Le 14 nov. 05, à 04:14, David Crossley a écrit :
...As part of our ForrestFriday, Ross and i did some work
on this. We can now generate the Changes as part of
the 2.1 docs. If Ross can get the proper solution
committed soon, then great, otherwise i will commit
a workround that will be the next be
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > David Crossley a ?crit :
> >
> >>...The top-level docs are now building the changes page
> >>by getting the status.xml file from the 2.1 branch svn.
> >>Not ideal, but it works
> >
> >Great!
> >
> >>http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ft/build/co
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 11 nov. 05, à 04:26, David Crossley a écrit :
...The top-level docs are now building the changes page
by getting the status.xml file from the 2.1 branch svn.
Not ideal, but it works
Great!
http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ft/build/cocoon-site/changes.html
Le 11 nov. 05, à 04:26, David Crossley a écrit :
...The top-level docs are now building the changes page
by getting the status.xml file from the 2.1 branch svn.
Not ideal, but it works
Great!
http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ft/build/cocoon-site/changes.html
The problem is that that page
ion building system, e.g. the
> > >index.xml file seems to be missing and various other
> > >source files have been deleted...
> >
> > Could we do the release and regenerate only the index and news pages?
> > I don't think there have been much changes to ot
David Crossley wrote:
>
> Double Uh'oh ... the "docs" target was also removed,
> so that means that for someone to build the "Changes"
> they will need to go back to an old version of cocoon-2_1_X
> and use todays status.xml file. Need to do 'build docs'
> and then do 'forrest' as described at:
>
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> David Crossley a ?crit :
> >...Uh'oh i see that someone has deleted
> >branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/forrest.properties
> >so i need to get that back. Can someone please explain how to find
> >out when that file was removed from SVN. I tried searching my local
> >mail archive
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
For example, the docs under the Community and About
labels gain extra subdirectories compared with the
existing website.
That's the bug in need of fixing, imho, and not more than that. I'm
sending out a diff...
I've had a look at this, please s
David Crossley wrote:
Don't know how that occurred, e.g.
src/blocks/faces/java/org/apache/cocoon/faces/samples/components/taglib/MapTag.java
PMC archives have it. See thread started on September 2004, 17th. It was deemed
to be non issue, and this demo is shipped w/Cocoon since version 2.1.6.
David Crossley wrote:
For example, the docs under the Community and About
labels gain extra subdirectories compared with the
existing website.
That's the bug in need of fixing, imho, and not more than that. I'm sending out
a diff...
Vadim
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> >
> >>David Crossley wrote:
> >>
> >>>there is currently a changed URL-space which will bust links,
> >>
> >>David,
> >>
> >>What changed URLs have you noticed, so far? If there is a list, it will
> >>help fixing problems.
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
What changed URLs have you noticed, so far? If there is a list, it
will help fixing problems. Myself, I noticed that
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/introduction.html
became
http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ft/build/cocoon-docs
David Crossley wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
there is currently a changed URL-space which will bust links,
David,
What changed URLs have you noticed, so far? If there is a list, it will
help fixing problems. Myself, I noticed that
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/intro
t; how that occurred, e.g.
> src/blocks/faces/java/org/apache/cocoon/faces/samples/components/taglib/MapTag.java
>
Arrrggg, it seems that releasing 2.1.8 will be one of the most
problematic releases ever. Ok, I'll stop all action now.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Sour
David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >
> > Another issue is that normally i run a program to
> > scan for license issues, but have not found time.
>
> I will try to make some time to do that tonight.
That is done now.
There are SUN licenses throughout the
src/blocks/faces/java/org/a
deleted...
Could we do the release and regenerate only the index and news pages?
I don't think there have been much changes to other parts of the
"old" docs.
I'm strongly for releasing 2.1.8 with the "old" docs and take our
time to improve them for 2.2.
Good id
deleted...
Could we do the release and regenerate only the index and news pages?
I don't think there have been much changes to other parts of the
"old" docs.
