Andrew Savory said the following on 18/9/06 17:38:
Hi,
Arje Cahn wrote:
I agree with all of these. I also agree with Betrand to have the rest
of Andrew's talks be written up on XML.com or similar. We missed out
on the last round of articles that I proposed after the previous GT,
so it might
Hi,
Arje Cahn wrote:
I agree with all of these. I also agree with Betrand to have
the rest of Andrew's talks be written up on XML.com or
similar. We missed out on the last round of articles that I
proposed after the previous GT, so it might as well get
beyond the idea stage this time.
...
> > I think this is really awsome list of talks.
> > What do you think??
>
> GREAT! +100
Thanks :)
> I agree with all of these. I also agree with Betrand to have
> the rest of Andrew's talks be written up on XML.com or
> similar. We missed out on the last round of articles that I
> proposed a
Arje Cahn said the following on 15/9/06 14:35:
I think this is really awsome list of talks.
What do you think??
GREAT! +100
"Things your mother never told you about Cocoon (The secret gems of Cocoon
rebranded)"
+1 wednesdaymorning
"10 Reasons to use Cocoon"
+1 wednesdaymorning
"Cocoon rel
On 9/15/06, Arje Cahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...And then we need to pick one from Andrew's list:...
Here's my order of preference for a Wednesday talk:
"An illustrated guide to Cocoon technologies"
(Coming from Andrew I think this would be brilliant...)
"Things your mother never told
...I think this is really awsome list of talks...
Definitely, and it makes for a packed day, but I'm +1 on your program.
With such a packed schedule, I assume people won't stay in the main
room the whole time. It might be good to have some space available
during the whole day for informal "para
e v6.03.05 is now available at www.hippocms.org
--------------
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Savory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: donderdag 14 september 2006 18:16
> Posted To: Cocoon Dev List
> Conversation
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Arje Cahn wrote:
On the other hand, it would fit right in... If me and Reinhard only need
15 minutes, and Andrew drops 4 out of his 6 proposals, we'll have 11
30-minute talks left..
WHAT?! Drop 4 talks?
I was hoping to drop at least 5 actually ;-)
Seriously though, at
On 9/14/06, Arje Cahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Are you suggesting we squeeze *all* talks to 30 minutes slots, effectively
raising the number of talks from 8 to 12 ??...
Why not? And try to have the material online *before* the talks, so
that people can read it in advance and ask good que
Arje Cahn said the following on 14/9/06 18:04:
My first reaction was: can't we fit all of them in?
Hold on...
Are you suggesting we squeeze *all* talks to 30 minutes slots, effectively raising the number of talks from 8 to 12 ??
That's a *lot* of talks..!
On the other hand, it would fit rig
> My first reaction was: can't we fit all of them in?
Hold on...
Are you suggesting we squeeze *all* talks to 30 minutes slots, effectively
raising the number of talks from 8 to 12 ??
That's a *lot* of talks..!
On the other hand, it would fit right in... If me and Reinhard only need 15
minut
Ross McDonald said the following on 13/9/06 14:07:
No problem with a 30 minute speech, the shorter, the simpler the better!
Same feeling here.
Bye, Helma
On 13 Sep 2006, at 12:56, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/13/06, Arje Cahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...In total, we can host about 8
hepabolu skrev:
My first reaction was: can't we fit all of them in?
On second thoughts: I cannot choose between the various talks, but
given the subject of Daniel's talk and my experience with the
complexity of his talk of last year, I propose that his talk be moved
to the Hackathon. I think
No problem with a 30 minute speech, the shorter, the simpler the better!
Ross.
On 13 Sep 2006, at 12:56, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/13/06, Arje Cahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...In total, we can host about 8 45-minute sessions, so we need to
decide on
which 8 or 9 talks have to go...
My first reaction was: can't we fit all of them in?
On second thoughts: I cannot choose between the various talks, but given
the subject of Daniel's talk and my experience with the complexity of
his talk of last year, I propose that his talk be moved to the
Hackathon. I think his talk is more
On 9/13/06, Arje Cahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...In total, we can host about 8 45-minute sessions, so we need to decide on
which 8 or 9 talks have to go...
Maybe some speakers would agree to bring their session down to 30 minutes?
I'm willing to do it for mine, if it allows more material t
16 matches
Mail list logo
