Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or
am I mistaken about the agreement?
Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and shows
that we're betting the farm on it, which I like.
My late +1 for "Cocoon Forms"
We can pro
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I volunteer for this. This move should also be the occasion of doing the
refactoring (rather a polishing, actually) I proposed in august so that
we quickly have some stable APIs.
Just curious, when are you planning to do so?
I should be st
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I volunteer for this. This move should also be the occasion of doing
the refactoring (rather a polishing, actually) I proposed in august
so that we quickly have some stable APIs.
But as far as the continuation and flowscript support for this g
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Friday, Oct 10, 2003, at 09:15 Europe/Rome, Steven Noels wrote:
Bearing in mind the amount of work that requires a _real_ renaming,
like changing package names, namespaces and all that - who's going to
do that?
I would suggest we do that in Cocoon 2.2
For the user
On Friday, Oct 10, 2003, at 09:15 Europe/Rome, Steven Noels wrote:
Bearing in mind the amount of work that requires a _real_ renaming,
like changing package names, namespaces and all that - who's going to
do that?
I would suggest we do that in Cocoon 2.2
For the users, a "planned incompatibilit
Christopher Oliver wrote:
But as far as the continuation and flowscript support for this goes, I
think "refactoring" is the proper term. IMO the hack to support
${continuation.id} and the whole JS (woody.js, woody2.js) interface
needs to be redesigned.
+1, and a big thank you for this cool-head
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I propose that we put in the docs some notes about the history of
Woody/Cocoon Forms: who started it (you deserve credit), the initial
name and where it came from, etc, etc, including the australian meaning
of woody ;-)
+1 (apart from the australi
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I volunteer for this. This move should also be the occasion of doing
the refactoring (rather a polishing, actually) I proposed in august so
that we quickly have some stable APIs.
But as far as the continuation and flowscript support for this goes, I
think "refactoring" i
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>
> I propose that we put in the docs some notes about the history of
> Woody/Cocoon Forms: who started it (you deserve credit), the initial
> name and where it came from, etc, etc, including the australian meaning
> of woody ;-)
>
+1 (apart from the australian meaning
Steven Noels wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
This is why having one official direction on the various areas is
good(tm) and having a simple name for it "cocoon sitemap" "cocoon
flow" "cocoon forms" would help our users to choose and feel more
protected and a more solid foundation.
+1 - le
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Which is a nice example, here, btw: the OT team proposed an alternative
flow control concept and an alternative form framework, the community
considered the first inferior to what we already had, but considered
superior the second and promoted it as "official".
Adapting
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Marc Portier wrote:
>
>
> Michael Melhem wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:13:38PM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> >>Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >>
>
>
>
> >>>We can probably keep Woody as the block name though, in homage to the
> >>>great
Michael Melhem wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:13:38PM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
We can probably keep Woody as the block name though, in homage to the
great sandwiches delivered to the great original authors of Cocoon
Forms ;-)
I had a "Woody" yesterday; wel
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote,
or am I mistaken about the agreement?
Someone mentioned that "Forms" in the name is "to official" and Stefano
answered "if we won't have forms in the name we don't need to r
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[at the hackaton, there was a discussion on why the REST-based approach
that Marc proposed cannot be matched one-2-one with the flow approach.
Marc agreed that his idea of continuation and the current continuation
are different concepts and forcing them into the same
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
...I doubt everyone knows what "woody" means in Australia ;)
ROFTL ;-D
For those who hadn't special aussie lessons with Michael, check out
the "vulgar slang" meaning at
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=woody
Sylvain
It reminds me of one the
Torsten Curdt wrote:
This is why having one official direction on the various areas is
good(tm) and having a simple name for it "cocoon sitemap" "cocoon
flow" "cocoon forms" would help our users to choose and feel more
protected and a more solid foundation.
+1
+1 also.
that's exactly wh
Torsten Curdt wrote:
I had a "Woody" yesterday; well...it's not that bad.
Carsten, tooo much information mate, ;)
cheers,
Michael
...I doubt everyone knows what "woody" means in Australia ;)
ROFTL ;-D
For those who hadn't special aussie lessons with Michael, check out the
This is why having one official direction on the various areas is
good(tm) and having a simple name for it "cocoon sitemap" "cocoon flow"
"cocoon forms" would help our users to choose and feel more protected
and a more solid foundation.
+1
that's exactly what I was preaching in my presentatio
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>
> No matter what the result was, I think forcing people with one solution
> forced discussions to happen, which helped all the parties involved,
> even to understand thing that were not previously understood by both
> sides.
>
> This is why having one official dir
Matthew Langham wrote:
>
> >>> I had a "Woody" yesterday; well...it's not that bad.
> >>
> >>Carsten, tooo much information mate, ;)
> >>cheers,
> >>Michael
> >
> > ...I doubt everyone knows what "woody" means
> > in Australia ;)
> >
>
> Hahaha - that's really funny :-).
>
Ok, be
On Thursday, Oct 9, 2003, at 14:50 Europe/Rome, Michael Melhem wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:13:38PM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote,
or
am I mistaken about the agreement?
I think we had consensus, h
...I doubt everyone knows what "woody" means
in Australia ;)
hum. I'm starting to agree with you guys on the renaming ;-)
-Bertrand
P.S. http://psy.otago.ac.nz/r_oshea/slang.html
I had a "Woody" yesterday; well...it's not that bad.
Carsten, tooo much information mate, ;)
cheers,
Michael
...I doubt everyone knows what "woody" means
in Australia ;)
Hahaha - that's really funny :-).
Matthew
I had a "Woody" yesterday; well...it's not that bad.
Carsten, tooo much information mate, ;)
cheers,
Michael
...I doubt everyone knows what "woody" means
in Australia ;)
cheers
--
Torsten
On Thursday, Oct 9, 2003, at 14:07 Europe/Rome, Geoff Howard wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote,
or am I mistaken about the agreement?
Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and
shows that we're betting the
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:13:38PM +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >
> > I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or
> > am I mistaken about the agreement?
> I think we had consensus, however not all committers attended the hackathon,
> so i
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or
am I mistaken about the agreement?
Someone mentioned that "Forms" in the name is "to official" and Stefano
answered "if we won't have forms in the name we don't need to rename it at
all". Such a ni
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or
am I mistaken about the agreement?
Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and shows
that we're betting the farm on it, which I like.
+1
We can probably keep Woody as the blo
Here is 2 cents worth of opinions from sweden :-)
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 13:03, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and shows
> that we're betting the farm on it, which I like.
+1
> We can probably keep Woody as the block name though
-1 F
From: Carsten Ziegeler
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >
> > I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we
> need a vote,
> > or am I mistaken about the agreement?
> I think we had consensus, however not all committers attended
> the hackathon, so it might be that someone is -1 on it
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or
am I mistaken about the agreement?
I guess there were a couple of +1 ;)
Here is mine again: +1
Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and shows
that we're betting the farm o
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or
> am I mistaken about the agreement?
I think we had consensus, however not all committers attended the hackathon,
so it might be that someone is -1 on it and has a good reason.
>
> Naming it "Coc
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or
am I mistaken about the agreement?
Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and shows
that we're betting the farm on it, which I like.
We can probably keep Woody as the block name though, in homage to t
34 matches
Mail list logo
