button. In JXTemplate you could do this very easy: > > > > > > > >${tas

RE: NPE in AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline

Hmm, this is imho not the best solutions. Preventing NPEs by null checking smells a little bit :) If the section has been added recently than that author should now if a null for the object is a valid case or not; otherwise we should better remove the section for the release. Carsten > -Ori

Cocoon-2.1.X Tests Failure 11/17/04

Automated Cocoon Unit tests failed! Full log file if this unit test run is available here: http://nagoya.apache.org/~vadim/cocoon-test-log-20041117.log Last messages from the log file: == [foreach] reader-mime-type.xml:39

Re: luceneINdexTransformer not optimized

Many thanks I will review this as soon as I can. regards Jeremy On 16 Nov 2004, at 23:03, Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote: see http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32263 On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:04:39 +, Jeremy Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Nicolas If you were to provide a patch an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32266] - [Link] NameOfMyCocoonSite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

Bruno Dumon wrote: On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 05:50 +0100, Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 12:15 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: How about an interface like this: public interface Convertor { public String getId(); public void setId(String id); public Class getTypeClass()

RE: [RT] Implementation of VPCs and "multi-relative" source resolving (long)

Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > It seems to me that this is the right approach - there is no different from the user pov in using vpc or usual components, which is great! So: +1 Only one question: > > The last source-resolving problem is related to URIs that may > be present in the SAX stream, e.g.

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

Bruno Dumon wrote: On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 12:15 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: CForms Convertor Integration Here is the Convertor interface: public interface Convertor { /** * Converts string representation into the object of convertor's type. * *

Re: Rhino Usage Warning

On 17 Nov 2004, at 06:35, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: On 16 Nov 2004, at 13:02, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi All, I am getting this message appearing in my console for Cocoon 2.2.0-dev : "file:/Users/jerm/Development/Checkouts/Apache/Cocoon/trunk/build/ webapp/sample

Re: Problem with jxtg and sax

Hi, after a lot of time on JXTG and DOMStreamer I see where the really problem is. The namespace was declared in the rigth way, the Document is correct and streaming it does'n create any problem. On this DOM I apply a cforms binding, and I create some node using jxpathContext.createPathAndSetValu

The Gump build

Gang, If you look at http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/cocoon/cocoon-block-eventcache/gump_work/build_cocoon_cocoon-block-eventcache.html you can see that the project needs JMS as a dependency. Can someone with commit access commit the attached patch, which adds to the project in questio

Re: [RT] Implementation of VPCs and "multi-relative" source resolving (long)

Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: It seems to me that this is the right approach - there is no different from the user pov in using vpc or usual components, which is great! So: +1 :-) Only one question: The last source-resolving problem is related to URIs that may be pre

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 10:25 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > I need to review your code a little bit more, then I'll commit the > conversion block to the trunk (if no one protest), so that people can > start to work on it. I made a few changes to the conversion block to make it easier to use w

Re: [RT] Attribute Rendering and CForms Convertors

Jonas Ekstedt wrote: On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 10:25 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: I need to review your code a little bit more, then I'll commit the conversion block to the trunk (if no one protest), so that people can start to work on it. I made a few changes to the conversion block to m

Re: svn commit: rev 76124 - cocoon/trunk

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: antonio Date: Wed Nov 17 05:11:21 2004 New Revision: 76124 Modified: cocoon/trunk/gump.xml Log: Fix eventcache. Thanks to Niclas Hedhman. Modified: cocoon/trunk/gump.xml == --- cocoon/trun

Re: The Gump build

Hi Niclas: Done. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo Niclas Hedhman dijo: > > Gang, > If you look at > http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/cocoon/cocoon-block-eventcache/gump_work/build_cocoon_cocoon-block-eventcache.html > > you can see that the project needs JMS as a dependency. > > Can someone w

Re: svn commit: rev 76124 - cocoon/trunk

Upayavira dijo: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Author: antonio >>Date: Wed Nov 17 05:11:21 2004 >>New Revision: 76124 >> >>Modified: >> cocoon/trunk/gump.xml >>Log: >>Fix eventcache. Thanks to Niclas Hedhman. >> >>Modified: cocoon/trunk/gump.xml >>=

Re: The Gump build

thanks, Antonio. I think I was trying to commit at the exact time you were. Geoff On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:17:56 -0600 (CST), Antonio Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Niclas: > > Done. > > Best Regards, > > Antonio Gallardo > > Niclas Hedhman dijo: > > > > > > Gang, > > If you look

Re: The Gump build

Geoff Howard dijo: > thanks, Antonio. I think I was trying to commit at the exact time you > were. Opss. Sorry. :-( Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo

Re: NPE in AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline

The section fixes http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31012 which is a serious bug in itself. Anyway, I have found out why toCacheSourceValidities could be null when cachedResponse is not. Apparently this happens when the pipeline is not yet expired. I have committed a better fix

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32011] - [PATCH] buildList in AbstractDatabaseAction generates incorrect parameter list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: rev 76124 - cocoon/trunk

And whole of cocoon was not at stake, just the eventcache block. There is one (?)class in eventcache which provides support for JMS messages invalidating cache (which in my original vision was the primary use) and thus this dependency on the JMS api. Do we in gump, or in blocks build have "condit

CachedSource persistence

I've successfully set up a cached source that refreshes every 60 seconds. If the source isn't reachable after the 60 seconds the old but cached version is used. This works fine if org.apache.cocoon.caching.impl.CacheImpl is used as Cache implementation. But this solution doesn't survive a server

Re: svn commit: rev 76124 - cocoon/trunk

Hi Geoff. Please change it. I just follow the Niclas' advise. ;-) Are there some mock classes to address that? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo Geoff Howard dijo: > And whole of cocoon was not at stake, just the eventcache block. > There is one (?)class in eventcache which provides support for J

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30878] - [PATCH] org.apache.xindice.core.xupdate.XUpdateImpl

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32274] New: - XUpdate bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32011] - [PATCH] buildList in AbstractDatabaseAction generates incorrect parameter list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Problem with jxtg and sax

Hi, sorry for this mail-spamming :D, but I'm trying to search the cause of this problem, and I'm going more in deep in the code, so I arrived on o.a.c.util.jxpath.DOMFactory, that was the factory passed on JXPathContext when create a context for binding. In createObject() the node parent has getPre

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28045] - [PATCH] Cookie input module

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: CForms Wizards

Sylvain Wallez wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Sure, IMO, you should always do a complete validation of _all_ widgets before binding your form model to business data. There is the same problem with widget states, you can have faulty event logic so

Re: svn commit: rev 76124 - cocoon/trunk

Please change what? Remove what is viewed to be a key use-case of a block to avoid a dependency? Move one class into its own block? (there are very few classes in the event cache block anyway). The jms event cache item could also be moved into the "jms" block, but that then introduces a deep dep

Re: svn commit: rev 76124 - cocoon/trunk

Geoff Howard wrote: Please change what? Remove what is viewed to be a key use-case of a block to avoid a dependency? Move one class into its own block? (there are very few classes in the event cache block anyway). The jms event cache item could also be moved into the "jms" block, but that then in

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28045] - [PATCH] Cookie input module

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apa

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28045] - [PATCH] Cookie input module

Leszek Gawron dijo: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· >> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT >> . >> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· >> INSERTED I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32011] - [PATCH] buildList in AbstractDatabaseAction generates incorrect parameter list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: A template transformer

Jonas Ekstedt wrote: Hello I have created a template transformer similar to JXTemplate and wondered if you would be interested in it. We had discussions at the list about template languages half a month ago did you read that? The conclusion was IIRC, that we like JXTG but not it's implementation

Next release (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28045] )

Leszek Gawron said: >> > When is the code freeze over? I do not know anything about next release. > Will there be any version in 2.1.x branch or do we go for 2.2 next? I believe the code freeze is over when Carsten does the formal build of 2.1.6. I find it hard to believe there won't be a 2.1.7.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32011] - [PATCH] buildList in AbstractDatabaseAction generates incorrect parameter list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

choose/when: container or control-structure?

The use of a choose in the form model should be invisible to the form template and form binding, just like use of a choose in the form template is invisible to the form model. Only structural differences between choices should force the parallel use of a choose in the template and binding. A choos

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32011] - [PATCH] buildList in AbstractDatabaseAction generates incorrect parameter list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[MIT Research Project] Identifying "features" in Cocoon 2.1

Dear Cocoon Community Members, I am a PhD candidate at MIT researching new models of software development and in particular how open source communities innovate and create products in a distributed, global setting. I have done extensive research on open source - some papers are here (http://web.mi

[PATCH] Loading a form from a DOM tree

Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote: Hello Cocoon developers, Would it be possible to load a form from a DOM tree instead of from a uri using the javascript flow api? Well, if FormManager already supports it, I see no problem in exposing it in the Form JS object. Sylvain Sylvain, The attatched patch for Form.

