On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
> previous RC1 proposal.
>
> RC2 Release is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/
> Tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/
>
>
--
From: "Mladen Turk"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:02 AM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
previous RC1 proposal.
RC2 Releas
--
From: "Mladen Turk"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:39 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: svn commit: r915668 - in
/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile
service/Makefile
On 02/24/2010 07:25 AM,
On 02/23/2010 09:02 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
---
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Just for the record. Here is my vote.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsub
On 02/24/2010 07:25 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
I think that we should declare this [VOTE] a
failure, and anyone that wants commons-daemon can get it from SVN.
Not necessarily.
We need 3 +1 votes more then there are -1 votes.
It's a release and release voting cannot be vetoed.
It's just a number
--
From: "Mladen Turk"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:05 PM
To:
Subject: Re: svn commit: r915668 - in
/commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/nt: Makefile moni/Makefile
service/Makefile
On 02/24/2010 05:21 AM, billbar...@apache.org wrot
On 02/24/2010 05:21 AM, billbar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: billbarker
Adding AL headers to files that look machine generated, but may not be.
Nice, but I won't make another daemon spin just because of those.
This is completely irrelevant. Everything we distribute is
ASL licensed except where
On 02/24/2010 02:44 AM, sebb wrote:
Are you sure they are all machine-generated?
What application generates them?
Note that I've not included the .rc files which have the heading:
//Microsoft Developer Studio generated resource script
httpd: Makefile.win, httpd.spec, Makefile.in ...
tomcat:
Thanks! Great info!
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
> --
> From: "Julius Davies"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:52 PM
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Subject: [codec] gump failure
>
>> What's this about? Is this s
--
From: "Julius Davies"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:52 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: [codec] gump failure
What's this about? Is this something we should take seriously?
Forgive me, I'm new to gump (always ignored it).
On 2010-02-24, Julius Davies wrote:
> What's this about? Is this something we should take seriously?
It says commons-codec is no longer producing the jar Gump expects it to
create. Gump uses something close to
ant -Dcomponent.version=23022010 dist
to build commons-codec and currently the res
What's this about? Is this something we should take seriously?
Forgive me, I'm new to gump (always ignored it).
Julius
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Gump wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit
--
From: "sebb"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 5:44 PM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
On 24/02/2010, Bill Barker wrote:
--
From
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:07 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> I'd like to do a release of the commons-parent pom - primarily to
>> upgrade to the latest commons-build-plugin 1.2 release.
>>
>> I have also upgraded the plugin versions and changed the "rc" &
>> "release
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-codec has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 24/02/2010, Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
> --
> From: "Mladen Turk"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:08 AM
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
>
>
> > On 02/23/2010 01:04 PM, sebb wr
--
From: "Mladen Turk"
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:08 AM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC2
On 02/23/2010 01:04 PM, sebb wrote:
On 23/02/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
Daemon RC2 fixe
On 24/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I'd like to do a release of the commons-parent pom - primarily to
> upgrade to the latest commons-build-plugin 1.2 release.
>
> I have also upgraded the plugin versions and changed the "rc" &
> "release" profiles to now only produce the javadocs and not t
I'd like to do a release of the commons-parent pom - primarily to
upgrade to the latest commons-build-plugin 1.2 release.
I have also upgraded the plugin versions and changed the "rc" &
"release" profiles to now only produce the javadocs and not the whole
site (this resolves a problem for multi-mo
This vote has passed with three +1 votes from Niall Pemberton, Phil
Steitz and Rahul Akolkar (and no other votes).
Thanks everyone. I'll finish up the release shortly.
Niall
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> The commons-build-plugin has been modified to improve the L&F a
On 02/23/2010 01:04 PM, sebb wrote:
On 23/02/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
previous RC1 proposal.
RC2 Release is here:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/
Tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMO
On 23/02/2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
> previous RC1 proposal.
>
> RC2 Release is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/
> Tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/
-1 becau
On 23/02/2010, Bill Barker wrote:
>
>
> --
> From: "Phil Steitz"
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 5:58 PM
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Daemon 1.0.2 based on RC1
>
>
> > Mladen Turk wrote:
> >
> > > Aft
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:04 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 20/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> The commons-build-plugin has been modified to improve the L&F and
>> cater for more than one release on the download page.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC2
>> [ ] -1 No, because...
>>
>> c
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1. Dist looks good. Sigs good, md5 good, clirr good, rat good,
> changes-report seems good.
>
> Site shouldn't be deployed imo - sites should be deployed from trunk
> instead of a branch (i.e. the 3.0 trunk is only going to get deployed
> on
Daemon RC2 fixes some minor distribution issues over the
previous RC1 proposal.
RC2 Release is here:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon/
Tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2/
If voted for a release the COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_2_RC2 tag wil
26 matches
Mail list logo
