Since the ojb and javaflow blocks are a bit unknown to me I would
appreciate if somebody could cross-check these updates.
regards,
-marc=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mpo 2004/05/07 14:32:32
Modified:src/blocks/ojb/samples/forms success.xsp
src/documentation/xdocs/userdo
Christopher Oliver wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Thank you that you didn't take it wrong :)
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[+1 ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
Vadim
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 08:16:32AM -0800, Christopher Oliver wrote:
> Stephan Michels wrote:
>
> >Thank you that you didn't take it wrong :)
> >
> >Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
> >
> >Move java into scratchpad?
> >
> >[ ] Move it into scratchpad
> >[+1 ] Leave it where it is
>
Stephan Michels wrote:
Thank you that you didn't take it wrong :)
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[+1 ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
Chris
Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
> >
> > Move java into scratchpad?
> >
> > [ ] Move it into scratchpad
> > [+1] Leave it where it is
> > [ ] Rename it to ___
>
> (though what I'd really like to see is a more clean separ
Am Di, den 30.03.2004 schrieb Marc Portier um 10:32:
> my argumentation is primarily short-term/pragmatic:
>
> starting at two observations:
> 1/ this is cool stuff and as far as I can see the reactions just about
> everyone here is salivating and wants to interact with that code
Yes, seems so.
>
> [ ] Move it into scratchpad
> [X] Leave it where it is
> [ ] Rename it to ___
Since this block is marked unstable, I dont see the need to move it
anywhere else.
cheers,
Michael
Stephan Michels wrote:
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[X] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
IMO, this is a very much expected feature that a lot of people are
waiting for.
It needs to be marked as experim
On 30.03.2004 09:37, Stephan Michels wrote:
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[ ] Leave it where it is
[X] Rename it to "jflow"
Joerg
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 30 mars 04, à 10:20, Marc Portier a écrit :
...just an idea popping up: why not reverse the default
exclude.block.XXX setting for the unstable ones?
then people will need to enable those and thus be more explicitely
confronted?...
I like the idea, and it's easy
Le 30 mars 04, à 10:20, Marc Portier a écrit :
...just an idea popping up: why not reverse the default
exclude.block.XXX setting for the unstable ones?
then people will need to enable those and thus be more explicitely
confronted?...
I like the idea, and it's easy to do as blocks.properties are
Stephan Michels wrote:
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[X] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
my argumentation is primarily short-term/pragmatic:
starting at two observations:
1/ this is cool stuff and as far as I can see the reactions just about
everyone here is salivating and wants t
Marc Portier wrote:
(though what I'd really like to see is a more clean separation of
stable/unstable blocks, possibly with a clear directory hierarchy
(src/blocks/stable, src/blocks/unstable), a default commented out
-1 on dir structure, cvs hastle would kinda prevent blocks of becoming
sta
Le 30 mars 04, à 09:45, Gianugo Rabellino a écrit :
...(though what I'd really like to see is a more clean separation of
stable/unstable blocks, possibly with a clear directory hierarchy
(src/blocks/stable, src/blocks/unstable), a default commented out
unstable.blocks.properties that Joe User *
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Stephan Michels wrote:
Hey, no problem - Stephan already contacted me and I think we have
sorted everything out - if there was something to sort out at all
between us. Now, as I still think that a new block gives the wrong
impression
(which user really reads that it's a
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[x] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
Hiding anything in scratchpad does not help
anything IMO. The block is marked unstable
and this should give the right perception.
scratchpad =
Stephan Michels wrote:
Thank you that you didn't take it wrong :)
Okay here another vote(and I wait more than 24h)
Move java into scratchpad?
[X] Move it into scratchpad
[ ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
My opinion is to leave it where it is, because I heard too much the
argum
Stephan Michels wrote:
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[X] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
Ugo
Stephan Michels wrote:
Hey, no problem - Stephan already contacted me and I think we have
sorted everything out - if there was something to sort out at all
between us.
Now, as I still think that a new block gives the wrong impression
(which user really reads that it's alpha?) I would prefer the
s
Le 30 mars 04, à 09:37, Stephan Michels a écrit :
Move java into scratchpad?
you mean javaflow for sure ;-)
[ ] Move it into scratchpad
[+1 ] Leave it where it is
[ ] Rename it to ___
But I'd add very visible mentions of the experimental status of this
block: on the samples page at least (ha
Am Di, den 30.03.2004 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler um 09:07:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >
> > IMHO some kind of action is needed on this: either keep the
> > javaflow block as is, move it to the scratchpad or move it
> > somewhere else.
> >
> > Stephan, I understand the "public pressure" and ex
Stephan Michels wrote:
>
> Your opinion is very important for us, especially for me,
> because I think you are every valuable for Cocoon.
Oh, thanks! But if that's true or not: my vote/voice isn't more
important than other ones. We are all equal (at least when it
comes to votes :) ).
> To be ho
Le 30 mars 04, à 09:07, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
...Hey, no problem - Stephan already contacted me and I think we have
sorted everything out - if there was something to sort out at all
between us...
Great, thanks guys!
-Bertrand
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> IMHO some kind of action is needed on this: either keep the
> javaflow block as is, move it to the scratchpad or move it
> somewhere else.
>
> Stephan, I understand the "public pressure" and excitement
> prompted you to do the commit this (which is great: I'm as
Le 29 mars 04, à 20:19, Stephan Michels a écrit :
Am Mo, den 29.03.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 19:27:
Hello? I thought someone said:
[X] nah... put it somewhere else
Which is more or less a -1 on committing it to our CVS.
So, please, why did you ignore it?
...Please accept my apology
Am Mo, den 29.03.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 19:27:
> Hello? I thought someone said:
>
> [X] nah... put it somewhere else
>
> Which is more or less a -1 on committing it to our CVS.
>
> So, please, why did you ignore it?
Ohh, sorry, I won't to. We got no answer, so I thought
you changed
Hello? I thought someone said:
[X] nah... put it somewhere else
Which is more or less a -1 on committing it to our CVS.
So, please, why did you ignore it?
Votes are useless if you ignore some voices whether you like
Their opinion or not.
Perhaps I'm changing my mind - perhaps not.
Carsten
27 matches
Mail list logo