I'm strongly for releasing 2.1.8 with the "old" docs and take our
time to improve them for 2.2.
Good id
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I'm a little slow responding right now. I'm travelling at present
> > and only have intermittent access and time. However, the URL space
> > issues are not issues, just get David or myself to zip up te built docs
> > and there you go, y
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Sorry, I'm a little slow responding right now. I'm travelling at present
> and only have intermittent access and time. However, the URL space
> issues are not issues, just get David or myself to zip up te built docs
> and there you go, you have the docs in the 2.1/... urls
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
-1 ... People have not addressed the documentation
side of things. See other recent email on this
David Crossley wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
there is currently a changed URL-space which will bust links,
David,
What changed URLs have you noticed, so far? If there is a list, it will
help fixing problems. Myself, I noticed that
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/intro
the release and regenerate only the index and news pages?
I don't think there have been much changes to other parts of the "old"
docs.
I'm strongly for releasing 2.1.8 with the "old" docs and take our time
to improve them for 2.2.
Good idea, i was wondering abou
Le 9 nov. 05, à 09:48, David Crossley a écrit :
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...I haven't commited the recovered file, in case you just need it it
temporarily you can get it with the above command.
Please do. I want to encourage other people to
deal with documentation issues...
done.
-Bertran
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> With svn log you can see when it was deleted:
Thanks, that is what i was looking for.
> I haven't commited the recovered file, in case you just need it it
> temporarily you can get it with the above command.
Please do. I want to encourage other people to
deal wi
Le 9 nov. 05, à 08:33, David Crossley a écrit :
...Uh'oh i see that someone has deleted
branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/forrest.properties
so i need to get that back. Can someone please explain how to find
out when that file was removed from SVN. I tried searching my local
mail archives for [EMAIL PROTEC
David Crossley wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>>This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
>>
>>Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
>
>
> -1 ... People have not addressed the documentation
> side of things. See other r
;documentation for this release, then we we need to
>>>>repair the old documentation building system, e.g. the
>>>>index.xml file seems to be missing and various other
>>>>source files have been deleted...
>>>
>>>Could we do the release and reg
ion building system, e.g. the
> > >index.xml file seems to be missing and various other
> > >source files have been deleted...
> >
> > Could we do the release and regenerate only the index and news pages?
> > I don't think there have been much changes to ot
David Crossley wrote:
>
> Another issue is that normally i run a program to
> scan for license issues, but have not found time.
I will try to make some time to do that tonight.
-David
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >there is currently a changed URL-space which will bust links,
>
> David,
>
> What changed URLs have you noticed, so far? If there is a list, it will
> help fixing problems. Myself, I noticed that
> http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/introduction.html
David Crossley wrote:
there is currently a changed URL-space which will bust links,
David,
What changed URLs have you noticed, so far? If there is a list, it will help
fixing problems. Myself, I noticed that
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/introduction.html
became
http://forrest.zones.apac
ous other
> >source files have been deleted...
>
> Could we do the release and regenerate only the index and news pages?
> I don't think there have been much changes to other parts of the "old"
> docs.
>
> I'm strongly for releasing 2.1.8 with the
the index and news pages?
I don't think there have been much changes to other parts of the "old"
docs.
I'm strongly for releasing 2.1.8 with the "old" docs and take our time
to improve them for 2.2.
-Bertrand
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
>
> Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
-1 ... People have not addressed the documentation
side of things. See other recent email on this topic
to which nobody replied. We will no
On 08.11.2005 11:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
+1
What about the three day voting period ;)
Jörg
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
Carsten
+1
Ralph
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
>
> Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
>
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Le 8 nov. 05, à 11:54, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
+1
-Bertrand
On 08.11.2005, at 12:15, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On 11/8/05, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
There are still some samples broken. Unfortunately
I don'
Il giorno 08/nov/05, alle ore 11:54, Carsten Ziegeler ha scritto:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
+1
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei
Tech Blog: http://agylen.com/
Open Source Zone: http://oszone.org/
Wine & Food Blog: http://www.divinocibo.it/
Hi,
On 8 Nov 2005, at 10:54, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
+1
Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas Limited
Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658 Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
Web: http://www.luminas.co.uk/
Orixo alliance: http
On 11/8/05, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
>
> Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
+1
Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
+100 ! :-)
Sylvain
--
Sylvain WallezAnyware Technologies
http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware
+1 !
