Hello,
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 16:22, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> We have fixed several problems/bugs in the sitemap source and pipeline
> implementations after the 2.1.3 release. So I think the best thing for
> you is to test your test case with the most recent version (2.1.8) and
> see if thi
* Carsten Ziegeler:
> > From a quick glance at the stack traces I think this might be a bug in
> > the sitemap source implementation when getInputStream() is used.
Is the problem related to the following bug:
Calling SitemapSource.getInputStream() twice
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOO
We have fixed several problems/bugs in the sitemap source and pipeline
implementations after the 2.1.3 release. So I think the best thing for
you is to test your test case with the most recent version (2.1.8) and
see if this problem still exists.
Carsten
Ralph Goers wrote:
> OK. I have no idea how
OK. I have no idea how to get the source for xmlutil-1.0-dev. I was
looking at the current source and the 2.1.7 source (the oldest I have)
and it looks to me that if there is a problem it is most likely in
XSLTProcessorImpl. However, I'd suggest you look at SitemapSource and
AbstractProcessin
Hello Ralph,
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 23:14, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Can you send the source for the DocumentGenerator? I'd love to see it.
Yes, of course. Shall I send it to the dev list or to your private address?
(The source is about 400 lines long.)
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 09:11, Ralph
What version of Cocoon is this? The source for excalibur xmlutils 2.1
and 1.0 doesn't match the line numbers in your stack traces. What
version is in your lib/core?
Ralph
Tilman Rassy wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 13:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Tilman Rassy wrote:
Hel
Can you send the source for the DocumentGenerator? I'd love to see it.
Ralph
Tilman Rassy said:
> Hello,
>
> On Tuesday 24 January 2006 13:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Tilman Rassy wrote:
>> > Hello Carsten,
>> >
>> > On Monday 23 January 2006 12:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> >> Can you prov
>From a quick glance at the stack traces I think this might be a bug in
the sitemap source implementation when getInputStream() is used.
Carsten
Tilman Rassy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tuesday 24 January 2006 13:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Tilman Rassy wrote:
>>> Hello Carsten,
>>>
>>> On Monday 2
Hello,
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:29, Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > Is there a way to create a stack trace and insert it into the logs? I
> > could do something like
> >
> > try
> > {
> >throw new MyExcpetion();
> > }
> > catch (MyException myExcpetion)
> > {
> >this.getLogger.debug( /* ge
Hello,
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 13:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Tilman Rassy wrote:
> > Hello Carsten,
> >
> > On Monday 23 January 2006 12:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >> Can you provide a stack trace for the two calls of the setup() method,
> >> so we can see from where this method is called
You can also just do new Throwable() and then print it.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Tilman Rassy wrote:
Hello Carsten,
On Monday 23 January 2006 12:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Can you provide a stack trace for the two calls of the setup() method,
so we can see from where this method is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Tilman Rassy wrote:
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:15:01 +0100
From: Tilman Rassy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: setup() called twice in one request
Hello Carste
Tilman Rassy wrote:
> Hello Carsten,
>
> On Monday 23 January 2006 12:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> Can you provide a stack trace for the two calls of the setup() method,
>> so we can see from where this method is called.
>
> Is there a way to create a stack trace and insert it into the logs?
Hello Carsten,
On Monday 23 January 2006 12:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Can you provide a stack trace for the two calls of the setup() method,
> so we can see from where this method is called.
Is there a way to create a stack trace and insert it into the logs? I could do
something like
try
Tilman Rassy schrieb:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 09:38, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Tilman Rassy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:43, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
> we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is some
On Monday 23 January 2006 09:38, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Tilman Rassy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:43, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> >>On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
> >>>we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is sometimes
> >>>called twice in
Tilman Rassy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:43, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>
>>On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
>>
>>>we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is sometimes
>>>called twice in one request.
>>
>>Are you sure that it is only one request. For
On Friday 20 January 2006 10:34, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Tilman Rassy wrote:
> > I think we can change our code so that multiple setup() calls are not a
> > problem any longer. The reasons why I posted anyway are: If there is a
> > bug, the Cocoon developers might want to know about it. Secondly,
On Friday 20 January 2006 01:22, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> > On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
> >> Our XSL stylesheets usually include other stylesheets. As far as I
> >> know, the caching mechanism takes this into account. May the problem
> >> have something to do with t
Hello,
On Thursday 19 January 2006 23:43, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
> > we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is sometimes
> > called twice in one request.
>
> Are you sure that it is only one request. For example using the Acrobat
> Rea
Tilman Rassy wrote:
> I think we can change our code so that multiple setup() calls are not a
> problem any longer. The reasons why I posted anyway are: If there is a bug,
> the Cocoon developers might want to know about it. Secondly, we do a lot of
> Cocoon programming in our project, and it wo
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
Our XSL stylesheets usually include other stylesheets. As far as I
know, the caching mechanism takes this into account. May the problem
have something to do with that?
Are you including the other stylesheets using a cocoon p
On 19.01.2006 19:01, Tilman Rassy wrote:
we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is sometimes
called twice in one request.
Are you sure that it is only one request. For example using the Acrobat
Reader in IE results in two requests.
in fact, it seem to happens only if th
On Thursday 19 January 2006 19:13, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
> * Tilman Rassy:
> > we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is
> > sometimes called twice in one request.
>
> Hello,
>
> Assuming it is the case, why is it a problem? Can you elaborate
> on that?
Thank you fo
* Tilman Rassy:
> we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is
> sometimes called twice in one request.
Hello,
Assuming it is the case, why is it a problem? Can you elaborate
on that?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Hello,
we discovered that the setup() method of a custom generator is sometimes
called twice in one request.
We saw in the logs that the following methods were called in that order:
setup
getKey
getValidity
getValidity
setup
...
This does not always happen; in fact, it seem to happens only if t
26 matches
Mail list logo