Re: A template transformer

Jonas Ekstedt wrote: The TemplateTransformer was based very much on how the TagTransformer works. Developers can extend the functionality by writing Tag classes. It would be good if you either use TagTransformer, or point out what improvements are required (from your POV) to the TagTransformer to

[VOTE?] - DELI update in 2.1.6

Hi: I wonder if we can include the DELI update in the comming soon release: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083 Interesting is that the patch allow to connect to more than 300 devices! I am willing to test again the patch, but first I want to know if this is a worth now. WD

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32083] - [Patch] upgrade Cocoon to latest version of DELI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32083] - [Patch] upgrade Cocoon to latest version of DELI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28045] - [PATCH] Cookie input module

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Leszek Gawron dijo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INS

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32083] - [Patch] upgrade Cocoon to latest version of DELI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE?] - DELI update in 2.1.6

Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 17:44, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto: I wonder if we can include the DELI update in the comming soon release: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083 Interesting is that the patch allow to connect to more than 300 devices! I am willing to test again the pat

Re: Rhino Usage Warning

[Cross-posted to netscape.public.mozilla.jseng: see below] Jeremy Quinn wrote: On 17 Nov 2004, at 06:35, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: On 16 Nov 2004, at 13:02, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Jeremy Quinn wrote: Hi All, I am getting this message appearing in my console for Cocoon 2.2.0-dev : "f

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

Yep, same here on W2K OO tries to open but crashes Guido Schreuder Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: To me is not working the OO Impress sample: http://localhost:/samples/hello-world/hello.sxi I am using OOo version: 1.1.2 on Linux Fedora Core 3. Can someone else confirm this? Best Regards, Antonio G

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

BTW, when i download it to disk and open it from there it does open correctly. Guido Schreuder wrote: Yep, same here on W2K OO tries to open but crashes Guido Schreuder Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: To me is not working the OO Impress sample: http://localhost:/samples/hello-world/hello.sxi I am

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31760] - Handle / Semaphore Leak?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31760] - Handle / Semaphore Leak?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31760] - Handle / Semaphore Leak?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE?] - DELI update in 2.1.6

Ugo Cei dijo: > Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 17:44, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto: > >> I wonder if we can include the DELI update in the comming soon release: >> >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32083 >> >> Interesting is that the patch allow to connect to more than 300 >> devices!

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

Guido Schreuder dijo: > BTW, when i download it to disk and open it from there it does open > correctly. This is weird! What OOo are you using? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31760] - Handle / Semaphore Leak?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31760] - Handle / Semaphore Leak?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32083] - [Patch] upgrade Cocoon to latest version of DELI

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

This is weird! What OOo are you using? Currently it's OOo 1.1.1

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

On 17.11.2004 00:59, Antonio Gallardo wrote: To me is not working the OO Impress sample: http://localhost:/samples/hello-world/hello.sxi I am using OOo version: 1.1.2 on Linux Fedora Core 3. Can someone else confirm this? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29480 Joerg

Re: [PATCH] Loading a form from a DOM tree

On 17.11.2004 17:29, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote: Is there any possibility for this to be included in 2.1.6? (It's just a small fix, and shouldn't break existing code, but then again, smarter people than me have said that before and got burned :-) I don't think so as we are already in code freeze phase

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi: To me is not working the OO Impress sample: Calc and Writer are broken for me too. Draw works fine. Ross

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

Antonio Gallardo wrote: To me is not working the OO Impress sample: http://localhost:/samples/hello-world/hello.sxi Could it be because of lines like this: file:///C:/Program%20Files/OpenOffice.org1.0.3/user/config/standard.sob (note the fixed filepath) Ross

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29480] - OO samples don't work any longer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

Hi Ross: I am checking byte by byte all the stylesheets we are using. I note all of the samples close the OOo window. I am using: Firefox 1.0 OOo 1.1.2 Sun Java 1.4.2_06 Fedora Core 3. I already changed some things in the stylesheet for writer: build/webapp/samples/hello-world/style/xsl/page2s

Re: OOo Impress hello-world sample not working

I noted we miss the

RE: [RT] Implementation of VPCs and "multi-relative" source resolving (long)

Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > The problem is *which* component and *which* sitemap. > > > > > > > > The caller-src file contains elements with > relative URIs. > What base URI should the xinclude transformer use? > > If the "file+include" generator is used in a subsitemap, the > com

RE: NPE in AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline

Great :) Thanks! Carsten > -Original Message- > From: Unico Hommes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: NPE in AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline > > The section fixes > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

RE: Next release (was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28045] )

Ralph Goers wrote: > > Leszek Gawron said: > > >> > > When is the code freeze over? I do not know anything about > next release. > > Will there be any version in 2.1.x branch or do we go for 2.2 next? > > I believe the code freeze is over when Carsten does the > formal build of 2.1.6. > Or w

[VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. If this vote passes, I will assemble the new release on friday morning based on the SVN of that date! So, please, only commit things that *really* have to be in 2.1.6 - everything else can

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 22:32, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto: Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. Do we still have an anteater test failing? It would be nice to fix it, but since this doesn't seem to bother anyone, here's my

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

On 17-nov-04, at 22:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. +1 -- Unico

Supersonic Tour: multi-page form error.