This is another try to get 2.1.8 finally out:
Please cast your votes for releasing 2.1.8 tomorrow, 8th of November.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> To be honest I'm not really happy about this vote: I counted only four
> votes! I'm still trying to figure out what this result means to us?
>
> Anyway, I counted two +1's, one +0.5, one -0.5 and some reservations for
> releasing today.
>
> My decision is to not release
Just as well. I'm still trying to get the portal full screen working
properly. If I can't get it working tomorrow I'll have to back the
change out as I'll be away next week.
Ralph
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
To be honest I'm not really happy about this vote: I counted only four
votes! I'm still
On 04.11.2005, at 08:30, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
To be honest I'm not really happy about this vote: I counted only four
votes! I'm still trying to figure out what this result means to us?
I suspect it means "I haven't tested enough to be confident so
I don't know. Have all reported issues rea
To be honest I'm not really happy about this vote: I counted only four
votes! I'm still trying to figure out what this result means to us?
Anyway, I counted two +1's, one +0.5, one -0.5 and some reservations for
releasing today.
My decision is to not release today, sorry, but imho there are not
e
OK.
While I think the table in the wiki is a good idea, the wiki's table
handling leaves a lot to be desired. If anyone has a better idea please
suggest it. But it does (or will - once more data is filled in) give a
nice overall picture of how much the release has been tested.
Ralph
Carsten
It seems that it's better to not rush the release and give us all one
more week time to get everything working.
So I'll start another vote next thursday and then hopefully release on
friday.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblog
Le 27 oct. 05, à 08:35, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
So please cast your votes for
[ ] Release tomorrow, 27th of October
[+1 ] Release next friday, 4th of November
Things are still happening re. testing and docs, so the release should
be a better one in a week.
-Bertrand
So please cast your votes for
[ ] Release tomorrow, 27th of October
-1: We can't: docs are not generated in 2.1 URI space yet
[ ] Release next friday, 4th of November
+0: Will see
+1 for delaying the release.
Jörg
Andrew Savory wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27 Oct 2005, at 15:53, Upayavira wrote:
>
>> Well, are you saying that this is a critical bug?
>>
>> As far as I am concerned, you can vote -1 on a release because something
>> is critical to the project, but not because it is inconvenient to you
>> :-)
>
>
>
Hi,
On 27 Oct 2005, at 15:53, Upayavira wrote:
Well, are you saying that this is a critical bug?
As far as I am concerned, you can vote -1 on a release because
something
is critical to the project, but not because it is inconvenient to
you :-)
Well, a component of Cocoon (SQL Transformer
Le 27 oct. 05, à 16:42, Andrew Savory a écrit :
...-1 for tomorrow: just got bitten again by this bug:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1594
I have created http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1663 to list
issues which we consider blocking for the release, and added
COCOON-
Andrew Savory wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27 Oct 2005, at 07:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> So please cast your votes for
>> [ ] Release tomorrow, 27th of October
>> [ ] Release next friday, 4th of November
>
>
> -1 for tomorrow: just got bitten again by this bug: http://
> issues.apache.org/jira/bro
Hi,
On 27 Oct 2005, at 07:35, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So please cast your votes for
[ ] Release tomorrow, 27th of October
[ ] Release next friday, 4th of November
-1 for tomorrow: just got bitten again by this bug: http://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1594
We need time to fix it. S
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We had some feedback in the last days wrt to the 2.1.8 release.
