Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Do, den 08.04.2004 schrieb Guido Casper um 20:18:
Stephan Michels wrote:
What the status of the WebDAVSource? It seems that it doesn't implement
any versioning. Or am I wrong?
No. I (vaguely) remember some discussion considering your
VersionableSource vs. Sylvain's
Guido Casper wrote:
Slide's CVS contains a JSR147 implementation as well. JSR147 strangely
is geared towards DeltaV-only.
Because the spec lead is interested in versioning only ;-) [I met him
monday]
Slide's implementation therefore has some
proprietary extensions (I never understood why
Hello,
I currently test and play around with the Repository block.
I guess a RepositorySource would be useful at least for my personal
needs.
I'm going do some coding on it and wonder what involved Cocooner's think
about it.
Since it is possible to configure different backends being used
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:59, Rolf Kulemann wrote:
Hello,
I currently test and play around with the Repository block.
I guess a RepositorySource would be useful at least for my personal
needs.
I'm going do some coding on it and wonder what involved Cocooner's think
about it.
Since it
Looking at the repository block, one will see that there is already a
RepositorySource, but that source and the RepositorySourceFactory are
not meant to be used with the new Repository interface from Guido.
What I have in mind is:
A new RepositorySourceFactory should simply look up the
Rolf Kulemann wrote:
Looking at the repository block, one will see that there is already a
RepositorySource, but that source and the RepositorySourceFactory are
not meant to be used with the new Repository interface from Guido.
What I have in mind is:
A new RepositorySourceFactory should simply
Guido Casper wrote:
Rolf Kulemann wrote:
Looking at the repository block, one will see that there is already a
RepositorySource, but that source and the RepositorySourceFactory are
not meant to be used with the new Repository interface from Guido.
What I have in mind is:
A new
Am Do, den 08.04.2004 schrieb Guido Casper um 17:08:
Rolf Kulemann wrote:
Looking at the repository block, one will see that there is already a
RepositorySource, but that source and the RepositorySourceFactory are
not meant to be used with the new Repository interface from Guido.
What
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 18:46, Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Do, den 08.04.2004 schrieb Guido Casper um 17:08:
Rolf Kulemann wrote:
Looking at the repository block, one will see that there is already a
RepositorySource, but that source and the RepositorySourceFactory are
not meant to be used
Stephan Michels wrote:
Am Do, den 08.04.2004 schrieb Guido Casper um 17:08:
Rolf Kulemann wrote:
Looking at the repository block, one will see that there is already a
RepositorySource, but that source and the RepositorySourceFactory are
not meant to be used with the new Repository interface from
Am Do, den 08.04.2004 schrieb Guido Casper um 20:18:
Stephan Michels wrote:
What the status of the WebDAVSource? It seems that it doesn't implement
any versioning. Or am I wrong?
No. I (vaguely) remember some discussion considering your
VersionableSource vs. Sylvain's VersionedSource
11 matches
Mail list logo