hi,
I was wondering (hoping) someone may have come across a good tool for
documenting javascript similar (or not) to javadoc. I have found:
http://jsdoc.sourceforge.net/
but it does not document JS the way I write it :) which is like:
function Shape() {
var color = null;
this.getColor = fu
Geoff Howard wrote:
Robert Koberg wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
Upayavira,
Since I know (don't I?) that you do some work with non-profits, you
may have free use of jive, though the pricing page says
non-commercial "discount" I thought it used to be free for
Geoff Howard wrote:
Upayavira,
Since I know (don't I?) that you do some work with non-profits, you may
have free use of jive, though the pricing page says non-commercial
"discount" I thought it used to be free for that use:
http://www.jivesoftware.com/products/pricing.jsp. Not open source but
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 2 Jan 2004, at 09:16, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi:
2 recently threads make me think about the topic of the thread. AFAIK
Cocoon does not try to stick on any product but Jetty performs better
than
Tomcat:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=107213647015
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On 7 Dec 2003, at 06:29, Robert Koberg wrote:
John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Ma
John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry for the off topic posting, but I've been thinking about
upgrading my laptop and you guys have been saying how good
the modern Macs are :)
I was wondering if you'd tell me which Mac you have and
whether you'd buy one again :)
Thanks,
J.
PS, I've never owned a M
Hi,
While the XUL people have been complaining about MS not adopting their
way and going with XAML (Longhorn), Macromedia has something that could
obsolete them both. It uses flash (v7) to deliver a Flex server
generated SWF.
checkout Flex and MXML:
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/flex
best,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:06 AM
> To: James Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lenya-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> On Sunday, Oct 26, 2003, at 23:33 Europe/Rome, Noel J. Bergman wrote
Hi Stefano,
> >
> > For example, unique IDs cannot start with a number, but all examples
> > of IDs
> > have been strictly numerical. Also the date below:
> >
> > http://host/path/id!date 031015
> >
> > does not conform to ISO 8601.
>
> hmmm, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html, says
>
Hi,
This is probably a minor and implementation detail but I when I see the
examples of datatypes being giving I was wondering if you were taking into
consideration of XML Schema datatypes (and therefore RNG datatypes, though I
don't understand the desire of clearly object oriented-type people usi
Works for me on my mac.
Mac OSX 10.2.8 with (Mozilla 1.4 -- Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X
Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624).
-Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 2:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
nal Message-
> From: Christopher Kohlhaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:54:35AM -0700, Robert Koberg wrote:
> > Also doesn't work on my WinXP (Mozilla 1.4 -- Mozilla/5.0 (Windo
Also doesn't work on my WinXP (Mozilla 1.4 -- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U;
Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624). The top menus show up but
get errors when accessing anything.
On my Mac OSX 10.2.8 with (Mozilla 1.4 -- Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac
OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/200306
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Conal Tuohy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 3:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> > We will probably be moving the Forrest DTD to XHTML2 in one
> > of the next
> > things to do. As you know, there ar
Not just for social engineering anymore :)
http://www.agora.de/eng/index.html
Morning,
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicola Ken Barozzi
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I will try to give you something to chew on. Here is an example page
> (our
> > homepage):
> >
> > > xsl="default">
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicola Ken Barozzi
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Robert Koberg wrote:
>
> > First, forrest's site.xml should change the element n
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicola Ken Barozzi
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 7:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> ...
> >> ...Messy. what would something like this behave?
> >>
> >> 22003-this-is-first-d
> to better isolate classloader and the contracts that are exposed by the
> block. make development more complicated but forces people to think of
> application contracts that can be later reused as global behaviors.
>
> think of it as a generalization of a collection of interfaces and data
> str
Hi,
I may be misunderstanding your need, but you could simply write out all of
you tab's display elements initially set to 'display:none'. Set a initial
focus tab (some variable sent from the server written to a JS var to be used
by the client) and set it's elements set to display:block or display
Hi,
Very cool stuff on all of these threads! I have another way to throw into
the mix. Perhaps it can spark some ideas?
I have been playing around with removing our apps dependence on the MSXML
SOM on client (to gain browser independence) and replacing it with (what I
call in my head) JSAXB. I st
Hmmm... makes me think of XSL's document function
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> On Tuesday, Jul 15, 2003, at 15:40 America/Guayaquil, Tony Collen wrote:
>
> > More RTing:
Hi,
Is there any implementation of a pipeline that transforms incoming email
(from James) to some XML format and another one that transforms the mail XML
format to standard SMTP format?
Also, I was thinking the incoming mail could then be sent through some
Filter/Handler to be indexed and added t
23 matches
Mail list logo