As I'm having access to a unix system tomorrow and next friday (but not
inbetween), I can do the release either tomorrow or we can use another
week to fix some possible issues and rele
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We had some feedback in the last days wrt to the 2.1.8 release.
As I'm having access to a unix system tomorrow and next friday (but not
inbetween), I can do the release either tomorrow or we can use another
week to fix some possible issues and release next friday.
So plea
Unless I have screwed something up, it appears the
ConvertableEventAspect is not doing its job. I can't test any more
tonight. It is very late.
Ralph
Ralph Goers wrote:
Saving of JSR-168 preferences does not appear to be working.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We had some feedback in the last da
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We had some feedback in the last days wrt to the 2.1.8 release.
As I'm having access to a unix system tomorrow and next friday (but not
inbetween)
You always have a unix system available: cocoon.zones.apache.org!
Sylvain
--
Sylvain WallezAnyware
Saving of JSR-168 preferences does not appear to be working.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We had some feedback in the last days wrt to the 2.1.8 release.
As I'm having access to a unix system tomorrow and next friday (but not
inbetween), I can do the release either tomorrow or we can use another
wee
Le 27 oct. 05, à 09:14, Ralph Goers a écrit :
...it would be great if we had a testing matrix of JVMs, Servlet
Containers and operating systems that we could check off when doing a
release
If you want to setup a simple matrix as a wiki page (or jira issues,
one per set of tests where peop
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We had some feedback in the last days wrt to the 2.1.8 release.
As I'm having access to a unix system tomorrow and next friday (but not
inbetween), I can do the release either tomorrow or we can use another
week to fix some possible issues and release next friday.
So ple
Hi,
my vote does not count but:
> So please cast your votes for
> [x] Release tomorrow, 27th of October
> [ ] Release next friday, 4th of November
:-)
kind regards,
Jens
We had some feedback in the last days wrt to the 2.1.8 release.
As I'm having access to a unix system tomorrow and next friday (but not
inbetween), I can do the release either tomorrow or we can use another
week to fix some possible issues and release next friday.
So please cast your votes for
[ ]
On Oct 21, 2005, at 8:43 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I just pasted your comments into the bug and will follow up there. Now
I am thinking I probably should have just left it here, since I think
Jörg and I went through all this before (see the comments to that bug),
but what's done's done :
Mark Lundquist wrote:
On Oct 10, 2005, at 12:49 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We wanted to release 2.1.8 as soon as possible after the GT.
Now the question is, are there any open issues?
I know it's just a little thing, but then I could stop maintaining
this local patch... any chance of gett
On Oct 10, 2005, at 12:49 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We wanted to release 2.1.8 as soon as possible after the GT.
Now the question is, are there any open issues?
I know it's just a little thing, but then I could stop maintaining
this local patch... any chance of getting this committed into
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sorry for the long name. I was unable to find quickly a better name.
;-)
Seriously, since the long name for customized eclipse build seems to
be used only by you and me, then I think we can also deprecate it
now and remov
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sorry for the long name. I was unable to find quickly a better name. ;-)
Seriously, since the long name for customized eclipse build seems to
be used only by you and me, then I think we can also deprecate it now
and remove it in 2.2.
WDYT?
I
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sorry for the long name. I was unable to find quickly a better name. ;-)
Seriously, since the long name for customized eclipse build seems to be
used only by you and me, then I think we can also deprecate it now and
remove it in 2.2.
WDYT?
I've been using it since
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it (I will (tm) this ! :))
mighty cool, thanks Leszek !
So what about those 300 outstanding bugzilla issues :P
lol. :-D Jorg, are you now committer, then you can get them only for
you! ;-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclip
* Jorg Heymans:
>
> Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
>
> > Bug 36907 Missing dependency on commons-beanutils
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36907
>
> isn't this fixed by r314825 from yesterday by Bruno ?
