Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons

2008-11-10 Thread Russel Winder
John, On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 06:11 +, John Spackman wrote: [ . . . ] > >Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS > >such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial. > > Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS > but it was

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module commons-cli-1.x) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2008-11-10, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll look into the proxy logs to see whether something unexpected is > being downloaded. INFO: Redirecting via client connector to: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apa che/maven/plugins/maven-plugins/11/maven-plugins-11.pom Nov 10, 2008

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module commons-cli-1.x) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Russel Winder
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 00:47 -0800, Gump wrote: [ . . . ] > Full details are available at: > > http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-cli-1.x/commons-cli/index.html > > That said, some information snippets are provided here. > > The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/err

Re: Resurrecting commons-email - Was:MultiPartMail order of parts

2008-11-10 Thread Simone Gianni
Hi Siegfried, I'm using commons-email in a few projects, so I'm interested in its future. I'm not a commons committer, but I'm an Apache committer so I know how to help testing the patches, writing tests, and so on .. unfortunately someone else will have to take the job of committing stuff. Simone

Re: Resurrecting commons-email - Was:MultiPartMail order of parts

2008-11-10 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Simone, I guess the "someone else" is me :-) Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Simone Gianni wrote: > Hi Siegfried, > I'm using commons-email in a few projects, so I'm interested in its > future. I'm not a commons committer, but I'm an Apache committer so I > know how to help testing the patche

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module commons-cli-1.x) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-cli has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

Re: Blogging on Commons

2008-11-10 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Viraj Turakhia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > If I have read it right, I do agree with the point that we need to give > committers access to people more freely. > Definitly.Primetime developing for Commons is no fun. It's a bit frustrating. Maybe there should be some

Re: Blogging on Commons

2008-11-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Martin Cooper a écrit : > On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would strongly protest against such a move. > > > I wasn't proposing such a move, merely speculating. > > >> Commons are used outside >> of the ASF and are successful there. I even think [

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module commons-cli-1.x) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-cli has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2008-11-10 Thread commons-compress development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[FILEUPLOAD] How to turn off FileUpload automatic cleanup feature?

2008-11-10 Thread Yvette Sermons
Hi, I'm using ServletFileUpload to upload a file with a DiskFileItemFactory. The file gets written to the temporary location, but before the file can be processed by a queue that will pick it up, the file is deleted. I set the diskfileitemfactory.setFileCleaningTracker(null) according to the

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons

2008-11-10 Thread Paul Libbrecht
John, Le 10-nov.-08 à 07:11, John Spackman a écrit : Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS but it was my intention to look at using a DVCS for this. But DVCS "only" does source code - setting up a seperate branch only works if the community at large see the

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module commons-cli-1.x) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2008-11-10, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Russel Winder a écrit : >> This command works for me on Ubuntu Hardy with JDK 1.6.0_07-b06 and >> Maven 2.0.9. I have noticed that this build has failed for three weeks >> now but it seems there is no-one around picking up on it. > I gu

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module commons-cli-1.x) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Russel Winder a écrit : This command works for me on Ubuntu Hardy with JDK 1.6.0_07-b06 and Maven 2.0.9. I have noticed that this build has failed for three weeks now but it seems there is no-one around picking up on it. I guess there is an issue with Gump and Maven 2. I'm just ignoring this

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

[OT] Open

2008-11-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Russel Winder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For a couple of my projects, Codehaus is the host so the central > mainline is a Subversion repository. However most work is done using > Bazaar or Git since people do not need an account to be able to work > using a ful

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons

2008-11-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new thread, marked [OT]. Some of these discussions have been happening at the ASF, on a more appropriate list whose public archives are here: http://mail-

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development

2008-11-10 Thread Felipe Leme
Hi all, Just for the record, I have used Jelly in a commercial project as well, in the installer of an application that supported multiple databases (like Oracle and MySql) - we developed the database installation/update script in Jelly. So, regardless of the discussion of wheter Jelly is appropr

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-11-10 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated Commons

2008-11-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Repling inline to both Paul and John: On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit : >> Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the >> Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons

2008-11-10 Thread John Spackman
Hi Russel, Of course graceful demise is entirely appropriate. The question I have is whether putting effort into maintaining a demising system is worth it compared to putting that effort into transferring to a different (more appropriate, in my view) technology for dealing with the problem. Th

Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons

2008-11-10 Thread John Spackman
Hi Paul, I agree that this is _not_ something where a technical solution is _needed_ to go forward, I'm simply trying to keep the options open so that Jelly does not disappear (IMHO marking a project as "Not Actively Maintained" is the beginning of the end). IMHO keeping Jelly in Commons Pro

Re: Resurrecting commons-email - Was:MultiPartMail order of parts

2008-11-10 Thread Dave Meikle
Hi, 2008/11/10 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > >> > >> Any hands out to help with commons-email and become a commons-email > >> maintainer? > >> > > I am willing to lend a hand. Not a committer in Commons, but an Apache committer. Cheers, Dave

Re: [COLLECTIONS] Heads up on 3.3 release

2008-11-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Proving Phil's point on release process, I'm staring at Collections and wondering just how to release it. Hen On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS > you'll see that Collections 3.3 is getting e