I was just wandering through the sample site to make sure 2.1.6 is OK and I got this error in the multi-page form of the supersonic tour. at public_startMultiPage (file:/home/rago2483/cocoon/head/BRANCH_2_1_X/build/webapp/samples/blocks/tour/flow/multi-page/multi-page.js, Line 36): Implicit decla

Supersonic Tour: Bean editor application error.

I encountered this in testing 2.1.6. at query_allTasks (file:/home/rago2483/cocoon/head/BRANCH_2_1_X/build/webapp/samples/blocks/tour/bean-editor/cocoon-app/flow/tour.js, Line 27): Implicit declaration of global variable 'list' forbidden. Please ensure all variables are explicitely declared with t

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Carsten Ziegeler said: > Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as > 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. +1 Ralph

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 22:32, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto: Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. Do we still have an anteater test failing? It would be nice to fix it, but since this doesn't seem to bother an

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 22:32, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto: Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. Do we still have an anteater test failing? It would be nice to fix it, but since this do

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 23:38, Vadim Gritsenko ha scritto: Ugo Cei wrote: Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 22:32, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto: Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. Do we still have an anteater test failing? It would

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Le 17 nov. 04, à 23:51, Ugo Cei a écrit : ...Actually we have two anteater tests failing: the second one does not appear unless you set anteater.option.haltonerror = false in local.build.properties. Would it be possible to set it when running the automated tests? Anyway, here's the failure:

Re: Supersonic Tour: multi-page form error.

Le 17 nov. 04, à 21:53, Ralph Goers a écrit : ...at public_startMultiPage (file:/home/rago2483/cocoon/head/BRANCH_2_1_X/build/webapp/samples/ blocks/tour/flow/multi-page/multi-page.js, Line 36): Implicit declaration of global variable 'page' forbidden. Please ensure all variables are explicitely

Re: Supersonic Tour: Bean editor application error.

Le 17 nov. 04, à 21:56, Ralph Goers a écrit : at query_allTasks (file:/home/rago2483/cocoon/head/BRANCH_2_1_X/build/webapp/samples/ blocks/tour/bean-editor/cocoon-app/flow/tour.js, Line 27): Implicit declaration of global variable 'list' forbidden. Please ensure all variables are explicitely dec

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Le 17 nov. 04, à 22:40, Ugo Cei a écrit : ...Do we still have an anteater test failing? It would be nice to fix it, but since this doesn't seem to bother anyone, here's my +1. I don't really know about the implications of the failing test (i.e. would it not break existing apps in some cases?) (de

Re: Supersonic Tour: Bean editor application error.

Ralph Goers wrote: I encountered this in testing 2.1.6. at query_allTasks (file:/home/rago2483/cocoon/head/BRANCH_2_1_X/build/webapp/samples/blocks/tour/bean-editor/cocoon-app/flow/tour.js, Line 27): Implicit declaration of global variable 'list' forbidden. Please ensure all variables are explicite

Re: Supersonic Tour: Bean editor application error.

Le 18 nov. 04, à 00:07, Upayavira a écrit : Well spotted. These variables in flowscript must be prefixed with var. This is a recent change. Can you handle this? it's done already ;-) -Bertrand smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

On 17.11.2004 22:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Please cast your votes for releasing the current SVN of 2.1.x as 2.1.6. The vote will end on friday morning. If this vote passes, I will assemble the new release on friday morning based on the SVN of that date! So, please, only commit things that *really

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Il giorno 17/nov/04, alle 23:55, Bertrand Delacretaz ha scritto: hmm.. are you testing on macosx and seeing this sometimes only? No, on Linux. And it seems to be repeatable. Ugo -- Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release of 2.1.6

Le 18 nov. 04, à 00:43, Ugo Cei a écrit : hmm.. are you testing on macosx and seeing this sometimes only? No, on Linux. And it seems to be repeatable. You're right, sorry. I see the same here on macosx ad webdav-step3.xml:93. And FWIW the test that fails only sometimes here (seems related to the

Re: Supersonic Tour: Bean editor application error.

Upayavira said: > Ralph Goers wrote: > >>I encountered this in testing 2.1.6. >> >>at query_allTasks >>(file:/home/rago2483/cocoon/head/BRANCH_2_1_X/build/webapp/samples/blocks/tour/bean-editor/cocoon-app/flow/tour.js, >>Line 27): Implicit declaration of global variable 'list' forbidden. >> Please

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32289] New: - Batik FragmentExtractorTransformer fragment id clash

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32289] - Batik FragmentExtractorTransformer fragment id clash

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu