Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Conal Tuohy dijo:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Though I would suggest jx:call-macro name=fooBar/ which would make it
clear that the attribute is the NAME of the macro to be invoked, rather
than the macro itself.
+1 here.
But please keep in
Leszek Gawron wrote:
snip/
That's good. If noone objects I will start tomorrow and hopefully commit
tomorrow.
I have not had time to evalute your proposal in detail, but from a first
look it seem good, so please go ahead.
The syntax you proposed for invocation:
jx:invoke
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
snip/
That's good. If noone objects I will start tomorrow and hopefully
commit tomorrow.
I have not had time to evalute your proposal in detail, but from a first
look it seem good, so please go ahead.
The syntax you proposed for invocation:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
snip/
That's good. If noone objects I will start tomorrow and hopefully
commit tomorrow.
I have not had time to evalute your proposal in detail, but from a
first look it seem good, so please go ahead.
The syntax you proposed
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 3:01, Leszek Gawron dijo:
If you already have something I should not commit - maybe I would send
you the source via email so you could use it if you wanted?
http://www.apache.org/~lgawron/jxtg-20041209.zip
Wasn't that hard with eclipse. Still took 4 hours so
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 3:01, Leszek Gawron dijo:
If you already have something I should not commit - maybe I would send
you the source via email so you could use it if you wanted?
http://www.apache.org/~lgawron/jxtg-20041209.zip
Wasn't that hard with eclipse. Still
Leszek and I have started refactoring JXTG, by breaking it up in its
subclasses. Later we will work on creating more detailed interfaces
between the different parts and all the other stuff that has been
discussed on the list.
Now the question is: where should this work take place?
For the
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
snip/
syntax instead. So that it can work together with common XML tools, if
people want to use such.
That would be good but looks like a bigger change while current macro
call is done via
macroName param1=value param2=value/
so I would reuse
I would like to add one feature to JXTG that would allow not to promote
hacks like [1]. Example:
jx:macro name=fooBar
somecontent/some
/jx:macro
you can only invoke it by fooBar/
If I were able to do jx:invoke macro=fooBar/ I would be able to pass
macro name as a parameter to other macro
Leszek Gawron wrote:
I would like to add one feature to JXTG that would allow not
to promote
hacks like [1]. Example:
jx:macro name=fooBar
somecontent/some
/jx:macro
you can only invoke it by fooBar/
If I were able to do jx:invoke macro=fooBar/ I would be
able to pass
macro
Conal Tuohy wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
I would like to add one feature to JXTG that would allow not
to promote
hacks like [1]. Example:
jx:macro name=fooBar
somecontent/some
/jx:macro
you can only invoke it by fooBar/
If I were able to do jx:invoke macro=fooBar/ I would be
able to pass
On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Conal Tuohy dijo:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Though I would suggest jx:call-macro name=fooBar/ which would make it
clear that the attribute is the NAME of the macro to be invoked, rather
than the macro itself.
+1 here.
But please keep in mind we need still
On Dec 8, 2004, at 3:04 PM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
I would like to add one feature to JXTG that would allow not to
promote hacks like [1]. Example:
jx:macro name=fooBar
somecontent/some
/jx:macro
you can only invoke it by fooBar/
If I were able to do jx:invoke macro=fooBar/ I would be able to
13 matches
Mail list logo