Yes, thank you.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
Systèmes d'Information
ANYWARE T
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
The thing is eclipse-project and eclipse-customized-project were out
of sync (doing different things regardles of being
inclusion/exclusion aware)
how about:
build -Dinclude.all.blocks=true eclipse-pr
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
The thing is eclipse-project and eclipse-customized-project were out
of sync (doing different things regardles of being
inclusion/exclusion aware)
how about:
build -Dinclude.all.blocks=true eclipse-project
I assume that
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
The thing is eclipse-project and eclipse-customized-project were out of
sync (doing different things regardles of being inclusion/exclusion aware)
how about:
build -Dinclude.all.blocks=true eclipse-project
I assume that include has precedence o
Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
> The thing is eclipse-project and eclipse-customized-project were out of
> sync (doing different things regardles of being inclusion/exclusion aware)
>
> how about:
>
> build -Dinclude.all.blocks=true eclipse-project
>
I assume that include has precedence over exclude,
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
I will remove the standard eclipse-project (It also seems outdated
comparing to eclipse-customized-project). eclipse-customized-project has
all the functionality of the former one so this should be no problem for
anyone.
Please don't - I'm usi
Upayavira wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclipse-customized-project ta
Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
> I will remove the standard eclipse-project (It also seems outdated
> comparing to eclipse-customized-project). eclipse-customized-project has
> all the functionality of the former one so this should be no problem for
> anyone.
>
Please don't - I'm using the project to
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> I will remove the standard eclipse-project (It also seems outdated
> comparing to eclipse-customized-project). eclipse-customized-project has
> all the functionality of the former one so this should be no problem for
as the standard eclipse-project is more known, why not k
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it (I will (tm) this ! :))
mighty cool, thanks Leszek !
So what about those 300 outstanding bugzilla issues :P
Hmmm you know ... I do impossible things in no time. Still you'll have
to wait a little bit for miracles.
--
Leszek Gawron
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclipse-customized-project target ?
They shou
Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
> want it - got it (I will (tm) this ! :))
>
mighty cool, thanks Leszek !
So what about those 300 outstanding bugzilla issues :P
Leszek Gawron wrote:
>
> Slightly OT: why don't we make eclipse-customized-project a default
> target for eclipse IDE? Since eclipse-customized-project was introduced
> this is the only one I use.
makes sense yes, +1
Jorg
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclipse-customized-project target ?
They should but ... to tell you t
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclipse-customized-project target ?
want it - got it (I will (tm) this ! :))
--
Leszek Gawr
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclipse-customized-project target ?
Unfortunately it does not - I'll look into that.
--
Lesz
Jorg Heymans wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclipse-customized-project target ?
They should but ... to tell you the truth I do not know.
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
> Bug 36907 Missing dependency on commons-beanutils
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36907
isn't this fixed by r314825 from yesterday by Bruno ?
Jorg
* Carsten Ziegeler:
> Is there anything else?
Yes, the four following issues are critical before releasing:
Bug 36462 JXPath expressions within are broken
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36462
Bug 36907 Missing dependency on commons-beanutils
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla
Leszek Gawron wrote:
>>
> want it - got it.
> check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
>
I don't have time to check myself, but are these new properties
respected by the eclipse-customized-project target ?
Jorg
Leszek Gawron wrote:
I do not understand... No plate then ? :)
Oh, no, you got it :-)
--
Stefano.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We wanted to release 2.1.8 as soon as possible after the GT.
Now the question is, are there any open issues?
I'm currently aware of two problems:
1) Documentation - 2.1.8 does not contain the doc
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
making the "include.block = true" overload "exclude.block.all = true"
would go a long way to make things easier for users, IMO and should
not but such a big change.
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll p
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
We wanted to release 2.1.8 as soon as possible after the GT.
Now the question is, are there any open issues?
I'm currently aware of two problems:
1) Documentation - 2.1.8 does not contain the docs anymore, so we should
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
making the "include.block = true" overload "exclude.block.all = true"
would go a long way to make things easier for users, IMO and should
not but such a big change.
want it - got it.
check the trunk - if it's ok - I'll port it back to 2.1.
Wow!
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
