John,
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 06:11 +, John Spackman wrote:
[ . . . ]
> >Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS
> >such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial.
>
> Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
> but it was
On 2008-11-10, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll look into the proxy logs to see whether something unexpected is
> being downloaded.
INFO: Redirecting via client connector to: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apa
che/maven/plugins/maven-plugins/11/maven-plugins-11.pom
Nov 10, 2008
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 00:47 -0800, Gump wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Full details are available at:
>
> http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/commons-cli-1.x/commons-cli/index.html
>
> That said, some information snippets are provided here.
>
> The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/err
Hi Siegfried,
I'm using commons-email in a few projects, so I'm interested in its
future. I'm not a commons committer, but I'm an Apache committer so I
know how to help testing the patches, writing tests, and so on ..
unfortunately someone else will have to take the job of committing stuff.
Simone
Hi Simone,
I guess the "someone else" is me :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Simone Gianni wrote:
> Hi Siegfried,
> I'm using commons-email in a few projects, so I'm interested in its
> future. I'm not a commons committer, but I'm an Apache committer so I
> know how to help testing the patche
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-cli has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Viraj Turakhia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> If I have read it right, I do agree with the point that we need to give
> committers access to people more freely.
>
Definitly.Primetime developing for Commons is no fun. It's a bit frustrating.
Maybe there should be some
Martin Cooper a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would strongly protest against such a move.
>
>
> I wasn't proposing such a move, merely speculating.
>
>
>> Commons are used outside
>> of the ASF and are successful there. I even think [
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-cli has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
Hi,
I'm using ServletFileUpload to upload a file with a DiskFileItemFactory.
The file gets written to the temporary location, but before the file can
be
processed by a queue that will pick it up, the file is deleted.
I set the diskfileitemfactory.setFileCleaningTracker(null) according to
the
John,
Le 10-nov.-08 à 07:11, John Spackman a écrit :
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of
DVCS but it was my intention to look at using a DVCS for this.
But DVCS "only" does source code - setting up a seperate branch only
works if the community at large see the
On 2008-11-10, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russel Winder a écrit :
>> This command works for me on Ubuntu Hardy with JDK 1.6.0_07-b06 and
>> Maven 2.0.9. I have noticed that this build has failed for three weeks
>> now but it seems there is no-one around picking up on it.
> I gu
Russel Winder a écrit :
This command works for me on Ubuntu Hardy with JDK 1.6.0_07-b06 and
Maven 2.0.9. I have noticed that this build has failed for three weeks
now but it seems there is no-one around picking up on it.
I guess there is an issue with Gump and Maven 2. I'm just ignoring this
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Russel Winder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For a couple of my projects, Codehaus is the host so the central
> mainline is a Subversion repository. However most work is done using
> Bazaar or Git since people do not need an account to be able to work
> using a ful
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Russel Winder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the bulk of this message would have been better off in a new
thread, marked [OT].
Some of these discussions have been happening at the ASF, on a more
appropriate list whose public archives are here:
http://mail-
Hi all,
Just for the record, I have used Jelly in a commercial project as
well, in the installer of an application that supported multiple
databases (like Oracle and MySql) - we developed the database
installation/update script in Jelly.
So, regardless of the discussion of wheter Jelly is appropr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
Repling inline to both Paul and John:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit :
>> Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the
>> Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to
Hi Russel,
Of course graceful demise is entirely appropriate. The question I have
is whether putting effort into maintaining a demising system is worth it
compared to putting that effort into transferring to a different (more
appropriate, in my view) technology for dealing with the problem. Th
Hi Paul,
I agree that this is _not_ something where a technical solution is _needed_
to go forward, I'm simply trying to keep the options open so that Jelly does
not disappear (IMHO marking a project as "Not Actively Maintained" is the
beginning of the end).
IMHO keeping Jelly in Commons Pro
Hi,
2008/11/10 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> >>
> >> Any hands out to help with commons-email and become a commons-email
> >> maintainer?
> >>
>
>
I am willing to lend a hand.
Not a committer in Commons, but an Apache committer.
Cheers,
Dave
Proving Phil's point on release process, I'm staring at Collections
and wondering just how to release it.
Hen
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS
> you'll see that Collections 3.3 is getting e
24 matches
Mail list logo